thirstforjustice.tripod.com/grifdlcom2-14-12.html

2/9/11 - 14:00 -

2/13/12 - 10:30-11:00, 12:00 - 12:00

2/14/12 - 10:00-16:15

Document List of 2/14/12

1. D/L of 2/9/12

2. Superseding Amended Complaint of 2/9/12

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, IL

CHANCERY DIVISION

Robert More, Estate of Robert J. More, ISMA Campaign to Make the World Safe for Innocence Once Again, Mrs. W.R. More, Co-plaintiffs, Elizabeth, Luke, Henry, Vincent, Blaise, Lonigro - Assignee Plaintiffs

v - Circuit Court Case No. 11 CH 12339

(all individual Defendants named herein are sued in their official and individual capacities & all Municipal Government Entities named herein are sued as Monell v Dept. of Social Services of the City of New York, Defendants) Cook County, IL, Sheriff's Department ("CCSD") Sergeant ("SGT") Jennifer Griffith, Cook County, IL Sheriff Thomas Dart, CCSD SGT Quimque, CCSD SGT Bergfalk, CCSD Deputy D. Dattulo, CCSD Deputy Koppe, in individual and Official Capacities, CCS T. Dart and Cook County, IL in Monell Capacity as Well, CCSD Chief Counsel Mr. Peter Kramer, CCSD Lieutenant Prescott, CCSD Chief of Court Security at the R. Daley Center Mr. Nolan, Cook County Board of Commissioners ("CCBC") President Mr. T. Stroger, CCBC, CCBC Commissioners #1-15 (all Commissioners other than the alleged two who endeavored to prevent the elimination of the public speakers component of CCBC Board Meetings) in individual and official capacities, CCBC and CCBC President Stroger in Monell Capacity as Well, CCBC President's Counsel Mr. R. Velasquez, Clerk of the CCCC, IL, Circuit Court of Cook County, IL ("CCCC") Judge Marvin Luckman, CCCC Judge Kuriakos Ceisel, CCCC Judge T. M. Donnelly, Cook County State's Attorney ("CCSA") R. Devine, CCSA, A. Alvarez, Asst. CCSA and Supervisor, Charis Valente, Asst. CCSA and Supervisors - John and Jane Does #1-8, Asst. CCSA John and Jane Does #1-6, Cook County Public Defender ("CCPD") Edwin Burrell, Asst. CCPD J. Stachler, Asst. CCPD Mr. Theodore Green, Cook County, IL Forensic Services Clinic ("FSC") , CC, IL FSC Director M. Markos, CCSD Deputies John Does #1&2 who informed RJM that if RJM did not leave the Floor of the FSC on ____, that RJM would "be arrested", Cook County Jail ("CCJ") Intake Person John Doe, CCJ, Cook County Health And Hospital Services Director, Mr. T. Foley, Isaac Ray Center Director Dr. Cavanaugh, Cermak Health Services ("CHS") Director, Dr. D. Carrington, CHS Dr. Matthews or Matthew Mills, CHS - Registered Nurse ("RN")Mr. Augusta Alabi, CHS RN Manuel Manalastas, CHS Dr. John Doe, CHS, CHS Clerks John Does #1-3, CCSD's Esposito, Stewart, Turner and Ton Involved In Haldol Injections Of RJM As Restrainers In Regard Thereto, CHS Clerks John Does #1-3, CCSD's Esposito and John Does #1-4 Involved in Haldol Injections of RJM, CCSD Lieutenant J. Doe, CCSD Chief at 555 W. Harrison St. Chicago, IL Courthouse, Jane Doe, CCSD Sgt's Renkas & Kush, CCSD Wilson, Hennessey, O'Niell, Simpson, Mr. N. Albuquerque, CCSD IAD Director Raymond Zene, CCSD Employees John and Jane Does #1-8, CCCC Chief Judge T. Evans, CCCC First Municipal Presiding Judge K. Wright, Official Court Reporters, Mr. Jean Kiriazes, CCHS Risk Management Supervisor - As Conditional Defendant, Asst. CCSA's Nenye Uche and Bret Franco, Defendants

Superseding, Bet-hedging Amended Complaint of 2/13/12 ...to be Superseded by 2/16/12 and again by 3/06/12 by 9:00 a.m. and Periodically Thereafter Until Court Will have Provided Confirmation that it Would Be Its Position that "Compliance Will Have Been Adequately Accomplished", if at Any Given Juncture, It Would be Its Position that it Still Would Not Have Been

I. Disclaimers, Qualifiers, Clarifiers, Amplifiers, Base Establishers, Router/Channeler/(Re)Director(s), Supplementers, Restricters and Commentary

As of this date, Attorney A. Galic ("AAG") has withdrawn his representation in the case this complaint concerns("this case") for a number of interconnected reasons, the Court indicated that no permanent prohibition regarding any possible future representation in this case by him would be left in place by such withdrawal and an abbreviated treatment of such is herein included in order, inter alia, that the issues underlying his retention and now withdrawal might be at this juncture, through what is an admittedly most cursory of assessments whereof, entered into the adjudication of this case so that some type of arrangement can be established whereby claims this case concerns are multi-furcated or otherwise split, such that no individual(s) entitled to consideration of any sort(s) from the adjudication whereof would not end up not receiving nor otherwise being deprived of, whatever consideration would ever be and/or have been, due, any given activity conductor(s) entitled to consideration of whatever type wherefrom.

RJM and AAG began the discussion of the possibility of AAG's representing RJM in the prosecution of the civil component of this case as early as May of 2011, after AAG had accompanied RJM in an audience conducted before Judge K. Pantley in the predecessor case to this case which was Case # 09 CH 18934, as early as December of 2010 regarding the appointment of a special prosecutor aspect whereof. RJM and AAG endeavored to develop an approach to the representation whereof which would provide a compatibility arrangement which both would consider acceptable, but ultimately AAG's proposed strategy to the prosecution whereof did not evidently cover a "worst case scenario" ("WCS") , and was predicated upon the presumption that a number of were all clearly and certainly meritorious according to existing legal standard promulgations in regard to such torts, respectively, but that RJM's agenda of procuring innumerable other forms of consideration through the adjudication of this case - which RJM understood and still understands, it to be RJM's moral obligation to endeavor to procure through the adjudication whereof (or at least in some case), including but not limited to the inclusion of Defendants wherein classified by statute as being immune from civil damages, the issue of the use of the existing legal system to procure criminal convictions of various activty conductors whose activity conducted in regard to the matters this case concerns ("this case") was and is morally mandated, the superimposition of structure upon the activity of various activity conductors, which superimposition would foreseeably not be appreciated by various of such AC's conducting activity in various positions of authority in given arrangements, respectively, and the relevance of certain "macro" issues was and evidently still is, an agenda with which, for a number of reasons, AAG simply did and does not see how he can afford to be associated. Thus, RJM ended up in a predicament in which he would either have to relinquish certain claims which RJM does not consider to be subject to any justified relinquishment whereof or the representation of AAG. Another issue was the magnitude of the res judicata and/or collateral estoppel aspects of this case both in terms of the macro objectives RJM is endeavoring to accomplish through the prosecution of this case (see NAACP v Button (_U.S._)) and the issue of what all to include wherein given RJM's 13 year ongoing conflict with the Cook County State's Attorney's Office, various components of the Cook County Judiciary and various other Representatives of Cook County IL government entities (the two malicious prosecution causes of action this complaint concerns were not mal pros'es #1 and 2 perpetrated upon RJM by the CCSA but #'s 4 and 5). The complexity of Monell government entity and RICO litigation, the plethora of federal constitutional bases upon which RJM has predicated the claims this case concerns and RJM's agenda to accomplish what both Rizzo in Rizzo v Goode (_U.S._) and Littleton in Littleton v O'Shea (_U.S._)failed to accomplish - the superimpostion of structure around the activity of government entities which those employed wherein find limiting, restrictive and constraining required of AAG a measure of legal research which AAG concluded that he could not complete according to time tables customarily established for civil litigation in Cook County, IL Courts. As of 2/10/12, RJM still cannot understand AAG's understanding of what exactly constitutes the adequate preservation of any given issue of a federal constitutional dimension pursuant to the standard promulgated for such in Webb v Webb (_U.S._), IL v Gates (_U.S._) and their progeny.

As soon as RJM can develop some type of prosecution strategy for the prosecution of this case that would enable AAG to represent RJM in the monetary damages claims wherein against Defendants not considered immune from civil damage liability according to presently operative and applicable postulations of the legal threshold presently promulgated in various sources of the law in the State of IL regarding such matter, whether for all matters unresolved between RJM and various Federal, County and State Officials and Entities whom this complaint and the one originally filed in 09 CH 18934 concerns, or solely for those regarding activity conducted whereby between 6/13/08 and 12/17/08 in regard whereto, without RJM's having to relinquish any challenges to existing and operative arrangements which RJM understands to be unconstitutional and/or otherwise morally unjustifiable, RJM will present a proposed stipulation concerning (this) (these) matter(s) to the Defendants who have filed appearances in this case, subject to the subsequent presentation whereof to both those Defendants who have not yet done so and to this Court, as RJM has not yet received any response to the proposed stipulations which he transmitted to the Office of the CCSA in such regard. RJM also intends to transmit a proposed stipulation to stay the adjudication of this case for 12 months. The contents of the MTLA statute presently operative in IL necessitated RJM's filing of Case # 09 CH 18934 way before RJM would have filed it, had there not been an SOL as short as that which is present in such statute and RJM finds participation in litigation to be a most burdensome requirement for the retention of a morally legitimate claim to ultimately result to contra-predatory vigilantism to resolve disputes which cannot be resolved legitimately via any other method - when such condition is present.

If all of the claims referenced herein supra which AAG is not willing to prosecute can be preserved for adjudication either in RJM's "Magnum Opus" lawsuit against federal, State of IL and Cook County government entities for loss of normal life, etc., or in some other case which RJM has pending, than it would appear to RJM that unless RJM would still be leaving something of importance out of his analysis of these matters, that AAG can be reretained to complete the prosecution of a version of this case which would be much pared down from what RJM intends to deliver to the CCSA by 3/6/12, Providence permitting.

Mindful that in the execution of any and every affirmative act ever executed in the adjudication of any legal dispute that certain issues come into being and other issues are waived, forfeited and/or relinquished, RJM now continues to proceed in the prosecution of this case, intend upon preventing the evident greater of evils. Providence permitting, sometime in the not too distant future RJM will have completed the entire "Escort Document" collection of documents which constitutes the ISMA understanding of the moral burden which all reason-possessing acivity conductors are obliged to use to remedy injuries unjustifiably caused. RJM proposed to this Court in June of 2011, that RJM could stipulate to getting that entire collection of documents into this case by June of 2012 and RJM expects to succeed in accomplishing that goal, barring his ending up seriously injured or out of circulation. For the time being this document is herein filed as is, subject to future supplementation and supersession, as a bet-hedging document for among other purposes, demonstrating that RJM most definitely recognizes and acknowledges that reasonable and just exercises of government authority require subjection whereto and that RJM's own understanding of the application of the requirements of the moral law to the circumstances ever present in any given situation is non-infallible and subject to the deceptions of the devil and error in general, just as that of everyone else is and that the pre-eminent priority of anyone who intends to ultimately procure deliverance from the greatest of all evils - the unremediable loss of the soul must be self-monitoring, self-assessment,and self-discipline, self-correction and the making of restitution when one fails to require himself to adequately comply with the requirements of the moral law in any given instance. Since, without the reception of answers to the questions and responses to the proposed stipulations which the CCSA has received from RJM in regard to the adjudication of this case over the past eight months, it remains unclear to RJM just how much he must include in this component of the complaint and what can justifiably be left out without waiving, forfeiting nor relinquishing any claim which would not have been relinquished would RJM have submitted a component of a complaint other than what is heren being submitted, RJM finally just decided to truncate this component whereof at 16:00 on 2/14/12, and file what is included herein on a CD, intent upon submitting updated and superseding components whereof upon some type of timetable or other.

It is RJM's understanding that the fact that RJM has demonstrated the deference to the exercise of governmental authority demonstrated in the filing of this component of this complaint on 2/14/12, cannot justifiably be construed to constitute consent to any arrangement or agenda not possessing legitimacy, as RJM has herein filed it under respectful protest that no evidentiary hearing has yet been conducted regarding RJM's original proposal made in June of 2011 that the case be adjudicated on a "snails pace timetable" not incompatible with the entirety of the considerations which could not justifiably remain unconsidered in any establishment of deadlines in regard to the adjudication whereof as this is not a two party slip and fall or fender bender case but rather is a comparatively complex conglomeration of interconnected individual unjustified injury causing duty breaches.

If Cook County Officials will not provide the consideration referenced in various stipulations transmitted to various amongst them, future components of this complaint will evidently have to include treatment of several other cases which RJM has filed against various Cook County and State of IL Officials and/or matters in which RJM has been involved regarding criminal prosecutions of Chris Bollyn, Jamie Hernandez and others so that no legitimate claim would ever be relinquished nor run aground on any legitimate res judicata, nor collateral estoppel defense.

RJM proposes that any and all recipients of this document other than those who possess the capacity to stipulate to consent decrees and civil damage awards in re whereto, leave the introduction component whereof, unread, as its purpose is to provide a depiction of the moral character as RJM apprehends such to the claims and the issue of the just resolution whereof in issue in this case and RJM is still uncertain at this juncture regarding exactly how he can get such material to a jury if it is necessary to try this case, but if it should be necessary to do so, RJM remains committed to the accomplishment of the objective of the demonstration to a jury just how egregious and unjustifiably injurious to legitimate interests the activity of those named as Defendants in the matters this case concerns was.

This component of this complaint ("complaint") is divided into a number of components which includes the following periods:

1. 6/13/08 - 12/17/08

2. 4/27/99 - 6/12/08

3. 12/18/08 - present

For a number of reasons, the matters which fall into categories #'ed 2 and 3 will be addressed in a subsequent component whereof.

II. Introduction:

1.This is the a proposed amended complaint regarding the complaint presented to this Court ("Court") on 6/30/10, whose IL Supreme Court Rule 298 Petition was granted in March of 2011, which was a refiling of Case # 09 CH 18934 ("09 CH18934"), which case was nonsuited shortly before 6/30/10, which RJM has had to compose in "Word Pad" as RJM cannot get any other software to adequately function for such composition. Numerous "trespass on the case" Defendants and/or Defendants whose alleged and/or actual torts in regard to which RJM was complaining in the complaint presented on 6/30/10, which have come into being from the false arrest to which RJM was subjected on 6/13/08 in the R. Daley Center and all of the loss, affliction, grief and travail which resulted therefrom which were committed either after 1/1/2009 or have been ongoing, have been left out of this component of this complaint ("complaint") pending the disposition of proposed stipulations RJM has transmitted to the CCSA in the recent past and/or is in the process of transmitting whereto and/or to various Judges or the CCSD.

2. In constitutional tort cases ajudicated in the federal courts, complaints have been amended as many as nine times in the pre-trial stage of litigation - which type amendment process must have been considerably expensive for all concerned in cases in which so many amendments were made, and hopefully the method RJM uses re amendment of this complaint will enable RJM to cover the entirety of what RJM understands to constitute the moral liability to which RJM is subject in all of its aspects regarding the demonstration of adequate diligence in the continue prosecution of this case in order to prevent any Defendant named herein from evading liability on any type of "excessive passage of time" type argument.

3.This is a suit in law and equity filed against Defendants in their official and/or individual capacities for-- without legal authority or just cause-- violating Plaintiff's ("JH"'s) unalienable rights, which at all times relevant to the matters in regard to which RJM herein complains were protected by the provisions of the common law, state administrative and statutory and federal statutory laws, and/or provisions of the state and federal constitutions applicable at the time of the developments described herein, inter alia, by falsely imprisoning and arresting Plaintiff in the Richard J. Daley Center in Chicago, Illinois (henceforth "the Daley Center" ("RDC")) and for falsely prosecuting Him without probably cause, and especially for doing so as part of a pattern of retaliation against many citizens, including Plaintiff, who have and has exercised their and his constitutionally protected rights to expose, oppose and/or eliminate the unjustifiably injurious consequences of activity conducted by various public servants, including some of the employees of one of the most powerful occupants of the Daley Center-- the Sheriff of Cook Country (henceforth "the Sheriff"), Whose Office is a component entity of a political subdivision of the State of Illinois. Plaintiff thus alleges illegal actions committed by Defendants that exceeded the scope of their authority, constituting an exception to the normal policy that claims against municipal actors in the performance of their duties are proscribed by qualified immunity. Plaintiff seeks declaratory relief in this suit which RJM is convinced will protect RJM from the types of predations this complaint concerns and also a preliminary and then a permanent injunction ordering the Sheriff to cease and desist from the application of any policy, promulgated or de facto, and or practice - the effect of which would be the prevention of Plaintiff's using the various courthouses in Cook County as He hitherto has done and has a right and/or privilege to do in any and all lawful ways. Plaintiff also seeks relief in regard to evidently unjustifiable exercises of the authority of various judicial and prosecutorial positions. Plaintiff also seeks all other relief to which He and all of those entitled to consideration from him are entitled, including compensatory, and punitive damages.

4. RJM admits that some of what is contained herein constitutes editorializing, and/or the expression of opinion(s)never solicited which do not directly subject any party to liability, but in RJM's concern to ensure that no predatory activity end up being apprehended as actually being contra-predatory, non-injurious to legitimate reliance interests, and/or otherwise benign, and in order to otherwise succeed in the accomplishment of the objective of ensuring that no arrogation(s), encroachment(s), usurpation(s) and/or transgressions ever cause any unjustifiable damage to the interests RJM is prosecuting this complaint to vindicate, RJM did not see how he could justifiably leave such out of this complaint (see NAACP v Button (_U.S._)).

5. RJM served a copy of the "'More et al v Griffith et al' Settlement Proposal of 4/../11", (see URL herein supra "(grisetprpo3-14-11)")upon the President of the Cook County Board of Commissioners and upon each of the Commissioners whereof, as well as upon the Office of the CCSD and CCSA, some time ago, so that consent decrees can be procured in regard to the matters in issue and so that this case can be settled as soon as possible at the lowest morally acceptable cost to the County Treasury.

6. According to the principles present in the axiom having its origin in what was once known as "Christendom" Qui nocentibus parcit, innocentibus punit ("He who spares the guilty, punishes the innocent"), RJM has not understood that he possessed any morally legitimate choice in regard to the filing of this complaint except to name each of the Defendants listed in the caption of this complaint as Defendants in this case, as Defendants named in a case can always be dismissed therefrom whereas Defendants not originally named in a case cannot always be added thereto.

7. So that inter alia, the appearance of a disposition of ingratitude could never be justifiably attributed to RJM, RJM herein explains that RJM is not at all oblivious to the fact that there have been no small number of instances in which RJM has been spared grief and/or shielded from the types of harms - from which although it is the duty of persons such as RJM to protect His Omnipotence's little ones (Jn. 21:15 et al) and not to seek to avoid themselves, there is no small evident net utility to the Interests of the Noncounterfeit Roman Catholic Church ("NRCC") (as distinct from the nominally Catholic, de facto Protestant Religion of the Second Vatican Council) in RJM (and affiliates) avoiding- by the activity of some D's listed herein supra and/or by individuals conducting activity in various positions which unless the government entities this complaint concerns are to be abolished forthwithly, necessitates such persons cooperating to some extent with various Defendants listed herein supra. The activity of a number of members of the various entities listed herein as Defendants, in regard to which RJM is cognizant, has no doubt been providing more utility to the interests of the R.C. Church than would be provided thereto, were such individuals to be replaced by non-contradegenerates in a given case. RJM cannot comment upon the information he possesses regarding the activity of a number of such type actors whose activity has produced at least some evident utility for the interests in regard to which RJM understands that RJM will have to provide an accounting, lest, in so doing, RJM were to risk compromising various important interests,…but for purposes of demonstrating a commitment to the protection of those same interests, and to engender the confidence of those who might ever find themselves in a position in which the assistance of any member of the Institute of St. Michael the Archangel ("ISMA") might be of utility to such persons, that the assistance of ISMA might be something not to be foregone, RJM herein explains that at various junctures between the hours of 10:45 a.m. on 6/12/08 and 16:00 p.m. on 12/18/08, CCSD Sgts. Garrett, Boyd, and Poachie, and CCSD Deputies A. Thomas, Morrissey, Mendoza and P. Martin, CCSD employees Carol McFadden, Megan Keating and Matthew Burke provided RJM assistance in one form or another, for which RJM is not at all ungrateful. RJM also notes that CCSD Defendants listed herein supra Mr. P. Kramer, Sgt. Renkas, Kush and Lt. _________, and CCCC Clerks Cecelia Jenkins, C. Bolland, F. Healy and Sheryl Holloway (who were not named as D's herein), at various junctures provided assistance to RJM in RJM's endeavors to defeat Lucifer's endeavors to injure that component of what Pope Pius XI referenced as the "Catholic Cause" (Ad Sacerdoti Catholici, 1935) in regard to which RJM understands that RJM will have to provide an accounting, via the affliction and oppression of RJM in the matters this complaint concerns to an extent such that were RJM to leave such contributions unacknowledged, RJM would fear accruing a moral arrearage in regard thereto. So that if it would be the case that if RJM would still be in the theatre of earthly existence at some future juncture attributable to the fact that at such juncture there would be some not-adequately reciprocated measure of utility("MOU") which RJM would have received and that thus RJM would be in a state of moral arrearages because of such, that it would not be the case that such not adequately reciprocated MOU at such juncture could possibly be attributed to RJM's knowingly, and therefore demonstrably culpably, having left any arrangement in place in which a not-adequately reciprocated MOU would be the only reason which if RJM were to possess the entity referenced in moral theology texts as "sanctifying grace" at such juncture, His Omnipotence Christus Rex would not have granted RJM some type of individual "reprieve" along the lines referenced collectively in Mt. 24:22, RJM has included the averments contained herein immediately supra, whatever their legal significance. RJM has come to understand in the marrow of his bones - at least for a lightweight, wretched, Non-Isaac Jogues/John de Brebauf, the reasons St. Teresa referred to the tour of duty in the theatre of earthly existence as a "bad night in a bad inn", and why when hearing the ringing of the church bell each hour, she would say a prayer of gratitude (and sometimes demonstrably rejoice) that at such juncture(s) there would be one less hour in which she could ever commit a mortal sin than there had been at the previous ringing of such church bell (acknowledging that the condition of not subjectively apprehending the presence of any culpability for any sin in one's record of activity at a given juncture cannot ever, by itself, constitute a basis upon which one might conclude that he possesses sanctifying grace (1 Cor. 4:4) and why Padre Pio too, so often prayed that the problem of conditional salvation for him, be forever "put into the rearview mirror" and out of the devil's reach. If RJM knew more clearly what RJM would have to now do to protect his record of conduct from any culpability rising to the level of a fully deliberate venial sin, or even a voluntary fault, RJM would do whatever RJM would have to do to protect such record and procure the condition of certainty, that if RJM were to end up in hell or to be left in this vale of tears one minute more than would have been unavoidable, that such condition could not be attributed to any culpable disposition of RJM, if this postulation even makes any sense (admitting that if it does not, that RJM has incurred a moral arrearage in inserting it herein and leaving those obliged to read this complaint having to read it - which demonstrates why RJM is so committed to get out of here asap - to eliminate the possibility of diminishing his own prospects of eventually procuring, howsoever undeservedly, a happy ending to that component of the entirety of the travail, affliction and grief of the fallen human condition in the vale of tears, which has been RJM's "portion whereof to be voluntarily borne" (Matt.11:30)).

8. If RJM is not going to succeed in procuring a place in purgatory prior to the time at which RJM will have to accomplish something in the prosecution of this case subsequent to the filing of this complaint, RJM herein explains that RJM has sought a nihil obstat from the ISMA CLT in regard to the defeat of the predations and the rectification of the injustices this case concerns and that it is only because RJM cannot procure such nihil obstat without the filing of this complaint that RJM is burdened with filing it and all others concerned are burdened with having to deal with it.

9. Accompanying this complaint is a "Declaration …Unconstitutionality…RJM" (Doc. #_______), (see also: URL at top LHC of this document "Dec… of Unconst….RJM" .

10. Were a copy of such document or something similar to now be signed by a judge of any Court in the State of IL possessing jurisdiction over the matters this case concerns, regarding the contents of the criminal code presently operative in the State of IL, as such might be applied to RJM et al's endeavors to rectify the injustices this complaint concerns in the absence of the issuance of such order or something similar, neither RJM nor anyone conducting activity in the IL Court System would be burdened by any adjudication of this case in the future.

11. Had RJM possessed a signed copy of such type document on 10/21/04, RJM could, even with his left arm in a full length cast, have endeavored to subdue and arrest the Obama supporting miscreant who blew out RJM's eardrum on that date with his megaphone and none of the afflictions, grief, travails, burdens and expenses incurred by all who have incurred such regarding the matters this case concerns would have ever transpired, or, even better, RJM could have even just taken the municipal code violating-megaphone from the batterer prior to the battery in the first place.

12. In a world as close to having evidently been completely abandoned by God as is that in which this document is being composed, afflictions, travail, grief and burdens other than those this complaint concerns would no doubt have been encountered by RJM in the period from 10/21/04 until today but the ones this case concerns would not have been.

13. In case RJM would procure a place in purgatory, or just end up in hell, prior to the vindication of the rights of His Omnipotence, Christus Rex, which this complaint concerns; as a matter of record which those entitled to consideration from RJM might consider, RJM herein declares that beyond RJM's commitment to procure declaratory relief which will prevent the perpetration of the types of crimes this complaint concerns in the future and monetary damages to make RJM and those entitled to consideration from RJM, whole for the injuries unjustifiably incurred by us, RJM also herein proclaims RJM's commitment to get all of those responsible for the perpetration of crimes in such matters, adequately prosecuted and punished and removed from the government offices in which the perpetrators of such crimes were conducting activity in the perpetration of such crimes. The piles of paperwork generated in the last weeks of May of 2010 and again throughout later 2010 and 2011 regarding the probable cause hearing/appt of special prosecutor projects in which RJM was the protagonist, attest to the efforts of RJM in such regard

14. In this vein, RJM herein invites Mr. T. Dart to resign from the Office of Cook County Sheriff immediately, and if there is even the slightest sense of shame in him to do public penance for the appalling priorities according to which he has conducted the activity which he has conducted over the past several years, most notably his atrocious participation in whatever sodomite parades he has been a participant. Moreover, RJM intends to complain to Fr. J. Smyth regarding Dart's presence in his Standing Tall Foundation. The invitation referenced herein supra is likewise extended to any other Defendant included in this case who has participated in any such type abomination, which would include Dorothy Brown, and whomever else it would include (CCBC Members who supported the "Gay Games") and all of those herein listed who have supported any other type of grave sin such as the abortions perpetrated at Stroger Hospital. RJM proposes that either Deputy Wallach or Pettigrew be appointed as interm Sheriff.

15. The egregious disrespect for the rights of His Omnipotence demonstrated by those referenced herein supra, has indisputably created a climate in which the types of crimes, predations and torts this complaint concerns are the natural product of dispositions of Chief Policy Makers which demonstrate an extreme indifference to the requirements of the natural law, which in turn causes the proliferation of sin and its effects, causing incalculable destruction to the social order.

16. RJM does not consent to participate in any proceedings which would be conducted in the adjudication of this case except in the Courtrooms of whatever Contra-degenerates are presently conducting activity in the Chancery Division of the CCCC.

III. Jurisdiction And Venue

17. This Court, being a state court of general jurisdiction, possesses--pursuant to § 9 of Art. VI of the Illinois Constitution and the Declaratory Action Act 735 ILCS 5/2-701, subject matter jurisdiction to entertain and to decide Plaintiff's justiciable claims of a common law, statutory law, and equitable nature, as the State Courts of the State of IL are courts of general and unlimited jurisdiction. Herb v Pitcairn (_U.S._). The claims of a federal constitutional dimension included herein are subject to this Court's jurisdiction pursuant to the authority postulated in among other SCOTUS opinions those of Herb supra, Claflin v Houseman, (_U.S._) and Lockerty v Phillips (_U.S._) which point the Supreme Court of the State of IL had to explain to the IL App. Ct, First District in the opinion recently postulated in Blount v Stroud ( _ Ill. 3d _).

B) All Parties include in this complaint are located in or reside in, or were conducting the activity in regard to which the claims herein addressed concern, in Cook County, IL, so this Court possesses personal jurisdiction over all Defendants listed herein.

IV. Barest minimum of factual predicates necessary to sustain claims concerned until all Defendants answer complaint:

18. On 6/13/08 ("RJM mistakenly pled the date of "6/12/09" in Case # 09 CH 18934[)], Robert J. More proceeded to Courtroom 2408 of the R. Daley Center in regard to Case # 08CH 9978 (More v Obama for Senate Campaign, et al), as RJM had filed a motion to be addressed on such date at 9:45 a.m. in such case.

19. RJM proceeded to go to Courtroom 2601 on another matter at 10:00 a.m.

20. RJM returned to Courtroom 2408 ("2408") shortly thereafter.

21. At about 10:45 a.m 2408 Case Management Coordinator, Barbara _________ ("CMCB") informed RJM that case # 08 CH 9978 had been dismissed and that an order declaring such had been placed in the "orders bin" outside of 2408, a copy of which RJM confirmed that he had received by that time.

22. RJM then informed CMCB that RJM would compose and submit a motion to have the case recalled on 6/13/08, which would include petitions for other relief as well, within minutes of that time.

23. The great majority of the details regarding what transpired next need not be detailed herein on this occasion, according to RJM's understanding of the compliance-accomplishment threshold according to which RJM must plead the causes of action herein pled in order to get this case to the discovery stage of the litigation process.

24. Based upon the plethora of lies CCSD Sgt Griffith and Deputy Dattulo told on the witness stand on 12/17/08, under penalty of perjury, in the criminal case adjudicated regarding the matters this complaint concerns, RJM would not see how RJM could possibly justify pleading this case more thoroughly than it is herein being pled, prior to RJM's being permitted to depose everyone who was in 2408 at the time of the arrest perpetrated on 6/13/08 in this case, and everyone who conducted activity in regard to such matter prior to 12/17/08 and indeed prior to the date upon which RJM would conduct such depositions, as there is every reason to believe that the problem of the tailoring of witness testimony to the contents of a complaint in order to evade liability will be a serious one in the adjudication of this case ("testilying" as the phenomena is labeled).

25. RJM would have filed this case in the local federal court, except that there are two filing restrictions still - entirely unjustifiably imposed - in place upon RJM in such court which would prevent the filing of anything RJM would endeavor to file therein. RJM has never discontinued his endeavors to get such restrictions removed, but as of 4/9/12, RJM has not succeeded in accomplishing the removal thereof. The fact that the USDC for NDI and CCA 7 judicial junkyards (acknowledging that just as there are sometimes invaluable items in junkyards, so too there are some individuals conducting activity in those Courts whose salutary contributions to the protection and restoration of the rule of law cannot remain unacknowledged in any legitimate assessment of the condition of such Courts) are still operative is itself a standing rebuke to RJM and a cause for great concern regarding RJM's prospects for avoiding ending up in hell.

26. As of the date of the filing of this complaint, the research RJM has conducted in regard to the issue of whether a state court would possess authority to adjudicate (a) tort claim(s) ever posited against a federal judge has provided no conclusive answer.

27. RJM herein simply explains that a number of individuals in 2408 advised RJM to proceed to room 802 and file a motion there.

28. RJM explained that he was filing a "Motion to Recall the Case on 6/12/08, Instanter" (or 6/13/08) in 2408 on 6/12/08 (or 6/13/08), as RJM possessed a constitutionally protected right to do so.

29. At this time CCSD Deputies Dattulo and Koppe were in 2408.

30. Deputy Koppe ("DK") clasped RJM's right arm and proceeded to endeavor to pull RJM away from the bench.

31. RJM demanded that DK release RJM's arm.

32. DK released RJM's arm.

33. RJM proposed that some supervisor other than Sgts. Quimque or Bergfalk be summonsed to 2408, and proposed that it be Sgt Garrett or Boyd who would be so summonsed.

34. Deputy Dattulo or Koppe, at RJM's insistence, summonsed a supervisor.

35. Minutes later, CCSD Sgts. Griffith, Bergfalk and Quimque entered 2408.

36. RJM explained what had occurred, as did Dattulo and Koppe.

37. Griffith informed RJM that RJM had to leave the courtroom.

38. In a voice of conversational tone, speaking with his head in the direction of Griffith, with no background noise then presently rendering communication difficult, RJM informed all concerned that RJM would leave the 2408 as soon as RJM received a confirmation that either the Court had ordered RJM to leave, that the courtroom was closed for the morning or that RJM would be arrested if RJM refused to leave without either of the types of confirmations referenced herein supra.

39. No such type confirmation was provided.

40. Bergfalk and Griffith both addressed RJM.

41. RJM again explained that all RJM understood that RJM needed to procure in order to possess the authority to leave 2408 at what was then very shortly after 11:00 a.m. was the type of confirmation described herein supra, emphasizing that RJM would leave without delay if the consequences of RJM's not leaving would be that RJM would be arrested for not leaving immediately.

42. The purpose of RJM's engaging in the colloquy described herein supra, is the principle volenti non fit injuria ("he who consents has no injury"), as an individual who would find him or her self in the position in which RJM found himself as described herein supra, cannot voluntarily accede to the mandate contained in an unjust order from a member of a policing entity ("MPE") without risking jeopardizing any claim to relief which might be due him or her in a given situation upon the shoals of a claim from a given (collection of ) MPE('s) that the addressee of a given illegitimate order would have voluntarily acceded thereto or that according to some other argument, no act constituting any utilization of any coercive aspect of an exercise of government authority would have ever been executed as a proximate cause of any injury alleged to ever have been unjustifiably inflicted.

43. RJM then opined that he was calling "the Office of Legal Counsel"

44. As RJM dialed 603-3396, Griffith moved into RJM's person space (the area within RJM's reach in an arrangement in which such positioning would not be unavoidable and would not be due to RJM's having provided at least tacit approval of such positioning).

45. As RJM heard Mr. M. Burke answer the phone, Griffith grabbed RJM's hand causing RJM to drop the phone onto the ground and informed RJM that RJM was under arrest.

46. RJM rose from the pew in which RJM had been seated and was escorted by Griffith et al out of 2408.

47. RJM inquired as to the basis for the arrest and Griffith stated: "Criminal Trespass to State Supported Land." ("CTSSL")

48. In the hallway, Quimque informed RJM that he had to "search your bag" referring to the waist pack RJM customarily wears.

49. Quimque made physical contact with RJM's body in an insulting and provoking manner as he removed such pack from RJM's person.

50. RJM was escorted to the lock-up in the basement of the R. Daley Center.

51. Descriptions of activity conducted by and encountered by RJM in regard to the matters this case concerns between 6/13/08 and 12/17/08 which in regard to such activity encountered, RJM understands to have been tortious is included herein infra somewhat further in this series of factual averments.

52. It is RJM's understanding that the pretrial endeavors RJM utilized in order to implode the prosecution of Case #08 MC 123741901 would have imploded it in an adequately aligned and accountable system, but that the system operative in IL at that time was plagued by what Solzenhytsen referenced as a "tilt towards evil".

53. On 12/17/08, Judge T. M. Donnelly granted a directed verdict for the Defendant Robert J. More and against the State of IL, in Criminal Case # 08 MC 123741901, which was the case in which a conviction was sought for the CTSSL Griffith alleged RJM perpetrated, explaining that the trial testimony of both Griffith and Dattulo had been thoroughly impeached by the Defense and that the contents of a statement of Griffith which the State produced at trial - a copy of a report Griffith submitted to her supervisors on 6/13/08, that stated that "More said he would leave if he would be arrested", exonerated Defendant Robert J. More of any criminal culpability in regard to the charge concerned.

54. Notwithstanding that Asst. CCSA's Franco and Uche transmitted to RJM's counsel on the scheduled day of trial a copy of such statement, Franco and Uche still proceeded to endeavor to procure a conviction of RJM regarding the activity which the Court ultimately decided was completely protected via RJM's notification of his intent to depart from courtroom 2408, were he to be subject to arrest for refusing to depart such room at the time immediately before RJM was in fact arrested in regard to the matters this complaint concerns ("these matters").

55. Sometime in September of 2008, RJM appeared before Judge Kuriakos-Ciesel ("JKC") in Courtroom 304 of the 555 W. Harrison St. Chicago, IL CCCC Courthouse.

56. .JKC held RJM in contempt for RJM's refusing to concede the issue of the capitalization of RJM's name before RJM would have received any confirmation from JKC that no claim to relief would have been waived, relinquished nor otherwise forfeited due to RJM's not having adequately presented and preserved any such type issue in any trial court proceedings ever conducted in the underlying criminal case this document concerns ("UCC") (on need to accomplish such issue preservation objective - see Webb v Webb (_U.S._) and Illinois v Gates (_U.S._).

57. RJM was prevented from even explicating the basis of his response to her question before being taken into custody and kept there until something like 16:00 p.m. when RJM was finally released.

58. CCSD Deputy Wilson battered RJM via an unconsented physical contact in escorting RJM to the lock-up.

59. RJM was prevented from the preservation of the legal issue of the detention and escort any better than what was accomplished in this regard inspite of the conduct of JKC and Wilson.

60. RJM repeatedly demanded paper and a writing utensil to complete and get filed a 28 USC 2241 habeas corpus petition to a federal judge and also to have various books in his book bag provided to him as well as to have a meal, but RJM was denied all of these measures of consideration.

61. RJM was repeatedly sent to behavior clinic exams at the Forensic Clinic Service of the CCCC, howsoever unjustified were the orders requiring such.

62. As will be detailed in much greater particularization in the future, RJM appeared at each of such appointments, informed Dr. M. Markos ("DMM") that RJM in good faith did not see how RJM could participate in any such proceeding without either a witness, an audio-recording or an opportunity to record every question, every answer in any examination which would ever be conducted and procure a signature confirming the accuracy of such record as would have been the product of such procedure from whatever examiner would conduct such, of such examination(s), based upon the consequences to RJM and all of those entitled to consideration from RJM (RJM et al) of the BCX exams to which RJM has been subjected over the past ten years.

63. DMM confirmed RJM's appearance in each instance, and informed RJM that he would not conduct any examination under such circumstances and that neither would he provide any explanation in support of his position.

64. On one occasion RJM inquired of the receptionist regarding some matter RJM then considered important and was informed by two CCSD Deputies that if RJM did not immediately then depart the floor on which the FCS Clinic is operative that RJM would be arrested. RJM departed under protest - explicitly postulated and after receiving a confirmation that he had been understood by such deputies.

65. In an October of 2008 pretrial audience, RJM was endeavoring to record on RJM's computer the proceedings being conducted by the attorney he had appointed against his most vociferous opposition to represent him - CC Public Defender Mr. J. Stachler before the Court by typing into the computer keyboard as much as RJM could gleen of what was being said by the Court and the attorneys then interacting with the Court, and to provide such attorney the list of the things RJM demanded be addressed on that court date, when CCSD Sgt Renkas who was on RJM's right side, ordered RJM to close the computer, notwithstanding that the Judge could obviously see what RJM was doing. When RJM proposed that Renkas identify the legal basis for the demand, a CCSD Deputy whom RJM now knows as Deputy Simpson came running up from the back courtroom pew and got into RJM's person space on RJM's left and exclaimed that, "You give her any lip, and I will lock you up!!!!!!!!!!"

66. This entirely unauthorized endeavor which would foreseeably cause a person of ordinary firmness to concede claims to consideration to which he would have been obliged to make claim, in order by so conceding to avoid the affliction and grief of the lock-up and further incarceration ordeal, with all of its attendant search inventories, interrogations, inavailabilty to honor any legitimate reliance interests others might have accrued from contracts and/or non-contractual associations and affiliations in which one might ever find oneself in the ordinary context of the lives of those who would not have committed themselves to the complete anchorite vocation at a given juncture, demonstrated a reckless and wanton unconcern for RJM's constitutionally protected right to assist in his defense, to petition the government for redress of grievances, to due process of law, to be free from the threat of false arrest and to other measures of consideration.

67. Mr. J. Stachler ("JS") [a Cook County, IL Asst. Public Defender] was appointed as RJM's Counsel over RJM's vociferous objection.

68. To his great credit, JS summonsed Fr. J. Perluzzi to the Court on 9/25/08 as RJM was preparing for a trip to the Cook County Jail - which for so many has been a death sentence or a sentence to conditions which would leave one's life forever worsened (cf. Mayoral v Sheehan, (_F.3d, _ ) (permanent paralysis from subjection to a gang beating in the CCJ which CCA 7, Judge K. Ripple attributed to the conscious avoidance of the Sheriff and subordinates of the evidence of the unreasonably dangerous conditions prevailing in the CCJ in the period in which Mayoral was being detained there) so that RJM could get what RJM at that time understood might very well constitute a "last confession" heard, which is something Catholics have always sought in life-threatening situations and/or situations in which one might have to participate, howsoever reluctantly, in the shedding of blood in order to contribute to the prevention of an evil demonstrably worse than the participation in activity the foreseeable unintended consequence of which might include the shedding of human blood, or even worse, the shedding of innocent human blood (for example in a given scenario an escapee from an illegitimate incarceration arrangement might have to use a vehicle or a firearm in such a manner that an altogether innocent child might be injured or killed from any such type use, notwithstanding the use of even extreme care to ensure that no such tragedy would ever result from a given activity conductor's activity) as a foreseeable unintended consequence of a given endeavor to escape an unjust detention or to evade what would constitute an unjustified endeavor to capture a fugitive in a given instance, which might include efforts to accomplish such objective made by individuals who would not possess the information necessary in a given instance to know that a given capture/endeavor would not be morally justified, due to a lack of access to information of the sort needed to make such a determination in a given case.

69 Beyond that he continually informed RJM that he did not have time to do anything in the case.

70. He permitted himself to be used as a muzzle on RJM as can be ascertained from the transcripts of the audiences conducted in regard to the criminal case this complaint concerns ("UCC") and all of the documents RJM composed and filed in the UCC, but whose contents were never addressed by any Judge, as will be detailed in the future.

71. Every time RJM went to Court, RJM was made to wait for inexplicably long periods to confer with him and to procure an audience with the Court.

72. On or about 11/25/08, RJM was ordered into the custody of the Cook County Jail ("CCJ") by Judge T. M. Donnelly, for refusing to answer BCX questions except according to the formula referenced herein supra on the basis that RJM had violated a condition of his bond.

73. RJM explained to Deputy Wilson and CCSD Lt. Burns that there was no legal justification for their transporting RJM out of the courtroom, to the lock-up and to the holding area to be sent to the CCJ to the extent RJM could accomplish and was not prevented from accomplishing, such provision of notice objective.

74. The law regarding this type matter clearly states that no defendant who appears for such type examination but refuses to answer any questions can be sanctioned for anything.

75. JS made no objection to the Court's ordering RJM into the custody of the CCJ on 11/25/08 and explained to RJM that he could do nothing for RJM on 11/25/08, even as RJM was demanding an opportunity to address the Court regarding the alleged legal basis of the sentence to the CCJ.

76. The supervisor of JS, Mr. T. Green ("TG") never did anything when RJM repeatedly complained about the culpable negligence and reckless and wanton disregard of the duties of a defense counsel demonstrated by JS regarding the UCC.

77. On or about 11/25/08, RJM was strip searched in the CCJ Cermak Facility in a situation in which females could see the video conducted of the matter, as RJM understands the parameters of the Cermak operation.

78. On 11/25/08, RJM was denied a medical exam upon entering the CCJ, notwithstanding that he repeatedly demanded such.

79. On 11/25, 11/26, and 11/27 RJM continued to demand a writing utensil and some paper in order to complete and get filed a habeas corpus petition to a federal judge pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC 2241 but RJM was repeatedly denied such consideration.

80. RJM repeatedly demanded that he be permitted to speak to a CCSD supervisor re this issue and several others on such dates, but RJM was never provided any opportunity to accomplish such objective.

81. On 11/26, RJM was injected with Haldol over his most vociferous objection by R.N. Mr. Augusta Alabi ("AA") .

82. On 11/27/08, RJM was injected with Haldol twice over his most vociferous objections, first by R.N. Manuel Manuelastas in the a.m. and then by R.N. AA in the p.m. .

83. The food in the jail was acidic garbage, which RJM surmises must have come out of cans with BPA resin coating the inside thereof or plastic containers leaching polycarbonates and consisted of genetically modified organisms, sugar, salt, pesticides, preservatives, processed white flour, and who knows what else, and in regard to which neither any dark green leafy vegetables, nor vitamin D or B supplements were provided, and there was a total deprivation of any physical or intellectual stimulation which caused RJM's brain and body to atrophy - as RJM is an individual without strong enough character to do without discipline and exercise and something to overcome.

84. On 11/28/09, RJM experienced the symptoms of withdrawal from the Haldol known as tardive dykinesia when RJM could not keep his tongue in his mouth, could not think straight and could not control his bodily operations.

85. This occurred to RJM while RJM was at his storage locker and RJM was terrified that he would never recover from this horrid condition but would be taken into custody if he sought treatment therefrom.

86. Over the course of a period of time whose duration RJM forgets, RJM called his mother and a number of affiliates to inform them of his predicament and affliction as RJM could not even remain on his feet and the storage facility does not permit customers to remain in the facility for any reason not relating to the storage of possessions - so RJM could not remain there indefinitely but RJM could not intelligibly convey the character of his problem. After truncated conversations including 2 or 3 intelligible words every 30 seconds or a minute transmitted in several calls, one of those affiliates relayed the message of the distress in which he had gleaned that RJM was enmeshed to a doctor familiar with tardive dykinesia.

87. Dr. L. Shelton was that doctor and when apprised of RJM's predicament in this regard, she brought RJM to her father's home and instructed RJM to take Benedryll until such symptoms resided.

88. RJM then spent the next 2 days helping her clean that home in gratitude for the assistance received - assistance which at the time provided was indispensably necessary to eliminate the distress - physical, mental and psychological to which RJM had been subjected by the illegitimate drug administrations.

89. JTMD held RJM in contempt with the assistance of the CCSA and its subordinates for filing an amicus curiae brief on behalf of Mr. J. Hernandez, which JTMD later had to dismiss.

90. A Mr. N. Albuquerque ("NA") ended up as RJM's counsel due to RJM's mother being induced through Dr. Shelton's counsel to pay him $1200.00 to replace JS.

91. The activity of JTMD, NA and the prosecutors from the Office of the CCSA resulted in RJM's not getting any of the pretrial or trial issues which RJM endeavored to raise, addressed, which prevented the dismissal of the case on a pretrial basis and also denied the public the evidence of the priorities according to which 01 M123741901 was instigated, prosecuted, defended and adjudicated, as can be ascertained from the contents of the motions RJM filed in such case on: 8/13/08, 8/15/08, 9/12/08, 9/15/08, 9/23/08, and 12/08/08.

92. On 12/17/08, RJM was again, without any justification, held in contempt of court, and Sgt Kush and CCSD Deputy Wilson battered RJM via an unconsented physical contact in taking RJM to the lock-up.

93. JTMD prevented RJM from finishing his presentation to such actors regarding RJM's claims as to their liability in enforcing the contempt order issued, before RJM was escorted out of the courtroom.

94. There was no response to any of the subpoenas RJM issued on various Cook County officials.

95. There is no record in regard to which RJM is cognizant that any Cook County Official who could have brought the ever lifted so much as a finger to prevent or remedy any of the injuries RJM has incurred as described herein, but RJM is concerned to salute and express.

96. On 12/17/08, the prosecutor - B. Franco ("PBF") made an opening statement in RJM's criminal case trial during which RJM endeavored to make the sign of the cross for each sin against the Eighth Commandment which it was RJM's understanding had been committed by him wherein and RJM ended up continuously making such sacramental sign as the statement was simply a series of fabrications, an enumeration of which will be provided once RJM can get the transcripts created from the conducting of such proceedings scanned into a form which will enable RJM to paste such into an editable document.

97. The Court directed a verdict against the prosecution based upon the contents of a memo written by Sgt Griffith to her supervisors on 6/13/08 which was entirely incompatible with the testimony Griffith and Dattulo provided under oath, which certainly permits the inference that such testimony was perjured.

123. The Guardianship and Advocacy Report Issued sustaining the allegations of misfeasance and/or malfeasance by CHS in the matters 09 CH 18934 and this complaint concerns is attached to the amendments added in 09 CH 18934 subsequent to its original filing and is accessible in the court file stored in Room 802 of the R. Daley Center.

124. RJM incorporates by reference herein the entirety of such report as if fully set forth herein and will present a copy of such to this Court such document, if the incorporation by reference herein would not be considered adequate for the purpose of getting to the discovery stage of the adjudication of this case.

125. That report contains factual claims according to which recovery can be procured for the torts of willful and wanton disregard of duty, battery, deprivation of a right guaranteed by the Constitution of the U.S. (right to privacy, right to free exercise of religion, and right to be free from pretrial intrusion except in an arrangement in which due process of law would have been provided, as applicable to the activity of actors of a political subdivision of a state via the incorporation provisions of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of such Constitution and substantive due process).

126. A copy of the documents which the Cook County Sheriff's Department provided RJM in response to RJM's FOIA in which RJM sought the names of all members of such Department who participated in any Haldol injection of RJM, is contained in the court file of Case # 09 CH 18934 and RJM incorporates the entirety of such document into this document by reference as if fully set forth herein according to the same principle utilized regarding the report referenced herein supra.

127. RJM did not receive the name of Manuel Manalastas ("MM") until 12/11/09 and so has to conditionally include Ms. Jean Kiriazes as a Defendant to this case in order to cover a scenario in which Cook County, IL would endeavor to evade liability by claiming that RJM was somehow responsible for not having procured the name of MM prior to such date.

128. On 11/26/08, in the evening of that date, a Mr. Augusta Alabi, RN, injected RJM with Haldol against RJM's will and over RJM's most vociferous, but not in any way, inappropriate protest

129. - on 11/27/08, in the morning of that date a Mr. Manuel Manalastas, RN, injected RJM with Haldol against RJM's will and over RJM's most vociferous, but not in any way, inappropriate protest

130. - on 11/27/08, in the evening of that date, a Mr. Augusta Alabi, RN, injected RJM with Haldol against RJM's will and over RJM's most vociferous but not in any way inappropriate protest

131. RJM herein complains that he was subject to inventory searches on five separate occasions, all of which constitute separate torts as violations of the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the u.S. of A.

132. RJM also complains that both Matthew Burke and Peter Kramer, licensed attorneys in the CCSD Office of Legal Affairs, expressed surprise on 11/20/09 and 11/23/09, respectively, that RJM had ever been criminally prosecuted in the matters this complaint concerns, indicating a total lack of control over the CCSD by Thomas Dart - if the members of the Office of Legal Counsel did not even ever receive notice that a criminal prosecution of the type herein described was being conducted, especially since investigations and monitoring of RJM had been conducted by various representatives of the CCSD, over the several years prior to and during the criminal prosecution in regard to which RJM herein complains.

133. RJM herein complains that he is being injured because he still has not received copies of the transcripts from the proceedings conducted in the trial court in Criminal Case # 08 MC 123741901, on 12/8/08 which has rendered him incapable of pleading various causes of action more specifically than they have been pleaded herein and that the condition presently prevailing in Cook County, IL in which innocent persons prosecuted for alleged crimes are dependent upon court reporters to reconstruct a record of trial court proceedings is egregiously incompatible with all of the measures of consideration guaranteed citizens of the u.S. of A. in the Fifth and Sixth Amendments to the Constitution of the u.S. of A. as such apply to the activity of state actors and actors conducting activity in political subdivisions of states via the incorporation provisions of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to such Constitution.

134. RJM herein seeks to add his mother - Mrs. W.R. More ("TBM"), as a plaintiff to this case, as it is the understanding of RJM that she was caused severe emotional distress when she learned that her firstborn male child was being injected with Haldol on 11/27/08, which distress continued until the reception of notice by her, of the granting of the directed verdict granted against the State of IL on 12/17/08.

135. "We are grateful to the Washington Post, New York Times, Time Magazine…whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promise of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been exposed to the bright light of publicity during those years. The world is…prepared to march towards a world government. The super-national sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely superior to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries. - David Rockefeller former CFR President at 1991 Bilderberger Mtg.

136. CC Sheriff Thomas Dart's listing as one of Time Magazine's 100 Most Influential Persons of 2009 is another cause for concern compelling RJM to against insist he resign from the Office immediately.

137. The Constitution is an iron clad contract in writing which is to be liberally interpreted in favor of the non-preparer - the citizen for the protection of rights and property - 2nd Amjur, 58 Const. Law - according to Carl Miller - this principle must be instilled into the minds of all of those named as D's hererin.

138. On 12/2/09 - RJM was subject to the theft of combination lock, allegedly by a member of the CCSD and demands restitution therefore in this case.

139. Two conspicuously considerate persons - 5' 10", heavy set black male - about 32-35 YO, CCSD CO who provided two baloney sandwiches to the group of detainees of which RJM was a member on 11/26/08, and the 5"10" medium build Hispanic male CCSD CO who oversaw the unconstitutional strip search of 11/26/08 are herein cited for the consideration demonstrated in the conducting of activity conducted by them, respectively, even though the latter activity conductor could not have not incurred moral, tort and criminal liability regarding his activity conducted in the strip search referenced herein.

140. Patrick Fitzgerald and his subordinates were all removed from this complaint in order to get the 298 petition signed asap but RJM is fully committed to suing him and his subordinates for interfering with RJM's access to the Federal Grand Jury presently seated at the Dirksen Federal Building as is RJM committed regarding USMS Marshal John Clark and USMS Marshal for the NDI, Kim Widup and his subordinates, but at present, RJM does not know exactly how he can accomplish such objective without causing the loss of the assistance of any licensed attorney in the prosecution of this case.

141. CC Clerk David Orr, notwithstanding the incalculable damage he has caused to the interests of the Catholic Church, by his support of moral degeneracy has provided information to RJM in regard to getting this complaint filed which has been of value.

142. RJM complains that the Chief Policy Makers of Cook County are all according to RJM's understanding, active promoters of degeneracy, decay, depravity, deterioration, disease and ultimately, death, and that they are all anti-innocence anti-innocence of childhood, anti-chastity, anti-family, antinomianism, anti-righteousness, and anti-civilization.

143. By 4/1/2012, RJM intends to present to the Cook County Board and its President and the Attorney General of the State of IL, a settlement proposal including - provision for the elimination of abortion, any arrangement which places any type of relationship on the same footing as sacramental or natural law contractual marriage, the discontinuance of withholding of federal income tax from county and/or state employees compensation and benefit packages, accompanied by the elimination of the acceptance/reception of federal funding "assistance" of whatever types there are in regard to which the County and/or State would possess the authority to eliminate such which are not compatible with some express provision of the Constitution of the u.S. of A., and to use Home Rule to eliminate any arrangement resulting in a disparity of weaponry between the citizenry and the government at all levels - with this final modification having taken on a new urgency in light of the recent enactment of the unlimited interrogation and detention provisions of the NDAA of 2012.

144. RJM intends to require himself to continue to conduct his activity such that there is neither any lack of forcefulness, nor any type of concession to any type of predation on the one hand, nor any lack of consideration for the infirmity of the fallen human condition on the other, and if he should allegedly fail in this regard, complaints can be filed against him at: see URL listed herein in the upper left hand corner of this document, supra (ISMA-Comp).

145. The time spent in a jail awaiting a trial has a detrimental impact on the individual. It often means loss of a job; it disrupts family life; and it enforces idleness. Most jails offer little or no recreational or rehabilitative programs. The time spent in jail is simply dead time. Imposing those consequences on anyone who has not yet been convicted is serious. It is especially unfortunate to impose them on persons who are ultimately found innocent. Finally, even if an accused is not incarcerated prior to trial, he is still disadvantaged by restraints on his liberty and by living under a cloud of anxiety, suspicion and often hostility. - Barker v Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 92 S.Ct. 2182

146. RJM's Mother paid 1200.00 for an attorney to defend RJM against the UCC this complain concerns which was a totally preventable expenditure.

147. RJM incurred severe mental and emotional distress, upon being subjected to Haldol injections and subsequent thereto until the directed verdict was issued as RJM had to deal with the possibility of having to endeavor to escape and use force in any such type endeavor which might foreseeably result in entirely unintended harm to persons of the moral caliber of Sgts. Boyd or Garrett or Deputies Pettigrew, Wallach, Untaretti, Molnar, A. Thomas etc. etc..

148. On 9/3/08, Judge TM Donnelly, stated, "The State must retain a monopoly on use of force.".

149. Solzhenitsyn, Guy Fawkes, St. Thomas, Claus von Stauffenberg, Pope Pius XII, the Cristeros, the Spanish in 1936, the Irish in 1918 and every Roman Catholic of all time cannot accept such a patently morally unjustified statement.

150. The letter from U.S. Attorney' s Office of July of 2008 regarding the unconstitutional and unacceptable conditions of the Cook County Jail evidently did not result in enough improvements for RJM et al to have been spared the grief and harm described herein.

151. RJM respectfully proposes that this Hon. Court consider eventually either providing her signature on a copy of the Proposed Dec…RJM (*HYPERLINK "../www.thirstforjustice.777host.us"**www.thirstforjustice.777host.us*) (Declaration Unconstitionality...RJM) in regard to this or some similar case which RJM will almost invariably have to file in the future, or providing such on an amicus curiae to a higher court in such regard and seeks feedback for what type record of conduct RJM would have to demonstrate in order to procure such at some future juncture.

Count One: Common Law False Imprisonment & False Arrest Against Griffith, Bergfalk, Quimque, Dattulo

152. Paragraphs #18-50 of this Complaint are incorporated herein in their entirety, as though fully set forth herein.

153. False Imprisonment has traditionally been defined as any unlawful, intentional show of force by which a person is compelled to remain in a place in which he or she does not wish to remain and is subject to no duty to remain, thus depriving him or her of liberty and property interests and the tort of False Arrest has traditionally been defined as the assertion of lawful authority to arrest with the intention to effect an arrest that restrains (whether tangibly or intangibly) the person arrested, who reasonably believes that he or she has been arrested and who, therefore, does not attempt to escape from the restraint exerted for fear of being found guilty of resisting arrest.

154. At all times relevant to the matters this complaint concerns ("At all times relevant"), Plaintiff possessed a common law right to be free from being falsely imprisoned by anyone, including the herein named Defendants.

155. At all times relevant, Defendants and unknown others were subject to a common law, and Official Misconduct 720 ILCS 5/33-3 duty, to refrain from falsely imprisoning Plaintiff, as well as a duty to avoid battering, kidnapping or depriving RJM of any measure of consideration guaranteed him by the Constitution and laws of the U.S and/or of the State of IL.

156. At all times relevant, the Defendants named in this Count were subject to the above said duties, notwithstanding the fact that they may not be "amenable to justice," according to the general principle of law articulated in 720 ILCS 5/8-2.1(b)(3) - that is, "not amendable to any type of justice not requiring the utilization of vigilante methods in no way lacking morally legitimacy."

157. On 6/13/08, in the R. Daley Center, without lawful authority or just cause, the Defendants named in this Count breached said duties and deprived Plaintiff of His protected liberty and property interests to be free from false imprisonment when They compelled Him-- both before and after His arrest--to stay put and later to go with them into the Daley Center Lock-up Facility for allegedly "interfer[ing] with another person's lawful use or enjoyment of such building or land,"

158. Plaintiff was injured by the actions of the Defendants named in this Count in that He was prevented from remaining in a public area - namely a public courtroom - that of 2408 of the R. Daley Center, by said Defendants, who committed said deeds without lawful authority or just cause, thus preventing RJM from exercising his right to petition the government for the redress of grievances in the form of accessing a civil court in regard to a civil case (see Chambers v Baltimore and Ohio Railroad (_U.S._)re "right of access to the courts") , and Plaintiff was injured in that Plaintiff lost time - in regard to which loss He will eventually have to provide an accounting, when He was forced into custody and when He was then compelled to spend money (thru a loan from his elderly mother) unnecessarily in order to defend himself regarding the criminal charge filed against him (via the retention of an attorney since the Court would not permit RJM to defend himself in the criminal case) as well as incurring the enormous costs of the subsequent court appearances, BCX exam excursions, incarceration, research and composition ventures, meetings with the Attorneys who represented him, detentions for subsequent contempts which were entirely unjustified, and the dispersion of his belongings. Finally, Plaintiff was injured in that He was compelled to endure the on-going private humiliation and emotional distress of the previously mentioned indignities.

159. The activity conducted by the Defendants named in this Count referenced herein supra constituted the proximate causes of Plaintiff's injuries, because those injuries were a direct result of their personal words and/or deeds.

160. While D. Dattulo was not involved in the perpetration of the torts perpetrated on 6/13/08 which this count concerns, her testimony at the trial of 08 MC 123941901 was obviously tailored to enable the State to procure a conviction of RJM and thus she has incurred liability on this count via such testifying.

161. Plaintiff prays for a jury trial on this count, declaratory judgment against the above named Defendants in this Count for the causes brought herein, compensatory damages of over $50,000.00 from each Defendant, punitive damages, injunctions as requested herein infra, and any other relief that whatever jury decides this case would find just and equitable.

Count # 2 - Battery and Illegal Seizure - Koppe

162. Paragraphs #29-32 of this Complaint are incorporated herein in their entirety, as though fully set forth herein.

163. The tort of battery in the State of IL consists of and unwelcome physical contact of a provocative or insulting nature

164. Plaintiff prays for a jury trial on this count, damages of $5,000.00 on the Battery count from the Defendant, punitive damages, and any other relief that whatever jury decides this case would find just and equitable.

Count # 3 - Illegal Seizure in Violation of Amendment #4 to U.S. Constitution - Koppe

165. Paragraphs #29-32 of this Complaint are incorporated herein in their entirety, as though fully set forth herein.

166. As there was no articulable fact present regarding activity conducted by RJM that would provide Deputy Koppe reason to believe that any crime had been, was being or was about to be committed by RJM, he incurred tort liability for illegally seizing RJM in the incident this count concerns.

167. Plaintiff prays for a jury trial on this count, damages of $5,000.00 on the Battery count from the Defendant, punitive damages, and any other relief that whatever jury decides this case would find just and equitable.

Count #4 - Illegal Seizure - Griffith, Bergfalk and Quimque

Count #5 - Battery - Griffith

Count #6 - Battery - Quimque

Count #7 - Defamation - Griffith, Quimque - RJM escorted through hallway in handcuffs and possibly on first floor in handcuffs on way from Courtroom to Lock-up

Count #8 - Illegal Search in Lock-up - Griffith, Bergfalk and Quimque

Count #9 - Denial of Due Process of Law in Violation of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the u.s. of A. - Judge Luckman

The entirety of paragraphs - 18-151 are incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth herein.

Judge Luckman's refusal to adjudicate RJM's motions filed in 08 MC 123941901 and/or to provide RJM a preliminary hearing in which to demonstrate that probable cause was not present in this case proximately caused the continuation of the prosecution whereof and the damages that ensued wherefrom

Count #10 - Denial of Due Process of Law in Violation of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the u.s. of A. - Judge Luckman

Judge Luckman's refusal to adjudicate RJM's motions filed in 08 MC 123941901 resulted in RJM's never getting the issues addressed wherein preserved for review, according to the formula promulgated in such regard in IL v Gates (_U.S._).

Count #11 - Denial of Due Process - Judge Kuriakos - Ciesel

Count #12 - Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Violation of the 6th Amendment to the Constitution of the u.s. of A. as Applied to the Activity of State Actors and/or Actors Representing Political Subdivisions of States, via the Incorporation Provisions of the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Const. - CCPD - J. Stachler and T. Green

Count #13 - Denial of Due Process of Law in Violation of the 5th Amendment to the Constitution of the u.s. of A. as Applied to the Activity of State Actors and/or Actors Representing Political Subdivisions of States, via the Incorporation Provisions of the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Const. and Violation of the 6th Amendment Rights to Confrontation and Compulsory Process via Same Incorporation Formula - Forsensic Clinic Dr. M. Markos

Count #14 - . and Violation of the 6th Amendment Rights to Confrontation and Compulsory Process via Same Incorporation Formula - Forsensic Clinic Assigned CCSD's John Doe #1 and J. Doe #2

Count #15 - Denial of Due Process of Law in Violation of the 5th Amendment to the Constitution of the u.s. of A. as Applied to the Activity of State Actors and/or Actors Representing Political Subdivisions of States, via the Incorporation Provisions of the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Const. - CCSD representatives at 555 W. Harrison St. who Prevented RJM from using his laptop computer in the Court and/or in the conference room.

Count #16 - Assault- CCSD Simpson

Count #17 - Threat of False Arrest - Simpson

Count #18 - Denial of Due Process of Law in Violation of the 5th Amendment to the Constitution of the u.s. of A. as Applied to the Activity of State Actors and/or Actors Representing Political Subdivisions of States, via the Incorporation Provisions of the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Const. - Judge T. M. Donnelly for revoking RJM's bond without any legal basis for doing so on 11/25/08

Count #19 - Illegal Seizure in Violation of the 4th Amendment of the Const. of the u.s. of A. - Judge Donnelly, CCSD Representatives Burns and Wilson re tranferring RJM to the Cook County Jail for the alleged bond violation

Count #20 - Battery - CCSD Rep. ... in Escorting RJM out of the Courtroom re the Bond Revocation Issue

Count #21 - Illegal Search - CCSD Rep..... re Inventory Search re the Bond Revocation Issue of 11/25/08

Count #22 - Denial of Due Process of Law in Violation of the 5th Amendment to the Constitution of the u.s. of A. as Applied to the Activity of State Actors and/or Actors Representing Political Subdivisions of States, via the Incorporation Provisions of the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Const. - CCSD Supervisors for refusing to provide RJM the means to get a federal habeas corpus petition filed on 11/25/08 pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC 2241

Count #23 - Denial of Due Process of Law in Violation of the 5th Amendment to the Constitution of the u.s. of A. as Applied to the Activity of State Actors and/or Actors Representing Political Subdivisions of States, via the Incorporation Provisions of the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Const. - CHS Supervisors and clerks of unknown name for refusing to provide RJM the means to get a federal habeas corpus petition filed on 11/26/08 pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC 2241

Count #24 - Denial of Due Process of Law in Violation of the 5th Amendment to the Constitution of the u.s. of A. as Applied to the Activity of State Actors and/or Actors Representing Political Subdivisions of States, via the Incorporation Provisions of the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Const. - CCSD Supervisors for refusing to provide RJM the means to get a federal habeas corpus petition filed on 11/27/08 pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC 2241

Count #25 - Denial of Due Process of Law in Violation of the 5th Amendment to the Constitution of the u.s. of A. as Applied to the Activity of State Actors and/or Actors Representing Political Subdivisions of States, via the Incorporation Provisions of the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Const. - CCSD Supervisors for refusing to provide RJM any medical examination before his being transferred out of Inmate Intake at the Cook County, IL Jail

Count #26 - Denial of Due Process of Law in Violation of the 5th Amendment to the Constitution of the u.s. of A. as Applied to the Activity of State Actors and/or Actors Representing Political Subdivisions of States, via the Incorporation Provisions of the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Const. - Cook County, IL ("CCJ") Jail Supervisors for refusing to provide RJM adequate nutrition and hydration while in the involuntary custody of the CCJ from 11/25-11/27 of 2008

Count #27 - Denial of Due Process of Law in Violation of the 5th Amendment to the Constitution of the u.s. of A. as Applied to the Activity of State Actors and/or Actors Representing Political Subdivisions of States, via the Incorporation Provisions of the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment f the U.S. Const. - Cook County, IL ("CCJ") Jail Supervisors for refusing to provide RJM adequate provision for exercise and to participate in the ordinary activities of life from 11/25-11/27 of 2008

Count #28 - Medical Battery and Battery in Securing RJM - Dr. M. Mills, CHS R.N. Augusta Alabi, CCSD Dep Hernandez

Count #29 - Medical Battery and Battery in Securing RJM Dr. M. Mills, CHS R. N. Manuel Manuelestas, CCSD Dep Stuart, Turner,

Count #30 - Medical Battery and Battery in Securing RJM - Dr. M. Mills, CHS R.N. Augusta Alabi, CCSD Dep. Hernandez & Ton

Count #31 - Monell Claim re Medical Battery - Cermak Health Services, Dr. Foley, Dr. Cavanaugh, Dr. Carrington

Count #32 - Illegal Seizure in Violation of the 4th Amendment to the Constitution of the u.s. of A. as Applied to the Activity of State Actors and/or Actors Representing Political Subdivisions of States, via the Incorporation Provisions of the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment f the U.S. Const - in seizures perpetrated to effect Haldol injections

Count #33 - Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Violation of the 6th Amendment to the Constitution of the u.s. of A. as Applied to the Activity of State Actors and/or Actors Representing Political Subdivisions of States, via the Incorporation Provisions of the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Const Including Officers of the Court -Nick Albukerk - in not renewing the demands make in the innumerable pre-trial motions RJM filed in 08 MC 123941901.

Count #34 - Denial of Due Process of Law in Violation of the 5th Amendment to the Constitution of the u.s. of A. as Applied to the Activity of State Actors and/or Actors Representing Political Subdivisions of States, via the Incorporation Provisions of the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment f the U.S. Const - in RJM's being denied access to Dr. Rivas'es criminal trial on 12/2/08

Count #35 - Denial of Due Process of Law in Violation of the 5th Amendment to the Constitution of the u.s. of A. as Applied to the Activity of State Actors and/or Actors Representing Political Subdivisions of States, via the Incorporation Provisions of the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment f the U.S. Const - conditional Defendant - Jean Kiriazes in RJM's being denied access to names of the activity conductors who injected RJM with Haldol until RJM was finally provided such.

Count #36 - Monell Claim Against the Cook County, Il Sheriff's Dept for Maintaining Conditions, Policies and Practices Resulting in Deprivations of Rights Guaranteed by the Constitution and Laws of the u.s. of A. - CCS T. Dart and Cook County, IL, CCSD Chief Counsel Mr. Peter Kramer, CCSD Lieutenant Prescott, CCSD Chief of Court Security at the R. Daley Center Mr. Nolan

Count #37 - Monell Claim Against the President of the Cook County Board of Commissioners, his Counsel and its Members for Maintaining Conditions, Policies and Practices Resulting in Deprivations of Rights Guaranteed by the Constitution and Laws of the u.s. of A. - President and Commissioners, Mr. R. Velasquez

Count #38 - Malicious Prosecution - Non-performance of Adequate Investigation - CCSA Valiente, Uche, Franco

Count #39 - Malicious Prosecution - Griffith, Bergfalk, Quimque, Dattulo, Devine, Alvarez, Valiente, Uche, Franco

Count #40 - Denial of Due Process of Law in Violation of the 5th Amendment to the Constitution of the u.s. of A. as Applied to the Activity of State Actors and/or Actors Representing Political Subdivisions of States, via the Incorporation Provisions of the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment f the U.S. Const - Official Court Reporters - deprived RJM of transcripts regarding proceedings conducted in 08 MC 123941901 on 12/2/08

Count #41 - Monell Claim for Maintaining Conditions, Policies and Practices Resulting in Deprivations of Rights Guaranteed by the Constitution and Laws of the u.s. of A. - Cook County, Il Judges Evans and Wright

Equitable Relief Requested

If this Court will not now simply provide a signature on RJM's "Declaration of Unconstitutionality …RJM" (RJM C:6/11b19 n46 p/9) (see also: * HYPERLINK "" *http://www.thirstforjustice.net (DecofUncon*)), at this juncture, then RJM must continue and herein adds:

Paragraphs 18-150 of this Complaint are incorporated herein in their entirety, as if fully set forth herein.

RJM respectfully moves this Court to issue an order in regard to the case this complaint concerns ("this case") prior to the conducting of any activity in regard to it other than the adjudication of the matter of the audio(-video) recording of any and all proceedings which might ever be conducted in it, that absolutely no proceedings may be conducted in this case except in an arrangement in which no such type proceeding would ever be conducted herein unless and until a confirmation in writing would have been received by this Court from all parties having a direct and legally cognizable interest in the adjudication hereof, and entered into whatever trial court record would be created in regard to it, that each and every such party would understand that none of such parties would ever have to participate in any proceeding ever conducted in regard hereto, except and unless either it would have been the case that no interference would have been posited with any endeavors which would ever have been undertaken for purposes of the creation of an audio-recording of any such proceeding(s) as might ever (be) (have been) conducted herein and that no such type proceeding(s) could likewise be conducted unless and until an order would be in place and operative which would prevent any interference with the audio-video recording of any and all activity of any individual which would ever be conducted in any government building containing any court of the State of IL, or quasi-court thereof, other than activity which would be conducted in any courtroom, lockerroom and or washroom thereof.

In other words, RJM does not consent to ever participate in any activity in which anyone who would be conducting activity as a representative official of any government entity would be conducting activity which would not be monitored by an audio (in the courtroom) or audio-video(everywhere and place other than those areas referenced herein supra) recording device, the product of which in regard to a given proceeding would be available to any party involved in any activity ever conducted therein in regard to this case or any other activity in regard to which RJM would find it necessary to access any government building (while there are a number of individuals conducting activity in the court system presently operative in the state of IL, without whose activity conditions therein would no doubt be far worse than they are presently found to be, it is the understanding of the matter this conveyance concerns in regard to which RJM understands that he will have to provide an accounting, that the combination of morally bankrupt individuals conducting activity as government officials, a disparity of weaponry between predation perpetrators and their potential victims ("PV"), conditions which provide the capacity and opportunity for the perpetration of predations under the color of law and pretext of legitimacy upon unarmed PV's whereof, and a lack of monitoring in a form which enables anyone and all of those victimized by the types of predations perpetrated in courtrooms in which activity is not adequately monitored on a continual basis [in order to possess a record of what [occurs] [would have occurred] in the adjudication of a given case- is an arrangement devastatingly destructive to the interests of the Roman Catholic Church in regard to which RJM understands that RJM will have to provide an accounting, and it is RJM's understanding that no such type arrangement can be permitted to remain in place without those possessing the means to eliminate such conditions incurring sinful culpability, not excluding gravely sinful culpability (1 Tim. 5:22, Eph. 5:8, et al) for any and all culpable neglect in not effecting the elimination of such conditions or at least having adequately endeavored to accomplish the elimination thereof. Even the presence in a given case, of a tribunal presider of the probity of St. Alphonsus Liguori would not be enough to deter many of the predators who frequent IL Courts from endeavoring to use the presently operative court system to defraud their victims.

RJM herein respectfully moves this Honorable Court to grant the relief described herein infra in regard to the issue of citizens being protected from the consequences of activity conducted by government officials of whatever type in Cook County, IL Courthouses which would not have been monitored by an audio-recording device or at least to provide it for RJM

It shall be required of any and every member of any and every type of security and/or policing entity ever enforcing any law and/or effecting any seizure or arrest upon any citizen upon any Cook County, IL Courthouse property that audio-visual ("A/V") evidence of any such type activity shall be provided to any arrestee or individual induced to comply with any given order via the assertion of an intent to arrest should compliance in regard to any given order not have been accomplished at a designated juncture, and that in the absence of the provision of such to any individual(s) ever demanding such, upon the reception of a demand wherefore, that any criminal complaint ever issued in regard to any arrest in regard to which no recording whereof would have been provided to any arrestee by a date certain, shall be retracted and that a presumption of both the commission of a crime and of a tort by whatever security or policing entity member(s) would have been involved in a given interaction shall attach to the non-provision whereof according to the contents of what follows herein: (a) Every law enforcement officer in Illinois or in any political subdivision thereof who participates in any encounter with a private citizen in a Cook County, IL Courthouse building that results in a governmental decision to arrest said citizen as a criminal suspect, shall make such arrest only in the good faith belief that three conditions do and shall exist: (1) that an audio-video (hereinafter "a-v") recording would have been made of the encounter that would allegedly provide a prima facie justification for the arrest, (2) that said a-v recording shall be automatically preserved for 6 months without a special notice or motion being necessary to accomplish such preservation, (3) (i) that the arresting or supervising officer in charge of a given arrest shall, at the time of said suspect's release on personal recognizance or on bail, present to said suspect an intelligibly high quality DVD reproduction of the audio-visual recording of said encounter that allegedly justified the arrest together with the written notice of the specific offense for which the suspect was arrested, which notice is already required on the bond form. (ii) that in the event that said suspect is not released within the customary 48 (or if on a weekend 72) hours but is held without bail pending trial, said a-v DVD together with a copy of said written notice of the charge shall, within 48 (or if on a weekend 72) hours of said suspect's arrest, as authorized by the suspect, be given to a public defender, a private attorney, or one of one or more designated relative(s) or friend(s) of a given arrestee as soon thereafter as any of such type actor(s) would have arrived to receive same, according to the incarcerated suspect's expressed intent in such regard. (b) In the event that all three of the above conditions are not met, the arrest of any private citizen in a Cook County Courthouse building or place shall be deemed to be null and void ab initio. (c) In the event of any arrest effected in violation of Sections (a) and/or (b) of this Statute such that said arrest as described therein is automatically without legal force and effect, a private right of civil action shall be deemed to exist against those responsible for said arrest and for said violation(s).

Plaintiff stands to suffer irreparable harm without the procurement of preliminary injunctions, ordering the relief sought in the previous paragraphs without delay.

There is no adequate remedy at law for those of Plaintiff's injuries that would now cause Plaintiff to abstain from entering and using Cook County courthouses in order to accomplish His legitimate and lawful purposes, which he often cannot accomplish without the type of monitoring described herein supra.

Plaintiff is likely to be successful on the merits of this action, since this Court is lawfully bound to uphold Plaintiff's due process and other constitutionally protected rights and to hold as void all orders that would not be compatible therewith.

There is urgency about Plaintiff's petition for injunctive relief, as He has immediate and on-going needs, as alluded to above.

Therefore, Plaintiff requests that this Court issue a preliminary injunction granting the relief sought supra.

Should Plaintiff prevail on some or all of His claims, He also requests a permanent injunction similar to the preliminary injunction requested above.

By way of additional relief Plaintiff seeks:

An order of the Court, after Defendants would have filed any response to this complaint which would be filed by any of them, explaining wherein this Complaint might justifiably be claimed to be deficient and leave to amend same.

Trial by jury on all issues triable by jury.

Exemplary damages in an amount that a jury would find just and equitable.

Any and all other relief that this Court would consider to be just and equitable.

RJM respectfully proposes that this Hon. Court consider eventually either providing her signature on a copy of the Proposed Dec…RJM (*HYPERLINK "../www.thirstforjustice.777host.us"**www.thirstforjustice.777host.us*) (Declaration Unconstitionality...RJM) in regard to this or some similar case which RJM will almost invariably have to file in the future, or providing such on an amicus curiae to a higher court in such regard and seeks feedback for what type record of conduct RJM would have to demonstrate in order to procure such at some future juncture.

Providence willing, once RJM and Attorney A. Galic and any other attorney who would be interested in participating in the prosecution of this case can develop a compatibility plan, RJM will add the material excised from the complaint dismissed in June of 2010 (09 CH18934) to this complaint which will hopefully be by 4/1/12, and all claims arising subsequent to 1/1/09 regarding the arrest et al of 6/13/08, in a form which would be in no way lacking in legitimacy.

RJM has received various forms of medical treatment from the Cook County Hospital ("Stroger") since April of 1999, including the extraction of a tooth, several X-rays necessitated by injuries incurred from torts committed by others against RJM, an ear examination necessitated by the blowing out of RJM's eardrum by an Obama for Senate supporter in October of 2004, one injury to RJM's clavicle not caused by anyone else, and the application of a cast to RJM's left arm in September of 2004, and since RJM refuses to accept any type of benefit from any government entity without somehow ensuring that no arrearage from any benefit ever received would ever be left unamortized as RJM would never consent to any arrangement in which RJM once able-bodied and employed would not provide compensation for any benefit ever received from anyone or any entity, RJM herein enters this notification into this complaint at this juncture so that the matter of RJM's reception of utility from any government program can eventually be resolved in conjunction with the consideration of the tort damages RJM has incurred from not having yet procured legitimate adjudications of several torts in regard to which RJM found it necessary to procure medical treatment, as RJM finds unconscionable any arrangement in which able-bodied persons would not voluntarily compensate the public treasury for utility and/or benefits - weighed in the balance against detriment incurred from the activity of any given government entity - ever received, and equally unconscionable any arrangement in which the ungrateful and derelict would not be required to amortize any arrearages ever incurred in any type of arrangement in which any benefit would have been received from any government entity.

To see the disbursement schedule of the funds to be recovered in this case, go here (thirstforjustice.tripod.com/grifdisbsch.html) and to procure a vouncher for the redemption of such in regard whereto, go here (thirst.../grifdisvou.html).

Besides adding all of the D's originally included in 09 CH 18934, and jury instruction and rules of evidence challenges, and an "escort to amended complaint ", to the next component of this complaint, RJM also intends to add a "Borchard - declaratory judgment for the relief of peril and insecurity" for members of policing entities count to protect those who demonstrate the possession of the combination of intellectual capacity, acquired knowledge, adequately adjusted priorities and moral fiber necessary to exercise the authority of a given policing entity office from retaliation which absent the issuance of such by judgment might ever be incurred whereby for a given such type actor's refusing to enforce a morally unjustified order due to its morally unjustified character in a given instance and a challenge to the presumed constitutionality of the recently enacted NDAA.

Wherefore, RJM herein demands the sum of two million dollars and all equitable relief described herein from the various Defendants named herein, subject to an upward augmentation twenty years from today, should it be demonstrated that RJM incurred brain and/or eye damage form the Haldol injections which would not have been adequately compensated by the sum of two million dollars at this juncture in history, which sum can be dispersed in any of a number of forms to any of a number of entities involved in the corporal and/or spiritual works of mercy of the Roman Catholic Church.

Plaintiff demands trial by jury on all non-equitable counts and on all equitable counts contained herein.

I aver that all factual averments contained herein are true.

Robert J. More