In the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, Small Claims Division       

                                                            First Municipal District

Robert J More

Plaintiff

vs                                                                                 Case # 07M1017559

United States Marshal’s Service (“USMS”) Court Security Officer  (“CSO”) Chris Doe and/or John Doe in his Personal and Official Capacity, United States Marshal’s Service as Respondent in Discovery (if Necessary)

     

FIRST AMENDMENT OF 12/14/07 TO COMPLAINT OF  8/24/07 WHICH TAKEN TOGETHER WITH SUCH COMPLAINT CONSTITUTES THE “AMENDED VERIFIED  COMPLAINT OF  12/14/07”

Introduction: This case was originally filed on 8/24/07 against the USMS CSO Chris Doe for the commission of a number of torts which also constituted violations of  18 USC 242 and possibly 1503, two years before the date of 8/24/07. Since that juncture, through laborious efforts and the assistance of Providence, RJM has learned that the CSO Doe, whose name RJM has never discontinued seeking to procure  since the torts this case concerns were first committed in August of 2005, was an employee of Akal Security, based in Espanola New Mexico, not the USMS. At this juncture RJM herein adds by way of amendment the USMS Phone Attendant who informed RJM in August of 2007 when RJM called that office that the Court Security Officers were employees of  the USMS and not of a private security company which proximately caused to name the USMS as the employer of the CSO Doe, rather than what RJM has learned now is the actual employer – namely Akal Security (“Akal”) and adds Akal on a Respondeat Superior basis and adds  another count against Akal CSO Chris Doe for his conduct on the last occasion in August of 2007 when RJM encountered him, a description of  which will be provided as an exhibit to this document or incorporated in a future revision thereof within 14 days of 12/28/07, Providence permitting, if  this case would not have been settled by then.  The acts committed by CSO Doe in regard to which RJM complains were committed while he was performing the functions his employer normally requires him to perform in his employment, such that they most definitely could not be claimed to not have been performed within the scope of  that employment, as such concept has been defined in Illinois cases addressing such subject. Since this claim has been plead as a small claim pursuant to  the provisions of Illinois Supreme Court Rule No. 282, this is all that RJM understands that he must now add to the original complaint filed in this case in order to keep the claims it concerns viable. RJM continues to prepare jury instructions for  the trial of  this case which will adequately address all substantive legal issues involved in this case.

 

Wherefore, the plaintiff  R. More respectfully prays that a  jury sworn by this Honorable Court  award him  a total of $10,000.00  in monetary damages,   against the  Defendant(s), and for provision to be included in whatever judgment is rendered for the remission to Cook County for the cost of  the filing fee, for the assessment of all costs against  the Defendant  which may be incurred by RJM in collecting judgment (s), and whatever other relief it would be determined would be necessary under the circumstances from the evidence presented at the trial to be conducted in this case, to remedy the harms caused to RJM et al.

The plaintiff demands trial  by  a six man jury.

Under penalty of perjury pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/1-109, I aver to the substantial truthfulness of  all factual averments contained herein & as to those claims made on information and belief that I verily believe the same to be true.

I Robert More certify that I am the plaintiff in the above entitled action. The allegations in this amended complaint are true.

Robert J. More

Opponent to the Slitting of Warm-blooded Throats, MC Clause 61, Non-defrauder of the Catholic Church

P.O. Box 6926, 

Chicago, IL 60680

312 479-6287

 

(See contents in brackets for additions and in parenthesis followed by “sic” for deletions)

 

The plaintiff claims as follows: Pursuant to Illinois Supreme Court Rule No. 282, the Plaintiff (“RJM”) herein avers that he was a resident of  Chicago, IL, residing at 2008 S. Blue Island Ave, Chicago, IL, 60608 on 8/24/05. Since the alleged tortuous and presumptively criminal conduct in regard to which RJM complains occurred  in the Dirksen Federal Building at 219 S. Dearborn St., Chicago, IL, 60604, the Circuit Court of Cook County, IL (“CCCC”) obviously possesses jurisdiction over the alleged torts this complaint alleges in terms of jurisdiction over the persons concerned. The CCCC possesses subject matter jurisdiction under principles of concurrent jurisdiction as promulgated in among other U.S. Supreme Court cases, that of Lockerty v _________ (_U.S. _), and Claflin v Houseman (_U.S._).

Introduction:

RJM approaches the endeavor to rectify the injustice(s) that this complaint concerns with a multi-faceted disposition that hopefully incorporates the condignly  meritorious elements of  the several virtues which it is RJM’s understanding that he must practice in regard to the matters concerned in order to ensure that what constitutes his moral liability therein would not be left not covered. At once concerned to ensure that neither the principles contained in the time and again proven adage Qui parcit nocentibus, innocentibus punit, nor those contained in the definition of  religion present in James 1:27 – “this is religion clean and undefiled before God, to visit widows and orphans in their need and to remain unstained by the world”  nor those postulated in 1 Tim. 5:22 – “to never incur complicity in anyone else’s sin” and in Eph. 5:8, “to have no part of the works of darkness, but to expose them by contrast,”  nor the principle that  to possess any hope for salvation, when matters  come down to a  conflict requiring a choice permitting no compromise, between complying with the requirements of  the moral law or of any civil law, order or postulation, that “we must obey God rather than men” (Acts. 5:29), and never to neglect to render unto God that which does not belong to Ceasar,  but to God (Matt. 22:22), nor that in the principle that mercy is shown to those who fear God (Lk. 1:_),  that those who demonstrate mercy will receive it (Mt. 5:8),  and need have no fear of judgment (James 2:13), nor that it is incumbent upon  able-bodied citizens such as RJM to ensure that exercises of government authority   are never permitted to exceed the acceptable limits within which a given exercise of governmental authority can and or in a given case – must, be exercised (Magna Charta  - the enabling document of the U.S. Constitution - Clause 61 – the source of the right to petition clause and Second Amendment thereof) (since the neglect of this duty all but ensures the eventual complete deterioration and destruction of   any representative form of  government); would remain not adequately vindicated in regard to the matters this complaint concerns, this Complain has been composed and presented for filing. It is hoped that in the endeavor to rectify  the injustices it concerns that the tortfeasors responsible therefore, will find a new respect for the Non-counterfeit Version of  the Rule of Law, that approaches to the issues concerned that adequately respect the rights violated  as described in this complaint will be formulated, and that a substantial contribution can be made to the St. Michael the Archangel Fund for the  Protection of   Not-merciless, Not-barbaric Government Officials At All Levels.

Since this is a small claims complaint and can be amended shortly or dismissed with automatic leave to refile under the provisions of  735 ILCS5-13/217, subject to future amendment, RJM will keep it as simple as possible.

RJM is complaining that  the Defendant(s) named in the caption supra has (ve) incurred tort liability for  interfering with RJM’s exercise of  his First Amendment Right to Petition the Government for the Redress of Grievances,  for a Denial of  Due Process of Law  and for the deprivation of a  type of consideration which all English speaking peoples have expected and demanded from their governments as such type entity has been defined in the jurisprudence of the U.S. Supreme Court as a Substantive Due Process claim (cf. Hurtado v CA (_U.S._)) on the level of constitutional torts  and for  the common law torts of false imprisonment in the form of interference with locomotion and battery.

At the risk of being redundant, RJM herein further emphasizes, just in case that   the averments included herein supra have not adequately explicated RJM’s concerns in this regard, that  RJM is obliged, as he understands the duties to which he is subject, to be concerned to neither leave uncovered his moral liability regarding the contribution RJM understands that he is obliged to make to ensure that no wrongdoer gets away with any wrongdoing at the expense of  the Catholic Church on RJM’s record of  conduct according to the principles referenced supra, on the one hand,  nor in the area of  continuing to demonstrate as much pity and mercy (and commitment to spare others, and on a higher level - shield others from, grief) (sic), as RJM can evidently justify continuing to demonstrate in a given case, without in so doing ending up incurring culpability for sin in some other area of RJM’s moral liability,  as RJM realizes that the consequences of not demonstrating non-counterfeit mercy are that one  can even lose a claim to such mercy him or herself (cf. Ja. 2:13 et al), [and]  that the preferable alternative by which disputes ought to be resolved is for individuals, out of a non-counterfeit remorse of  conscience, to voluntarily make reparation and restitution for harms unjustifiably caused others and the social order at large.

RJM would prefer that he could just leave the tortious and presumptively criminal actions this email concerns un-addressed, but given  the danger posed by the acts herein described infra, the frightful reminders they provide of  historical periods in which  liberty was all but extinguished and totalitarianism reigned  and the duties incumbent upon RJM as RJM understands them in regard to  the accomplishment of the spiritual and corporal works of  mercy needing to be accomplished at this time and in particular the need to continue to support Non-barbarians exercising the authority of government offices at all levels, before none are left therein, and the similar need to  continue to support those who should it come down to it, would not hesitate to lose life and limb in endeavoring to prevent any type of enslavement and/or genocide agenda from ultimately prevailing in  the conflict between evil and good that continues to rage in the theatre of earthly existence  that this world constitutes; RJM’s could find no basis upon which he was confident he could justify continuing to refrain from filing this complaint.

The  public is entitled to every man’s evidence and RJM cannot present that evidence in a court of  law without filing this complaint and without filing it as an indigent person, knowing that the costs of  the filing will be paid by the Defendant, when RJM recovers what ought be recovered for the harms unjustifiably caused as described in this complaint.

                                  

Since the United States Marshal’s Service has evidently corrected the problems which led to the commission of the torts herein alleged, no injunctive relief has been sought in this complaint.

 

Facts:

1.      On 8/22/05,Robert J. More ("RJM") left what  must have been message number 7 or 8 (over the  3 weeks prior to that date) on a voice mail provided him by the phone attendant in the U.S. Marshal Service for the Northern District of IL.

2.      In  this particular instance, the message was left with a John O'Malley.

3.      In such message, RJM articulated  extensively enough to cover the threshold of compliance-accomplishment explicated in among other treatises that of Police Misconduct, by Avery, Rudosky, and Blum  the issue regarding the duty of citizens to act so as to avoid incurring damages from the conduct of government  actors whose conduct could reasonably foreseeably result in an unjustified injury in a given case to a citizen and to mitigate any damages ever incurred in this regard as a requisite to retaining a claim to later recover damages in a 42 USC 1983 action (  v    _________F.3d_____________ 7th C.C.A.) (or a Bivens action).

4.      RJM also informed U.S. Marshal's Service (“USMS”)  that it was the understanding of  RJM that the activity of the USMS in preventing RJM from accessing any part of the Dirksen Federal Building on the basis of an order issued on 8/8/05 by Judge D. Wood of the 7th C.C.A. which asserted that RJM was prevented from filing any paper in any court under the 7th C.C.A. until the appalling unjust $100.00 fine so criminally imposed upon RJM on 9/19/02 was paid in full, was entirely unjustified, as such order imposed a filing restriction, not any type of access restriction.

5.      Leaving aside the patent illegitimacy of that order for the purposes of this document, the USMS obviously had incurred criminal and tort liability in this matter in the several instances in which RJM was detained by their Court Security Officers (“CSO”) and prevented from accessing any part of the building other than the lobby as there  neither was, nor is, any claim contained anywhere in any court order that authorized them to prevent RJM from accessing any part of the Dirksen Federal Building.

6.      There are innumerable areas in such building which are not used for any matter having to directly to do with filing any document.

7.      One CSO  to whom other CSO’s referred as “Mike”  on several occasions detained RJM, prevented him from proceeding beyond the lobby of the building into any other area of the building  and repeatedly addressed RJM upon the presumption that RJM understood that RJM was prohibited by “the order” from accessing any area of  the building beyond the lobby.

8.      RJM repeatedly explained to CSO Mike and others that  no order in regard to which RJM was cognizant, prevented RJM from accessing the Building.

9.      On 8/24/05, in the early afternoon, RJM entered the Dirksen Federal Building in an endeavor  to obtain a copy of whatever order it was which had been used to keep RJM out of the DFB .

10.  RJM proceeded to the South scanning lane, where CSO Cagney, Badge 7295 acknowledged RJM’s presence – CSO Cagney being on the East side of the machine and RJM being on the West side thereof. 

11.  RJM  spoke to CSO   Cagney, and asked him what the presently extant arrangement was on that date in  regard to RJM’s accessing various offices and places in the building.

12.  Cagney replied that until RJM would pay the fine, RJM cannot access any part of the building.

13.  RJM asked to see a copy of  the order, postulating, “I am proposing that you show me a copy of the order according to the provision of which I am being prevented from entering the building.”

14.  This occurred at the South medal detector/scanning machine  where Cagney was stationed along with CSO  Bamos and an old Italian-looking CSO (“CSO C. Doe”) – who was sitting in the elevated booth at that station, whom RJM later heard called “Chris”, on a different occasion.

15.  Cagney pointed to the CSO C. Doe who had some paper in his hand which he then placed on the ledge in front of  him.

16.  Since the USMS had  not provide RJM a copy of  whatever order it was  claimed was being enforced in keeping RJM from accessing the parts of  the building RJM was then being prevented from accessing, RJM endeavored to look at what the CSO C. Doe had  put on the ledge.

17.  The CSO DOE covered the page, then said to RJM “get the F--- out of here.

18.  RJM inquired as to his name and badge number.

19.  CSO C. Doe then  informed RJM that RJM would receive that name on a complaint.

20.  CSO C. Doe then  came out of the booth area,  walked around it to the side RJM was on and grabbed RJM’s uninjured side (RJM fractured his clavicle on 7/30/05 and was wearing a sling to keep his left side stationary on 8/24/05), which would have been RJM’s right side.

21.  CSO C. Doe then clasped RJM’s right arm with his two hands and began walking towards the Outside door of the DFB, half pushing and half pulling RJM with him.

22.  RJM without demonstrating anything that could possibly be construed to constitute even implied consent, was more or less compliant since the battery had already been committed by this juncture, only informing CSO C. Doe that RJM did not consent to any eviction from the building.

23.  On the way to the door, CSO C. Doe  F---word 2 more times, ordering RJM to get the “F--- out of here” -  escorting RJM out of the door by the arm.

24.  A man with a side bag in a black suit – 5’9” 180 lbs witnessed this and when RJM asked him for his contact information – he refused to provide it and claimed that he had not seen anything.

25.  The bag had a patch in it – saying Kevin Lawrence Diller.

 

Cause of Action #1. False Imprisonment/Interference with Locomotion

1.      RJM herein incorporates the contents of paragraphs 1-23 supra, into this paragraph as if fully set forth herein.

2.      The conduct described therein states a cause of action actionable in the State of  IL under the theory of False Imprisonment/Interference with Locomotion.

Wherefore, the plaintiff  R. More respectfully prays that a  jury sworn by this Honorable Court  award him $10,000.00  in monetary damages,   against the  Defendant, and for provision to be included in whatever judgment is rendered for the remission to Cook County for the cost of  the filing fee, for the assessment of all costs against  the Defendant  which may be incurred by RJM in collecting judgment (s), and whatever other relief it would be determined would be necessary under the circumstances from the evidence presented at the trial to be conducted in this case, to remedy the harms caused to RJM et al.

Robert J. More

Cause of Action #2, Battery

1.      RJM herein incorporates the contents of paragraphs 1-23 in the Facts section supra, into this paragraph as if fully set forth herein.

2.      The conduct described therein states a cause of action according to which relief can be granted in the State of IL under the theory of Battery.

Ditto on the prayer for relief included supra, except that RJM would not consider it justified to seek more than the amount presented as the ad damnum in total for the entirety of the torts committed.

Robert J. More

Cause of Action #3, Denial of  Right to Access to the Courts

1.      RJM herein incorporates the contents of paragraphs 1-23 in the Facts section supra, into this paragraph as if fully set forth herein.

2.      The activity of  the USMS CSO’s in preventing RJM from accessing the areas of the DFB other than the lobby states a cause of action actionable under the Right to Petition Clause of  the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Ditto on the prayers for relief included supra.

Cause of Action #4, Denial of Due Process of  Law

1.      RJM herein incorporates the contents of paragraphs 1-23 in the Facts section supra, into this paragraph as if fully set forth herein.

2.      The activity of  the USMS CSO’s in preventing RJM from accessing the areas of the DFB other than the lobby states a cause of action actionable under the Due Process of Law Clause of  the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Ditto on the prayers for relief included supra.

Cause of Action #5, Illegal  Siezure Prohibited by Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

1.      RJM herein incorporates the contents of paragraphs 1-23 in the Facts section supra, into this paragraph as if fully set forth herein.

2.      The activity of  the USMS CSO’s in preventing RJM from accessing the areas of the DFB other than the lobby states a cause of action actionable under the Prohibition on Illegal  Siezures provisions of  the Fourth  Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Ditto on the prayers for relief included supra.

 

Since CSO’s Cagney and Bamos have never been heavy-handed in their dealings with RJM  - RJM has not complained  under any theory analogous to  42 USC 1986 – Action for Neglect to Prevent – against them in their not preventing CSO C. Doe from committing the torts in regard to which RJM herein complains.

Nor does RJM name Marshal Widup in this complaint, unless the USMS would assert that no recovery could be accomplished without his being named –in which case, RJM would name him solely out of necessity to avoid the consequences of not doing so, as it is only CSO C. Doe – that physically contacted RJM and used the F---- word in addressing RJM, and in fact a number of  members of   the USMS have in fact demonstrated a conspicuous and noteworthy concern to keep the exercises of  the authority of their respective offices upon the protective side of the protective/predatory fault line in regard to matters concerning the activity of RJM and in fact from the evidence in regard to which RJM is cognizant would evidently have to be considered to be more assets than liabilities and in some cases,  this being so by a substantial margin and since RJM would understandably be concerned to neither cause anyone grief, nor to fail to shield anyone from harm when RJM could do so, above all in cases involving those whose conduct would have in the balance, spared RJM grief and/or shielded RJM from harm and since conducting his activity according to such priorities and agendas such that  the costs and burdens of  the execution of  [the authority of] any government office for any Not-merciless and Not-barbaric officer and/or agent therein would be raised higher than such inevitably would have to be,  would be something in regard to which RJM would understandably be concerned to never incur liability therefore

Since this case has been filed naming the USMS as a Respondent in Discovery according to the provisions of  IL Supreme Court Rule 224,  since RJM inquired of the CSO C. Doe on 8/24/05, and of  the USMS before 8/24/07,  as to the name of  the alleged tort feasor and since this is not a case in which there would be any difficulty in identifying such party (RJM would think CSO Cagney would be capable of  naming him and RJM could readily identify him) and since the USMS has RJM’s  phone number and email address in its possession,  RJM will continue to proceed in the prosecution of this case upon the presumption that unless and until RJM would hear to the contrary from the USMS, that there would be nothing more that RJM would be obliged to do to name such CSO before RJM would voluntarily dismiss this case with automatic leave to refile within one year pursuant to the provisions of 735 ILCS5/13-217.

(Since the constitutional causes of action pled under 42 USC 1983,  in this complaint are causes according to which attorney’s fees can be assessed according to the provisions of 42 USC 1988, since an attorney could be appointed to prosecute this case under the provisions of  735 ILCS 5/5-105, and since RJM is donating whatever is recovered in this case to the St. Michael the Archangel Fund, RJM would consider it inappropriate and unjustified for RJM to not herein respectfully propose that this Hon. Court take under advisement  the issue of  the appointment of an attorney to prosecute this case and eventually appoint  via a methodology  not including any coercion,  a Not-merciless and Not-barbaric Attorney to prosecute this case upon the presumption that attorney’s fees could be recovered if  a recovery were to be compatible with the standard established under the US. Supreme Court’s precedents issued  in regard to this matter; which RJM herein now respectfully proposes) (sic).

RJM is also herein respectfully suggesting that a communal penance/work program be instituted wherein those found to be liable for  the commission of  (a) given tort(s), those who in the execution of  the position of a given judicial office would have caused unjustified injuries to others – ie a given litigant and the pubic, and those who find it necessary to file complaints in civil cases without being capable of paying the fees therefore, who would lose a given case, could all participate in some type of joint work program and the specifics of this proposal would be provided upon any request submitted therefore. RJM can think of few  if any, possible  arrangements that he would think would be more conducive to the rebuilding of a social order so devastated by the effects of sin as such type communal penance program presumably would. While it is generally, not difficult to recognize the unjustified injuries that the activity of others causes one, it can be very difficult to recognize the unjustified injuries which one’s activities causes others and it is in the interests of all to eliminate or at least reduce the animosities that can arise when a given individual has either truly  been wronged or whatever the truth of  the matter would be in  a given case, is convinced that he or she has been.

 

Addendum

 

1.       From each of those whom this document concerns, RJM would posit the question – what is it that RJM might do to assist each and all concerned to make it less difficult in a given case for a given actor to conduct his or her activity at a high enough standard of accountability to ensure that the moral liability of  such actor would not be left uncovered in a given exercise and in every exercise of the authority of a given office?

2.       Further, RJM herein explains that RJM is committed to allocate whatever monetary damages would  be recovered from the adjudication of  the complaint in which this conveyance is contained to either a fund whose purpose would be exactly to assist  those  Not-merciless and Not-barbaric individuals who conduct activity in government offices or who might do so in the future,  to  succeed in conducting  their activity in the exercise(s) of  the authority of  government offices at a high enough standard of accountability as to ensure that the moral liability of a given such  exercise of  such authority  and of  every such exercise would never  remain uncovered or a related fund to support anyone  who might become permanently disabled from any participation in any endeavor which in a given instance would have been implemented to defeat any given manifestation of  the enslavement/genocide agenda presently being imposed upon this world.

3.       Any observations and/or suggestions in this regard would be welcome and could be submitted to the website of  the DNRCPN at: www.geocities.com/thirsforjustice or via mailing or hand delivery to RJM.

4.       RJM hopes to attract the assistance of  Dr. E. Vieira B.A., M.A., J.D., Ph. D. Harvard Univ.   and local stalwart Attorney Mr. M. Cronin B.A. Harvard Univ. J.D. Northwestern Univ. and any other similarly formidable type individuals,  to oversee the activity of  a component of  the St. Michael the Archangel Fund which would assist Not-merciless and Not-barbaric government officials to accomplish the objectives of  protecting everything God can still justify not hating from the malice and wickedness of the  innumerable predators whose conduct has caused so much destruction and which so threatens all that is good, noble, decent and true (Phil 3:7 et al) and ensuring that if evil should proximately ultimately (admitting Jesus cannot not ultimately leave all evil entirely and eternally vanquished) prevail in this Country, that  such condition could not be imputed to any faintheartedness or culpable negligence on imputable to RJM.

5.       Thus proceeding amidst innumerable evils and pitfalls on all sides, and rejecting amongst the many temptations present in the matters concerned, both those of an  opportunism which would seek to benefit from the sin(s) of another,  on the one hand and a pusillanimity/faintheartedness/apathy/passivity in making unjustified concessions, overlooking that which could not be justifiably overlooked and/or not laboring to defeat evils as they are encountered, on the other, RJM herein respectfully submits this complaint.

6.       For the record the CSO C. Doe could make a contribution to the St. Michael the Archangel Fund and/or  Most Holy Family Monastery in Fillmore, N.Y.  of $1000.00 every 3 months for the next 30 months and consider the matters this case concerns to be settled. In the alternative, a similar contribution to any charity committed to the works which such entities perform would also be considered to be acceptable. Any reasonable counterproposal would likewise be considered. Petitions for whole or partial clemency  regarding the matters concerned can be addressed to the website of the DNRCPN at: www.geocities.com/thirstforjustice.  Any observations and/or suggestions regarding the contents of this complaint can also be addressed thereto and would be much appreciated.

7.       The problems facing America and the world are enormous, and cannot absent Divine intervention be solved without a joint commitment of  all Not-merciless and Not-barbaric individuals to  continue to  labor in disinterested charity for their solution and it is RJM’s concern that this complaint furthers the accomplishment of such objective rather than setting it back.

RJM also herein petitions to be permitted to serve all documents filed in this case via email or the posting to a URL with adequate notice having been provided thereof.

8.                   Since it is hoped by RJM that the individual  responsible for the conduct described supra will be deterred sufficiently via the cost of  his employer having to pay the monetary damages herein sought,  from future suchlike conduct, RJM has not filed any criminal charges for the violations of 18 USC 242, which could have been presented to a special grand jury under the provisions of 18 USC 3332(a), but  if the type of  unjustified injury causing conduct  described supra, would be repeated, RJM would have to consider the filing thereof anew, as it is RJM’s understanding of  the matters concerned that these types of  abuses and arrogations cannot be permitted to remain not adequately punished without grave consequences in the lives of  the Not-merciless and Not-barbaric whose causes, RJM, is admittedly, without any express delegation in regard thereto, obliged to continue to help champion, and to the social order at large.

If there is anything in this complaint which in any way smacks in the least of anything  reprehensible, RJM would welcome any identifications thereof, as in endeavoring to avoid sin in one area, one can so easily incur culpability therefore in another, or worse, incur culpability for various sins simultaneously.

Wherefore, the plaintiff  R. More respectfully prays that a  jury sworn by this Honorable Court  award him  a total of $10,000.00  in monetary damages,   against the  Defendant(s), and for provision to be included in whatever judgment is rendered for the remission to Cook County for the cost of  the filing fee, for the assessment of all costs against  the Defendant  which may be incurred by RJM in collecting judgment (s), and whatever other relief it would be determined would be necessary under the circumstances from the evidence presented at the trial to be conducted in this case, to remedy the harms caused to RJM et al.

The plaintiff demands trial  by  a six man jury.

Under penalty of perjury pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/1-109, I aver to the substantial truthfulness of  all factual averments contained herein & as to those claims made on information and belief that I verily believe the same to be true.

I Robert More certify that I am the plaintiff in the above entitled action. The allegations in this amended complaint are true.

Robert J. More

Opponent to the Slitting of Warm-blooded Throats, MC Clause 61, Aspirant to Unbegrudgability

P.O. Box 6926, 

Chicago, IL 60680

312 479-6287

 

 

 

 

 

 

1