Make your own free website on Tripod.com

thirstforjustice.tripod.com/grifilscr383dl102713.html


.Document List of 10/27/13 – Grif -383

1. D/L of 10/27/13 - Grif X

2. N of M/POS of 10/27/13 X

3. Motion of 10/27/13 X

4. Proposed Order of 10/27/13 X

5. Nihil Obstat Pet – Grif

6. SCOTUS Pet for Cert/Special Writ

7. Core Temporal Problem

8. RCDRC

9. Proposed ground rules

10. PWCS -

11. Declaration of Unconstitutionality

12. Complaints/Arrearages Claims Against ISMA Members

13. Apology to Innocents/Posterity

14. Lawsuit Against Robert J. More on Behalf of World's Innocents & Posterity

15. Documents to Federal Grand Jury of 10/27/13

16. Petition for Equitable Relief from Complaint in 11 CH 12339 re Audio-recording device

17. Record of time and resources consumed/expended re this project 10/27/13 – 18:00 - 19:00, 21:15-1:15 minus 30 minutes - emails

18. s&madjdl102713.html X

19. RJM “Magnum Opus Lawsuit” whose Purpose is to Accomplish objectives listed as goals of Proposed “Federal Bill …plagued” and procure adequate remuneration for over 14 years of unjustified injury incurrment from conditions of govt entities in Cook County, IL at all levels.

20. Petition to Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee of the 112th Congress to Conduct Hearings Regarding the Appt of a Special Prosecutor pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC 592(g) re Activity of Cook County, IL Courts (including federal and state Appellate Courts and IL Sup Ct conducting activity in Cook County, IL), Sheriff’s Dept, State’s Attorney’s Office, Clerk of the Court’s Office and for Passage of Bill Closing Cook County, IL and City of Chicago, Il Governments, or at Least Elimination of All Federal Funding Whereto According to a Formula which would leave no legitimate reliance interest un-accommodated.

21. Petition to Chairman of the Judiciary Committee of the IL General Assembly to Conduct Hearings Regarding the Appt of a Special Prosecutor pursuant to the provisions of 55 ILCS ….. re Activity of Cook County, IL Courts, and for Passage of Bill Closing Cook County, IL and City of Chicago, Il Governments, or at Least Elimination of All State Funding Whereto According to a Formula which would leave no legitimate reliance interest un-accommodated

22. Nomination for ISMA HOS of 3/11

23. Prevent Worst Case Scenario – which would be the incurrrment of culpability for any sin the incurrment of which would leave a given activity conductor without the possession of sanctifying grace which could occur via either the execution of an affirmative act or the making of a concession, the making of which could not be morally justified in a given instance/Foregone conclusion that the dispute at issue in a given instance will not be acceptably resolved except via either the application of a contra-predatory vigilante endeavor or a full scale military conquest, unless it might end up being resolved via the demonstration of the capacity to accomplish such in a given instance (eg. King John III, conceded his subjects claims at Runneyemede in 1215 A.D.) in which case nothing further would be necessary and correlatively justified, unless the villain party(ies) conceding would demonstrably be involved in some type of deception and subterfuge (see Michael Collins on the dangers of a truce, and the slaughter of the Cristeros who complied with the mis-informed Pius XI’s directive to lay down their arms) ultimately likely to prevent the procurement of the consideration ever sought by the part(y)(ies) endeavoring to rectify a given injustice, which foregone conclusion approach necessarily includes a commitment to accept a just resolution of any given dispute which could be procured without there being any resorting to any property confiscation and/or destruction and obviously, correlatively, without there being any use of force to defeat any endeavor which might ever be undertaken for the purpose(s) of the prevention of the successful use of contra-predatory property damage and/or confiscation as a method of procuring a legitimate resolution to a given dispute/Demonstration of Affirmative Refusal to consent to any deprivation of any legitimate claim to consideration/Evident Adequate Effort to Mitigate any and all Damages unjustifiably Incurred and Demonstrate Adequate Diligence, no relevant factor left unconsidered in bringing a given dispute to a just resolution all conducted in a disposition of what St. Teresa referenced as “religious indifference” .

24. Proposed Verified Statement(s) of IL S.C. Justices Burke, Freeman and Theis, Clerks Elizabeth and Christin re RJM's Endeavor to File IL S.C.R. 383 Motion on 10/22 or 10/23 of 2012

25. Conditional Amended Complaint of 2/14/12 in Case # 11 CH 12339 - [grifdlcomp112013.html]

26. Complaint Presently Pending in Case # 08 CH 9977

27. Complaint Presently Pending in Case # 11 M1 013782

28. Queen v Tooley -Excerpts,

29. Amici Petition in Dei v Tumara Foods

30. Petition of 10/27/13 to Federal Grand Jury for Indictments re Griffith

31. Petition of 10/27/13 to Federal Grand Jury for Indictments re Jack

32. Petition of 10/27/13 to Federal Grand Jury for Indictments re Lablanc

33. Proposed Stipulation of 10/27/13 re Present Conditions of Court Systems

34. Rule of Law/Reign of Terror

35. Letter to CCSD Mr. T. Dart

36. Order of Chief Judge of CCCC, IL re Use of Recording Devices

37. Petition of 10/28/13 to FGJ re Indictments of Those Preventing Access to the FGJ in Chi

38. Disbursement Schedule for 11 CH 12339

39. Disbursement Schedule for 11 M1 013782

40. Disbursement Schedule for 10 M1 015265

41. Disbursement Schedule for 08 CH 9977

42. Baby Picture

43. Demand to CCS Dart of 7/26/13

44. FOIA to CCSD of 7/26/13

45. Combined Petition to IL State Police Public Integrity Unit & Federal Grand Jury Demanding Investigation into What Happened to the Documents Which Constituted the First Component of RJM's S.C.R. 383 Motion in re Case # 11 CH 12339 Which RJM Transmitted to this Court in October of 2012




Attempt was made to submit documents adjacent to which there is an "X" to the IL S.C. on or before 11/1/13 via e-filing


thirstforjustice.tripod.com/grifnomotscr383.html



IN THE SUPREME COURT OF the State of ILLINOIS

Robert More (“RJM”), Estate of RJM, Campaign to Make the World Safe for Innocence Once Again, St. Michael the Archangel, MAA Fund Plaintiff/Movant

v

Judge L. Martin


re: More, et al.,


v Case # 11 CH 12339

Grif et al, in the Circuit Court of Cook County, IL,


Robert J. More, et al

v

Judge Sydney Jones

re: More, et al

v Case # 11 M1 -013782

Jack et al. in the Circuit Court of Cook County, IL

Robert J. More

v
Judge in Room 2102 of the R. Daley Center

re More

v Case # 08 CH 9977

LaBlanc et al in the Circuit Court of Cook County, IL

Robert J. More et al

v

Judge Sydney Jones

re More et al

v in the Circuit Court of Cook County, IL Case #10 M1-015265

Zeeh et al


Notice of Filing


PLEASE TAKE Notice- that on 11/1/13, the undersigned attempted to file via efiling the accompanying:

Plaintiff RJM’s Third Component of 10/27/13 of Ill S. C. R. 383 Motion of 10/23/12...", this notice and the Proposed Order of 10/27/13, and an IL SCR 298 petition in re whereto, via the online filing whereof to the Clerk of the Supreme Court of the State of IL, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby served upon you.

Robert J. More

P.O. Box 6926

Chicago, IL, 60680, anselm45@gmail.com, 863 688-9880 – lv msg

PROOF OF SERVICE

I, Robert J. More a non-attorney, under verification, state that I served the foregoing:

Plaintiff RJM’s Third Component of 10/27/13 of Verified Ill S. C. R. 383 Motion of 10/22/12 ....", this notice and the "Proposed Order of 10/27/13"

On:

Office of the Atty General of the State of IL

Civil Division

150 W. Randolph St.

Chicago, IL 60602, or ggriffin@attygen.il.state.gov or email pursuant to an agreement made between Mr. G. Griffith of the Office of the Atty Genrl and RJM re the burden of hand delivery service in re matters involving the Atty Gen of IL

And

Asst. Cook County State's Attorney Paul Groah at: pgroah@cookcounty.gov or whatever constitutes the email address via which RJM has contacted him within the past 30 days, via email,

and

Judge L. Martin – Room 2008

R. Daley Center, 50 W. Washington St. Chicago IL 60601 on or before 11/1/13, via hand delivery of CD containing documents to room 2600 of the R. Daley Center, and

Nick Albukerk via email and

Judge D. Atkins,50 W. Washington St. Chicago IL 60601 on or before 11/1/13, via hand delivery of CD containing documents to room 2102 of the R. Daley Center

and

Attorney Edward Leahy for Chas LaBlanc via email and

Judge S. Jones, 50 W. Washington St. Chicago IL 60601 on or before 11/1/13, via hand delivery of CD containing documents to room 1306 of the R. Daley Center

and

Asst. Cook County State's Attorney R. Shippee via mailing a CD containing documents to the Office of the CCSA, at Suite 500, .50 W. Washington St. Chicago IL 60601 on or before 11/2/13,

Under penalties provided by law pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/1-109, I certify that the statements set forth herein are true and correct and that a challenge to the constitutionality of Supreme Court Rule 12(b)(2) and (5), on the face whereof and as applied in regard to the service this conveyance concerns is included in the motion this document concerns, thus rendering the Clerk incapable of rejecting this proof of service ("POS") without any adjudication of the constitutionality issue referenced herein being addressed by the Court, even if such addressing would have to result in a multi-furcation of the adjudication of the motion this POS concerns. Robert J. More





IN THE SUPREME COURT OF the State of ILLINOIS

Robert More (“RJM”), Estate of RJM, Campaign to Make the World Safe for Innocence Once Again, St. Michael the Archangel, MAA Fund Plaintiff/Movant

v

Judge L. Martin


re: More


v Case # 11 CH 12339

Grif et al in the Circuit Court of Cook County, IL

Robert J. More, et al

v

Judge Sydney Jones

re: More, et al

v Case # 11 M1 -013782

Jack et al. in the Circuit Court of Cook County, IL

Robert J. More

v
Judge in Room 2102 of the R. Daley Center

re More

v Case # 08 CH 9977

LaBlanc et al in the Circuit Court of Cook County, IL

Robert J. More et al

v

Judge Sydney Jones

re More et al

v in the Circuit Court of Cook County, IL Case #10 M1-015265

Zeeh et al


[Proceeding according to the formula explicated in St. Alphonsus'es Preparation for Death}



Verified Third Component of 10/27/13 of IL Supreme Court Rule 383 Motion, of less than 25, not less than 40 word, sentence, paragraphs, to be Superseded Weekly, if Necessary, (still to be entirely proof-read) as Providence would permit, Filed Upon the L Gideon (Gideon v Wainwright (_U.S._)) Procedural Compliance Hardship Waiver Standard, in which RJM Challenges the Constitutionality of the Deliberative Process/Special Witness Doctrine, and the Forum Provisions of the IL Constitution as Being Incompatible with the "Right to Petition", "Fourteenth Amendment Due Process of Law" and "Substantive Due Process of Law" Provisions of the Constitution of the u.s. of A. and other provisions whereof to be explicated when circumstances permit and challenges the presumption of fitness to hold and exercise the Authority of an IL Supreme Court Judicial Office of Each and All of the Present IL Supreme Court Justices other than Justice Thomas, Both in Quo Warranto, and Otherwise, and to Demand that this Court Must Immediately Abolish the Circuit Court of Cook County, IL and the IL Appellate Court First District, or at least suspend the activity whereof, according to a formula according to which no legitimate reliance interest would be left un-accommodated in the Execution of such Type Order, and for other relief, descriptions of which is included in the order which accompanies this motion.

Now comes RJM to respectfully move this Court to grant the relief referenced in the title to this motion and in the Proposed Order which accompanies it, and in explanation and support whereof, RJM avers and explains as follows:

1. The entirety of the contents of the “Preliminary Component of 10/22/12 of …Motion of 10/22/22….” and the "Additions of 10/27/12" which were included alongwherewith, which RJM mailed to this Court on 10/23/12, and of the Motions filed on 5/29/13 in regard to Cicruit Court of Cook County, IL ("CCCC") Case # 11 M1 013782 and on or about 6/27/13 in regard to Case # 11 CH 12339 in this Court are incorporated herein by referenced as if fully set forth herein.

2. RJM recently received a letter from the Clerk of the IL Supreme Court ("ISC") ("Clerk") (respectively), dated 9/3/13, possibly in response to the innumerable phone calls made to such office in regard to the matters the documents referenced in entry #"1" herein concerns by RJM which does not provide answers to the many questions RJM still has not gotten answered in regard to what transpired in regard to the documents filed by RJM with

this Court in October of 2012.

3. RJM is in the process of producing a document to be presented to the IL State Police "Public Integrity" Unit and the Federal Grand Jury in order to get an investigation into such matters conducted, as the non-processing of a document mailed to this Court with adequate postage and envelope formatting, which has not been returned to the return address included upon such envelope, is no unimportant issue to understate the case.

4. Relative to such matter, RJM has included "Proposed Verified Statements" for the three Cook County, ISC Justices and the Clerks working for the Clerk of the ISC in Cook County as of October of 2012 in the collection of documents submitted to this Court at this juncture.

5. Having read the arguments which RJM has found which are supposed to demonstrate the justification for the concealment from the public of (a)ny "judicial deliberating processes" going back in SCOTUS jurisprudence to Fayerweather v Rich (_U.S._) (1904), RJM remains entirely unconvinced that any evidence procurable regarding such processes could ever be legitimately kept from the public and thus herein renews his constitutional challenge to such evidentiary privilege beyond that included in prior components of the motion this document concerns, citing among other concerns that of the Branzburg v Hayes (_U.S._) Court that the "public is entitled to everyman's evidence, which the invocation of such privilege seems to entirely unjustifiably negate, in conspicuous distinction from say the priest-penitent, or husband-wife privileges, the protection of which RJM concedes is of greater importance than the cost of the accommodation of such would ever be.

6. The French Priest who went to Devil's Island for all of the years he was stuck there rather than exculpate himself from being sentenced to such hell hole, by revealing the secret he learned re the murder of his housekeeper in the confessional is more than enough, all by itself for RJM to concede the fact that some interests are more important in the Divine Scheme of things than the public being deprived of any given person's evidence in regard to any given matter.

7. If that priest was willing to accept the consequences to himself of relying upon such privilege, far be it for RJM to challenge its priority in importance in any instance in which the consequences would not be as costly to anyone invoking it as they were to such Priest in the instance referenced herein.

8. A bare assertion, not a component of any syllogism and not including any evidence in support whereof, to consider against the mountains of evidence in regard to which RJM is cognizant which are evidently incompatible with, and easily take supereminence over, the reasons presented as justification for the invocation of such privilege by this Court in the matter involving Justice Thomas that such privilege must be maintained "not for the benefit of the Judges but for that of the people" (whatever the exact wording of the postulation used in such regard was), cannot legitimately, RJM is convinced, provide any justification for the use of the consideration such privilege provides - keeping the contents of judicial deliberations from the members of the public effected by the decisions and judgments which would ever result from any such type use whereof.

9. At this juncture, RJM respectfully demands that this Court consider the entirety of the documents which accompany this document and formally adjudicate the entirety of the Standard and Method of Adjudication ("S&MA") demands which is included wherein.

10. RJM understands that it would bear mentioning here for reasons which would be fully explicated upon RJM's receiving a demand for such explication but which will not be provided herein, that the first three priorities according to which this document has been composed and filed and served are a.) to prevent the incurrment of culpability for any sin beyond whatever would constitute RJM's aggregate sinful culpability at the juncture at which the composition of this document was commenced in regard to any of the matters this document concerns and in general, and b.) to maintain all security protocols applicable to the type of project this document concerns, and c.) to provide, in a scenario in which any criminal and/or contempt of court process would have been instituted against RJM in the State of IL, CCA 7 Judge D. Manion a basis upon which to grant RJM habeas corpus relief pursuant to the provisons of 28 USC 2241, the granting of which would completely eliminate any process ordered to the confiscation of RJM's person from possessing any legal pretext, without the SCOTUS'es being capable of ever reversing any such type judgment without in so doing having to completely disregard the principle that "no man can be the judge of his own case" (Dr. Bonham's Case, 1621) in that one of the issues before Judge Manion in any scenario in which process would have been issued in response to RJM's having participated in the use of a contra-predatory vigilante remedy would be that there would have been no remedy available through any government process for any remedying of any given unjustifiably caused injury in regard to the remedying of which RJM would ever have participated in any CPVR, including application to the SCOTUS in any given instance in which RJM would have petitioned it for relief, and that thus the SCOTUS could never reverse any granting of habeas relief which reversal whereof would necessarily require it to adjudicate whether its adjudication of any petition to it in regard to activity which would have elicited the issuance of process in regard to which any petition for habeas delivered to Judge Manion would have been adequate in the first place.

11. Given all of the presumptions that are supposed to be present in the law, RJM is convinced that the present wording of 28 USC 2241 would most definitely prevent the SCOTUS from ever legitmately reversing any granting of habeas relief of the sort referenced herein supra.

12. Since the present composition of the SCOTUS has so frequently demonstrated the abscence of any concern for moral legitimacy in the activity conducted by it (as distinct from the concern to maintain appearances of non-net injuriousness of its activity to the component of the population which does not lack the capacity to drop all of the government buildings and vehicles, and residences of government officials in this Country not controlled by Contra-genocidists and/or in which no Contra-genocidist and/or innocent children would ever be found to be abiding into their respective footprints, without having gotten any and all such type profile individuals out of harm's way before having commenced any given component of property destruction); the further issue which ought evidently be addressed herein at this juncture, would be that it might well be the case that any attempt by the SCOTUS to reverse any such type issuance of habeas relief would constitute the type of Lexington Bridge, 4/18/1775, development, in which the Contra-genocide component of the American population would finally collectively decide that the only morally viable alternative at such juncture would be to defend habeas and the entire rule of law of which it is such an indispenable component with all of the force that could be legitimately brought to bear to eliminate the enslavement and extermination arrangement in which this Country is found to be presently shackled as a component part of what would incrementally become a full scale insurrection ordered to the rescuing of the Non-counterfiet Version of the Rule of Law before it is forever lost in this world to the living hell on earth New World Order of Total Enslavement, which the Committee of 300 is now so close to having gotten consumately installed in Amerika and the world.

13. It is RJM's informed understanding that this Court having, in August of 2013, suspended Attorney Lanre Amu's law license summarily pending a plenary adjudication of the cause brought against him by the ARDC, for the sake of compatibility, ought grant all of the consideration referenced in the "Proposed Order of 10/27/13 which accompanies this document and all of that referenced in the S&M of Adjudication document which accompanies it which would not be incompatible with any of the consideration referenced herein, summarily - according to the reasoning according to which Mr. Amu's law license was suspended, or in the name of compatibility maintenance (sometimes referenced as consistency) reinstates Mr. Amu's law license at this juncture, so that inter alia, he is no longer incapable of providing RJM legal advice and/or representing RJM in any given case, without risking incurring any more detriment than he has already incurred from the ARDC's campaign to silence him in regard to the activity conducted by him for the purpose(s) of exposing and effectively defeating the effects of the types of arrogations, usurpations, encroachments, abuses, malefactions, predations, defraudments of legitimate reliance interests and goverment violence as such term is defined in the Summa Theologica's "Treatise on Law" and criminality in general, which have necessitated RJM's filing of this motion in the first place.

14. RJM stipulates that RJM will agree to hold Justice R. Thomas harmless in tort for any activity conducted by him in regard to the matters this document concerns at least until any subsequent component of this document would have been filed, in recognition that in In re McDunn (_Ill.3d_) there was no evident dereliction in regard to which RJM is cognizant of his judicial duty to help protect the innocents from the abomination of homosexual abduction via court process which that case concerned but that RJM understands that RJM cannot legitimately make any such concession to any other representative(s) of this Court including members of the Clerk of this Court's Office.

15. Such stipulation has been included herein to demonstrate the commitment included in the priority structure which regulates any and all activity conducted by RJM to continue to subjugate himself to any and every legitimate exercise of governmental authority and the enormous gratitude which is present in RJM's soul for the exercises of government authority in regard to which RJM is cognizant in instances such as various adjudications of former Fed.. Judge J. Alesia in which re ruled against Goliaths instead of caving in to any illegitimate demand wherefrom and the proclamations of former Lee County, FL Sheriff J. McDougall's to "any and all concerned" that he and his deputies would respond to any attempted gun confiscation, from whatever source proximately emanating, with whatever force could be marshalled to prevent the implementation whereof in any given instance, and the similar and/or related expressions and/or insinuations of Sheriff's Denny Peyman, David Clarke and other members of the CSPOA.

16. Amongst the cluster of issues this document concerns, that one which has reached front and center at this moment is articulated as follows: "Whether an arrangement ought be kept in place in which an(y) given government official ought possess a prerogative to participate in activity in any given instance in which he or she would ever conduct activity under the auspices of exercising the authority of a given goverment office which would demonstrably lack moral "legitimacy"/constitute a defraudment of (a) "legitimate" reliance interest(s) with impunity"; the addressing of which issue, requires, of course, a definition of the term "legitimacy" before any assessment of the issue in regard to which such definition must be procured could be adequately conducted.

17. As this document was being constructed today, the building in which it was being constructed had to be evacuated attributable to the encountering by someone of a "suspicious package" upon the property upon which such building is situated. This development, along with the problems incurred from the break-in and lock changing perpetrated at the residence in which RJM has been sleeping for most nights over the past three years, by individuals claiming to have been sent by the bank endeavoring to foreclose upon such property on 10/30/13 evidently necessitates RJM's truncating this document here, before he encounters any more interruptions to the prosecution of the agenda of which the completion of such document is a component part which would take him even further off of the time table he had set for the prosecution of the matters this document concerns than he had been before such interruptions, intending to continue its prosecution upon extricating himself from the pitfall in which he now finds himself postured, in regard to his sleeping and possession maintenance bases.

18. If the provision of any of the consideration sought in this motion, including any of that in regard to which any entry has been included in the "Proposed Order of 10/27/13" which accompanies it would require this Court to invade the province of any other government entity, RJM would respectfully demand that any such consideration not be provided, but that any concern in such regard would be addressed to RJM so that RJM can consider the appropriate means to "petition the government" according to constitutionally legitimate methods to eliminate the dreadful detriment this document concerns.

19. RJM has petitioned the legislature in such regard in the past and is forwarding a copy of this document to various legislators as well.

20. As can be ascertained from the "notes and raw material for next component of this motion of 11/27/13" there is much which RJM intends to include in the entirety of the Rule 383 motion of which this component part is a component part, but RJM can only get what is included herein presented today, and all else will have to be filed in future submissions to this Court, filed in seriatum.

21. Recent activity conducted by Judge S. Jones III in regard to 11 M1 013782, has been so blatantly offensive and defrauding of legitimate reliance interests, not to mention unconstitutional, that considered in common with the other adjudicative activity this document concerns as RJM understands the character of such matter(s), that RJM has become convinced that it is not even justified for RJM to participate in any proceedings in regard to any of the cases referenced herein unless and until the relief referenced in the PO of 10/27/13 would have been granted as RJM has not yet succeeded in procuring either any permanent disability insurance, nor any life insurance, inspite of time consuming and laborious endeavors undertaken in this regard, and Sheriff Dart has not responded at all to any of the several demands, including a FOIA, RJM has made to him in regard to the "litigant security crisis in CCCC, IL Courts" over the past several months.

22. RJM remains entirely convinced that any arrangement in which anyone is subjected to the consequences of any adjudicative activity which is not conducted according to a formula as protective of legitimate reliance interests for the purpose of the making of "compatibility determinations" as was that present in Chapter 13 of the Book of Daniel - which is present in any Catholic Bible, the particulars of which and a treatment whereof, RJM intends to provide in the next component of this document, is entirely unacceptable and is substantially more detrimental to the prospects for the favorable eternal disposition(s) of soul of all effected whereby than any arrangement which could legitimately be classified as "total anarchy" could ever be, and that the conditions of the Courts in Cook County, IL at this juncture most definitely leave them in the "any arrangement" category referenced herein.

Under penalty of perjury pursuant to the provisions of 735 ILCS 5/1-109, I aver to the veracity of all factual averments included in this document and as to any such averments posited upon information and belief, that I verily understand such to be true.


Wherefore, RJM herein moves this Court to provide the relief referenced in the title to this motion and/or in the Proposed Order of 10/27/13 which accompanies it.


Continuing to rely upon a diet of the bread of sorrow and the water of affliction, Pope Paul IV prescribed for penitents in the Bull Cum Ex Apostolatus Officio (1559) as an indispensable component of the remedy for any and all evils ever encountered in the theatre of earthly existence,

Robert J. More

Afflicted by the uneliminable infirmity of the fallen human conditiion, plodding on unrelentingly in the pursuit of cleansing from all unrighteousness (1 Jn. 1:8), but hopefully not derelict beyond the threshold referenced in Matt. 25:26, et seq. Neighbor, on behalf of the 37 million not entirely morally bankrupt citizens of the former u.s. of A. (the final obstacle to the Committee of 300's,long sought NWO - "component of the final obstacle", "CFO", for short) ("NMB"'s) who do not lack the capacity to at the very least force the Committee of 300 to reduce this country to a smoking graveyard in order to complete their demonically designed and instigated N.W.O Agenda, but obviously, not by any express designation in re whereto, - Lesser Deputy Guardian of the Catholic Cause Referenced in the Papal Encyclical, Ad Sacerdoti Catholici (1935) and Protector of the Haven in the Heartless World -An activity conductor who remains haunted by the specter of the Schiavo atrocity (what RJM understands to constitute the "NWO's Showcase Atrocity") and all of the other atrocities which it exemplifies and epitomizes (eg. most recently 9/11/01, the Barksdale 9 Assassinations, and "Hurricane Katrina" if it can be so labeled, justifiably, if it actually was rather a controlled demolition of a Lake Ponchtarain Levy), as an able-bodied adult who had had over 37 years from the date of his 7th B-day to prepare for that atrocity, but who stood around the "deathspice" in March of 2005, looking for someone to order the charge - an order which was never issued - attributable to the unlynched lynch pin of Robert Schindler's having been left as the de facto decision maker in regard to the restrictions on resistance to such atrocity kept in place, not conceived by a parent in whom there (was) (is) any Jewish blood – therefore, not one of the “chosen people”, nor willing to leave any of the "lesser brethren" who reject the abominations of the Talmud exposed to hostility incompatible with any given individual's own personal record of activity, as no one chooses the religion of his or her parents, not willing to participate in the shedding of innocent blood, w/o just cause (nor for that matter to risk incurring culpability for any sin of any type at all) - therefore not one of the goy slavemasters, nor one of the rest of the 486 million goy slaves to be retained, but rather one of the “to be exterminateds” determined to enter into eternity endeavoring to make restitution to the innocents and posterity for RJM’s share of the blame for the Talmudic-barbaric horror they have inherited (where would a list of the component horrors whereof even begin? – the first dozen, plus that came into RJM's mind in considering the subject are: deprivation of adequately safe water – “fluoride”, air –chemtrails, Fukishima, food – GMO’s, Codex Alimentarius, etc., , parents – depleted uranium, protection from criminal regulation of every aspect of existence re the global warming pretext/subterfuge, the U.S. Const.’s Art. I, Sect. 8, Cl. 5, protection of the purchasing power of the currency, the Art. I Sect 2, Cl. 3, Sect. 8 Cl. 1, & Sect. 9 Cl. 4 protection from direct un-apportioned taxes, the protections of 4thAmendment designed to keep Big Brother the Beast at arm’s length, protection from orchestrated pandemics and the vaccinations produced purportedly to counter them, false flag terror acts, assassinations of individuals who are relatives &/or whose knowledge &/or priorities have been found to be incompatible with the NWO agenda, radiation exposure as a new condition of air travel, the protections of the 5th Amendment Rights to an Independent Grand Jury and Jury Nullification Instructions, etc., etc., etc., and the protection of 2nd Amendment Right to ensure the accommodation of all legitimate reliance interests via the maintenance of commensurate strike capacity between the Country’s citizens and its government, the protection of the First Amend Free Exercise and Prevention of Establishment of Religion Clauses, and whatever protection would have been available from the lifework of any potential geniuses and/or conduits of apostolic graces, not to mention those who had they been spared the blades of Rahm Emmanuel & Barry Soetoro types of specimens, would have turned out to be at least “not entirely derelict neighbors”, who have been or will be, murdered in or shortly after having departed from, the wombs of their mothers), not to mention that an estimated 600 - 1000 trillion dollars that such childen ought to have inherited has been appropriated via the appropriation, counterfeiting and extortion of the Committee of 300 to the children of the slavekeeper class - since such restitution-making constitutes the burden RJM understands himself to be bound to continue to bear pursuant to the contents of Matt. 11:30, as such have been adequately and infallibly explicated via the authority instituted in Matt. 16:18). (Time and space have not permitted enumerations of the defraudments of the protection of the Commerce, General Health and Welfare, Right to have the Laws Faithfully Executed, Supremacy, Right to a Republican Form of Government, Equal Protection, War Powers, Takings, Originization, Natural Born Citizen, Clauses, nor the 9th and 10th Amendments, and other guarantees of consideration instituted into the compact between the government and its citizens which all are obliged to protect which is supposed to be providing a structure within whose requirements and restrictions all government activity is supposed to be kept conducted, herein, but FTR, the author of the email in re which this conveyance is contained remains committed to fight against the arrogations, encroachments, usurpations, and depradations with which this Country's burden-bearers have become so painfully familiar, through his dying breath. [Add - Right to evidence of atrocities perpetrated by C of 300 controlled govt kept out of purview via invocation of law enforcement/national security privilege(s)]]



-thirstforjustice.tripod.com/sig102713.html - still under construction, last updated on ....



IN THE SUPREME COURT OF the State of ILLINOIS

Robert More (“RJM”), Estate of RJM, Campaign to Make the World Safe for Innocence Once Again, St. Michael the Archangel, MAA Fund Plaintiff/Movant

v

Judge L. Martin

re: More


v Case # 11 CH 12339

Grif et al in the Circuit Court of Cook County, IL

Robert J. More, et al

v

Judge Sydney Jones

re: More, et al

v Case # 11 M1 -013782

Jack et al. in the Circuit Court of Cook County, IL

Robert J. More

v
Judge in Room 2102 of the R. Daley Center

re More

v Case # 08 CH 9977

LaBlanc et al in the Circuit Court of Cook County, IL

Robert J. More et al

v

Judge Sydney Jones

re More et al

v in the Circuit Court of Cook County, IL Case #10 M1-015265

Zeeh et al

In re Cook County Sheriff T. Dart (a Defendant in 11 CH 12339, who has received a CD containing all of the documents this Court has received in re this Order, beyond delivering the CCSA wherewith in an endeavor to compensate for the comparative enormity of the malice by which the ranks of the Office of the CCSA is so thoroughly plagued and that of the CCSA herself, without having to herein address the malice Dart himself so conspicuously personifies)


Proposed ORDER of 10/27/13

This cause coming to be heard on the third component of the IL SCR 383 Motion of 10/27/13 filed by Robert J. More (“RJM”) in regard to each of the cases referenced in the caption to this document in the Circuit Court of Cook County, IL, adequate notice having been served, & the Court having been presumably adequately advised in the premises:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the relief sought in the accompanying motion by RJ More is granted/denied.


1. The activity of the Circuit Court of Cook County, IL and the IL Appellate Court First District is herein immediately suspended, without RJM's having to have provided notice of his seeking such suspension according to the principles operative to the filing of petitions for the issuance of temporary restraining orders, ________________________, or:

the criminal code of the State of IL is herein declared to be un-constitutional as absent the issuance of this order, the contents whereof might ever have been applied to any and all activity conducted by RJM and/or in which RJM would ever participate, by whomsoever orchestrated, for the purpose of remedying the unjustifialby caused injuries which any of the cases referenced in the caption to this document concerns ("these cases") or:

All proceedings in these cases in the Circuit Court of Cook County, IL are herein stayed for 60 days so that a.) records of the audiences in regard to which Petitioner (“RJM”) complains can be presented to this Court for its consideration, b.) an attorney can be appointed to present further components of this SCR 383 Motion to this Court, and c.) RJM can present any and all supporting material he understands that he would have to present to this Court in order to adequately present the claims for consideration which he understands that he is supposed to be presenting hereto at this juncture, to this Court.

2. Permission is herein granted to RJM to bring and use an audio recording device in any proceedings ever conducted in any and all of these cases in the future according to the terms included in the “Petition for Equitable Relief” included in the Amended Complaint pending in 11 CH 12339 (Doc. # 10 in the “D/L of 10/27/13).<<<<<<

3. In light of the recent staying of the injunction instituted against the NDAA by the CCA 2, RJM is herein provided assurance and correlatively, members of any and all policing entities conducting activity in IL are provided notice, that RJM may wear whatever body armor, protection from tasers and/or directed energy weaponry of whatever sort, asphyxiation, blinding and/or hearing destruction mechanisms, RJM would ever consider it necessary to wear in any Court building and/or courtroom in Cook County, IL and/or upon any other property in existence w/n the State of IL except private property upon which RJM would not possess any legitimate claim to ever be present.

5. It is herein ordered that the members of the Cook County Sheriff’s Department shall not be permitted to have any weapons on their persons while on duty at the R. Daley Center in Chicago, IL, but may continue to bear weapons when coming to or leaving their employment, except for one member whereof in each of the plazas on the first floor whereof in all hours in which any Courts might be in session_______________________, or:

In light of the same considerations referenced in “#3” herein supra, the same rules apply to RJM’s bearing the entirety of the weaponry which would constitute standard issue for a NAVY Seal, Army Ranger, and/or any member of any state or local policing entity ___________________.

6. The threshold for direct criminal contempt in the Courts of the State of IL (“IL”) is not one iota different at this juncture in history than it was the day upon which the SCOTUS’es opinion in “In re Oliver, (333 U.S. …) was issued and no one shall be held in direct criminal contempt in IL unless and except: _______________________________, ___________________________, ___________________________ (add pages if necessary)


7. The stay upon discovery issued in the trial court in case 3 11 CH 12339 is herein lifted.

8. RJM is excused from the ordinary requirement to include copies of all documents referenced in any motion filed in this Court, and can instead satisfy any and all "informing of the Court and adversaries re any given matter" requirements via the posting of any and all documents referenced in any petition filed in this court in a website provided adequate references would be provided to any documents posted in such manner in any petition ever filed in this Court.

9. RJM may file any and all documents which he would ever endeavor to file in the petition this order concerns via the use of the verification statute codified in 735 ILCS 5/1-109 on whatever proof of service would accompany any filing and without any notarization thereupon________________________.

10. RJM may file any and all documents which he would ever endeavor to file in any petition which he might ever file in this Court via the use of the verification statute codified in 735 ILCS 5/1-109 on whatever proof of service would accompany any such type filing and without any notarization included thereupon________________________.

or

RJM must have any and all documents ever filed in this case accompanied by a notarized proof of service and a briefing schedule in regard to this matter is herein established as follows, so that RJM can adequately present and preserve a constitutional challenge to the contents of this order in regard to the notarization issue __________________________

or

RJM must have any and all documents ever filed in this case accompanied by a notarized proof of service and RJM can explain his concerns in this regard to this Court according to the following timetable ____________________________, ______________________________, ___________________________, ___________________, but RJM must file a separate lawsuit seeking a declaratory judgment in regard to the use of the verification for the proof of service issue in regard to documents filed in this Court__________________

This Court (will) (will not) provide findings of facts and conclusions of law regarding the notarization issue if it will not provide RJM a dispensation from the most onerous notary requirement ______________

11. (see #8 included herein supra) RJM may omit the inclusion as exhibits to future components of this motion which might need to be filed of any document referenced in whatever he would submit to this Court provided he provides links to internet postings which adequately function at the time of the filing of a given document

____________.

12. It is the position of the members of this Court that no claim to any consideration has been waived, forfeited, nor relinquished attributable to the non-presentation whereof in the documents presented to this court along with this proposed order __________________.

13. The activity threshold at which direct (summary) criminal contempt may be asserted and any penalty imposed in re whereto, imposed, in regard to adjudicative activity conducted in the Courts of the State of IL., is not one iota less protective of the legitimate reliance interests which court adjudications and government activity in general (are) (is) supposed to protect (Dec. of Ind. "it is to secure these interests that governments are established among men") than is that promulgated by the SCOTUS in "In re Oliver," (_U.S._), ________________________, or this Court finds that the instrument of direct criminal contempt in State of IL Courts has been so egregiously abused that the use of such instrument is herein entirely suspended, pending further consideration of this matter by this Court ____________________.

14. This Court acknowledges that RJM possesses a constitutionally protected natural law right protected by the Free Exercise of Religion Clause of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution to explicitly assert that it his informed understanding that inter alia, there is not any basis upon which, howsoever highly a given government official ought to be held in esteem for his or her record of activity, that anyone could ever legitimately incur any detriment for refusing to use the adjective "Honorable" in referencing any official of a nation which, inter alia, denies the preborn the protection of the criminal law, denies innocent children protection from adoption by homosexuals, whose government facilitated the torture and murder of Teresa Schiavo, and which now wages unjust wars of aggression upon, inter alia, pretexts of terrorist attacks which are actually perpetrated by its own operatives conducting activity under the control of the Committee of 300, and the possession of weapons of mass destruction, and whose present claimant to the Office of "Slavemaster/Assassin/Slitter of the Throats of the Warmblooded/Defrauder of Legitimate Reliance Interests in General /(epithet deleted so that Judge Jones would not be tempted to use the "Anti-semitic" pretext to mulct me for any further astronomical extraction of funds which I do not possess at gunpoint) in Chief" cannot prove his eligibility for the holding of the office he holds but does claim an executive prerogative to assassinate and/or otherwise, execute American Citizens with no process of law of any type, from a list that can be kept concealed in perpetuity from all Americans not involved in any given execution __________________________.

15. The Orders issued by Judge S. Jones in Case # 11 M1 013782, a.) requiring RJM to be escorted any time that he is in the Daley Center Courthouse, and b.) i.)to be subjected to any burden regarding either the contents of any documents ever filed in any case by him or ii.) to effect service whereof in any given instance upon the Office of the Cook County State's Attorney ("CCSA") by any means other than those listed as acceptable alternatives in the Supreme Court Rule that pertains to service of documents in a civil case in IL Courts are herein summarily suspended in order, inter alia, to enable RJM to mitigate damages adequately and c.) the bar upon RJM's filing of any new case is also likewise summarily suspended, for inter alia, the same reason and also so that no one would be induced to perpetrate any tort upon RJM out of an expectation of impunity of the type an unjustified filing restriction might serve to elicit___________________.

16. This Court herein provides confirmation that it takes notice of the the substantial handicap imposed upon RJM by the Orders entered in Case # 11 M1 013782 by Judge S. Jones which have resulted in RJM's not being capable of accessing the Clerk's electronic case dockets for any of the cases this document concerns, which in turn has resulted in his being incapable of explicating the factual predicates which constitute the basis upon which he has concluded that the continued Operation of the CCCC, IL and the IL App. Ct. First District constitute an "unjustifiably dangerous condition" to all of the interests that constitute the basis upon which as the DOI opines, "governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, ______________________________, and the similar handicap imposed upon RJM by the IL App. Ct. First District likewise preventing RJM from accessing the Clerk's files for that Court _______________________.

17. This Court herein confirms that it has been informed that it is RJM's understanding that the arrangement presently prevailing in the CCCC, IL and IL App. Ct. First District, in which what is, except in the case of the few adjudications ever adjudicated by any of the ever dwinding number of James Alesia profile judges, a skull and cross bones arrangement disguised behind the facade of the ubiquitous yellow smiling face (see Dr. Ed Vieira's article on this type matter) - in other words that the ordinary and customary activity of these courts in matters involving parties of substantial difference in terms of the capacity to summons the collective force of the body politic against one's adversary (which is what every legal dispute is ultimately about - which party in a given dispute will succeed in procuring a facially valid order to effect the institution of such type measure against whom, in any instance in which any given litigant will decide that (s)he is not willing to accept the issuance of any facially valid order ever issued) in which it is not the accommodation of any and all legitimate reliance interests ("LRI")ever implicated in any given dispute but the defraudment whereof, cloaked in a superficial civility, which constitutes the function of the ordinary and customary adjudicative activity conducted wherein, and that whatever quantum of utility to LRI results wherefrom pales in comparison to the detriment resulting wherefrom and that the SCOTUS, upon receiving complaints about such system(s) and petitions to correct the problem(s) this entry concerns will demand an explication of the endeavors utilized to procure such consideration from this Court according to the principle that it is this Court that is vested with the responsibility for the supervision of the activity of IL Courts and that it will not address issues of a federal constitutional character except in instances in which no remedy would be available except via its addressing of such type issues.

18. The practice of the involuntary administration of psychotropic drugs in Cook County, IL is herein summarily discontinued, inter alia, so that the need to eliminate such ultra-hazardous and destructive practice via means other than the issuance of this order would no longer be present, which termination renders any contra-predatory vigilante remedy ordered to such termination in any given instance and/or in general, unnecessary and correlatively, unjustified.

19. Any judge found to have directed a summary criminal contempt charge against anyone attributable to any alleged cause more expansive in scope than the very limited scope referenced in In re Oliver (_U.S._) will be subjected to the punishment meted out to the victim of such type abuse of the SCC instrument.

20. The resisting arrest statute in the State of IL is herein summarily declared to be unconstitutional as such might ever have been applied to any endeavor to take RJM into custody on any property used as any type of adjudication facility in IL against his expressed protest in regard to any such any type endeavor which ever might have been instituted absent the issuance of this order.

21. The home addresses of any and all government officials participating in any manner in any adjudication involving RJM shall be provided to RJM upon his positing any given demand wherefore, for the purpose of contributing to the making of progress in the bringing of the conditions in which adjudications involving RJM would ever be adjudicated back to conditions similar to what prevailed in 1790 in England as the SCOTUS has explained that the common law is the "law of England at the time of the passage of the bill of rights" (Thompson v Utah (_U.S._)), in the sense that the problems of a lack of person to person accountability attributable in part to what authors such as Van Patten and Willard in proposing the establishment of the tort of "Malicious Defense of a Civil Suit" have referenced as the mobility and metropolitan anonymity of modern society might be effectively reduced via the inbedding of the recollection in the minds of any and all concerned wherewith in any given instance that any system in which malefactions can be perpetrated with impunity and the victims whereof left w/o forms of recourse which Providence has provided to deter such, such as salutory "home visits", is no form of justice at all but a form of depersonalized, dehumanized enslavement and that until a basic sense of shame and decency can be restored to the social order in the u.s. of A., the prospect of retribution cannot be justifiably left unutilized as a deterring disencentive to predatory activity.

22. In a scenario in which the CCCC, IL would not be immediately closed according to a formula which would not include any deprivation of any given legitimate reliance interest, in order, inter alia, to eliminate the pretext that the type of judges by which Cook County, IL is so lamentably plagued are so strongly tempted to use as a basis for ordering the laying on of hands upon those unfortunate to have had to have ended up in a CCCC, IL Courtroom that any of them would have "felt threatened" (the basis for the causing of the death of Jack Richman), no adjudications shall be conducted in the RDC, except via telephone, unless and until bullet-proof plexiglass partitions would have been installed in each and every courtroom in the RDC, ________________________________, or:

such type partitions shall be installed in a limited number of courtrooms in the RDC and litigants shall be provided an opportunity to choose to have any case(s) anyone would be so afflicted as to have to have adjudicated in the RDC litigated solely in such type courtroom _______________________.

23. A presumption of freedom from culpability for any and every instance in which any member(s) of the CCSD would ever encounter any situation in which (s)he would (be) (have been) informed by the target of any given order that a given order ever issued according to a presumption that he or she would be obliged to comply wherewith in any given instance, would lack moral and/or constitutional legitimacy (w/o implying that any unconstitutional order could ever possess moral legitimacy) for refusing to participate in any enforcement whereof, is herein established in regard to any and every order ever issued directed at RJM ___________________.

23. Notwithstanding that RJM, in his endeavors to apprise this Court of his concerns that the burdens of the vast majority of the Judicial Offices with which he is so painfully familiar in Cook County, IL have not been adequately born over the past decade plus, has been deprived access to so much of the evidence which constitutes the basis of such claim and that he has informed it that he is now more concerned than ever that the arrangement presently prevailing in the CCCC, IL and the IL App. Ct. First District constitutes an "unjustifiably dangerous condition, the leaving in place of which is not only unconscionable but criminal as well" ("UDC"), this Court finds it impossible to legitimately contest, much less disregard RJM's expression of concern(s) in this regard, and takes notice that no human being not undeserving of the name could have contributed anything less to the elimination of such UDC than RJM has thus far succeeded in contributing, w/o in so proceeding losing any claim to the possession of even the most rudimentary decency ________________________.

24. In consideration of, inter alia, the entries included herein supra, until the types of conditions which resulted in the death of Jack Richman, the entirely unjustified arrest, prosecution, detention and psychotropic drugging to which RJM was subjected as partially chronicled in the complaint presently pending in Case # 11 CH 12339, and howsoever many other similar and the unjustified arrests, trials and detentions of howsoever it is herein declared that no person shall be subjected to any detriment for refusing to participate in person in any proceeding ever conducted in the RDC, provided he or she would either make a best effort within one's means to be available to participate in any given proceeding via telephone or email or any other similar type of arrangement in order to answer any questions any judge might consider it imperative to get answered via a method of communication more ordered to the expeditious just resolution of disputes than that of the use of the mail or hand delivery of documents.

25. No fine may be imposed upon any litigant not profaning the Lord's name, using any type of vulgarity, or otherwise executing some type of act constituting malum in se except via a proceeding involving a jury trial in which the jury would have been informed of its right of jury nullification would have been and the right of any target of any designated fine to examine any prospective fine imposer, witnesses, and testify himself, just as the commoners of Medeival England could not be fined according to the axiom
The sword of the sovereign could not be drawn except though the humblest of his servants placed it into his hands

26. In order, inter alia, to reduce the justified resentment of the victims of judicial criminality and violence in Cook County, IL ("CCI") (which, inter alia, provides such a fertile environment for the development of insurgents and violence advocating extremists), and to provide some demonstrations of progress towards the elimination of the oppressions to which common citizens are ordinarily and customarily subjected via adjudicative activity in such County, so that, inter alia, none of the countless "gored oxes" wronged by Judges in such County will be as likely to "go post office" as they otherwise might be, the salaries of all judges in Cook County, IL shall be reduced by 1/2 with each Judge having his salary so reduced being permitted to convince a jury of laypersons of his deservingness of the reception of the other 1/2 of such salary, provided that the institution of such measure could be implemented in such form that it would not constitute any type of crime attributable to this Court and would not result in the deprivation of any legitimate reliance interest and/or cause the resignation of any of the small number of James Alesia Profile Judges still conducting judicial activity in CCI.

27. In light of the need of a given unjustly accused and/or imprisoned individual to either resist any attempted arrest or get charged with some violation of some criminal law in order to possess 28 USC 2241 standing as pretrial detainee, all consideration necessary to enable the use of such remedy must be provided anyone demanding such in regard to any contempt proceeding ever conducted upon his or her making any demand for the provision wherefore.

28. Case decisions including references to either any presumption of legitimacy of judicial activity and/or of judicial impartiality shall be superseded with a declaration that in re adjudicative activity conducted in CCI, no such presumption applies and an opinion detailing the reasons for the supersession whereof will be provided shortly.

29. This Court shall propose to the IL State Legislature a bill codifying the postulations referenced in entry #28 herein by 7/1/2014.

30. In the interest of preventing the grave problems which so often accompany disappointed expectations in human affairs, permission is herein granted to provide signs to be posted by Official Bldg Maintenance Engineers over the entrances of the RDC and of the IL Courts Bldg at 160 N. LaSalle indicating that this Court has declared the conditions of State of IL Courts in CCI to a.) constitute an UDC, to be deserving of a skull and cross bones next to an X'ed out yellow smiling face, and/or b.) to be as bad as the conditions which were found to abide in Brown v MI and Johnson v TN, in the Courts whose activity was addressed wherein, respectively.

31. This Court will address whatever abuses of Supreme Court Rule 137(b) sanctions RJM would complain of when arguments are presented to it by RJM, as well as whatever Barriers to Access/symbiotic/blatant and flagrant disregard of constitutionally protected rights issues not included implicitly in any of the documents which have been included along with this order might need to be addressed at such juncture and any "Standing Army" issues will likewise be addressed at such juncture.

32. No res judicata nor collateral estoppel effect will accrue from this Court's adjudicating this petition in regard to any issue presented herein unless and until all parties whose interests this document concerns would have received notice of an intent to adjudicate any given issue this document concerns according to a formula which would necessarily require that res judicata and/or collateral estoppel effect accrue whereto.

36. Notwithstanding the content(s) of any order entered in any case in the CCCC, IL, RJM may use the CCLL and any materials made available to litigants and the public by the Clerk of the CCCC, IL to whatever extent he understands that it would be necessary to access such during the normal business hours of the Clerk's Office in order to adequately participate in any adjudication in which he would find it necessary to participate in order to adequately cover whatever he would ever understand to constitute his "moral liability" in regard to any given matter(s), (w/o having to produce any testimonials as to the reasonableness of such understanding in any instance) (provided he would produce testimonials affirming the understanding of the reasonableness of any such understanding of RJM according to the following formula:_________________________,________________________, __________________(add sheets as necessary)

37. The entirety of the consideration referenced in the "Standard and Method of Adjudication" document which accompanies this document is herein summarily granted and any and all proceedings conducted in regard to any of the cases listed in the caption to this order shall be adjudicated according to such standards and methods

38. The members of this Court, being citizens of the State of IL within the u.s. of A. (or rather what little is presently left of it) recognize the incontravertable character of SCOTUS Member A. Scalia's explanation contained in Williams v U.S. (_U.S._) regarding the constitutional protection of the independence of the federal grand jury ("FGJ") contained in the Presentment Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the u.s. of A. and we add our voices to that of Movant Robert J. More in addressing the Chief Judge of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of IL, the U.S. Attorney for such District, and the United States Marshal and all of her Deputies in demanding that the treasonous manipulation of the FGJ which has been utilized over the past 60 plus years cease and desist immediately before any more goverment crime can be committed upon the presumption of impunity from what is supposed to constitute the just penalt(y)(ies) for violations of any and all of the components of the U.S. Code which possess criminal penalties for violations whereof, included wherein and immediately institute whatever measures would have to be instituted to restore such independence.

39. This Court herein summarily declares the independence of the State of IL Grand Jury and orders the Presiding Judge of the Criminal Division of the CCCC, IL to make provision for citizen access to such entity immediately according to a fomula which will provide adequate protection for all secrecy and orderly processing of criminal matters concerns and informs the entirety of the members of the judicial and executive branches of government at the state and county level in CCCC, IL that anyone interfering with citizen access to such entity, and the independence whereof, and/or endeavoring to interfere with the investigation and/or indicting of any government activity will be subject, inter alia, to criminal prosecution pursuant to the provisions of 720 ILCS 5/33-3.

41. This Court having, in August of 2013, suspended Attorney Lanre Amu's law license summarily pending a plenary adjudication of the cause brought against him by the ARDC, herein grants all of the consideration referenced in this Order and all of that referenced in the S&M of Adjudication document which accompanies this document which would not be incompatible with any of the consideration referenced herein, summarily - according to the reasoning according to which Mr. Amu's law license was suspended, or in the name of compatibility maintenance (sometimes referenced as consistency) reinstates Mr. Amu's law license at this juncture, so that inter alia, he is no longer incapable of providing RJM legal advice and/or representing RJM in any given case, without risking incurring any more detriment than he has already incurred from the ARDC's campaign to silence him in regard to the activity conducted by him for the purpose(s) of exposing and effectively defeating the types of arrogations, usurpations, encroachments, abuses, malefactions, predations, defraudments of legitimate reliance interests and goverment violence as such term is defined in the Summa Theologic's Treatise on Law and criminality in general, which have necessitated RJM's filing of this motion in the first place.

42. This Court has been informed (inter alia, via this conveyance) that RJM stipulates to hold Justice R. Thomas harmless in tort for any activity conducted by him in regard to the matters this document concerns at least until any subsequent component of this document would have been filed, in recognition that in In re McDunn (_Ill.3d_) there was no evident dereliction in regard to which RJM is cognizant of his judicial duty to help protect the innocents from the abomination of homosexual abduction via court process but that RJM understands that RJM cannot legitimately make any such concession to any other representative(s) of this Court including members of the Clerk of this Court's Office.

43. In any and all matters involving RJM and any member(s) of any policing entity ever conducted on State of IL property regarding anything having to do with any legal case pending in any court in this State, RJM shall be permitted to utilize the "Tooley Approach to Rule of Law Protection" which is herein summarily postulated as follows: any tooley demand issued from any target of government activity and/or any prospective intervenor ("TPI") whereinto shall result in opportunity being provided for any and all member(s) of any such type policing entity to demonstrate that any such type activity conducted by him or her would possess legitimacy if he or she can effect such objective, upon his or her receiving any demand wherefore, so that any given TPI can ascertain whether there would be any legitimate basis upon which he could justify not intervening with potentially permanent disability causing or lethal, force into any given exercise of govt claimed authority in any given instance as Tooley found it necessary to do in the English case of Queen's Bench v Tooley (1710), whose controlling principles are applicable in the State of IL at this juncture, according to a formula to be fully postulated in future successors to this order, but in regard to the particulars of which, anyone effected by this entry can procure insight whereinto by reading the William Grigg's Pro Libertate entry of 8/3/13.


ENTER:

___________________ _______________________

Justice Date



thirstforjustice.tripod.com/s&madjdl102713.html


Document List of 10/27/13 for S&M of Adjudication (“D/L 10/27/13”) Doc #1 in D/L of 10/27/13

Document List of 10/27/13 re Standard and Method of Adjudication – D/L of 10/27/13 - - X

2.

5. Nihil Obstat Pet –

6. SCOTUS Pet for Cert/Special Writ

7. Core Temporal Problem - X

8. RCDRC - X

9. Proposed ground rules of 10/22/12 - X

10. PWCS – X

11. Declaration of Unconstitutionality Template - X

12. Davis – Duties of Certain Classes of Laypersons – X*

Complaints/Arrearages Claims Against ISMA Members

13. Apology to Innocents/Posterity

14. Lawsuit Against Robert J. More on Behalf of World's Innocents & Posterity

15. Documents to Federal Grand Jury

16. Structural Defect Document of 10/27/12 - X

17. ROL/ROT

18. Errors of Conscience

19. Davis

20. Four tragic examples of targets of violence waiting too long to fight back: Cristeros in 1929 after truce, Ukranians, Solz, Targets of Nazi Predations

21. Solzenhitsyn - Tilt towards evil, gulag, van irion - anarchy lesser of evils than totalitarianism, grigg - nadler, summa - violence, Pius XII Inversion of ....,

22. A modest proposal,

23. E Supremi, 24. Nature and Grace - Imit. Christ - Bk 2, Ch. 54,


Record of time and resources consumed/expended re this project

documents adjacent to which there is an "X" would have been submitted to the Court on 10/27/13 as partial performance of expression of intent included in motions previously filed


#7 from D/L of 10/27/13

thirstforjustice.tripod.com/ctp5512.html



Core Temporal Problem



Presuming that the devil will be left with the capacity to tempt the fallen human beings who inhabit and will inhabit the theatre of earthly existence to sin and that the problems inherent in the sin of the first parents and the consequences of that sin and every sin committed since, will be present in such theater until Christ returns:



The Core Correctable Temporal Problem is herein defined in a most abbreviated form as follows:

Bill Still - "the issue of the control of the money supply of the U.S. [and beyond that of each of the European Countries and Countries colonized by European countries] is the human rights issue of our time



hunger, poverty, misery, disease are all caused by the unacceptable arrangements in place via which private central banks control the money supplies of the [various countries whose money supplies are controlled whereby]."



"they ask why it is that we say more upon the money question than we say upon the tariff question



when we have restored the money of the constitution, all other necessary reforms will be possible, until that is done there is no other reform that can be accomplished" - William Jennings Bryan



RJM note - it is RJM's informed but necessarily non-infallible understanding that the control of the money supply by the Talmudic banksters, is actually the hinge issue between the establishment of the Talmudic religion with all of its abominations as the de facto world religion and the police state apparatuses established to incrementally extirpate the noncounterfeit version of the rule of law from the face of the earth.



3 videos to be viewed to grasp the essence of the "core temporal problem" - Secret of Oz - hinge issue - money supply - Bill Still, Camp FEMA - police state to effect the genocide in progress to get world's population down to 14 million Talmud Adherents and Imposers (which group must be distinguished from those born into Jewish families but who would be unwilling to have any intended part in the enslavement and extermination agenda the Committee of 300 and its predecessors have been in the progress of imposing for centuries) and 486 million goy slaves - Gary Franchi, Synagogue of Satan - Fr. John O'Connor - to understand what the Presumptively Sanctifying Grace Possessing Kings and Temporal Rulers in Christendom understood re the menace Talmudism constituted and the dangers leaving it uncontained engendered, the Condemnations - explicit and/or implicit of it by Popes Innocent III and Innocent IV, Leo XIII, Pius X, Pius XI and the endeavors undertaken by such Popes to prevent the catastrophic consequences of its reaching ascendancy on the world stage as it now indisputably, approaching complete dominion, through Lucifer's instigation(s), has.



Question which a reader of this document might consider positing to him or her self: Is whatever combination of whatever it is that I am prioritizing, attempting to contribute to whatever cause(s) and/or leaving unaccomplished and/or uncontributed whereto, actually contributing anything to the prevention of 1.) the loss of souls and/or 2.) the shedding of innocent blood, given the opportunity cost of what i could be endeavoring to contribute in lieu of what it would be in a given instance which would in fact be being contributed by the participation in whatever projects it would be in which i would be participating/not participating?



An invitation is herein extended to contribute to the removal of the "root" of the "core temporal problem" rather than participating in the continued consumption of unregainable non-unlimited time and resources striking at what are evidently in the minds of many individuals who have prayed, done penance, conducted extensive research and sought extensive counsel in regard to the matters this document concerns, only "branches" whereof.



"The minds of men must be illuminated with the sure light of Catholic teaching, and their wills must be drawn to follow and apply it as the norm of right living in the conscientious fulfillment of their manifold social duties.



"In addition ... Catholic Action must organize propaganda on a large scale to disseminate knowledge of the fundamental principles on which, according to the Pontifical documents, a Christian Social Order must build.



"... But for the solution of our present problem, all this effort is still inadequate. When our country is in danger, everything not strictly necessary, everything not bearing directly on the urgent matter of unified defense, takes third place. So we must act in today's crisis. Every other enterprise, however attractive and helpful, must yield before the vital need of protecting the very foundation of the Faith and of Christian civilization."



Divini Redemptoris, Pope Pius XI, 3/19/1937



thirstforjustice.tripod.com, anselm45@gmail.com, 863 688-9880

#8 of D/L of 10/27/12

http://thirstforjustice. tripod.com/rcdrchc102212.html, www.thirstforjustice.net (…), Gordon W. Watts.com – click here: Master Document List - (“MDL”) to get to the MDL in which this document is referenced. To access this document via a search engine, enter the characters - aloysiusalphonsusanselm.4 - wherein. Click here to access the home page of the site in which this document is included.

ROMAN CATHOLIC DISPUTE RESOLUTION CHARTS ARE FOUR IN NUMBER AS OF 10/22/12 - CIVIL, CRIMINAL -PETIIONER AS PROSECCUTOR, CRIMINAL -PETITIONER AS DEFENDANT OR CONVICT, & HABEAS CORPUS 28 USC 2241

ROMAN CATHOLIC DISPUTE RESOLUTION CHART – SUPERCEDING VERSION OF 10/22/12 - ROUGH DRAFT UNDER CONSTRUCTION AND SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVISION AND/OR MODIFICATION, BUT CONSTITUTING THE BASIS UNTIL FURTHER SUPERCEDED FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF LEGITIMATE RELIANCE INTERESTS IN ITS PRESENT FORM – REVISED FROM PRECEDING VERSIONS OF SUCH DOCUMENT (NOTE – THE POSITION OF THE ISMA IS THAT IF MARTIAL LAW WERE TO BE IMPOSED AND/OR A FULL SCALE SLAVE-UPRISING/DOMESTIC INSURRECTION COMMENCED, NO OBLIGATION WOULD BIND ANYONE TO PETITION ANY COMMON LAW TRIBUNAL FOR ANY NIHIL OBSTAT(S) UNLESS CIRCUMSTANCES WOULD PERMIT SUCH TYPE PETITIONING IN A GIVEN INSTANCE, AND OTHER DISPENSATIONS MIGHT ALSO BE AVAILABLE IN A GIVEN CASE ACCORDING TO MORALLY LEGITIMATE PRINCIPLES OF EPIKEA). Next scheduled review and possible revision - Easter Sunday - Feast of the Ascension of 2013



#9 of D/L of 10/27/12

thirstforjustice.tripod.com/pgr102212.html


Proposed Ground Rules of 10/22/12


Update of 10/22/12 – a number of proposed updates formulated since 4/1/11 have not been included herein

Case must be adjudicated according to standard of Court providing confirmation that: This Court has been informed that in regard to any activity ever conducted by any activity conductor which would result in a denial of any of the forms of consideration referenced in this document, that inter alia, in order to procure re-commissioning by the ISMA, that RJM is required by the COC of the ISMA to procure the equivalent of an adjudication of innocence or guilt at the level of a criminal conviction in regard to the activity of each and every activity conductor who would conduct activity in regard to the matters this order concerns.


If SCOTUS does not grant certiorari and does not provide explanation that reason for non-granting whereof was not that RJM did not adequately present and preserve any issues in regard to which cert would be sought, would Judge indemnify RJM for costs of ad damnum included in case or in re injunctive relief…..




updates in inchoate form for 3/28/11 –

include update of 3/28/11 re claim to consideration corresponding to DLRI of a type which has a.) been recognized in past Anglo-American History or in the alternative b.) has not been, but at least at this juncture, evidently ought to be



– opportunity to demonstrate the priorities according to which the activity of all actors conducting activity in a given instance in an arrangement equivalent in terms of accessibility of the public to evidence available regarding the priorities and methods according to which a given component of govt activity would ever be conducted to the “public trial” guaranteed in the 6th Amendment to the Const. of the u.s. of A., will be provided for any party demanding such for reasons obvious and possibly not immediately apparent –practically this will often necessitate on the spot depositions/examination upop to lock … suspected perpetrator or a predation, into factual predicates and the alleged legal basis of activity so that no predation perpetrator would ever succeed in escaping liability by having some morally bankrupt attorney coach him or her into
“explaining away” activity which would be malicious in character according to some evidently plausible explanation, which right constitutes a right which all are necessarily obliged to accommodate to participate in the creation of a record of any and all court proceedings ever conducted, and any and all activity conducted relative to the adjudication of a given case of sufficient extensivity to prevent any perpetrator of any crime committed either in the substantive matters a given case concerns, or in its adjudication from succeeding in evading punishment demonstrably justifiably deserved for any perpetration whereof, - note






Exhibit Number ______ to Motion of ________________, in ___________________, in the ________________________________________________________

Note #1 – If it has not been included herein and at this late juncture, the author cannot even recall what all is included herein but would have to proceed point by point through each and every entry included herein infra before incurring any prejudice for not having made a given demand at a given juncture, a requirement requiring all parties and their attorneys to be subjected to depositions (which in many cases would be quite short) at every stage at which a given adversary would allege fraud or subterfuge, in every case in which either a request to admit the truth of some allegation or other would have been made and no admission whereof would have been provided in response whereto - in which case the costs of the proof of a claim which could have been admitted would have to be borne by the party against whom a given claim would have been proven, or in which the party demanding the deposition of a given adversary would need to proceed without the provision of any warning in regard to the topic(s) of a given deposition in order to ensure that no liar would ever succeed in “explaining away” any type of fraud, subterfuge or malefaction after having become apprised of the subject matter of a given deposition ever demanded – assessment of costs wherefore would be determined by a jury in some theatre or other.

Note: Some entries included herein may in a given instance still need to be augmented with “upon the reception of a demand wherefore” language in order to possess legitimacy, and any activity conductor demanding the addressing of the issues addressed herein reserves a claim to have such language added to any entry to which such language might ever have to be added in regard to a given matter.

First Rough Draft, Not Proofread, Subject to Innumerable Possible Revisions and Modifications of Robert J. More’s Proposed New 2007 Procedural Requirements as Ground Rules for Litigation in Cases Litigated in the Circuit Court of Cook County, IL, both criminal and civil, and to the extent in a given matter, such rules could be applied to the, _____________________________________ that such modifications be applied in those tribunals as well, which ____________is incorporating here as his own, Proposed in Consideration of the Gravity of the Peril in Which the Republic and the Non-counterfeit Version of the Rule of Law is Indisputably Found to be at this Juncture in the World’s Continued Descent to a Level of Barbarism, Which Given the Genocide in Progress, Even Possibly Far Exceeds That Described in Genesis 6:6 et seq., which Caused God to Then Greive, Regret Ever Having Made Man and to Rid the Face of the Earth of All but Eight Human Persons (Gen. 6: 6, et seq.).

Disclaimer:

Robert J. More has without assiduous reflection and consideration, to understate the case, included this no longer so short list of proposed revisements and modifications, out of what he subjectively apprehends to constitute a concern to spare others as much grief as RJM’s activity can be used to accomplish such objective, first and foremost, the grief of the ultimate calamnity of an eternal unimaginably miserable eternity, and third of the consequences of sin and sinful systems, structures and conditions, in this life namely the temporal miseries of poverty, disease, violence, the denial of the measure of autonomy which persons need to fulfill their potential and to conduct activity in this life, without anguish, bitterness and confusion, and the absence of clear standards upon which reliance can be justifiably predicated in a given instance; without RJM’s, in conducting his activity according to priorities, standards, agendas and methods not-evidently incompatible with such asserted concern, incurring culpability in anyone else’s sin (cf. Mt. 22:21, Acts 5:29, Rom. 14:23, 1 Tim. 5:22, Eph. 5:8, et al), and RJM admits that constructing such list without possessing any residence in which such can be constructed, nor even any electrical outlet after a certain hour, which can still be used, since it is New Year’s Eve on which this list is being composed, has left RJM susceptible to some resentments, which the enemy of the human race, he who unrelentingly goes about seeking whom he may devour (1 Pet. 5:8), naturally will almost certainly endeavor to use to cause RJM’s judgment to be to some measure skewed (Mt. 7: 3-5), and to cause RJM to include in these proposed rule changes, material which upon reflection in regard thereto, RJM would eliminate therefrom. In short, RJM is not naturally grateful the persons whose conduct has resulted in the takeover of the monetary system of the U.S., of the instigation of two enormous world wars, the Russian Revolution, Spanish Civil War, most of the major assassinations and attempts thereof, the destructions of economies, innumerable false flag terror attacks, most recently that of 9/11/2001 and an incredibly substantial component of the aggregate of human suffering over the course of history of this world. While RJM continues to aspire to make progress in the practice of the virtue of meekness, even to begin to approach in some measure (even if only from afar and in the meagerest of measures) of the paragons of unobtrusiveness such as St. Bernard of Clairvaux, St. Francis De Sales and St. Vincent De Paul, as saints such as St. Teresa and St. John of the Cross, amongst other distinguished luminaries have defined the particular parts of the virtue of true meekness (as entirely distinct from culpable capitulation to manifest evils and innumerable other distortions of the true virtue), and that RJM recognizes that the saints who had truly mastered their carnal natures have far outperformed RJM’s paltry efforts to practice this virtue; RJM also has to continue to help oppose the monstrous wickedness of that same enemy of the human race who in this period is more than ever using his instrument of choice (Apoc. 2.9,. 3:9) to destroy everything God can still justify not hating, and if RJM has not succeeded in keeping the resentment he experiences when he considers the horrific consequences in this world and in RJM’s endeavors to procure for himself a happy ending and to help anyone else interested in doing likewise for him or her – self, to accomplish the same objective, towards those primarily responsible for such horrors, completely out of whatever is included herein infra, RJM would respectfully propose that no one who might consider any proposals contained herein to potentially constitute a part of a long term solution to the problems they address, permit any element of RJM’s wretchedness and/or defectiveness or frailty or just plain limitedness to unjustifiably effect whatever positive effects might come from an implementation of any given proposal included herein. RJM acknowledges the duty to be angry and sin not (Eph. 4:6) and that the anger of man worketh not the righteousness of God (Jas 1:20), and that he must never permit himself to succumb to any temptation of the devil, but rather to use whatever resentments he would ever experience in this carnal nature and whatever temptations the devil would use against RJM, to be not overcome by evil, but to use them to overcome evil with good (Rom 12:21). If anyone would inform RJM that it would be his or her opinion that there is either anything in this document or anything else, for that matter in anything that RJM has ever said, written or done, that would cause anyone to be unjustifiably subjected to any measure of hostility (since what is sown is inevitably reaped, the hostility engendered from wickedness, violence, cruelty, brutality and predations such as that encountered by the Republicans (ie. The Bolsheviks, Talmudists – whatever term would be used to describe them) from the Loyalists in the Spanish Civil War would most definitely not be unjustified hostility but rather the natural fruits of endeavors to impose wickedness upon those who would refuse to render unto any Pharaoh (Ex. 5:___), Caesar (Mt. 22:21), collection of Rothschilds (Apoc. 3:9), or for that matter, any other collection of Golden Calf Worshippers, what in a given case would rightfully belong to God (cf. Mt. 22:22, Acts 5:29 et al.), in such scenario, RJM would make whatever revisions RJM would understand would have to be made to bring any unjustified activity into compliance with the requirements of the moral law as such would apply in a given case.

1. Court must sign under penalty of perjury that every word included in a given document has been read upon a proposal submitted in regard thereto on a timely basis or else upon a blanket arrangement submitted at the commencement of the adjudication of a given case which would be confirmed at the end thereof.

1.a) Court must either sign under penalty of perjury that there would have been no construction in a given conveyance which would not have been understood by the Court or provide notice regarding any conveyance(s) which the Court would claim would not have been understood by it, and provide explicit leave for amendment thereof and a subsequent adjudication regarding exactly what the author of a given conveyance intended to convey in a given conveyance.

2. The procedural history of case must be presented to a jury – even in matters such as motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment upon a proposal submitted in regard thereto on a timely basis via the maintenance of juries which upon demand therefore, would adjudicate whether a given case would have been adjudicated at a high enough level of accountability for any judgment emanating therefrom to possess any binding effect upon those subject to any judgment in regard therefrom and whether any member of any policing entity could enforce any given order without in so doing incurring criminal and/or civil liability.

3. Findings of fact and conclusions of law must be provided by the Court on some type of portable media device or via email or internet posting, upon a proposal submitted in regard thereto on a timely basis.

4. The use of a camcorder as an audio recording device, inside of every courtroom in every proceeding must be permitted upon a proposal submitted in regard thereto on a timely basis.

4.a The use of a camcorder or any audio-video recording device must be permitted in every interaction with every government official whether upon public or private property without the need for any express consent in regard thereto.

5. A judge, law clerk, clerk and/or security personnel must either sign a verified statement in regard to a particular claim or description of developments ever occurring in any given interaction with any person or party which would be directly or indirectly related to a given legal matter, or else participate in a deposition not too exceed three times the length of the duration of a given interaction for interactions less than ten minutes in length, twice the time … for interactions between 11 and 45 minutes length and the same amount of time for interactions exceeding 46 minutes in length, except that there would be an appropriately sliding scale for those interactions between 46 minutes and 90 minutes in length, upon a proposal submitted in regard thereto on a timely basis.

6. No immunity from civil suit will ever be permitted for judges (except upon the submission of a voluntary express waiver in regard thereto by a litigant seeking to have a given judge adjudicate his or her case – with appropriate provision for an adversary to contest such appointment and agree to waive or commit to refusing to waive a claim to concede or not concede immunity in a given case) nor for any other activity conductors, according to: the provisions of the right to petition clause of the U.S. Constitution anchored in the provisions of the third Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and Clause 61 of the Magna Charta et al (the formula in regard to which ultimately emanates from the requirements of the Fourth and Fifth Commandments of the Decalogue).

7. Electronic docketing, access to all documents filed in each and every case and e-filing in every case.

8. Every attorney must sign his or her name and attorney number on a roster upon entering and leaving a given courtroom, so that if a judge or an attorney commits any type of unjustified injury causing duty breach, the victim thereof can know the names of the witnesses who are obliged under the RPC to report certain duty breaches committed by attorneys, and upon the demand thereofor by a given person claiming to have been unjustifiably injured by the activity of some attorney, to provide either a verified statement of what would have been witnessed in a given case or a refusal to provide such with an explanation for such conjectural refusal or a refusal to even provide this but in this case to sign a document admitting that such last among the refusals could not possibly have been made in good faith in the absence of the provision of an explanation in regard to the selection of such alternative.

9. Every judge upon the demand therefor by a given person claiming to have been unjustifiably injured by the activity of some attorney, is required to provide either a verified statement of what would have been witnessed in a given case or a refusal to provide such with an explanation for such conjectural refusal or a refusal to even provide this but in this case to sign a document admitting that such last among the refusals could not possibly have been made in good faith in the absence of the provision of an explanation in regard to the selection of such alternative.

10. The name of the law clerk, minute clerk, and security representative for a given judge must be placed on the bench next to the name of the judge, where everyone in the courtroom can see it.

11. Every law clerk upon demand therefore by a given person claiming to have been unjustifiably injured by the activity of some attorney, is required to provide either a verified statement of what would have been witnessed in a given case or a refusal to provide such with an explanation for such conjectural refusal or a refusal to even provide this but in this case to sign a document admitting that such last among the refusals could not possibly have been made in good faith in the absence of the provision of an explanation in regard to the selection of such alternative.

12. Every Judge, upon submission of a petition by a litigant in this regard, must sign a verified statement indicating whether or not he or she has taken at any juncture any oath or made any affirmation incompatible with oaths and/or affirmations to uphold the Constitution of the U.S. and of the State of Illinois.

13. Every Judge, upon submission by a litigant of a petition in this regard, must sign a verified statement indicating whether or not he or she is convinced that there is an objective standard of morality according to which any and all exercise(s) of the authority of a judicial office which would ever be exercised would have to be exercised in order for (a) given such exercise(s) in a given case to be legitimate and to impose any obligation upon anyone to comply with a given order that would ever be issued in a given case, and that mal, mis and/or culpable non-feasance in regard to both the fulfillment of the duties of a given office and in regard to every area of one’s conduct will be punished in eternity and that no member(s) of any class of persons would ever be subjected to conduct prejudicial to him, her or them, due to race, ethnicity, nationality, ancestry, sex or physical handicap, or any other criteria over which no person would have control via any exercise of any judicial authority, unless such matter would constitute an issue in a given case.

14. Requirement that no statute of limitations, Supreme Court time limit rule or deadline for the completion of a given task or suchlike issue ever be adjudicated independent of the issues of the material, political, social, financial, physical, moral and psychological conditions of the various parties involved in a given dispute, nor independently of the conditions of the tribunals, nor of the societal conditions, in which a given case would stand to be adjudicated.

15. Provision that the first judge to whom a given case would be assigned can recuse him or herself, without the provision of any explanation therefore, in every case.

16. Requirement that Judge, all clerks and security personnel sign documents confirming that it is understood by each and everyone of them that the Magna Charta is the enabling document (actually emanating itself out of the Charter of Liberties of 1100 A.D.) of the constitutions authorizing the exercise(s) of authority of a given and every office and that pursuant to Clause 61, thereof, that no one is above the law, no matter what his or her office or station, and that there is no such thing as any type of legitimate immunity from the consequences of one’s unjustified injury - causing duty breaches, but that in a given case, a given litigant can sue and criminally prosecute a judge, clerk or security operative, or in a given case, if no adequate remedy can be procured whereby, simply resort to the use of a Contra-predatory Vigilante Remedy in order to adequately remedy any injury ever unjustifiably inflicted.

17. Requirement that a litigant and/or his or her legal representative(s) be subject to civil and/or criminal prosecution and correlatively, can likewise be sued or criminally prosecuted by a judge, clerk or security operative for any unjustified injury-causing duty breach ever committed by him or her regarding a given case.

18. Posting on a wall in each courtroom and in the plazas of the courthouse the contents of the story of Daniel Chapter 13, Ex. 20 13 & 14, John 2:15 et seq. Magna Charta Clause 61, and excerpts from Pope Pius XII’s Christmas Message of 1956, and the wording of the right to petition, due process and equal protection clauses of, and the entirety of the third and Thirteenth Amendments to, the U.S. Constitution with an explanation that the consideration that an able-bodied person must procure and receive in any and every court proceeding is not anything less than what Susanna received in Dan. Ch 13, from the Govt (ie the King in that case) (namely, Daniel, on behalf of Susanna and the interest all innocent and not consciously purposefully, wicked, persons, persons who would have the interest described in the axiom Qui nocentibus parcit, innocentibus punit had in ensuring that an innocent woman was not put to death and that false accusers did not get away with their falsehoods, was permitted to prosecute that case to a sufficient extent to ensure that there was no relevant issue material to the outcome of that

case whose bottom was left unscraped and no issues not turned inside out and in regard to which a negative definition –ie a what cannot not be definition was not procured) in order to justify the continued abstention from the taking of recourse to the means Providence has provided for the resolution of disputes that cannot otherwise be acceptably resolved – the use of what in a given case would constitute the non-excessive and not otherwise unjustified use of force, namely that except as a given party would demonstrably culpably negligently neglect to adequately avail himself of any legitimate opportunity that would have been available to vindicate his or her claims in a legal proceeding, that neither any legitimate claim to any form of consideration, nor the claim to protect and/or vindicate such claim via the use of force could ever be lost due to the mis or mal feasance of any other party or entity involved in a given adjudication.

19. Disarming of all security personnel in court buildings, except for at checkpoints for the entry into and exit from, such buildings, or in the alternative, at least the removal of any firearm and/or taser or OCD and/or pepper type spray from the possession of such persons, rather than having to resort to the more potentially destructive alternative of permitting individuals to bring weapons and body armor into the building to counter the enormous problems created by the disparity of weaponry between the government and those on the one hand, who unjustifiably manipulate its organs for their own illegitimate benefits at the expense of those without positioning in a given conflict that is as favorable, and the unarmed individuals on the other hand, who endeavor to vindicate claims in the arrangement that now prevails in the court system under consideration..

20. Declare the period since 9/11/2001 until whatever date it would be upon which the Federal Reserve Bank would be eliminated and the Rothschilds and the other nine banking families who have accumulated the hundreds of trillions of dollars that they have accumulated from the control of the money supply of the U.S. and whatever other Countries have had their money supplies fraudulently and criminally overthrown and controlled by them a “Genocide in Progress” period and treat all cases filed by or against those engaged in combating such genocide according to the same standards as are treated those cases filed by or against those in the formal service of the present de jure government’s military.

21. Require the emailing of each and every document ever filed in a given case (except where to do so would be practically impossible) to adversaries possessing a valid email address, so that it is not unjustifiably difficult and expensive for parties with legitimate claims to expose and overcome the types of patently vacuous, frivolous and malicious claims and defenses that licensed attorneys submit to tribunals on a regular basis, when representing a corporation and/or government entity being sued by a non-attorney or a single practitioner or member of a small law firm.

22. Permit private citizens to prosecute ARDC and JIB complaints so as to eliminate the problem of the conflict of interest in the preservation of the market value of the law license, the benefit of “insider arrangements and deals” and the preservation of the status quo, which at this juncture in history is one in which Talmudism (a religion whose foremost authoritative source – the Talmud was ordered burned no less than three times in the Thirteenth Century by various Popes who were not unfamiliar with the horrors and abominations contained in the unedited, unsanitized for “goy assessment, examination and consumption”, versions thereof and of the destructiveness upon every foundation of civilization of that “document published in hell” ) which none but the rarest of exceptions of an attorney –one in whom there would be an adequately adjusted arrangement of priorities and sufficient moral fiber to exercise the authority of a law license and of a given office according to a minimally morally acceptable standard, could realistically be expected to overcome.

23. Provision that those who have been made homeless by their continued abstention from the use of non-

excessive and not-otherwise unjustified force in the resolution of disputes and/or those who have been three times accused within a five year period of being anti-semitic or as having a reputation for being anti-semitic, while never deviating in their conduct in any substantial manner from the requirements of the Fifth Commandment and of the edicts of Sicut Didum (1437), Sublimus Dei (Pope Paul III, 1539 ?) Mit Brennender Sorge (Pope Pius XI, 1937) can choose their own judges both at the trial and appellate level, given the comparatively enormous difficulty that those lacking residences would and do have in litigating matters and given the injury in terms of ostracization that indisputably is incurred, when in a Country such as the one in which this document has been composed in which the defacto religion of such Country is Talmudism and the supply of money is controlled by persons (all Talmudists) who do not consider non-jews to even be human persons but consider such persons to be goyim.

24. Permit use of all staircases to those who would sign an acceptably worded and negotiated, waiver of liability in this regard.

25. Require attorneys to be subjected to the exact same procedures and processes regarding security as those who

represent themselves in court proceedings.

26. Require Court to explicitly confirm that it has been informed that the program of persons such as R J More (“RJM”) (unless RJM’s name could be left out of the matter, which RJM would certainly prefer) (for the benefit of anyone who might ever howsoever end up reading this document, who do not know, who RJM is, he is an admittedly lowly, embattled and beleaguered, and most definitely, comparatively - as relates to his status in this earthly life - personally, very unimportant, unemployed, former truck driver, whose endeavors to vindicate claims he has subjectively apprehended he has been obliged to endeavor to vindicate through existing court systems combined with his continued abstention from the participation in the use of what would have constituted in a given case, the non-excessive and not-otherwise unjustified use of force, has left him without a vehicle, residence, or bank account regarding the agenda to close down all courts operative in Cook County IL, both state and federal, at this juncture, is one which would most definitely not exclude adequate provision to accommodate what could be in a given case, identified to constitute the legitimate reliance interest of all of those whose activity as employees and agents and actors of various types in such systems, has rendered them undeserving of being classified as miscreants, liabilities, damage-doers, derelicts, and/or blights or banes upon everything worth defending and preserving upon the stage of salvation history; is only what RJM and others similarly situated are convinced is the only morally legitimate alternative available at this juncture given the comparatively enormous destructiveness of the activity of such systems relative to the foundations of civilization and everything that God can still justify not hating, which has been demonstrated by the activity thereof over the period of years in regard to which RJM has had the opportunity to assess the effects of such activity.

27. Requirement that upon petition in regard thereto, that any judge so petitioned would either declare him or herself to be either pro-courts of unbridled and absolute discretion (ie –the law is whatever the judge says it is in a given case) to which reference will be herein made as the pro-Rothschild controlled Reign of Terror Agenda or pro-slavery, pro-genocide of the goyim position (which is a de facto categorical deference to the prevailing caste system/evilarchy presently prevailing in the u.s. of A.), or anti-unbridled and absolute discretion, to which reference will be herein made as the anti-slavery, anti-genocide position or else present an argument explaining why in a given case, a given judge would claim that it would be in the best interest(s) of the Resurrection of the Rule of Law Movement (aka the Anti-Genocide Movement) or otherwise not-evidently-justified, for such judge to defer any explanation in such regard to a future date, or to not address the issue at all.

28. Requirement that pictures of the consequences of unmonitored govt activity and the exercise of discretion by persons in whom there is not a demonstrably adequately adjusted fear of the consequences in eternity of not satisfying the requirements of the moral law in a given exercise of authority, in cases in which such sins would not have been adequately repented of before the death of a given exerciser of authority who would have been culpable in this regard, be posted in the plaza of each courthouse ie. starting with piles of the bodies of baptized persons tortured and murdered and slaughtered in Russia in the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 and in the Leninist Regime , in the Hungarian takeover in 1918 and the Kuhn regime and in Spain in 1936 due to the control of the U.S. Govt by the Talmudists at that juncture.

29. Require all judges to swear an oath or commit to an affirmation declaring the abdominal character of the Talmud, and a commitment to refuse to participate in any of the types of malice and depravity contained therein, and to refuse to consider any human person who would ever participate in any court proceeding to be subhuman.

30. Require all judges to refuse to permit any governmental official to accept federal reserve notes as payment for any fee, debt or fine ever legitimately imposed, or owed, pursuant to the provisions of …..

31. Some type of provision, including various types of incentives and/or disincentives to deter the non-vitandus Judges in the County from retiring upon reaching 20 years of service as a judge, so that persons far less capable, qualified, conscientious and courageous are not enabled via retirements to procure judicial positions.

32. Provision for certain judges to be brought up on the petition therefore by a given litigant to adjudicate a given appeal, the prospect of which alone would so greatly diminish the enormously negative and injurious effect that the present lamentable and abysmal condition of the First District Appellate Court causes – namely it induces and encourages deep-pocketed parties to abuse and defraud the system in trial court proceedings, upon the presumption that no matter what occurs in a Cook County Trial Court, evil and money ALWAYS AND WITHOUT EXCEPTION PREVAIL IN THE FIRST DISTRICT IL APPELLATE COURT as the devil possesses an almost complete if not actually entirely complete, stranglehold on such Court, which is considered by many to be as bad a

court as there is anywhere in the Fifty Talmudic States of Amerika at this juncture in its descent into total barbarism, even as horrible as the hell-full-of-horrors that is the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.

102912 16:15

33. Requirement that every judge take an oath or affirmation to do whatever would be necessary in a given case and in every case ever before him or her, to ensure that he or she would never decide a case based upon his or her unwillingness and/or incapacity to resist the temptation to which he or she might ever be subjected to permit him or her-self to be intimidated out of the duty ever imposed by sources of authority controlling the exercise of the authority of a given office, regardless of how many pictures he or she has seen or stories he or she has read of the horrors that Talmudists have perpetrated upon baptized persons, especially those who refuse to betray their baptismal promises and render unto the Rothschilds what rightfully belongs to God (cf. Mt. 22:21, Rev. 3:9) in any period of history in which Talmudism has gained supremacy such as that in which this document has been composed.

34. Require each and every Judge to sign under oath or affirmation a statement affirming that he or she (“he”) understands that a court which conducts its activity upon an absolute discretion standard is not just an abomination to God and a menace to everything that God can still justify not hating, but is conducting its activity according to a standard entirely incompatible with the requirements of Article VI, the prohibition on slavery clause of the Thirteenth, and the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendments, to the U.S. Const., and the principles articulated regarding substantive due process violations of inalienable rights, and that former Chief Justice Marshal agreed that there is absolutely nothing in the Eleventh Amendment to that Constitution prohibiting a citizen from suing his or her own state for deprivations and injuries caused by its actors and agents.

35. Require whomever signs the paychecks for the acceptably accountable Judges to discontinue the withholding of any federal income tax from the compensation and benefit packages of such Judges, so that inter alia the opportunities for employment off the bench are not as appealing relatively, as the prospects of remaining on the bench for a given Judge who requires him or her self to keep all exercises of authority within acceptable standards of accountabity.

36. Requirement that every judge to whom a given case would be assigned would sign a statement under penalty of perjury that he or she would understand that given the conditions in which the Court Systems in this Country are presently found to be and the social order within which such Courts operate is found to be, that the objective of the financially and politically less favorably positioned party in a given dispute must be, not to prevail in the case in the trial court, nor even upon appeal (an almost impossible task – given the lamentable conditions of reviewing courts in this Country at all levels, at this juncture in the descent back into barbarism) but rather to preserve all legitimate claims and protect the claim to vindicate such claims via vigilante means and/or after the completion of a successful domestic insurrection – which distinction obviously bears profound implications for the issue of relevancy in a given case, as what would not be relevant for those depending upon the adequate functioning of the court system for the rectification of injustices would be in no way irrelevant for those committed to ensure that what would constitute their moral liability in a given case would not be left uncovered due to their not having utilized the means which Providence has provided for the vindication of claims and interests in regard to which a given person or party would understand that an accounting would have to be provided (in other words confirmation that a given judge understands that litigation in which any member of ISMA is involved or ….. is conducted according to the presumption that it is a foregone conclusion that no minimally acceptable remedy will ever be procured in regard to a given dispute except via either a floating measure or in stages #7-16 of the RCDRC (see URL in ULC “(RCDRC3-11)”.

37. Build either a plexiglass wall with a sound system or some type of a barrier in the form of steel bars between the judicial bench and the area in which the advocates and everyone else abides and functions, and eliminate all of the courtroom deputies in all but criminal cases except two for each floor to handle what are disturbances or demonstrations of disrespect not provoked, instigated, educed, induced or otherwise caused by any predatory activity conducted by any judge, clerk or attorney.

38. Require judges to abstain from deliberately smiling for any photographer (not applicable to a situation in which someone would inadvertently appear to be smiling and be caught in such posture on camera) and require any judge whose picture would end up in any publication which any member of the public would see and report to pay the costs of the publication of a formal apology to that component of the members of the public who are so distressed by the present conditions and activity of the court systems and the great majority of the judges in them at this juncture (the “outsiders” the “goyim”, those targeted for extermination or reprogramming and categorical enslavement (Georgia Guidestones et. al), as this requirement would hopefully prevent the escalation of resentments which occurs when those victimized by illegitimate, unjustified, tortuous and/or criminal judicial conduct encounter pictures in publications in which those considered by them to be either the, or at least one of the, chief, source(s) of their distress, infliction and hardship in a present case would appear to be demonstrating a wanton disregard and unconcern for the unjustified injury that would have been caused by his, her, and/or their activity in the adjudication of a given case (the sight of someone such as the Chief Judge grinning ear to ear in so many published pictures of him, given the unjustified and unconscionable injuries that burden-bearers sustain every hour in the system he oversees from the misconduct of judges and attorneys whose conduct, as RJM understands the matter, he is obliged to report, and above all that incurred by the victims of homosexual adoption (which is of course, really just legally sanctioned abduction and who can bear to even consider what else – except for purposes of ensuring that the perpetrators do not remain unpunished for their atrocities) can only cause anyone not entirely oblivious to the contents of Mt. 18:6 to cringe at the thought of the accounting that will have to be provided in regard to this matter.

39. Require the establishment and declaration of a day on various levels of judicial penance and atonement.

40. Include a downlink on the Court’s website, or from the Court’s website to websites, containing the publication of nihil obstats for judges whose conduct has been found to have been conducted at a consistently, without exception, acceptable level of accountability and who correlatively have evidently demonstrated a condition of "non-unfitness" for the holding and exercise of the authority of a given office.

41. Regarding IL Supreme Court Rule 298 Petitions submitted to Room 2005 as of the First Quarter of 2007, to require that no such petition be denied, without its first having been submitted to one of the following judges who have demonstrated a conspicuous capacity in adversarial contested proceedings of keeping the exercise of authority of a given exercise of authority, upon the protective side of the protective-predatory fault line – for torts – Judges Ward, K. Flanagan, Duncan Brice, or McDunn (there is no intention here to slight anyone, but rather it is the case, that there are a number of judges in that division who have demonstrated the capacity described supra and the proposed referrals are restricted to those judges in regard to whose activity RJM is to some measure cognizant as it concerns the threshold of compliance-accomplishment herein described). RJM is cognizant of the types of problems that have plagued the 298 petition process in the Law Division as being present in other Divisions at this time and in fact is cognizant that the First Municipal and Chancery Judges with whose activity RJM is cognizant regarding the 298’s have with some exceptions demonstrated an incapacity to adequately adjudicate 298’s.

42. Prohibition upon any assessments of and/or rulings upon issues concerning passage of time, such as any issue concerning any statute(s) of limitations, establishment of deadlines, missing of deadlines, DWP’s and/or motions for continuance(s) by anyone other than a jury of the peers of a given litigant who would ever be/have been subject(ed) to the incurment of any adverse judgment attributable to any alleged non-execution of any affirmative act(s) and/or the non-accomplishment of any objective w/n any given time period except via the provision of a signed confirmation of consent by a given activity conductor ever in a posture of being subjected to the type of detriment such matters involve, given the unlikelihood that anyone in the position of Former SCOTUS Chief “Justice” Taney could ever understand at a minimally acceptable level the burdens, constraints and afflictions to which someone in the position of Dred Scott was subjected and given that the u.s. of A. at present is most definitely a Talmudic Controlled Police State and that members of the Slavemaster Class (“insiders”) wherein (which definitely includes judges – even if not all judges are slavemasters), would be highly unlikely to understand just how burdensome, afflicting and distressful life as a member of the slave class (“outsiders”) in the caste system which presently prevails in the u.s. of A. indisputably is – an arrangement in which almost nothing any judge would ever do would be considered a crime and almost nothing any of (us) slaves would ever do would not be considered a crime. (See Ken D’Oudney –Article on Jury Nullification).

102912


Vacate the criminal code as such might ever be applied to the conduct of RJM in any endeavors he might ever incept for purposes of rectifying injustice(s) and or… or in the alternative declare the

unconstitutionality as it would be applied to the conduct of RJM in ….

The only individual who is ultimately benefiting from the constraints existing structures and systems impose upon the activity of RJM is the devil

Submitted for consideration and comment by (any and all comments sincerely provided would be appreciated and hopefully incorporated into the next revision of these proposed rule changes):

Robert J. More (Rom. 12:21) – Assistant But Not By Express Delegation To (Someone Familiar With RJM’s Modus Operandi Might Be Tempted To Think RJM Was Going To Write “Chief Justice J. Roberts” Here, But This Is Not The Case, As Since It Is The Case That There Is No Reason To Believe That A Critical Mass Of Those Amongst The Over 80 Million Gun Owners In This Country, In Whom The Voice Of Conscience Has Not Yet Been Entirely Extinguished, Cannot Do At Least As Well Against The Contemporary Talmudist Menace As The Spanish Loyalists Did In The Spanish Civil War In 1936-39 Against Their Predecessors, There Is No Need For Any Assistance From Any Court, Including The U.S. Supreme Court, To Vindicate The Interests Of Almighty God Against The Wicked And Ungodly) Jesus Christ, Christus Regnat And His Immaculately Conceived And Ever Virgin And Spotlessly Pure And By Her Veritably Astounding Demonstration Of Humility, Now Forever Exalted, Mother –



[She, Who As A 16 Year Old Girl, By Her Fiat Mihi, Secundum Verbum Tuum, Put In Motion The Historical Chain Of Events Which Forever Doomed Lucifer’s Hideous Agenda For The Human Race And Without Whose Cooperation The Poor Banished Children Of Eve, Would Have Had To Have Remained Banished From The Inheritance Her Fidelity Enabled Jesus To Make By His Suffering, Death and Resurrection, Available To All Of Those Who Carry Their Own Personal Crosses and Bear Their Share of the Burden Referenced in Matt. 11:30, After His Example.]

P.O. Box 6926

Chicago, IL 60680

_ HYPERLINK "mailto:thirstforjustice@yahoo.com" _thirstforjustice@yahoo.com_

anselm45 @gmail.com

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<


Proposed Rules Addendums combined for all after 1/1/07, later 3/24/11 (inchoate constructions included herein infra can be disregarded for the time being with the consent of the postulator whereof)

and the or else:

As an alternative to the implementation of the proposed revisions of the rules submitted along herewith, the closing down of the entire court systems according to an agenda that would not leave the legitimate reliance interests of those who have labored in such systems to the net benefit or at least a break-even level for, the Non-counterfeit Version of the Roman Catholic Church, not demonstrably adequately accomodated would be a possibility infinitely preferable to the preservation of the presently prevailing status quo. But, even if the systems in their present conditions could not be closed without leaving such reliance interests not adequately accommodated, the closing down of the systems without any such accommodation, as lamentable as it would indisputably be for those who would have foregone opportunities in the private sector which would have been more lucrative than a career or stint, as the case might be in a given instance, in public service, or who would have distinguished themselves by selfless service to the true common good via their conduct as public servants, or even just those who would have refused to make any unjustified concessions to complacency, and whose intolerance of mediocrity, sloth, apathy and selfishness and unwillingness to make any unjustified concessions thereto would have redounded to the common good, would not be protected from a non-honoring of any given legitimate reliance interest, it would still obviously, and this statement is not just the subjective opinion of this one not-altogether comatose in conscience penitent, be incomparably less difficult to justify the complete and even permanent closing of the system in its present condition, than the maintenance in existence of a court system which would permit so much as one adoption of an innocent and defenseless child by a homosexual, nay as would permit so much as the laying of the hand of a homosexual or any other predator for that matter upon any child, period (Mt. 18:6)

And if this is still too soft and unjustifiably conciliatory in tone, then RJM will just have to augment it when time permits.


In any situation in which more security would be utilized than is ordinarily utilized, the parties involved would be permitted to address everyone in the Courtroom for a period not exceeding 120 thirds each, to eliminate any unfavorable consequences that might result from inferences that might be drawn from such extraordinary use of security measures.

Some type of provocation jury instruction in cases in which judges or attorneys would have force used against them by common citizens who would claim that he, she or they, would have been victimized by lawyer or judicial crimes, torts and/or predations of whatever sort; which would demonstrate a concern for the innumerable victims of lawyer and judicial crimes and predations, without unjustifiably reducing the disincentives now in place which serve to deter aggression against acceptably accountable judges and attorneys - via the operation of penalties for any use of force that might be unjustifiably employed against an acceptably accountable judge or attorney.

Add a representative of every policing entity which it could reasonably be foreseen in a given case might be summonsed to enforce an order emanating from a given case to the adjudication of such case (as some type of third party observer), so that no one ever summonsed to enforce a given order could justifiably claim that he or she was convinced in good faith that a given void or otherwise illegitimate order could have been enforced without the incurrment by any enforcer thereof or attempted enforcer thereof of tort and/or criminal liability.

#’s 1-30 correlate to #’s 48-76

see relevance – defined according to retention of claim to rectify…vacate entirety of criminal code

prohibit any entity from

Addendum of 1/14/07 to Proposed Ground Rules –later 3/24/11 (prior postulation re entries included herein in inchoate form also herein applicable)

Provision of body guards for some number of judges who would have demonstrated an unwillingness to render unto the Rothschilds what would rightfully belong to God in a given case (see Mt. 22:22 et al) , or to otherwise permit themselves to be intimidated, or betray their oaths of office, or disregard the requirements of the moral law as they would be applicable to a given exercise of authority.

relevance – defined in a given proceeding according to retention of claim to rectify…a given dispute via use of a contra-predatory vigilante remedy

vacate entirety of criminal code

prohibit any entity from preventing use of the stair cases in courthouses – save time, opportunity to stimulate bloodflow, expiate sins and relieve stress

long shadow of Richman v Sheahan, T.Schiavo, Roe v Wade and Federal Reserve Act of 1913

explanation explains how …. Is compatible with art IV, standard of absolute discretion is compatible with thirteenth Amend, substantive due process

Require stipulation regarding a standard according to which litigants and court can conduct their activity respectively so as to not be subjected to liability under 18 USC 242, conversely a standard according to which such activity must be conducted in order to avoid such liability and if no standard can be negotiated, use the ROL/ROT standard RJM has constructed.

Requirement as a requisite for participation in a given case as a litigant, judge or law clerk that anyone interested in participating in any given case would sign a statement that the postulator of any postulation that a given conveyance would be unintelligible, non-sensical or would contain veiled threats of violence, would be subject to the burden of demonstrating that a given conveyance fit such description via the demonstrating of the substance of any such type claim, assessed against an acceptable objective standard in regard to whatever type of claim would have been posited in a given case, respectively.

ill app court – efiling, edocket, e service

What is the reasoning justifying the non-publication of IL Supreme Court votes?

Who decided that the public is not entitled to know how each justice voted on each petition?

How can one know if one's petition was read at all or by someone who is not just a law clerk?

Is there a limit to the number of petitions they can grant in a given period?

Do the justices read every petition first then go back and decide which ones they will accept, or is the assessment and adjudication process conducted on a decide them as they read them, one after another, basis?

Are the votes of the various judges known to the other judges?

Are the cases assessed by the Justices in their separate offices or in a convocation?

Do the judges deliberate amongst one another before deciding which petitions to grant and which to deny?

If there are deliberations conducted regarding petitions, what is the argument justifying not permitting the public to assess the content of such deliberations?

What can be justifiably concluded re the process and methods applied in such ventures?

Does the activity of the Court provide enough benefit, to offset the expenses and harms the activity thereof costs and causes respectively, that its continued existence and operation is justified or would Contra-barbarians not be much better off without the system?

How would one obtain the bar registration numbers of any and all law clerks that would participate in a given adjudication?

Can RJM obtain such information in this case?

Thank you by anticipation for whatever information can be obtained in this regard, and to all those who by their conduct have rendered themselves unworthy of having to be subjected to the injustices and afflictions inflicted regularly through the conduct of Illinois Courts, an apology for whatever is RJM’s share of the blame for the present conditions of such Courts [which is, on the whole, deplorable, or maybe, considering that innocent children are subjected to being adopted by homosexuals in IL at this juncture through such Courts and that abortionists can use such Courts to continue to murder babies and that pornographers can continue to use them to disseminate their filth, even, notwithstanding the edifying conduct of various judges, clerks, security personnel, and law librarians et al, abominable might be the more easily justified adjective] is herein extended,

Make adequate provision for commensurate body protection and weaponry of everyone not possessing any record of violence in all government buildings at all junctures or eliminate the functions governments are supposed to perform in any situation in which it would be claimed such objective cannot be accomplished.

11112

Supreme Court Rule 63 – one means of eliminating the indignity and absence not only of decorum but anything remotely resembling an acceptable measure of accountability – need for audio-video of each and every proceeding to deter the types of abuses, defraudments, malefactions, predations and crimes that have become the customary modus operandi according to which most Cook County Circuit Court proceedings in regard to which RJM has been cognizant have been conducted

<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Either eliminate the presumption that individuals in positions of govt. authority will conduct activity according to acceptable standards on any type of code of honor, not unworthy of the appellation, or eliminate all govt activity that would not be compatible with the presumption that those subjected to it in a given case do not need to be constrained by any fear of getting caught and punished for culpable non, mis and/or mal-feasance, but rather that like govt officials ought be accorded a presumption that they will conduct their activity according to the same type code of honor (in which case, at least in this area, a double standard will have been eliminated) or if the first or third options would not be chosen, then predicate all rules on the solid ground basis of the fear of getting caught and punished for any culpable non, mis or mal-feasance for both govt officials and those who constitute the ‘people” as in “We the People….” (D.C. v Heller (_U.S._)).

29. In sum – either everyone’s activity ought to be regulated solely on an honor code or no one’s activity ought to be, or activity ought not be regulated at all, or everyone’s activity ought to be regulated according to the presumption that the prospect of punishment for morally unacceptable activity is always and ever necessary to deter predatory activity - standard.

30. As an addition to the proposal that a Plexiglas shield be build to be kept between the court and the parties and/or their advocates, it is herein demanded that such measure be implemented without delay as such entity would forever eliminate the pretext so frequently used as a justification for a given Court’s not addressing a given issue or not addressing it adequately and then having it hold someone in contempt of court, that the Judge “felt” threatened. With this ruse removed, Judges will not be capable of silencing those advocating interests incompatible with the interest to keep govt activity unmonitored, and any evidence of malice and criminality which would ever be in existence in a given instance, suppressed, concealed and unexposed.

77. See Griffith injunctive relief and proposed statutes, no criminal prosecutions re activity conducted upon any govt property unless arrestee receives audio-video recording of entirety of activity which constitutes basis for arrest in a given instance.

78. 28 USC 2241, making of names and addresses e…. available as condition, Court must sign document re what docs it has received and read before any proceeding commences,

79. Upon transfer of case, new judge must read all docs filed prior to his or her participation in case, except those in re which express disclaimer is provided and provide signature confirming that such objective would have been accomplished.

80. Any and all judges, government attorneys, security activity conductors and clerks involved in a given interaction and/or activity are required to commit under penalty of perjury to a description of factual predicates of a given encounter, either affirming or denying such (no refusal for this type of consideration may ever be kept from a jury) – upon reception of a demand wherefore-------------and any denial of such not accompanied by factual claims provided to allegedly rebut any factual claims contested or otherwise not stipulated at the earliest possible non-emergency juncture, will be construed to constitute an admission of the legitimacy of the factual claims not suchlike contested in a given instance.

81. Any and all judges, government attorneys, security activity conductors and clerks involved in a given interaction and/or activity are required – upon reception of a demand wherefore-------------to commit under penalty of perjury to the identification of an alleged legal basis according to which a given exercise of authority would ever have been exercised in a given encounter and any defense to any claim of any type which might ever be posited subsequent to such juncture will be limited to the explanation provided at the juncture at which a given explanation would have been provided, and if no identification of such type basis would be provided in a given instance, if a private citizen were to venture a given identification of such basis, and a given government official who would have been a participant in a given interaction to neither affirm nor deny such (no refusal for this type of consideration may ever be kept from a jury), the non-provision of any contesting of any such type identification not accompanied by any explanation demonstrating the legitimacy of any non-provision of such, will be construed to constitute an admission of the legitimacy of the allegation(s) regarding such basis which would have been posited by the non-government official in this construct, since such would not have been contested after opportunity to contest such would have been present.

82. Upon the reception of notice that a given activity conductor would be accusing a given judge, SAC and/or clerk ("JSC") of having perpetrated a deprivation of a right guaranteed by the constitution and/or laws of the u.s. of A., and/or of violating any criminal and/or penal law, the non-addressing at the earliest non-emergency juncture of a given accusation would result in the relinquishing of any claim to present any argument in the defense of any claim in which he or she (JSC) would be a defendant in the future, that he or she would not have received opportunity to make modifications of his, her and/or their, activity adequate to enable him, her or them to evade the incurrment of civil &/ or criminal liability.

83. Upon the reception of a demand for a clarification whether a given course of activity alleged to constitute any type of deprivation of a legitimate reliance interest, predation, arrogation, transgression and/or imposition of a false morality(“DPATI”) which would ever have been executed, conducted &/or perpetrated ("ECP") , would have been ECP for the purpose of the instigation of the use of force in response whereto by any of the victims whereof(ie constitute "provocation"), or would have been conducted according to a presumption of insulation from the justly deserved consequences (“PIJDC”) of a given such type course of activity, or whether it could justifiably be classified otherwise, the non-provision of such type clarification in a given instance, will be construed to constitute an admission that either the purpose of a given DPATI would have been to instigate the use of force and/or that it would have been perpetrated according to a PIJDC.

84. For among other purposes, to protect whatever component of the federal and state judiciar(y)(ies) actually require(s) him, her or themsel(f)(ves) to read the contents of documents presented to him, her or them other than the caption of a given document ever filed in a given case, from charges that judges do not require themselves to read the document(s) presented to them in (a) given case(s) before issuing rulings in regard whereto, and/or that many judges cannot comprehend the contents of documents which are objectively demonstrably comprehensible; to establish as a condition of employment in a judicial office a requirement that all judicial activity ever conducted be monitored by an audio-recording device, the contents of the recordings created by which over a weekly basis for every week of the year would be transmitted to both two storage facilities in states other than that in which a case would have been adjudicated [an independent bodies], including grand jur(y)(ies) at both the state and federal level at the end of each week of the year and made available to both the general public and any and all incarcerated persons two years prior to the expiration of any statute of limitations, either civil or criminal would expire in which such contents could be used as evidence in any case, civil or criminal in which any judge would be named as a defendant; and in regard whereto, all statutes of limitations (“SOL”) in regard to crimes ever alleged to have been committed by any judge(s) would have to be extended so that no criminal or tort SOL which might ever be invoked regarding any component of judicial activity would ever expire before any victim of any judicial crime and/or tort would have had adequate opportunity to assess the audio-video record of judicial activity of concern to him, her or them. No evidence of any judicial activity conducted without a record of the monitoring whereof, would ever be permitted entry into any defense of any civil or criminal case in which the judicial activity of any judge would be one of the entities in issue in a given case, but on the contrary, a rule of law would be operative, that the non-consideration of a document and/or other type(s) of predatory, tortious and/or criminal, judicial activity must be presumed from the non-presence of any record whereof in the recording(s) of judicial activity for the period in which a given case would have been pending in the court of a given judge, and for purposes of providing adequate safeguard to judges in this type operation, no one could incur any detriment in regard to the issues concerned unless and until either everyone directly concerned in regard to a given matter would have received confirmation of the reception and possession of such records as are referenced herein by the custodians whereof, or it could be demonstrated that conditions would be present providing commensurate protection from unjustified detriment according to the legitimate application of equitable principles whereto.

85. Require judges to wear a wire at all times as a condition of employment, whose contents would be secured, and retained according to the formula referenced in paragraph #84 herein supra.

A condition for the participation in the adjudication of any dispute by any judge, prosecutor, government attorney, attorney of any type, member of any security entity and/or clerk is the provision of a signature that he or she realizes that as in the case of any able-bodied male, much less any Baptized Roman Catholic, that such type activity conductor does not possess the authority to incur culpability for the remission, whether such remission would be accompanied by knowledge in re whereof or not, of whatever consideration would ever end up being remitted via the abstention/forbearance from the use of force in the form of Contra-predatory Vigilantism, in regard to the rectification of a given injustice ever perpetrated without the procurement of consideration commensurate therewith in a given instance and in every case.

86. A condition for the participation in the adjudication of any dispute by any judge, prosecutor, government attorney, attorney of any type, party in any case, member of any security entity and/or clerk is the provision upon the reception of a demand wherefore, of a signature that he or she realizes that it is the case that no able-bodied male, much less any Baptized Roman Catholic, would ever possess the authority to remit whatever consideration is remitted via the abstention/forbearance from the use of force in the form of Contra-predatory Vigilantism, in regard to the rectification of a given injustice ever perpetrated without the procurement of consideration commensurate therewith in a given instance and in every case.

87. Correlative to the contents of #86 herein, a condition/prerequisite for the participation in the adjudication of any dispute by any judge, prosecutor, government attorney, attorney of any type, party in any case, member of any security entity and/or clerk is the provision upon the reception of a demand wherefore, of a signature that he or she realizes that the objective in any litigation in which any member of the Institute of St. Michael the Archangel would ever be involved is to retain a claim to resort to use of “disadvantage negators” (aka “equalizers”) in any of the dispute resolution stages, listed as #’s 7-15 &/or beyond, in the RCDRC and that any need and correlative justification for the use of such could invariably be eliminated in a given case in which any allocation of property and/or assets would be all that would be at stake, via either a party’s offering an acceptable offer to settle a case or a judge, or other participant’s’ stipulating to him or her - self cover any amount in dispute via the provision of compensation to ensure that no loss would be incurred by a given member of ISMA ever involved in any given case, in other words that just remuneration for any injury unjustifiably inflicted &/or otherwise caused would be accepted from a collateral source provided any such remission would be free from any coercion, fraud or any other type disqualifying activity.

88. The consequences of the denial of a motion to dismiss is the rendering of a verdict in favor of the non-moving party, which is what the arrangement was in regard to such motions at common law according to Prof Suja Thomas

89. Summary judgment is not permitted in any instance in which both parties to a given dispute would not have agreed to be bound by any judgment ever rendered in regard to such type motion.

Revise each of those entries included herein supra in which the addition of the “ upon the reception of a demand wherefore language included in #88 supra would have to be included in order to ensure the legitimacy of a given proposed ground rule.




<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

90. Questionnaire Transmitted and Affirmations Under Penalty of Perjury Demanded, so that Moral Liability of Participant in Proceeding Making Demands Wherefore Would not have been Left in Condition of Not Having been Adequately Covered

Q.) As a condition of adjudicating any given case, any judge to which a given case would be assigned is required to sign a statement under penalty of perjury that he or she has never taken and/or sworn any kol nidre oath, nor any other oath which would be incompatible with the oath taken to uphold and defend the Constitution of the u.s. of A. or that if such type signature could not be legitimately provided, provide a description of any and all endeavors ever undertaken to purge oneself from the effects of the taking of such type oath so that all concerned in a given situation can ascertain whether there would be a basis upon which any given professedly and evidently actually, repentant former malefactor would not lack the requisite dispositions to adjudicate a given matter (see Assize of Clarendon re precedent for grants of clemency for various sins in certain situations, the conversion and apostolic activity of St. Paul after he had directed St. Stephen’s murder, etc.)

1 O.) Under penalty of perjury I aver that I have never taken and/or sworn any kol nidre oath, nor any other oath which would be incompatible with the oath taken by me to uphold and defend the Constitution of the u.s. of A. or that such type signature cannot be legitimately provided, but I herein provide a description of any and all endeavors ever undertaken to purge myself from the effects of the taking of such type oath ______________________.

Under penalty of perjury I aver that I have never heard the expression “Tob Shebbe Goyim Harim” uttered orally, nor seen it expressed in writing by anyone who has ever been in any position of authority over me, whether directly or indirectly _____________________. Or I have in the following instances_________________________, ________________________, __________________.

I am familiar with the contents of the Talmud referenced in Michael Hoffman’s website which require a Jewish Judge to render verdict in favor of a Jew in any matter in which a Non-Jew would be pitted in an adversarial posture with a Jew.

I am familiar with the contents of the Talmud referenced in Michael Hoffman’s website which make reference to Non-Jews as "Goy" (s) and “Goyim” (pl) which is interpreted by him to mean cattle.

Under penalty of perjury I aver that I have never been a member of any secret society, nor any entity committed to the subversion of the Noncounterfiet Version of the Rule of Law and/or of the Constitution of the u.s. of A.

I accept in their entirety the postulations contained in Acts 10:34 about God not being a respecter of persons, Acts 5:29, and Matt. 22:21 prohibiting the rendering unto any body politic any consideration owed to God, and the duty incumbent upon all to avoid incurring complicity in anyone else’s sin (1Tim. 5:22), in participating in any “work of darkness” (Eph. 5:8) and/or to permit oneself to be overcome by evil (Rom. 12:21) and that, as St. Thomas Acquinas has explained, any law incompatible with God’s natural law, is not a law but a form of violence (S.T Part... a…Art…), that a “court order or judgment” constitutes a “law” in the sense in which he used such term in such construction and that any such type “law” (ie - one that would in essence constitute a form of violence, necessitates disobedience whereto.


Have all “upon the reception of a demand wherefore” entries been augmented to include such language?


#10 in D/L of 10/27/12



thirstforjustice.tripod.com.ismapwcs11512.html


PWCS – Prevent Worst Case Scenario Formula Document of 11512

update under construction to include arrangement in which ac tivity conductor making concession in a given instance would claim that the making of such in a given instance would not result in the permanent relinquishment of any claim to consideration according to the reasoning in Prosser and Keaton that criminal defendant plea bargain acceptors in certain arrangements would not lack a claim to sue for malicious prosecution, issue of criminal and tort liability incurred when a given issue – substantive in a given case and/or in regard to the method and/or standard of adjudication of a given substantive issue has remained unaddressed in a trial court proceeding (“TCP”), in a TCP and in an appellate court proceeding (“ACP”) as well, or in a TCP, an ACP and in petitions to review by Court’s whose review is discretionary, and the character of an arrangement in which a court would refuse to accommodate legitimate reliance interests in which it would also refuse to simply provide a declaration of unconstitutionality as applied of various criminal codes whose provisions might ever be applied in regard to any contra-predatory vigilante endeavor undertaken in regard whereto, and whether any member of any policing entity could ever incur any detriment for refusing to enforce a facially valid court order in such arrangement

Objective of Participation in Dispute Adjudication in 21rst Century in the De Jure Government Courts of Committee of 300 Owned and Operated /Talmudic-Barbaric amerika - A modest Proposal Presenting a Legitimate Alternative Between the Despicable, Sycophantic Relinquishment of Assets and Property to the Committee of 300 and its Merciless Minions (the Genocidist/Cannibalist Regime (“GCR”) ) Via the Provision of What Might Ever Be Construed to Constitute Any Type of Consent to Subjection to a Given Predation Perpetration on the One Hand, and “Going Post Office” (“GPO”) Whereby Sending Oneself from the Frying Pan into the Eternal Fire (Absent the Making of a Perfect Act of Contrition in Whatever Time Might be Available Between Incurrment of Trauma and Death in a Given Case) and Leaving the Contra-Genocidist/Contra-Cannibalist Movement with an Enslavement Arrangement Incrementally Worse After a Given GPO Incident than that which would have been in Place Before a Given GPO Incident would have transpired

Objective: Short Formulation: Until the court systems presently existing and operative in the u.s. of A. can be abolished according to a formula which would leave no reliance interest legitimate in character in any condition of not having been adequately accommodated, the objective of participation in litigation evidently must be to proceed through and out of the adjudication of a given case with all claims to consideration ever possessed in regard to a given matter, intact and unrelinquished, along with claims to consideration for any injuries unjustifiably incurred in any adjudication process ever conducted in regard whereto, w/o having permitted oneself to have become so entangled in and burdened by, the participation in the litigation of a given dispute that the burden of any prior obligation to which one would have ever been subjected would not have been adequately borne.

11512

Objective: Longer Formulation: 1. Prevent Worst Case Scenario approach to Participation in either any Criminal or Civil Legal Adjudication ("PWCS") in Systems Promulgatedly in Place for the Purpose of the Adjudication of Disputes &/or Prosecution of Activity Ever Alleged to be Criminal in Character– which would be the incurrrment of culpability for any sin the incurrment of which would leave a given activity conductor without the possession of sanctifying grace which could occur via either the execution of an affirmative act or the making of a concession, the making of which could not have been morally justified in a given instance/2. Foregone conclusion that the dispute at issue in a given instance will not be acceptably resolved except via either the application of a contra-predatory vigilante remedy ("CPVR") or a full scale military conquest, unless it might end up being resolved via the demonstration of the capacity to accomplish such in a given instance and the commitment to accomplish such, should proposals for resolution of a given dispute without any recourse to the use of any CPVR prove unavailing without any CPVR having to actually be utilized in order to accomplish a given legitimate objective (eg. the claims of the English Subjects of King John III, at Runneyemede in 1215 A.D. ended up being accommodated without any CPVR having to be utilized for the purpose of the procurement of such accommodation), ever continuing to acknowledge that no CPVR can ever be used except when demonstrably necessarily needed and that in a case in which the predation perpetrating adversary concedes the matter in issue, nothing further would be necessary and correlatively justified, unless the villain party(ies) conceding would demonstrably be involved in some type of deception and subterfuge (see Michael Collins on the dangers of a truce, and the slaughter of the Cristeros who complied with the mis-informed Pope Pius XI’s directive to lay down their arms in Mexico in 1929) ultimately likely to prevent the procurement of the consideration ever sought by the part(y)(ies) endeavoring to rectify a given injustice, which foregone conclusion approach necessarily includes a commitment both to avoid the provocation of any sin and/or error and to accept a just resolution of any given dispute which could be procured without there being any resorting to any property confiscation and/or destruction and obviously, correlatively, without there being any use of any CPVR for the purpose of defeating any endeavor which might ever be undertaken for the purpose(s) of the prevention of the successful use of any CPV(R) property damage and/or confiscation remedy, as a method of procuring a legitimate resolution to a given dispute/3.Demonstration of Affirmative Refusal to consent to any deprivation of any legitimate claim to consideration/4. Evident Adequate Effort to Mitigate any and all Damages unjustifiably Incurred and Demonstrate Adequate Diligence, no relevant factor left unconsidered in any assessment of what would constitute "adequate mitigation endeavors" in a given instance, in bringing a given dispute to a just resolution, all conducted in a disposition of what St. Teresa referenced as “religious indifference” . Re the mitigation of damages aspect of this formula: demand would not necessarily have to be, but can be, made, that the unjustified injury causing duty breacher and/or tort feasor in a given instance either provide a mitigation of damages formula in regard to its culpable non, &/or mis &/or mal – feasance in a given instance, or else provide a confirmed explicit concession that it has been informed by the individual claiming the incurrment in a given instance of an unjustified injury (“harmed party”, “HP”) , that it would be the position of such HP that until a given definite date certain, that any claim incompatible with a presumption of adequate endeavors to mitigate damages would be relinquished unless a proposed formula in re whereto would be provided or an explanation justifying the utilization of some alternative other than those herein referenced would have been provided. Pursuant to the postulations contained in Logan v Zimmerman Brush Co. (_U.S._) that damages in a civil case constitute a property interest in regard to which due process requirements apply, the HP possesses claims to consideration to create an adequate record of all that would have transpired in regard to a given injury unjustifiably caused and in general, to rectify any given injustice/5. Submission of Demand for provision of stipulation from tribunal presider, prosecutor and/or member of policing entity, as the case ever might be – that any postulation of conveyance, or vice versa, whether oral, written or nonverbal, posted or unposted and howsoever delivered, which might ever, howsoever unjustifiably in a given instance, be interpreted, construed and/or claimed to constitute any type of insult and/or to have been insulting, could not by (itself) (themselves) ever constitute any basis via which culpability for any claim of provocation, elicitation, inducement, educement, &/or instigation of error &/or duty breach and/or sin, (“provocation of error”, “POE”) ever committed could be justifiably attributed to any activity conducted by the transmitter whereof except in an instance in which any explanation which it might ever be claimed could provide a justification for the causing of any detriment to the transmitter whereof would have been transmitted whereto at an early enough juncture in any given interaction to which it might ever be claimed that this stipulation might be applicable, to enable the modification of any such transmission ever alleged to constitute a provocation of error such that, inter alia, no claim of POE could ever be legitimately posited in any arrangement in which such could have been prevented and/or eliminated via the transmission of the type of stipulation which this conveyance constitutes. Or any unjustified injury causing duty breacher/tort feasor can provide the following general stipulation: Such and Such Adversary ______________herein stipulates that given the condition of the de jure government court systems in the country bordered on the North by Canada and on the South by Mexico as of …, that the dispute this document concerns will never be resolved according to a standard of accountability not incompatible with the requirements of the natural moral law in any proceeding ever conducted in any de jure government operated court presently conducting activity in such country, at the very least, attributable to the condition of the reviewing courts operative wherein (which clause leaves in place provision for the presence and activity of the Judge J. Alesia contingent of the judiciary still adjudicating cases in American Courts at this juncture in its history in trial court proceedings). Therefore it is herein conceded that the petitioning of any such court(s)would practically constitute a futile endeavor and the principle that the law can never require the execution of (a) futile act(s) is herein acknowledged/6. Demand for either a stipulation under penalty of perjury including an acknowledgment of the veracity of any factual averments which might ever be referenced wherein to the incurrment of criminal liability in a given instance or a “Running Lanier (520 U.S. 259) Examination” – that is a component of each and every audience ever conducted and/or in regard to each and every document ever submitted in regard to a given adjudication/interaction/process in which an opportunity would be provided for the examination of any and every govt activity conductor and/or individual who it would ever be alleged would have participated with any government activity conductor in the perpetration of any deprivation of any claim to consideration alleged to be guaranteed by the Const and/or laws of the u.s. of A. in any and every instance in which a given claim that a deprivation of such sort would have been perpetrated would have been anchored in the identification of a specific citation to a definition of the scope of the alleged liability of any given alleged perpetrator of any given alleged deprivation perpetration at the level of specificity at which tort liability for qualified immunity has been defined by the opinions promulgated by the SCOTUS in its opinions issued in regard to such matter (see Harlow v Fitzgerald (_U.S._), Parrat v Taylor (_U.S._)) and/or any private sector actor, his principal and/or agents at the juncture of the perpetration of any alleged malefaction, crime, tort, sin and/or error so that there would not be any provision in any arrangement ever in place in regard to the type of situation herein referenced via which Lucifer would have any opportunity to enable any of his servants to lie their way out of criminal and/or civil liability via (any) post hoc reconstruction(s) of factual predicates and/or the legal basis for a given component of activity. Any Lanier Examination ever conducted would have to be conducted according to a standard of procedure and modus operandi sufficient to ensure that neither any vagueness/overbreadth, nor honest mistake of fact defense(s) could ever be legitimately invoked to enable any government activity conductor of any type to succeed in evading a criminal conviction which would have been the justly deserved consequences of his or her activity in any given instance. There would have to be adequate provision provided by any and all persons and/or entities involved in a given interaction/audience for the examination referenced herein (to be) (have been) recorded via a method of audio-video recording, in regard to which the SD or any other type media device onto which whatever would (be) (have been) recorded would (be) (have been) made available to any and all such persons and/or entities prior to any discontinuance of any interaction/audience which would have ever been recorded so that neither any tampering with any recording nor the positing of any false allegation posited in regard whereto could undermine and/or negate the effectiveness and usefulness of this strategy.

1. To ISMA – addendum to PWCS of 11/5/12 – implicitly present in the formulation contained herein supra is: 1. A Refusal to contribute to the conference of the appearance of legitimacy upon any activity the character of which would be either one of obvious illegitimacy or in regard to which there would be a serious question regarding the moral character whereof in terms of the issue of whether there would be any (il) legitimacy whereof. 2. A Refusal to make any concessions to any activity in regard to which there would be evidence of demonic instigation, except unless and until moral certainty could be procured in regard to a given component of activity that such would not have been demonically instigated. 3. Inclusion of acknowledgement that the competent evidence in regard to which RJM would be cognizant at a given juncture would be that some activity conducted by some activity conductors in any given theatre of adjudication in regard to which an assessment of the moral character whereof would have been conducted in a given instance, would either permit or even in a given instance, compel, the provision of an assessment that such activity would not have lacked substantial legitimacy if indeed this would be the case in a given instance.

2. Finally, a Confirmation is herein sought that (such &/or such) tribunal presider ….will verify that there would be no competent evidence in regard to which he or she would be cognizant in a given instance upon which any conclusion could ever be predicated that adequate performance/compliance accomplishment would not have been demonstrated by any activity conductor ("AC") claiming the non-relinquishment of any claim to any measure of consideration attributable to the entrance into an adjudication record in a given case of a facially valid court order evidently adverse to the prospects for an initial just resolution of a given dispute at all, much less, due to his or her not having accomplished more than what would have been accomplished at a given juncture to prevent the perpetration of any error/unjustified injury causing duty breach and/or most importantly, sin, in regard to the entrance into any given adjudication record of any given order or judgment.

(ismaburd11512)

Focus and concern – that the burdens of the exercise of the authority of the office defined as:…. have not been and are not being, borne, according to what can be identified and demonstrated to constitute a minimally acceptable standard of accountability, that the component of the Catholic Cause in regard to which RJM understands that RJM will have to provide an accounting have been and are continually incurring a measure of detriment , as a foreseeable consequence of such other-than-adequate bearing and that the condition of the eternal disposition of the soul of RJM is dependent upon his making a “sufficiently strong showing” to eliminate such detriment.

(ismaforbeacpv11512)

Forbearance/Contra-predatory Vigilantism Formula

There is no promulgated authority, promulgated by the Authentic Magisterium of the Roman Catholic Church – history’s only infallible source of authority (Matt. 16:18), in regard to which RJM is cognizant, nor any other promulgation in regard to which RJM is cognizant, to which RJM would be confident that any legitimacy could ever be justifiably attributed and/or upon which RJM would be willing, so long as the gates of hell remain open, to predicate any reliance interest - in which has been contained any expression of approval of any type of unilateral and/or unconditional remission of forbearance /provision of/deprivation of the consideration correlating to the consequences whereof in regard to (a) (any) given predation perpetration(s) ever perpetrated, and/or in the process of ever being perpetrated, from the use of the means Providence has provided for the punishment of predations, the subduing and/or disabling of (a)predation perpetrator(s) and the protection of that component of the Catholic Cause in re which (a) given activity conductor(s) would ever understand in an adequately informed understanding and state of mind/condition of sense of accountability that he would have to provide an accounting.

(ismafitnass5-5-11)

Master document list – Fitness Assessment - -Negative - demonstrated combination of the non-possession of the capacity to bear and the non-presence of a commitment to bear the burdens of the exercise of the authority of the office described as….at what can be identified to constitute a standard of accountability that could justifiably be classified as not less than acceptable

Positive - -demonstrated combination of the non-non-possession of the capacity to bear and the non- non-presence of a commitment to bear, the burdens of the exercise of the authority of the office described as….

a.) at what can be identified to constitute a standard of accountability that could justifiably be classified as not less than minimally acceptable

- b.) … at what can be identified to constitute a standard of accountability that would not be so low that Pope St. Pius X would have considered it necessary that the issue of activity conducted at a commensurate standard of accountability by individuals conducting activity in roles similar to the role in which a given component of activity would ever have been conducted, 100 years ago, be addressed during his 11 year pontificate – (1903-1914) in any promulgation to the universal Roman Catholic Church.

- C.) At what can be identified to constitute a SOA that would not be lower than what it can be ascertained from Inferences permitted from activity conducted by Pope Pius X which was never promulgated to the Universal Church that he would have considered to constitute too low a SOA for such to be considered acceptable

A component of the solution for the time being: Declare the contents of all criminal codes unconstitutional as applied to any activity of RJM conducted relative to the just resolution of the dispute this document concerns.

Apologies are herein expressed that this document might not be clearer and more thorough than the condition in which it is presently found to be, and that if something clearer and more thorough would not have been available, that it or something similar would not have gotten into the hands of the countless victims of the Court Systems presently operative in Northern IL, who have capitulated to any given predation perpetration(s) ever perpetrated upon them on the one hand and to the Salvador Tapia, Joe Jackson and any Bart Ross “Persona” (since the author of this document is not cognizant that any investigation has been completed demonstrating that the official Bart Ross story is worthy of any presumption of legitimacy) types prior to their deciding not to adopt a morally legitimate approach to their problems in a given instance.

Non-sham investigation, prosecution and punishment of crime arrangement (“IPPA”) distinguished from Sham IPPCA

Non-sham investigation, prosecution and punishment arrangement - defined: Alleged perpetrator of predation perpetration would have to be subjected to examination under penalty of perjury at least once in investigatory phase of administration of just retribution administration process in a given case and likewise in any prosecution phase whereof, in an arrangement in which provision for the administration of just retribution and punishment for activity demonstrated to have been predatory in character in a given instance would not be controlled by individuals whose activity and decision making in regard whereto would be subject to the same economic, political and/or social incentives and disincentives as that activity in regard to which the punishment referenced herein supra would constitute the just consequences, as distinct from an arrangement in which the administration of such punishment as would be justified and necessary to protect the true common good according to the principle present in the axiom “Qui nocentibus parcit, innocentibus punit” would be in the control of those injured directly and indirectly from any given component of predatory activity in regard to which punishment would have to be administered in order to protect such true common good.

Sham IPPA – Anyone can observe any non-atypical IPPA in any court system operative in the u.s. of A. in this period of its continued descent into an ever deepening barbarity and formulate his or her own formula in this regard.



Updates, modifications and improvements to this document are in the process of being completed and posted.

This document is subject to demands for the production whereof and the disposal, destruction and/or altering whereof would leave any perpetrator of such subject to penalties applicable under a given configurement of law(s) and/or legal promulgations of various sorts.,.

Confirmation of Reception of Service/Delivery Whereof - .On __________________________, at ______________, I (title)___________________ received a copy of the document in which this Con…/del is included via hand delivery at _____________________________________, from a person demonstrating identification as _______________________________. or Designee refused to sign and document was left with him or her as indicated herein, but not in such manner that I could be subject to any legal sanction for having so left it ___________________________

#11 in D/L of 10/27/12

thirstforjustice.tripod.com/decuncon42012.html….)

Motion And Proposed Order For Declaration Of Unconstitutionality As Applied Of Provisions Of Criminal Codes - Template

Plaintiff’s Motion and Proposed Order of …

Now comes the Plaintiff (“RJM”) to respectfully move this Court to provide signatures in the spaces adjacent to the entries included herein infra or explanations justifying not doing so in any case in which this Court would not provide a signature adjacent to a given entry, in order to ensure that the Court’s moral liability regarding its activity therein would not remain not adequately covered and that if it would, that such lamentable conjectural condition could in no way be imputed to any culpable negligence attributable to RJM and in explanation and support whereof, RJM avers and explains as follows:

Declaration of Unconstitutionality of… Criminal Code(s) Regarding Activity of …Robert J. More

1. (It is herein proposed that any clause contained herein which would cause any Court to refuse to sign this document be stricken over the explicitly confirmed and acknowledged objection of the proponent thereof, so that no clause, the inclusion of which would render it impossible for such proponent to presently procure a signature upon this document, would be left herein such that the signature herein sought would remain unprocured, without in the endeavor - to procure a signature on a document which might facilitate the procurement of some form of relief and/or the elimination of some burden - there being present the making of any unjustified concessions to the activity of the devil, and such that it could never be claimed that the proposition was unjustifiably conciliatory and/or characterized by concessions which the proponent thereof would possess no authority to make, acknowledging that in exigent circumstances wherein a signature upon some modified version of any original proposal could facilitate the procurement of a benefit or the elimination of an evil, the effect of which would evidently be more beneficial to the interests of the Catholic Church than would be whatever condition would be left in place as a consequence of whatever injury or loss might accrue to such Church from the non-inclusion of any clause in whatever declaration would have been issued which would not include the entirety of whatever would have been included in the proposal originally offered, it is the proponent of this postulation’s understanding that the procurement of a document in some measure modified would not be unjustified, but that great solicitude must necessarily be exercised in this regard, lest non-negotiables end up being unjustifiably conceded and/or otherwise compromised.

(SEVERABILITY CLAUSE SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION AND STILL UNDER CONSTRUCTION))



By the authority vested in this Court pursuant to the provisions of the Constitution of the united States of America {or by any other authority and/or any authority howsoever described (include any other formulation here:_____________________)} as the derivation of such authority has been transmitted down through the centuries of the history of Western Civilization, through the succession of generations reaching back prior to the signing of the Magna Charta on June 15, 1215 A.D. to the signing of the Charter of Liberties in 1100 A.D., and in consideration of the consideration and protections to which the people of the united States of America (“u.S.A”, “u.S. of A.”))(or any other formulation describing the citizens of the 50 states that presently constitute the Union and/or Republic of the u.S. of A. howsoever described and/or appelled) are entitled, correlative to the moral liability to which such persons are subject under the immutable requirements of the natural law as such as been inscribed upon the heart of every man (Romans 1:15 et al) and that any arrangement at any juncture in place imputable to whatever combination of contributing causes which would effectively constitute a deprivation of the measures of consideration guaranteed to all citizens of such Union and/or Republic by amongst other provisions of such Constitution, those of the Prohibition on the Establishment of a Religion, Prohibition on the Right to the Free Exercise of Religion, Right to Petition, Due Process, Supremacy and/or Guaranty Clauses of such Constitution and/or the prohibition on slavery explicitly promulgated in the Thirteenth Amendment to such Constitution, the prohibition on the denial of the equal protection of the laws and the implicit prohibition present in the Fourteenth Amendment to such Constitution upon arrogations, encroachments, usurpations, infringements, transgressions and/or predations which would ever constitute any type of deprivation of any of the liberties English speaking persons have been accorded through the centuries at least on paper as constituent components of “ordered liberty” by their government(s) as such are actionable under what is classified as substantive due process in the jurisprudence of the SCOTUS, this Court herein declares that all state, county and municipal laws are unconstitutional as such might be applied and/or as any member of any government entity might ever endeavor to apply such in the absence of the issuance of this order to any measure which Robert J. More might implement and/or to any endeavor in which RJM might ever participate which would have been implemented and/or undertaken, whether in a given case, the intents and purposes of a given agenda and/or project concerning such matters, would have been published, promulgated and/or declared explicitly or not, for purposes of the rectification via vigilante and/or military measures of any injustice(s) which it is RJM’s informed understanding presently prevails in the matters which the case this document concerns in _________________________________________ concerns and that further no member of any policing entity may endeavor to take Robert J. More (“RJM”) into custody pursuant to any allegation of contempt of any type without RJM’s first being provided a hearing in regard to any such type charge via the filing and adjudication of a 28 USC 2241 petition for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus to be presented in the first instance to either U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (“7th C.C.A”) Judge(s) Daniel Manion, Diane Sykes or Kenneth Ripple should any such type charge have been postulated in any proceeding ever conducted in the States of IL, WI or IN and before either Supreme Court of the United States (“SCOTUS”) Chief Justice J. Roberts or SCOTUS Justice Samuel Alito, should any such type charge have been postulated in any proceeding conducted in any state other than IL, WI or IN, with provision for the adjudication of any such type charge that might ever be postulated in IL, WI or IN, before one of the two SCOTUS Justices listed herein supra, should none of the 7th C.C.A. Judges listed supra be available in a given case to adjudicate any habeas corpus petition which might ever be submitted to any of them and/or the clerk of the 7th C.C.A.

_________________________, _____________

Signature Date

OR:

This Court, ever mindful, that the authority which it exercises in this case, has ultimately emanated from the consequences of a commitment to use force by the English Peasants at Runneyemede in 1215, were King John III not to grant them the concessions which they then and there demanded as being the minimal consideration which they could accept, without in accepting anything, less incurring a most egregiously sinful complicity in deprivations and predations, the likes of which no human being, created in God’s image and likeness, who would hope to retain a claim to procure the reward promised to those who refuse to make any unjustified concessions to evil & to avoid the punishment guaranteed to those who do not require themselves to refuse to make any such type of unjustified concessions, and who otherwise satisfy the requirements of the moral law in the conduct of their mortal lives at least to the extent necessary to ensure that their moral liability would not have been left not adequately covered in any substantial area in regard to which their activity in the earthly theatre would ultimately be assessed (Matt. 25:26 et al), could justifiably accept from any sovereign, and the actual use of force by those British American Colonists who in 1775, refused to make the same type of unjustified concessions to the predations and deprivations which the then reigning British Sovereign was at that time perpetrating upon them; acknowledges that no morally legitimate formula concerning the relations of people and their government(s), could ever be proposed which would not include provision for vigilantism and/or domestic insurrection in situations in which means less likely to result in the types of serious consequences which has always caused the Catholic Church to insist that remedies for the rectification of injustices and the resolution of disputes alternative to those involving the use of force, always be exhausted prior to anyone’s resorting to force for the accomplishment of such objectives, howsoever legitimate and necessary the use of force for such purposes might be in a given instance, be, but for the following reasons, asserts that the conditions which would have to be present in order for force to be justifiably utilized in these matters described supra are not present at this time either because conditions independent of RJM’s control render the use of force unnecessary and hence unjustified which are identified as follows __________________________________-, __________________________________, ____________________ (use additional paper as needed) or because RJM has not proven to this Court’s satisfaction that he possesses the requisite combination of adequately adjusted priorities and moral fiber for this Court to now provide him the type of “Declaration of Unconstitutionality as Applied…RJM….” which this Court would understand and consider that RJM would have had to have demonstrated in order for it to provide RJM such type order _________________________________, and that further, correlative to this assertion that RJM simply has not yet demonstrated the possession of such type priorities and moral fiber to this Court’s satisfaction, this Court herein informs RJM that if RJM would complain that it would be RJM’s position that such position of the Court could not on the whole be justified, that RJM would be welcome to explain to this Court the basis upon which RJM would posit such claim, so that upon the consideration of any such postulations as RJM might present in this regard, this Court could without further delay and the imposition of any further burden upon RJM in this regard, issue the type of order RJM has sought herein, or that RJM would have to satisfy the following exact requirements and/or make the following exact modifications in his priorities and/or modus operandi in order to procure the type of order which he has herein sought ___________________________, ___________________________, _____________________-(use additional paper as necessary).

2. This Court is reluctant to provide any affirmative endorsement of the nature proposed herein, but at this juncture would at least provide a nihil obstat – indicating that it could not see any reason why some Court of higher authority than this ought have any reluctance to provide a signature on the document or something similar in regard to the activity of Robert J. More in general (subject to the following restrictions, limitations and prohibitions) _________________, ______________, _____________.

Last revised 9/15/08, next scheduled revision 8/15/10, any input for the next revision would be much appreciated



Robert J. More

P.O. Box 6926,

Chicago, IL 60680, 863 – 688-9880

anselm45@gmail.com

#16 in D/L of 10/27/12



Structural Defect Document of 10/27/12

add - invitation to explicitly admit that ....it would not have mattered what ...in ...(past case) would not now matter what...would affirmative acts would have been executed, would be executed...the result would have been, will be .... the party evidently most capable of causing what is apprehended to constittute detriment to.. providing benefit to.. would have prevailed in at least any and all trial courts and appellate courts... discretionary review courts - either admit the legitimacy of such proposition, produce an argument that such is not the case has not been the case, would not be the case, ...some other alternative, confirm that has been apprised that ... finds it necessary to proceed upon the presumption that....

thirstforjustice.tripod.com/ismacrcpvr102712.html

Confirmation re CPVR Retention Agenda of RJM in re Prosecution of ........



Confirmation of ..., from this Court, the Counsel for the Defendants and each and all of their supervisors in whatever chains of command are present in regard to the Offices of such Counsel, and from each and every D included in this case or that would have been included had RJM been permitted to include all D’s in this case which RJM has understood have incurred tort liability from activity conducted by him or her or them in regard to the matters ........ concerns, [respectively] that each and all have been informed that RJM does not consent to have any of the claims the case this conveyance concern (“this case”), includes, adjudicated in the any of the Courts presently conducting activity in Chicago, IL, state or federal, does not expect that any such claims will ever be adequately resolved via activity conducted in and via any Committee of 300 Controlled Government Entity nor any political subdivision whereof, understands that the State and Federal Court Systems in Chicago IL are so controlled, and only filed ........ in the CCCC, IL, because of filing restrictions unjustifiably and criminally and tortiously imposed upon him in the area's federal courts (which he understands to constitute “judicial hell hole”s, acknowledging Judge D. Manion's exceptional activity conducted wherein and that of any other judge who has in any given instance adequately borne the burden of his or her judicial office in any given exercise of judicial authority, under protest, in order to retain a morally legitimate claim to participate in the utilization of (a) contra-predatory vigilante remed(y)(ies) (“CPVR”) in order to remedy the unjustifiably caused injuries concerned and to rectify the injustices concerned, via either the procurement of an acceptable resolution whereof [in this proceeding], or the demonstration of the unavailability of any alternative to the use of a CPVR which would not be plagued by the possibility of there being casualties and/or fatalities in the use whereof as CPVR's invariably are in situations in which members of policing entities refuse to concede a given matter and "stand down" (while acknowledging that far more casualties and fatalities might in the long term result from leaving a CPVR unused in regard to a given injustice ever perpetrated, eg. see Solzenhytzen's lamentation from Stalin's gulag re waiting too long to resort to the use of force against Stalin's round-up head-busters during Stalin's purge of all dissidents, the Ukranians failure to stop Stalin's extermination of them via the use of force in the textbook example of a "too little too late" scenario which their use of force failed because recourse to such remedy was not utilized soon enough, same outcome for the Germans who could have stopped Hitler after the Reichstag fire false flag, but who were without remedy by the time Hitler had replaced von Hindenburg ), pursuant to the exhaustion of alternative remedies prong of the promulgated requirements for the use of armed rebellion against a predatory government entity (the principles of which are applicable to any contra-predatory vigilante endeavor) explicated in the ordinary magisterium of the Catholic Church'es position in regard to the moral legitimacy of the use of force against government oppression and false morality imposition (see entries in the
Catechism of the "Catholic Church" re the matter which promulgate authentic Catholic principles notwithstanding their inclusion in a heretical book), and that RJM does not consent to participate in any adjudication of any dispute with a balance of power/leverage and/or prerogative arrangement in place between the government and private sector activity conductors which is any weaker a position for such PSC’s than would that of the English Protestants in 1790 or 1791 (see Utah v Thompson or vice versa (_U.S._)“the common law consists of the law of England at the time of the passage of the Bill of Rights, of the U.S. Constitution” - paraphrase), been, had they had the benefit of the indigenously beneficial developments of the past 222 years of American Jurisprudence where the term “indigenous” is defined relative to the term "surrogate" in Clyde Cleveland’s “Common Sense Revisited” published w/n the past 10 years (which progression would in turn constitute a benchmark on the way to the establishment of conditions in the relation between a country's citizens and its government not incompatible with those which prevailed in the 13th Century France ruled by King St. Louis IX, who in a death bed letter to his son directed him as follows in regard to the adjudication of disputes in what was then to become the Son's Kingdom, "In a dispute between the rich and the poor, the side of the poor must always be taken until the truth of the matters in issue can be fully ascertained.", and that RJM has only participated in any proceeding(s) in ........ in order to retain the claims to participate in contra-predatory vigilantism which he understands that he has possessed since the malefactions, crimes and torts this case concerns were perpetrated and in light of the fact that it is RJM’s informed understanding that it would not be impossible to have this case adjudicated by a judge of the moral probity of former USDC for NDIL Judge J. Alesia, in the State of IL at this juncture in history, which has left RJM understanding that refusing to file any lawsuit in regard to the matters this case concerns (“this case”) was not an alternative the use of which would have enabled RJM to retain the claim to participate in a CPVR of the type referenced herein.

Where then is the claim to resort to the use of (a) CPVR's at the end of an adjudication of a given civil dispute in the Court system's presently existing and operative in the u.s. of A.? Provided the unjustifiably injured party has not resorted to the use of any unjustified liberties himself and has participated w/n the limits of his capacity to participate in the adjudication of a given dispute in the adjudication whereof, such claim is right where it was when he was injured before filing any civil suit, except that at such juncture he would possess legitimate claims against malefacting judges for malicious adjudication and malefacting attorneys and defendants for malicious defense of a civil suit and for deprivations of (a) right(s) guaranteed by the Constitution and laws of the u.s. of A. under color of law pursuant to 42 USC 1983 re all concerned other than federal judges, attorneys and defendants and the "Bivens" remedy against these type actors.

The authority upon which this postulation abides is that: 1. "the law cannot require the impossible," 2. "presumptions against the waiver of rights of a federal constitutional dimension will be liberally indulged by this Court," SCOTUS - Michigan v Jackson (_U.S._) (in the type of arrangement this conveyance concerns, the right to sue (Right to Petition Clause, Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses, Substantive Due Process, Prohibition on Slavery provisions of Constitution of the u.s. of A. ("Fed. Cons.") ) ("the damages in a civil suit constitute "property" actionable via the invocation of the protection(s) of Due Process," (Logan v Zimmerman Brush Co. (_U.S._)) . 3. "res judicata cannot be used as a defense to a civil case in any arrangement in which (a) (the) part(y)(ies) in any prior case to which effort would ever be made to apply such doctrine would not have been provided adequate opportunity to litigate such prior case - SCOTUS (U.S. v Montana or vice versa (_U.S._) Footnote 16). "for every injury incurred, the law will always provide a remedy."4. no legitimate claim for the remedy of any given substantive injury in regard to which any claim would have originally been filed could ever be in fact permanently lost attributable to a given possessor whereof's unwillingness to make concessions to any arrangements ever encountered in the standards and methods of adjudication utilized for the adjudication of such claim which he would have found to have constituted (an) unreasonably dangerous condition ("UDC") , in any arrangement in which the unreasonably dangerous character of such condition could be proven to be such not to those who would ever have been beneficiaries in their subjective apprehensions of what would constitute a benefit to any of them, but to those who would have been in a posture leaving them as injured parties from the leaving in place of such type condition or as subject to detriment at some future juncture from the maintenance in place of any such type UDC. 5. the right to avoid the incurrment of detriment from the bearing of what a given activity conductor would have subjectively apprehended in a given instance to have constituted a component of any burden which he would have understood himself bound to bear attributable to the religious convictions of such burden-bearer, would be protected by among other provisions of the Fed. Cons., the free exercise and prohibition upon the establishment of religion provisions of the first Amendment whereto.

In other words, unless and until either all of the safeguards which are presently supposed to be in place in every Court System operative in the u.s. of A., for the purpose of the adjudication of disputes of whatever type (civil, criminal, etc.), based upon all legitimate development(s) of Anglo-American Jurisprudence to this date, but which are presently not in place in a given court system presently operative in the u.s. of A., would have been reinstalled wherein in a given case, it is RJM's understanding that it could not ever possibly be legitimately claimed that any substantively meritorious claim could ever be permanently lost attributable to the incapacity of a given litigant to prevail initially in the participation in any given legal proceeding in which he or she would ever participate unless either he or she would have explicitly and uncoercedly, knowingly consented to have participated wherein according to whatever standards and methods of claim processing would have been utilized in the processing whereof or it could be demonstrated that for equitable reasons, an adverse disposition of a given adjudication could not be legitimately disregarded.

In summation, unless RJM would be missing something substantive in regard to the matters herein being addressed, in which case he would be most grateful to receive even non-infallible opinions in regard whereto: the initial abstention, subsequent to the causing/incurring of a given unjustified injury from the use of a CPVR by the victim whereof, for the purpose of the just remedying whereof could no more result in the relinquishment of any claim to later vindicate any such type claim whether via some adjudicative process or the use of a CPVR, than did the evacuation of Dunkirk and activity conducted during the period between such evacuation and the subsequent invasion of Normandy, result in any relinquishment of any claim to eventually invade Normandy, because, inter alia, THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A "FINAL ILLEGITIMATE JUDGMENT" as no judgment which would lack moral legitimacy could ever possess finality, regardless of how many assassins, government employed jack-booted thugs and/or activity conductors otherwise members of any entity of the type VA governor G. Mason referenced as "standing armies" would be willing to risk incurring permanent disability or death in any endeavor to enforce such type instrument of iniquity which ever might be utilized in any given instance.

It is RJM's further understanding that, as of the date of the composition of this docment, there is a "structural defect" present in every reviewing Court reviewing cases in this country with whose activity RJM is familiar and every single trial court wherein with whose activity RJM is familiar except the few over which James Alesia profile judges still preside and the source from which it is RJM's understanding that such structural defect emanates is referenced in the "Core Temporal Problem" document posted at: thirstforjustice.tripod.com/ismactp.....html.

Further, RJM herein opines that the concept that non-accession &/or non-deference to edicts, orders, laws &/or judgments issued by whatever constitutes the governmental arrangement presently prevailing in a given venue, regardless of the (il)legitimacy whereof is unacceptable, is itself an unacceptable and intolerable abomination of a concept which could not possibly have emanated anywhere other than the deepest bowels of hell.

Finally, further for now, RJM herein opines that unless one of the tragically few Judge J. Alesia profile judges still adjudicating cases in any of the Courts, state or federal presently operative in Cook County, IL, would end up having a given case assigned to his docket, there would not be any realistic prospect of any demander of moral legitimacy in the standard & method of adjudication of a given dispute ever procuring a morally legitimate adjudication whereof unless certain conditions, an enumeration of which can be found in other documents of which this document is a companion document in a collection of documents maintained in regard to the matters this document concerns.



# 12 from D/L of 10/27/12


“Duties of Certain Classes of Laypersons “– from Moral Theology in Four Volumes by Henry Davis, S.J. (1958 edition) as PDF




IN THE SUPREME COURT OF the State of ILLINOIS

Robert More (“RJM”), Estate of RJM, Campaign to Make the World Safe for Innocence Once Again, St. Michael the Archangel, MAA Fund Plaintiff/Movant

v

Judge L. Martin


re: More


v Case # 11 CH 12339

Grif et al in the Circuit Court of Cook County, IL


Now comes the Petitioner, Robert J. More, to respectfully move this Court to grant RJM permission to proceed in the causes described in the title to the motion which this motion accompanies, without payment of any fee in re whereto and in explanation and support whereof, RJM provides the information that IL S. CT. Rule 298 (“Rule 298”) requires as follows:

1. RJM receives no assistance of any type from any government entity other than waivers of fees for court cases, and in some cases, service of process (all of which are of course recoverable from RJM’s opponents in litigation in any given case and which would never remain unrecovered, except in a case in which the system would malfunction, but since RJM is a Magna Charta Clause 61 (“MC C 61”) Burden-bearer, such fees would not remain unrecovered in the end anyway, unless RJM were not to survive a given endeavor to comply with the express mandate(s) of MC C 61 in regard to a given injury RJM would have unjustifiably incurred), which waivers would not be necessary if RJM were to have all criminal laws declared to be unconstitutional as such might ever be applied to RJM in the absence of the issuance of such type conjectural declaration and RJM is continuing to endeavor to procure just such a declaration from U.S. S. Ct. Justice J. Roberts, and/or somehow from some Court or other.

1.a. Furthermore to rebut a number of entirely unfounded allegations which have been made regarding RJM, his intentions, priorities and conduct, in regard to which RJM has become cognizant, in various Courts and by various Judges over which and whom, respectively, this Court possesses authority, RJM further avers as follows:

For whatever its worth, RJM respectfully informs this Court that RJM accepts no benefits from the government whatsoever, except what is indispensably unavoidable (ie a tooth extracted in 1999, several X-rays from numerous incidents in which RJM has been hit by cars while riding his bike, the waiver of court filing fees which are recoverable once cases are won and damages recovered) has not had a government job since 1977, avoids all avoidable hazards that might result in any malady requiring medical or dental attention and tries to consume nothing except what is unavoidably necessary to sustain life and health and what RJM hopes constitutes a commitment to continue to make progress in interior purification, and in general labors to not only not be a burden to others in any way, but to assist in the bearing of the burdens of the maintenance and now restoration, of a constitutional republican form of government anchored in the Non-counterfiet Version of the Rule of Law as a committed Roman Catholic Militia member who is continuing to labor to prove himself not deserving of eternal punishment, and howsoever deficient RJM's overall performance in the earthly theatre indisputably has been, RJM is at least sufficiently ashamed and dissatisfied wherewith to still be endeavoring to make restitution wherefor in whatever time is still left in RJM's earthy theatre tour of duty.

2. RJM has no income and the support RJM has received and is still receiving from relatives is well below the threshold defined in par. # 2 of Rule 298. RJM has borrowed a few hundred dollars over the past year to cover deficits caused by a sibling's infirmity which left him in default for a few months on a debt owed.

3. RJM possesses a computer purchased for $380.00 (all sums are pre-tax), an external harddrive purchased for $130.00, a camcorder purchased for $85.00, an MP3 player purchased for $33.00, a printer purchased for $20.00, a broken stepper, a bike purchased for $37.00, a few sleeping bags, some clothes, some weights, shelving units and peripheral media devices and tools, books and suchlike, the sum total resale value of which, RJM would think could not be greater than $1250.00 or maybe even only $1050.00 and possesses no other assets. There are a number of judgments RJM has won in small claims cases, but RJM is not certain of recovering any of them and has not gotten around to even trying to collect any of them, most of which involve Defendants residing in other states.

4. The applicant is eligible to receive civil legal services as defined in 735 ILCS 5/5-105.5.

5. The applicant is unable to proceed in this proceeding without the payment of fees, etc. and such charges would result in substantial hardship to the applicant.

6. The applicant has been unemployed for over 13 years, due to, as RJM understands the causes of his unemployment, the defamatory references of former employers RJM has had to sue, and employment reporting agencies, one of which RJM has also had to sue, RJM’s stigmatized condition as a non-capitulator/disciple of Jesus, who refuses to render unto the Rothschilds or any other golden calf worshipper what rightfully belongs to God (Mt. 22:22, Acts. 5:29, 1 Tim. 5:22, Eph. 5:8, et al) and now the entirely unjustified position of the IL Secretary of State requiring RJM to retake the road test to even recover his formerly entirely unjustifiably suspended commercial driver’s license, all of which causes are intertwined inextricably with the conditions of the Law and Chancery Division of the Circuit Court of Cook County and the U.S.D.C. for the N.D. of IL. in which it is entirely unjustifiably difficult and unless one ends up before an atypical judge in such Courts, all but impossible for a pro se “goy” to ever get any case to a jury of his or her peers, howsoever meritorious it might be.

7. The applicant has no income but survives at a sustenance level on the $500.00 a month received from relatives.

8. No child support is involved.

9. The applicants monthly living expenses are necessarily exactly what he receives in a given month in support - $500.00.

10. RJM understands in good faith that the claims this document concerns are eminently meritorious.

Wherefore, Movant, Robert J. More, herein respectfully moves this Court to issue an order enabling RJM to procede in the matters this motion/application concerns without payment of fees.

Under penalty of perjury, pursuant to the provisions

of 735 ILCS5/1-109, I aver to the veracity of all

factual averments contained herein.

Respectfully submitted,

Robert J. More



>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>j




notes and raw material for next component of this motion of 11/27/13 -


In re Oliver, RJM’s version of transpirings, transcripts, each visit to CCCC Courtroom – need to make a last confession, put out a minuteman alert call, isma…102812, grand jury 10/17/12,

J. Alesia,

383 - no claim to any consideration has been waived, forfeited nor relinquished attributable to the non-presentatin of issues not presented in the motion to which this order correlates

Bars, IL. S.C.R. 137(b), Sanctions, Summary Criminal Contempt used as bludgeon to .., deprivation of Liteky basis for SOJFC SOJFC'es, deprivation of opportunity to frame constitutional challenges, truncation of proceedings rendering it in many cases impossible to even identify what constitutional and/or statutory source of alleged and/or actual promulgated law it would be in regard to which any given constitutional challenge would have to be posited to satisfy the Webb v Webb (_U.S._) and steer under the Michigan v Long "independent and adequate state grounds" (_U.S._) - S&M of Adjudication in this Court - upon CCCC, IL Court proceedings, estate of RJM, RJM has not participated in any adjudicative proceedings other than status calls in

flight from the light referenced in Jn 3:19 et seq. ..


first 15 particularized issues:

1. psychotropic drugging of detainees at CCJ

2. deprivation of provision of the means to file 28 USC 2241 petition in Pysch ward of CCJ,

3. deprivation of provision for the use of audio-video recording device in any and every interaction with any government official and/or at any juncture at which any citizen would be on government property, including most especially in any courtroom

4. issue of disparity of strike capacity between government and citizens in every area in which such type arrangement would be present over which this Court would possess jurisdiction in the type of petition in which this issue has been presented

5. abuse of summary criminal contempt

6. abuse of S.C. R. 137(b) sanctions

7. abuse of bars to filings

8. deprivation of SOJFC on Liteky basis

9. abuse of motion to dismiss

10. deprivation of provision for the structuring of proceedings adequate to enable litigants to adequately frame questions of a federal constitutional dimension, so as to adequately satisfy the W v W and M v L thresholds,

11. need to examine judges, attorneys, parties UPOP at time of alleged transgression to lock in factual predicates and alleged legal basis of activity in regard to which complaint would ever be made

12. remedy in quo warranto to enable activity conductor actually unjustifiably injured in a given instance to prosecute removal from bench and bar, of judges and atttorney, respectively, demonstrably unfit to be exercising the authority of a judicial office/law license, rather than leaving such prosecutions to the JIB/ARDC

proposed solution: Close CCCC, IL and IL App. Ct. First District immediately, with this Court to cover emergency type matters into the indefinite future,

13. abuse of civil contempt instrument

14. citizen access to state grand jury for crimes perpetrated by government officials w/o having to deal with interdisposition of any prosecutor or judge

15. declaration of unconstitutionality of resisting arrest statute which criminalizes the resistance to an unlawful arrest

16. redefinition of the definition of "relevant evidence" used in the Rules of Evidence for Courts in the State of IL - “Relevant evidence” means evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.

Adopted September 27, 2010, eff. January 1, 2011.

Rule 402. - O'Connor - Michigan AA case - confidence in the legitimacy of the Grutter v. Bollinger upheld the University of Michigan Law School's consideration of race and ethnicity in admissions. In her majority opinion, Justice O'Connor said that the law school used a “highly individualized, holistic review of each applicant's file.” Race, she said, was not used in a “mechanical way.” Therefore, the university's program was consistent with the requirement of “individualized consideration” set in 1978's Bakke case. “In order to cultivate a set of leaders with legitimacy in the eyes of the citizenry, it is necessary

17. Provision of any and all measures necessary to eliminate adjudications of cases at any standard and method of adjudication less likely to "acertain the truth of (a) given disputed point(s) and/or issue(s) and result in the rendering of actual justice between disputing parties than the "demonstrations of (in)compatibility of...with the principle of non-contradiction demonstrated in Ch. 13 of the Book of Daniel in Susanna's Trial"

18. declaration regarding parameters of protests which will adequately limit the capacity of any government entity to prevent exposure of the unjustifiably injurious activity of the CCCC, IL, and the First District Appellate Court and the unjustifiably dangerous condition left in place from such activity, enough that no legitimate reliance interest would be defrauded in regard to this matter. protect prevent witness, jury influence re particular case, produce rules and regs first, sound amplification devices - decibels,

the filing of this motion provides evidence re mitigation of damages, extent to which RJM endeavored to get issues, especially those of federal constitutional dimension adequately "pressed and passed upon" in the trial court webb v Webb (_U.S._) Smith v Murray - perceived futility...court opportunity to correct its errors

RJM does not see any need to get the statute that protects judges and courtroom deputies from arrest in court declared to be unconstitutional provided the consideration referenced in #14 listed herein supra would be provided

affiliate victim of lawyer and judicial criminality and disregard of legitimate reliance interest requested that RJM not use his evidence in any and all instances, indiscriminately.

Dei v Tumara Foods, et al SCOTUS Amici



First Municipal Cases since 10/210/27,

is ..going to indemnify?

E Supremi quotes, Pius XII, ignorant, corrupt, politicized - Griffith, Jack, Rojas, LaBlanc,

steer under independent and adequate state ground,

status of CCA 7, FGJ, resisting arrest, ACLU v Alvarez - applicable to courtrooms, no prosecution of black upon white crime in Soetoro quasi-administration,

in seriatum - magnitude of Lucifer's control and influence, now almost 100 years since the fraudulent passage of the Federal Reserve Act have to proceed with only a small fraction even identified .

POR - duty to mitigate damages and all damages assessable to Diane Wood, C300

1 cor 10:13 -




.


Douay-Rheims Bible
Let no temptation take hold on you, but such as is human. And God is faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above that which you are able: but will make also with temptation issue, that you may be able to bear it.

Darby Bible Translation








>>>>>>>>>>>>>>



In re Oliver, RJM’s version of transpirings, transcripts, each visit to CCCC Courtroom – need to make a last confession, put out a minuteman alert call, isma…102812, grand jury 10/17/12,

J. Alesia,

383 - no claim to any consideration has been waived, forfeited nor relinquished attributable to the non-presentatin of issues not presented in the motion to which this order correlates

Bars, IL. S.C.R. 137(b), Sanctions, Summary Criminal Contempt used as bludgeon to .., deprivation of Liteky basis for SOJFC SOJFC'es, deprivation of opportunity to frame constitutional challenges, truncation of proceedings rendering it in many cases impossible to even identify what constitutional and/or statutory source of alleged and/or actual promulgated law it would be in regard to which any given constitutional challenge would have to be posited to satisfy the Webb v Webb (_U.S._) and steer under the Michigan v Long "independent and adequate state grounds" (_U.S._) - S&M of Adjudication in this Court - upon CCCC, IL Court proceedings, estate of RJM, RJM has not participated in any adjudicative proceedings other than status calls in

flight from the light referenced in Jn 3:19 et seq. ..


first 15 particularized issues:

1. psychotropic drugging of detainees at CCJ

2. deprivation of provision of the means to file 28 USC 2241 petition in Pysch ward of CCJ,

3. deprivation of provision for the use of audio-video recording device in any and every interaction with any government official and/or at any juncture at which any citizen would be on government property, including most especially in any courtroom

4. issue of disparity of strike capacity between government and citizens in every area in which such type arrangement would be present over which this Court would possess jurisdiction in the type of petition in which this issue has been presented

5. abuse of summary criminal contempt

6. abuse of S.C. R. 137(b) sanctions

7. abuse of bars to filings

8. deprivation of SOJFC on Liteky basis

9. abuse of motion to dismiss

10. deprivation of provision for the structuring of proceedings adequate to enable litigants to adequately frame questions of a federal constitutional dimension, so as to adequately satisfy the W v W and M v L thresholds,

11. need to examine judges, attorneys, parties UPOP at time of alleged transgression to lock in factual predicates and alleged legal basis of activity in regard to which complaint would ever be made

12. remedy in quo warranto to enable activity conductor actually unjustifiably injured in a given instance to prosecute removal from bench and bar, of judges and atttorney, respectively, demonstrably unfit to be exercising the authority of a judicial office/law license, rather than leaving such prosecutions to the JIB/ARDC

proposed solution: Close CCCC, IL and IL App. Ct. First District immediately, with this Court to cover emergency type matters into the indefinite future,

13. abuse of civil contempt instrument

14. citizen access to state grand jury for crimes perpetrated by government officials w/o having to deal with interdisposition of any prosecutor or judge

15. declaration of unconstitutionality of resisting arrest statute which criminalizes the resistance to an unlawful arrest

16. redefinition of the definition of "relevant evidence" used in the Rules of Evidence for Courts in the State of IL - “Relevant evidence” means evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.

Adopted September 27, 2010, eff. January 1, 2011.

Rule 402. - O'Connor - Michigan AA case - confidence in the legitimacy of the Grutter v. Bollinger upheld the University of Michigan Law School's consideration of race and ethnicity in admissions. In her majority opinion, Justice O'Connor said that the law school used a “highly individualized, holistic review of each applicant's file.” Race, she said, was not used in a “mechanical way.” Therefore, the university's program was consistent with the requirement of “individualized consideration” set in 1978's Bakke case. “In order to cultivate a set of leaders with legitimacy in the eyes of the citizenry, it is necessary

17. Provision of any and all measures necessary to eliminate adjudications of cases at any standard and method of adjudication less likely to "acertain the truth of (a) given disputed point(s) and/or issue(s) and result in the rendering of actual justice between disputing parties than the "demonstrations of (in)compatibility of...with the principle of non-contradiction demonstrated in Ch. 13 of the Book of Daniel in Susanna's Trial"

18. declaration regarding parameters of protests which will adequately limit the capacity of any government entity to prevent exposure of any and all unjustifiably injurious activity ever conducted by the CCCC, IL, and/or the First District Appellate Court and/or of the IL Supreme Cout, and any unjustifiably dangerous condition left in place from such activity, enough that no legitimate reliance interest would be defrauded in regard to this matter. protect prevent witness, jury influence re particular case, produce rules and regs first, sound amplification devices - decibels, requirement that in every situation in which any protestor has posted a $1000 bond with CCA 7 Judge D. Manion (possibly with provision to have any such type matter adjudicated at Judge Manion's discretion by CCA 5 Judge E. Jones, CCA 11 Judge C. Wilson or USDC for EDM Judge V. Roberts as "Non-Tel Aviv Toilet Rim Licking Adjudicators"), that no order other than an order to disperse will ever be issued nor will any matter ever be adjudicated in regard to any activity conducted by any protestor of the type this entry concerns prior to Judge Manion's receiving notice that a government entity would be seeking to procure the entirety or some component of such type bond ever posted and in existence as has been referenced herein and/or to institute any type of criminal and/or code violation charge in regard to any protest/dissemination and/or collection of, information activit(y)(ies)

19. the issue of the proscription of the issuance/retention of the possession of, respectively, law licenses to individuals whose homosexuality has been adequately demonstrated to a measure of clear and convincing evidence whereof as constituting an unrebuttable presumption of the non-presence in the case of any given individual of the requirement for the possession of "character" adequate to justify the issuance/retention of the possession of a law licence in the list of requirements for the procurement/retention of such in the State of IL.

20. the issue of the elimination of the most onerous burden of subjection to magnometer screening of individuals who would have made more than 8 documented trips into the R. Daley Center in the prior calendar year, or at the very least, the elimination of the bypass of such source of affliction for licensed attorneys who make the concessions to the prevailing status quo necessary to retain a "bypass card"

21. the issue of the establishment of a rebuttable presumption of innocent possession of any and all entities necessary for FEMA red and blue listers to adequately protect themselves from assassination and/or murder attempts en route to and from court proceedings and while conducting activty upon government property of any and every type

22. the issue of the issuance of whatever promulgations are needed so that the consequences of compliance with any unlawful (morally illegitimate) order by any member of any policing or military entity can be the removal of the reptilian (Michael Collin's term for the type of government officials who culpably permit themselves to be used as slavemasters over other human beings, by members of the slavekeeper class and ultimately by Lucifer himself) components of such entities w/o the risk of the incurrment of any sin in the removal whereof by those burdened by the requirements of the moral law with such removal in any given instance, which practically means the superimposition of structure into any and all order and/or statute enforcement activity sufficient to eliminate any invincible ignorance in re whereto via the use of conveyances of whatever type via which to ensure the provision of sufficiently particularized notice of the contents of a given individual(')s(') position in regard to any given matter in regard to which any policing and/or military entity member would have ever been/be summonsed as there is absolutely no justification which RJM can see in any FEMA red or even blue lister's abstaining from the use of whatever force would ever have to be used in order to ensure the prevention of the pyschotropic drugging or suchlike injurious predatory activity out of any concern to avoid injurying or killing any government official who would have assumed the risk of executing orders in a governmental scheme as demonically dominated as is that in which this document has been composed and will have been read by anyone who will have read it.

23. the issue of the elimination of any requirement to provide paper copies of any cases cited in any memoranda of law and/or briefs provided no adversary would be prejudiced by such arrangement in any given case

24. amend Grif - and to IL S. C. 383 - duty to disobey unlawful order, and provide opportnnity to target of enforcement action to explicate case to any and all pursuers, so that if necessary any given target use permanent disability causing and/or lethal force in response to summonsing of collective force of body politic in any of the various forms the effect of such summonsing might ever be applied w/o risking the incurrment of any sin in so doing - free exercise clause etc.

the filing of this motion provides evidence re mitigation of damages, extent to which RJM endeavored to get issues, especially those of federal constitutional dimension adequately "pressed and passed upon" in the trial court webb v Webb (_U.S._) Smith v Murray - perceived futility...court opportunity to correct its errors

RJM does not see any need to get the statute that protects judges and courtroom deputies from arrest in court declared to be unconstitutional provided the consideration referenced in #14 listed herein supra would be provided

affiliate victim of lawyer and judicial criminality and disregard of legitimate reliance interest requested that RJM not use his evidence in any and all instances, indiscriminately.

Dei v Tumara Foods, et al SCOTUS Amici



First Municipal Cases since 10/24/30,

is ..going to indemnify?

E Supremi quotes, Pius XII, ignorant, corrupt, politicized - Griffith, Jack, Rojas, LaBlanc,

steer under independent and adequate state ground,

status of CCA 7, FGJ, resisting arrest, ACLU v Alvarez - applicable to courtrooms, no prosecution of black upon white crime in Soetoro quasi-administration,

in seriatum - magnitude of Lucifer's control and influence, now almost 100 years since the fraudulent passage of the Federal Reserve Act have to proceed with only a small fraction even identified .

POR - duty to mitigate damages and all damages assessable to Diane Wood, C300

1 cor 10:13 -




.


Douay-Rheims Bible
Let no temptation take hold on you, but such as is human. And God is faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above that which you are able: but will make also with temptation issue, that you may be able to bear it.

Darby Bible Translation



thirstforjustice.tripod.com/grifilscr383dltc43013.html

Document List of 4/30/13 – Grif -383

1. D/L of 4/30/13 - Grif

2. N of M/POS of 4/30/13

3. Motion of 4/30/13

4. Proposed Order of 4/30/13

5. Nihil Obstat Pet – Grif

6. SCOTUS Pet for Cert/Special Writ

7. Core Temporal Problem

8. RCDRC

9. Proposed ground rules

10. PWCS -

11. Declaration of Unconstitutionality

12. Complaints/Arrearages Claims Against ISMA Members

13. Apology to Innocents/Posterity

14. Lawsuit Against Robert J. More on Behalf of World's Innocents & Posterity

15. Documents to Federal Grand Jury of 4/30/13

16. Petition for Equitable Relief from Complaint in 11 CH 12339 re Audio-recording device

17. Record of time and resources consumed/expended re this project 4/30/13 – 13:45-14:15, 18:45 -

18. s&madjdl102713.html

19. RJM “Magnum Opus Lawsuit” whose Purpose is to Accomplish objectives listed as goals of Proposed “Federal Bill …plagued” and procure adequate remuneration for over 13 years of unjustified injury incurrment from conditions of govt entities in Cook County, IL at all levels.

20. Petition to Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee of the 112th Congress to Conduct Hearings Regarding the Appt of a Special Prosecutor pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC 592(g) re Activity of Cook County, IL Courts (including federal and state Appellate Courts and IL Sup Ct conducting activity in Cook County, IL), Sheriff’s Dept, State’s Attorney’s Office, Clerk of the Court’s Office and for Passage of Bill Closing Cook County, IL and City of Chicago, Il Governments, or at Least Elimination of All Federal Funding Whereto According to a Formula which would leave no legitimate reliance interest un-accommodated.

21. Petition to Chairman of the Judiciary Committee of the IL General Assembly to Conduct Hearings Regarding the Appt of a Special Prosecutor pursuant to the provisions of 55 ILCS ….. re Activity of Cook County, IL Courts, and for Passage of Bill Closing Cook County, IL and City of Chicago, Il Governments, or at Least Elimination of All State Funding Whereto According to a Formula which would leave no legitimate reliance interest un-accommodated

22. Nomination for ISMA HOS of 3/11

23. Prevent Worst Case Scenario – which would be the incurrrment of culpability for any sin the incurrment of which would leave a given activity conductor without the possession of sanctifying grace which could occur via either the execution of an affirmative act or the making of a concession, the making of which could not be morally justified in a given instance/Foregone conclusion that the dispute at issue in a given instance will not be acceptably resolved except via either the application of a contra-predatory vigilante endeavor or a full scale military conquest, unless it might end up being resolved via the demonstration of the capacity to accomplish such in a given instance (eg. King John III, conceded his subjects claims at Runneyemede in 1215 A.D.) in which case nothing further would be necessary and correlatively justified, unless the villain party(ies) conceding would demonstrably be involved in some type of deception and subterfuge (see Michael Collins on the dangers of a truce, and the slaughter of the Cristeros who complied with the mis-informed Pius XI’s directive to lay down their arms) ultimately likely to prevent the procurement of the consideration ever sought by the part(y)(ies) endeavoring to rectify a given injustice, which foregone conclusion approach necessarily includes a commitment to accept a just resolution of any given dispute which could be procured without there being any resorting to any property confiscation and/or destruction and obviously, correlatively, without there being any use of force to defeat any endeavor which might ever be undertaken for the purpose(s) of the prevention of the successful use of contra-predatory property damage and/or confiscation as a method of procuring a legitimate resolution to a given dispute/Demonstration of Affirmative Refusal to consent to any deprivation of any legitimate claim to consideration/Evident Adequate Effort to Mitigate any and all Damages unjustifiably Incurred and Demonstrate Adequate Diligence, no relevant factor left unconsidered in bringing a given dispute to a just resolution all conducted in a disposition of what St. Teresa referenced as “religious indifference” .

24. third Component of ...383 Motion of 4/30/13

documents adjacent to which there is an "X" were submitted to the IL S.C. on 4/30/13


thirstforjustice.tripod.com/grifnomotscr383.html



IN THE SUPREME COURT OF the State of ILLINOIS

Robert More (“RJM”), Estate of RJM, Campaign to Make the World Safe for Innocence Once Again, St. Michael the Archangel, MAA Fund Plaintiff/Movant

v

Judge L. Martin


re: More


v Case # 11 CH 12339

Grif et al in the Circuit Court of Cook County, IL


Notice of Filing


PLEASE TAKE Notice- that on 4/15/13, the undersigned filed the accompanying:

Plaintiff RJM’s third Component of 4/30/13 of Ill S. C. R. 383 Motion of 10/23/12...", this notice and the Proposed Order of 4/30/13, and an IL SCR 298 petition in re whereto, via the hand delivering mailing whereof to the Clerk of the Supreme Court of the State of IL, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby served upon you.

Robert J. More

P.O. Box 6926

Chicago, IL, 60680, anselm45@gmail.com, 863 688-9880 – lv msg

PROOF OF SERVICE

I, Robert J. More a non-attorney, under verification, state that I served the foregoing:

Plaintiff RJM’s third Component of 4/30/13 of Ill S. C. R. 383 Motion of 10/22/12 ....", this notice and the "Proposed Order of 4/30/13"

On:

Office of the Atty General of the State of IL

Civil Division

150 W. Randolph St.

Chicago, IL 60602, or ggriffin@attygen.il.state.gov or email pursuant to an agreement made between Mr. G. Griffith of the Office of the Atty Genrl and RJM re the burden of hand delivery service in re matters involving the Atty Gen of IL

And

Asst. Cook County State's Attorney Paul Groah at: pgroah@cookcounty.gov or whatever constitutes the email address via which RJM has contacted him within the past 30 days, via email,

and

Judge L. Martin – Room 2008

R. Daley Center, 50 W. Washington St. Chicago IL 60601 on or before 4/30/13, via hand delivery to room 2600 of the R. Daley Center.

Under penalties provided by law pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/1-109

I certify that the statements set forth herein are true and correct. Robert J. More





IN THE SUPREME COURT OF the State of ILLINOIS

Robert More (“RJM”), Estate of RJM, Campaign to Make the World Safe for Innocence Once Again, St. Michael the Archangel, MAA Fund Plaintiff/Movant

v

Judge L. Martin


re: More


v Case # 11 CH 12339

Grif et al in the Circuit Court of Cook County, IL


Third Component of 4/30/13 of IL Supreme Court Rule 383 Motion, of less than 20, less than 40 word, sentence, paragraphs, to be Superseded Weekly, if Necessary, (still to be entirely proof-read) as Providence would permit, Filed Upon the L Gideon (Gideon v Wainwright (_U.S._)) Procedural Compliance Hardship Waiver Standard, in which RJM Challenges the Constitutionality of the Deliberative Process/Special Witness Doctrine, and the Forum Provisions of the IL Constitution as Being Incompatible with the "Right to Petition", "Fourteenth Amendment Due Process of Law" and "Substantive Due Process of Law" Provisions of the Constitution of the u.s. of A. and other provisions whereof to be explicated when circumstances permit and challenges the presumption of fitness to hold and exercise the Authority of an IL Supreme Court Judicial Office of Each and All of the Present IL Supreme Court Justices other than Justice Thomas, Both in Quo Warranto, and Otherwise, and to Demand that this Court Must Immediately Abolish the Circuit Court of Cook County, IL and the IL Appellate Court First District, or at least suspend the activity whereof, according to a formula according to which no legitimate reliance interest would be left un-accommodated in the Execution of such Type Order, and for other relief, descriptions of which is included in the order which accompanies this motion.

Now comes RJM to move this Court to grant the relief referenced in the title to this motion and in the Proposed Order which accompanies it, and in explanation and support whereof, RJM avers and explains as follows:

1. The entirety of the contents of the “Preliminary Component of 10/22/12 of …Motion of 10/22/22….” which RJM mailed to this Court on 10/23/12 is incorporated herein as if fully set forth herein.

2. Since RJM has been informed that such document was never entered into the Clerk's docket and RJM never received such document as returned mail, notwithstanding that RJM had included his return address upon the envelope in which such document and its accompanying documents were contained, RJM finds it necessary to include the entirety of what is included herein infra in brackets "[]" as the body of such motion herein.

[1. It is RJM's informed understanding that at the final accountability audience appointment referenced in Matt. 25:26 et seq it will be revealed that ("R...FAAA.R") the Courts subordinate to this Court presently operating in Cook County, IL, are plagued by a horrendous "structural defect" which has left in place an "unreasonably dangerous condition" ("UDC") , the leaving in place of which has resulted in what RJM understands to constitute in-calcuable damage to what Pope Pius XI referenced as the "Catholic Cause" ( Ad Sacerdoti Catholici, 1935), which cause is the salvation of souls.

2. RJM was baptized into the Catholic Church on 4/24/1960 ( as all infants and non-use of reason possessors, validly baptized, are baptized into the Catholic Church) and is morally bound, like every other use of reason possessor to bear the component of the burden referenced in Matt. 11:30, which the circumstances of Divine Providence would ever leave him obliged to bear.

3. RJM finds the elimination of the UDC referenced in para #1 supra, to constitute a moral imperative.

4. Until that objective can be accomplished, in order to procure a nihil obstat from the ISMA Common Law Tribunal in regard to the use of any contra-predatory vigilante remedy via which to acceptably remedy the injustice(s) this document concerns (see Doc # ...in D/L of 4/30/13 re the template for such type petition), at the present juncture in America's continued descent into a complete Talmudic-barbaric hell on earth, until martial law would be declared in this country, RJM is subject to a burden to submit along with any petition submitted whereto for the issuance of any such nihil obstat ("NO") in regard to the injustices this document concerns a final determination from the Supreme Court of the u.s. of A. ("SCOTUS") of whatever would end up having been filed to such Court in regard to such injustices, just as RJM is obliged in regard to any given dispute, to remit a copy of a final determination from the Supreme Court of the u.s. of A. ("SCOTUS") in regard to whatever adjudication in a trial court and lower reviewing courts, would ever have been conducted in regard to any case in regard to which any nihil obstat would ever be sought (see Doc. # ... in the D/L of 4/30/13 re the template for the filing of a petition to the SCOTUS of the type referenced herein) (this paragraph has been modified from what constituted its precursor in the component of this motion mailed on 10/23/12 - for all such type paragraphs included herein after a "PM" will be included at the end of any such type paragraph).

4. In order to render the SCOTUS incapable of rejecting any petition which RJM would submit to it in regard to the matters this document concerns upon procedural grounds, so that RJM would not lack the prerequisite necessary to petition the ISMA CLT, RJM found it necessary to file this document with this Court.

<<<<<<<<<<<<

5. In order not to relinquish any claim to consideration in regard to the standard and method of adjudication of this Court or its method of selecting its members and the problem RJM apprehends of there not being in six of those members a concern regarding the moral legitimacy of this Court's adjudications sufficient for any of such six to be adjudicating cases in this Court, RJM found it necessary to file this "third Component of 4/30/13...." before filing the "But for RJM's Problems of Conscience Regarding Presumption of Fitness of Members of IL Supreme Court Other than Justice Thomas.... Component of 4/30/13...," whereof (PM).

6. This document having been filed so that no claim to raise the issues referenced in the title to this motion would have been relinquished attributable to RJM's not raising it in the first instance, RJM now informs this Court that RJM would accept the consideration referenced in the "Proposed Order of 4/30/13", were it now granted summarily, for reasons which RJM would enumerate and explain upon his receiving a demand to accomplish such objective.

7. RJM will address the next issues RJM understands which he must get addressed to this Court when circumstances permit as RJM has to continue to bear the entirety of the component of the "burden" referenced in Matt. 11:30, RJM apprehends himself to presently be obliged to bear.

8. For now, RJM finds it necessary to demand that this Court stay the proceedings in Case # 11 CH 12339 and provide the other relief referenced in the "Proposed Order of 4/30/13" summarily, before anyone else would end up like Jack Richman - dead, who died on the floor of a CCCC, IL courtroom floor or Erik Scott or Derek Hale or countless other victims of Committee of 300 controlled government violence, who likewise were murdered or manslaughtered by morally bankrupt thugs employed by such governmental entities which have been directly or indirectly conducting activity under the control of the Committee of 300, or like the federal law enforcement officers who in enforcing iniquity in the Gordon Kahl and Vicki Weaver predation perpetrations ended up themselves dead when encountering someone unwilling to make unjustified concessions to any given morally unnacceptable and cannibalistic agenda.

9. It has been observed that there are not many certainties in the earthly tour of duty theatre.

10. Amongst those that do exist, RJM reminds himself frequently of two such: 1.) there is only a limited amount of time in which humans can voluntarily accept the pains and hardships of earthly existence in the fallen world resulting from Adam's sin, which condition has been exacerbated by each and every subsequent sin and to improve one's prospects for eternal salvation, and 2.) God's perfections render it impossible for Him to renege on promises ever made by Him to any of His creatures.

11. The formula via which RJM understands that RJM has to continue to proceed in order to retain the claim which he understands that he presently still possesses to participate in the contra-predatory remedying of the evils this docment concerns, includes, inter alia the principles and/or rules present and/or promulgated in Webb v Webb (_U.S._), volenti fit non injuria, Michigan v Jackson (_U.S._), impossibilia lex non compellat - the law cannot require the impossible, and that the law cannot require the performance of a futile act, NAACP v Button (_U.S._), and Montana v U.S. (_U.S._) FN #16.

12. RJM's concern re the ajudication of the trial court case this document concerns ("TCC") (the defense whereof has been even more sinful and offensive) is that what has occured in such adjudication has constituted the subsumption of the entirety of the protections of the non-counterfeit version of rule of law into one non-infallible activity conductor's (Judge L. Martin) discretion - what he considers to be "proper" - which subsumption includes the entirety of the contents of the Constitutions of the U.S. of A. and State of IL and all contents of legitimate statutory and judicial precedent promulgations not incompatible with the contents of the Magna Charta, the Charter of Liberties of 1100 A.D. and principles of epikia as anchored in the identifiable objective natural moral law - the entirety of which has been subsumed into this activity conductor's carnal appetite based fiat M.O.(in the 17 months the TCC has been on his docket he has cited exactly one case while adjudicating 11 CH 12339 from the bench).

13. It is the inforrmed understanding of RJM that what will be revealed at the approaching final accountability audience appointment (Matt. 25:26 et seq) ("AAA") is that the component of the burden referenced in Matt 11:30 which it has been his burden to bear in the adjudication of 11 CH 12339 has remained unborne, and that a concern that activity conducted by him in the adjudication of this case satisfy the requirements of legitimacy as such can be subjectively ascertained (2 Cor. 10:13)has not been amongst the top 1000 priorities according to which the activity conducted by him wherein has been conducted since this case ended up on his docket.

14. RJM understands that RJM lacks the authority to accept innumerable rulings made by Judge Martin in his adjudication of 11 CH 12339, in as much as it is the informed understanding of RJM that at that last AAA, it will be revealed that such adjudication whereof has constituted a series of arrogations, usurpations, encroachments and predations which has constituted a series of sins, crimes and torts.

15. Such adjudication has constituted a textbook example of judicial hydroplaning - a M.O. in which issues which a given tribunal presider finds it not in his apprehended interest to have addressed, simply remain unaddressed to the entirely unjustified detriment to all effected by such practice.

16. The substance of the underlying dispute 11 CH 12339 concerns will be explained in future submissions to this Court.

17. The magnitude of the alignment and accountability problems encountered in the adjudication this motion concerns far exceed RJM's capacity to adequately describe such except via a production of innumerable comparatively voluminous documents (which claim is corroborated by the contents of the Document List which accompanies this document) and so, time constraints being what RJM finds them to now be, RJM has to truncate this document here while expressing a commitment to provide the explanations necessary to understand such problems as the circumstances of Providence would permit RJM to accomplish such objective.

18. RJM needs to have an attorney appointed and/or be provided to petition this Court w/o having to provide paper copies of documents referenced in documents submitted to this Court, and with enough time, RJM can get all such documents posted into the website referenced in the ULC of this document.

19. RJM needs to have the building access restriction imposed upon him w/o his having been permitted to participate in the adjudication whereof by the IL App. Ct. First District, removed immediately.

20. A status date is set in 11 CH 12339 for 10/24/30 in which the Court had indicated it would establish a hearing date upon the Defendant's Motions to Dismiss, which attributable, according to RJM's understanding, to the Court's and/or Defendant's malefactions and/or duty breaches, RJM has been denied any opportunity to brief.



Wherefore, RJM herein moves this Court to provide the relief referenced in the title to this motion and/or in the Proposed Order of 10/22/12 which accompanies it.


Continuing to rely upon a diet of the bread of sorrow and the water of affliction, Pope Paul IV prescribed for penitents in the Bull Cum Ex Apostolatus Officio (1559) as an indispensable component of the remedy for any and all evils ever encountered in the theatre of earthly existence,

Robert J. More

Afflicted by the uneliminable infirmity of the fallen human conditiion, plodding on unrelentingly in the pursuit of cleansing from all unrighteousness (1 Jn. 1:8), but hopefully not derelict beyond the threshold referenced in Matt. 25:26, et seq. Neighbor, on behalf of the 37 million not entirely morally bankrupt citizens of the former u.s. of A. (the final obstacle to the Committee of 300's,long sought NWO - "component of the final obstacle", "CFO", for short) ("NMB"'s) who do not lack the capacity to at the very least force the Committee of 300 to reduce this country to a smoking graveyard in order to complete their demonically designed and instigated N.W.O Agenda, but obviously, not by any express designation in re whereto, - Lesser Deputy Guardian of the Catholic Cause Referenced in the Papal Encyclical, Ad Sacerdoti Catholici (1935) and Protector of the Haven in the Heartless World -An activity conductor who remains haunted by the specter of the Schiavo atrocity (what RJM understands to constitute the "NWO's Showcase Atrocity") and all of the other atrocities which it exemplifies and epitomizes (eg. most recently 9/11/01, the Barksdale 9 Assassinations, and "Hurricane Katrina" if it can be so labeled, justifiably, if it actually was rather a controlled demolition of a Lake Ponchtarain Levy), as an able-bodied adult who had had over 37 years from the date of his 7th B-day to prepare for that atrocity, but who stood around the "deathspice" in March of 2005, looking for someone to order the charge - an order which was never issued - attributable to the unlynched lynch pin of Robert Schindler's having been left as the de facto decision maker in regard to the restrictions on resistance to such atrocity kept in place, not conceived by a parent in whom there (was) (is) any Jewish blood – therefore, not one of the “chosen people”, nor willing to leave any of the "lesser brethren" who reject the abominations of the Talmud exposed to hostility incompatible with any given individual's own personal record of activity, as no one chooses the religion of his or her parents, not willing to participate in the shedding of innocent blood, w/o just cause (nor for that matter to risk incurring culpability for any sin of any type at all) - therefore not one of the goy slavemasters, nor one of the rest of the 486 million goy slaves to be retained, but rather one of the “to be exterminateds” determined to enter into eternity endeavoring to make restitution to the innocents and posterity for RJM’s share of the blame for the Talmudic-barbaric horror they have inherited (where would a list of the component horrors whereof even begin? – the first dozen, plus that came into RJM's mind in considering the subject are: deprivation of adequately safe water – “fluoride”, air –chemtrails, Fukishima, food – GMO’s, Codex Alimentarius, etc., , parents – depleted uranium, protection from criminal regulation of every aspect of existence re the global warming pretext/subterfuge, the U.S. Const.’s Art. I, Sect. 8, Cl. 5, protection of the purchasing power of the currency, the Art. I Sect 2, Cl. 3, Sect. 8 Cl. 1, & Sect. 9 Cl. 4 protection from direct un-apportioned taxes, the protections of 4thAmendment designed to keep Big Brother the Beast at arm’s length, protection from orchestrated pandemics and the vaccinations produced purportedly to counter them, false flag terror acts, assassinations of individuals who are relatives &/or whose knowledge &/or priorities have been found to be incompatible with the NWO agenda, radiation exposure as a new condition of air travel, the protections of the 5th Amendment Rights to an Independent Grand Jury and Jury Nullification Instructions, etc., etc., etc., and the protection of 2nd Amendment Right to ensure the accommodation of all legitimate reliance interests via the maintenance of commensurate strike capacity between the Country’s citizens and its government, the protection of the First Amend Free Exercise and Prevention of Establishment of Religion Clauses, and whatever protection would have been available from the lifework of any potential geniuses and/or conduits of apostolic graces, not to mention those who had they been spared the blades of Rahm Emmanuel & Barry Soetoro types of specimens, would have turned out to be at least “not entirely derelict neighbors”, who have been or will be, murdered in or shortly after having departed from, the wombs of their mothers), not to mention that an estimated 600 - 1000 trillion dollars that such childen ought to have inherited has been appropriated via the appropriation, counterfeiting and extortion of the Committee of 300 to the children of the slavekeeper class - since such restitution-making constitutes the burden RJM understands himself to be bound to continue to bear pursuant to the contents of Matt. 11:30, as such have been adequately and infallibly explicated via the authority instituted in Matt. 16:18). (Time and space have not permitted enumerations of the defraudments of the protection of the Commerce, General Health and Welfare, Right to have the Laws Faithfully Executed, Supremacy, Right to a Republican Form of Government, Equal Protection, War Powers, Takings, Originization, Natural Born Citizen, Clauses, nor the 9th and 10th Amendments, and other guarantees of consideration instituted into the compact between the government and its citizens which all are obliged to protect which is supposed to be providing a structure within whose requirements and restrictions all government activity is supposed to be kept conducted, herein, but FTR, the author of the email in re which this conveyance is contained remains committed to fight against the arrogations, encroachments, usurpations, and depradations with which this Country's burden-bearers have become so painfully familiar, through his dying breath. [Add - Right to evidence of atrocities perpetrated by C of 300 controlled govt kept out of purview via invocation of law enforcement/national security privilege(s)]]



-thirstforjustice.tripod.com/sig10712.html - still under construction, last updated on 10/17/12



IN THE SUPREME COURT OF the State of ILLINOIS

Robert More (“RJM”), Estate of RJM, Campaign to Make the World Safe for Innocence Once Again, St. Michael the Archangel, MAA Fund Plaintiff/Movant

v

Judge L. Martin


re: More


v Case # 11 CH 12339

Grif et al in the Circuit Court of Cook County, IL

Proposed ORDER of 4/30/13

This cause coming to be heard on the third component of the IL SCR 383 Motion of 10/22/12 filed by Robert J. More (“RJM”) in regard to Case # 11 CH 12339 in the Circuit Court of Cook County, IL, adequate notice having been served, & the Court having been presumably adequately advised in the premises:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the relief sought in the accompanying motion by RJ More is granted/denied.

1. The activity of the Circuit Court of Cook County, IL and the IL Appellate Court First District is herein immediately suspended, without RJM's having to have provided notice of his seeking such suspension according to the principles operative to the filing of petitions for the issuance of temporary restraining orders, ________________________, or:

the criminal code of the State of IL is herein declared to be un-constitutional as absent the issuance of this order, the contents whereof might ever have been applied to any and all activity conducted by RJM and/or in which RJM would ever participate, by whomsoever orchestrated, for the purpose of remedying the unjustifialby caused injuries which 11 CH 12339 concerns. or:

All proceedings in Case # 11 CH 12339 in the Circuit Court of Cook County, IL (“11 CH 12339”), are herein stayed for 60 days so that a.) records of the audiences in regard to which Petitioner (“RJM”) complains can be presented to this Court for its consideration, b.) an attorney can be appointed to present further components of this SCR 383 Motion to this Court, and c.) RJM can present any and all supporting material he understands that he would have to present to this Court in order to adequately present the claims for consideration which he understands that he is supposed to be presenting hereto at this juncture, to this Court.

2. Permission is herein granted to RJM to bring and use an audio recording device in any proceedings ever conducted in 11 CH 12339 in the future according to the terms included in the “Petition for Equitable Relief” included in the Amended Complaint pending in 11 CH 12339 (Doc. # 10 in the “D/L of 4/30/13).

3. In light of the recent staying of the injunction instituted against the NDAA by the CCA 2, RJM is herein provided assurance and correlatively, members of any and all policing entities conducting activity in IL are provided notice, that RJM may wear whatever body armor, protection from tasers and/or directed energy weaponry of whatever sort, asphyxiation, blinding and/or hearing destruction mechanisms, RJM would ever consider it necessary to wear in any Court building and/or courtroom in Cook County, IL and/or upon any other property in existence w/n the State of IL except private property upon which RJM would not possess any legitimate claim to ever be present.

5. It is herein ordered that the members of the Cook County Sheriff’s Department shall not be permitted to have any weapons on their persons while on duty at the R. Daley Center in Chicago, IL, but may continue to bear weapons when coming to or leaving their employment, except for one member whereof in each of the plazas on the first floor whereof _______________________, or:

In light of the same considerations referenced in “#3” herein supra, the same rules apply to RJM’s bearing the entirety of the weaponry which would constitute standard issue for a NAVY Seal, Army Ranger, and/or any member of any state or local policing entity ___________________.

6. The threshold for direct criminal contempt in the Courts of the State of IL (“IL”) is not one iota different at this juncture in history than it was the day upon which the SCOTUS’es opinion in “In re Oliver, (333 U.S. …) was issued and no one shall be held in direct criminal contempt in IL unless and except:


7. The stay upon discovery issued in the trial court in the case this document concerns is herein lifted.

8. RJM is excused from the ordinary requirement to include copies of all documents referenced in any motion filed in this Court, and can instead satisfy any and all "informing of the Court and adversaries re any given matter" requirements via the posting of any and all documents referenced in any petition filed in this court in a website provided adequate references would be provided to any documents posted in such manner in any petition ever filed in this Court.

9. RJM may file any and all documents which he would ever endeavor to file in the petition this order concerns via the use of the verification statute codified in 735 ILCS 5/1-109 on whatever proof of service would accompany any filing and without any notarization thereupon________________________.

10. RJM may file any and all documents which he would ever endeavor to file in any petition which he might ever file in this Court via the use of the verification statute codified in 735 ILCS 5/1-109 on whatever proof of service would accompany any such type filing and without any notarization included thereupon________________________.

or

RJM must have any and all documents ever filed in this case accompanied by a notarized proof of service and a briefing schedule in regard to this matter is herein established as follows, so that RJM can adequately present and preserve a constitutional challenge to the contents of this order __________________________

or

RJM must have any and all documents ever filed in this case accompanied by a notarized proof of service and RJM can explain his concerns in this regard to this Court according to the following timetable ____________________________, ______________________________, ___________________________, ___________________, but RJM must file a separate lawsuit seeking a declaratory judgment in regard to the use of the verification for the proof of service issue in regard to documents filed in this Court__________________

This Court (will) (will not) provide findings of facts and conclusions of law if it will not provide RJM a dispensation from the most onerous notary requirement ______________

11. (see #8 included herein supra) RJM may omit the inclusion as exhibits to future components of this motion which might need to be filed of any document referenced in whatever he would submit to this Court provided he provides links to internet postings which adequately function at the time of the filing of a given document

____________.

12. It is the position of the members of this Court that no claim to any consideration has been waived, forfeited, nor relinquished attributable to the non-presentation whereof in the documents presented to this court along with this proposed order __________________.

ENTER:

___________________ _______________________

Justice Date



IN THE SUPREME COURT OF the State of ILLINOIS

Robert More (“RJM”), Estate of RJM, Campaign to Make the World Safe for Innocence Once Again, St. Michael the Archangel, MAA Fund Plaintiff/Movant

v

Judge L. Martin


re: More


v Case # 11 CH 12339

Grif et al in the Circuit Court of Cook County, IL


Now comes the Petitioner, Robert J. More, to respectfully move this Court to grant RJM permission to proceed in the causes described in the title to the motion which this motion accompanies, without payment of any fee in re whereto and in explanation and support whereof, RJM provides the information that IL S. CT. Rule 298 (“Rule 298”) requires as follows:

1. RJM receives no assistance of any type from any government entity other than waivers of fees for court cases, and in some cases, service of process (all of which are of course recoverable from RJM’s opponents in litigation in any given case and which would never remain unrecovered, except in a case in which the system would malfunction, but since RJM is a Magna Charta Clause 61 (“MC C 61”) Burden-bearer, such fees would not remain unrecovered in the end anyway, unless RJM were not to survive a given endeavor to comply with the express mandate(s) of MC C 61 in regard to a given injury RJM would have unjustifiably incurred), which waivers would not be necessary if RJM were to have all criminal laws declared to be unconstitutional as such might ever be applied to RJM in the absence of the issuance of such type conjectural declaration and RJM is continuing to endeavor to procure just such a declaration from U.S. S. Ct. Justice J. Roberts, and/or somehow from some Court or other.

1.a. Furthermore to rebut a number of entirely unfounded allegations which have been made regarding RJM, his intentions, priorities and conduct, in regard to which RJM has become cognizant, in various Courts and by various Judges over which and whom, respectively, this Court possesses authority, RJM further avers as follows:

For whatever its worth, RJM respectfully informs this Court that RJM accepts no benefits from the government whatsoever, except what is indispensably unavoidable (ie a tooth extracted in 1999, several X-rays from numerous incidents in which RJM has been hit by cars while riding his bike, the waiver of court filing fees which are recoverable once cases are won and damages recovered) has not had a government job since 1977, avoids all avoidable hazards that might result in any malady requiring medical or dental attention and tries to consume nothing except what is unavoidably necessary to sustain life and health and what RJM hopes constitutes a commitment to continue to make progress in interior purification, and in general labors to not only not be a burden to others in any way, but to assist in the bearing of the burdens of the maintenance and now restoration, of a constitutional republican form of government anchored in the Non-counterfiet Version of the Rule of Law as a committed Roman Catholic Militia member who is continuing to labor to prove himself not deserving of eternal punishment, and howsoever deficient RJM's overall performance in the earthly theatre indisputably has been, RJM is at least sufficiently ashamed and dissatisfied wherewith to still be endeavoring to make restitution wherefor in whatever time is still left in RJM's earthy theatre tour of duty.

2. RJM has no income and the support RJM has received and is still receiving from relatives is well below the threshold defined in par. # 2 of Rule 298. RJM has borrowed a few hundred dollars over the past year to cover deficits caused by a sibling's infirmity which left him in default for a few months on a debt owed.

3. RJM possesses a computer purchased for $380.00 (all sums are pre-tax), an external harddrive purchased for $130.00, a camcorder purchased for $85.00, an MP3 player purchased for $33.00, a printer purchased for $20.00, a broken stepper, a bike purchased for $37.00, a few sleeping bags, some clothes, some weights, shelving units and peripheral media devices and tools, books and suchlike, the sum total resale value of which, RJM would think could not be greater than $1250.00 or maybe even only $1050.00 and possesses no other assets. There are a number of judgments RJM has won in small claims cases, but RJM is not certain of recovering any of them and has not gotten around to even trying to collect any of them, most of which involve Defendants residing in other states.

4. The applicant is eligible to receive civil legal services as defined in 735 ILCS 5/5-105.5.

5. The applicant is unable to proceed in this proceeding without the payment of fees, etc. and such charges would result in substantial hardship to the applicant.

6. The applicant has been unemployed for over 13 years, due to, as RJM understands the causes of his unemployment, the defamatory references of former employers RJM has had to sue, and employment reporting agencies, one of which RJM has also had to sue, RJM’s stigmatized condition as a non-capitulator/disciple of Jesus, who refuses to render unto the Rothschilds or any other golden calf worshipper what rightfully belongs to God (Mt. 22:22, Acts. 5:29, 1 Tim. 5:22, Eph. 5:8, et al) and now the entirely unjustified position of the IL Secretary of State requiring RJM to retake the road test to even recover his formerly entirely unjustifiably suspended commercial driver’s license, all of which causes are intertwined inextricably with the conditions of the Law and Chancery Division of the Circuit Court of Cook County and the U.S.D.C. for the N.D. of IL. in which it is entirely unjustifiably difficult and unless one ends up before an atypical judge in such Courts, all but impossible for a pro se “goy” to ever get any case to a jury of his or her peers, howsoever meritorious it might be.

7. The applicant has no income but survives at a sustenance level on the $500.00 a month received from relatives.

8. No child support is involved.

9. The applicants monthly living expenses are necessarily exactly what he receives in a given month in support - $500.00.

10. RJM understands in good faith that the claims this document concerns are eminently meritorious.

Wherefore, Movant, Robert J. More, herein respectfully moves this Court to issue an order enabling RJM to procede in the matters this motion/application concerns without payment of fees.

Under penalty of perjury, pursuant to the provisions

of 735 ILCS5/1-109, I aver to the veracity of all

factual averments contained herein.

Respectfully submitted,

Robert J. More





[would not invade the province of any other branch of state nor federal government in regard to the conspicuously limited authority delegated to the Federal government by the Sovereign States in the constitution of the u.s. of A. nor result in the incurrment of any criminal nor tort liability by any official who would ever participate in the adjudication of the motion this document concerns

use of disadvantage negators

pay ESS,letter to J jones,

grif - add Dart - institutional opacity, and whatever other means and methods it would ever be necessary for him to utilize in order that he can continue to participate at at least whatever it would be that it would be his at least somewhat informed understanding would constitute the threshold level presently minimally necessary to keep those above him in the Extermination and Enslavement Arrangement now in place in Amerika placated sufficiently in regard to the issue of this record of activity and the priorities such record demonstrates that he would not become the target of any of the innumerable type measures available via which those holding any given goverment office have to conduct activity in order not to become, themselves, targets of removal/destruction and/or complete elimination.

progress towards a resolution of the dispute(s) which are the subject which this conveyance concerns which would not constitute simply another arrangement which will end up being rejected as unacceptable at the respective accountability appointments at which the moral character whereof will be definitively illuminated and revealed in light not of what ... would have those below him in the EEA presently in place in this location at this juncture in the continued descent of what is left of the ruins of what once was an American Society in which, among other evils, baby murder, sodomy and the custody of innocents by homosexuals all constituted crimes into an ever deeper Talmudic-barbarity

evidently be far less difficult to justify ....

skull and cross bones operation the elimination of which does not in any way dispense the adequate accommodation of any legitimate reliance interest(s) ("LRI") but on the contrary in fact leaves in place legitimate reliance interests the continued accommodation of which remains and will continue to remain a requirement for the ultimate deliverance from evil referenced in among other scriptural passages that of Matt. 6:13 and 25:26

habeas corpus remedy - Federalist 84 calibrated]

burden to be born that has not been born in the past, will not be born in the future and that there will be hell to pay for the non-bearing whereof (citations to authority in support of such assertion yet to added ("CAYTA")

competition between RJM's endeavors to get structure superimposed into adjudication of case s this document concerns sufficient to ensure the adequate accommodation of any and all reliance interests of a type which have been recognized as possessing legitimacy at prior juncture(s) in Anglo-American Jurisprudence vs endeavors of D's and Adjudicators to prevent such superimposition and to keep conditions of adjudication in place which permit the entrance of facially valid court orders, from which the collective force of the body politic can be summonsed to facilitate the effective transfer of any given resource and/or other type consideration ("ROTC") from one morally entitled whereto to one not so entitled, but capable of effecting the imposition of his or her agenda, howsoever lacking in moral legitimacy such might be in any given instance upon the party entitled to the ROTC ever at issue in any given dispute

claim of RJM under a number of constitutional protections whose substance relates to natural law rights which exist relative to natural law duties and burdens inhering in the unalterable nature of matters to which all use of reason possessors ever remain subject to expose Lucifer's activity in any given collection of circumstances in which it would be encountered and as might ever be necessary in any given arrangement ever encountered to contest any and all components of such activity ever encountered, including the duty to resort, in any scenario in which alternatives to the use of force would have been proven to be unavailing relative to the bearing of any burden ever in need of bearing, to the use of the one universal "language", to defeat any given component whereof, the 'language" of which no use of reason possessor could ever lack an understanding in that the relocation of one's body and/or incurrment of physical contact whereto in an given instance is not unamenable to sensory perception and intellectual apprehension - that language being the language of physical force

huge problem of deprivation/defraudment of independence of federal grand jury

use of disadvantage negators - burden while operating as a fugitive of dealing with government officials and/or any snitch who might become cognizant of one's fugitive status , the non-taking into custody of whom would jeopardize one's freedom, and the taking into custody of whom would constitute a most onerous burden



silence regarding a given evil in certain circumstances most definitely results in the incurrment of culpability for dereliction in regard to the general duty or in a given instance a particular duty of either a venially gravely (depending upon the circumstances present in any given situtation) sinful character


a system as thoroughly turned in on itself as are the CCCC,IL and IL App Ct. First Dist. jj

orwell - language indicative of measure of decay - use of mildly emphatic language for all of purposes for which various rhetorical devices would ever be used - inter alia, that of preventing the devil from succeeding in getting away with perpetrating predations under guise of moral character of any such PP constituting something other than the evil actually present in any given instance - jar the not altogether wicked or even the altogether wicked not willing to be openly associated with their wickedness, out of the stupor, torpor and acclimation to what are objectively atrocious evils in which so many are found to be at present - example - Judge P. Beibel who at least was somewhat familiar with the excommunication of Fr. L. Feeney, Judge W. Maddux who has a ring with the Mother of God's name it referencing Timothy Evans as possessing a "basic decency" indicating that such term now ought in the opinion of the presiding judge of the law division of the CCCC, IL include such activities as facilitating the adoption of innocent children by homosexuals and having one's picture taken with homosexuals seeking consideration which would never have been available to them in the France of King St. Louis IX nor in any society which would not have become all but entirely depraved and abominable

If any reader of this document could provide RJM a formula via which RJM could compile all that he understands has to be compiled in order to complete...RJM would certainly endeavor to use any such type formula which might ever be provided




No honorable - a nation which denies the preborn the protection of the criminal law, denies innocent children protection from adoption by homosexuals, a nation which facilitated the torture and murder of Teresa Schiavo, and which now wages unjust wars of aggression upon pretexts of terrorist attacks and the possession of weapons of mass destruction, a nation whose present claimant to the Office of Slavemaster in Chief cannot prove his eligibility for the holding of the office he holds but does claim an executive prerogative to assassinate American Citizens with no process of law of any type

Filed under the Substantial Handicap Imposed Upon RJM by the Orders entered in Case # 11 M1 013782 by Judge S. Jones which have resulted in RJM's not being capable of accessing the electronic case dockets for any of the cases this document concerns

first 4 - elimination of the dreadful arrangement presently prevailing in CCCC, IL and IL App. Ct. First District - in which what is, except in the case of the few cases ever adjudicated by any of the ever dwinding number of James Alesia profile judges, in the understanding of the author of this document, a skull and cross bones arrangement disguised behind the facade of the ubiquitous yellow smiling face - in other words the ordinary and customary activity of these courts in matters involving parties of substantial difference in terms of the capacity to summons the collective force of the body politic against one's adversary (whcih is what ever legal dispute is ultimately about - who will procure a facially valid order to effect the institution of such type measure against whom, in any instance in which any given litigant will decide that (s)he is not willing to accept the issuance of any facially valid order ever issued is not the accommodation of any and all legitimate reliance interests ever implicated in any given dispute but the defraudment whereof, cloaked in a superficial civility, the mask whereof being removed

to bring risk of participating in court proceedings back to where it was in 1790 in England - target is the France of King St. Louis IX, Daniel-Susanna model,

psychotropic drugging, 2 abuse of direct criminal contempt, 3. resisting arrest statute, 4. audio-video recording, 5. addresses of all govt officials involved - reciprocity, 6. either disarm the CCSD or permit bearing of arms and any and all other weapons constituting the equivalent of weapons any member of an security entity would ever possess (in RDC since there are no criminal ajudications wherein in court and 7. build bullet proof plexiglass screen in courtrooms. 8. establish presumption of freedom from culpability for any instance in which any member(s) of CCSD would encounter any situation in which (s)he would be have been informed that a given order ever issued according to a presumption that he or she would be obliged to comply wherewith in any given instance would lack moral and/or constitutional legitimacy (w/o implying that any unconstitutional order could ever possess moral legitimacy) for refusing to participate in any enforcement whereof, 9. penalty for SCC - issuer of order has to be subject to same penalt(y)(ies) as target of charge

43. Amongst the cluster of issues this document concerns, that one which has reached front and center at this moment is articulated as follows: Whether an arrangement ought be kept in place in which an(y) given government official ought possess a prerogative to participate in activity in any given instance in which he or she would conduct activity under the auspices of exercising the authority of a given goverment office which would demonstrably lack moral "legitimacy"/constitute a defraudment of (a) "legitimate" reliance interest(s) with impunity, the addressing of which issue, requires, of course, a definition of the term "legitimacy" before any assessment of the issue in regard to which such definition must be procured could be adequately conducted. As this document was being constructed today, the building in which it was being constructed had to be evacuated attributable to the encountering by someone of a "suspicious package" upon the property upon which such building is situated. This development, along with the problems incurred from the break-in and lock changing perpetrated at the residence in which RJM has been sleeping for most nights over the past three years, by individuals claiming to have been sent by the bank endeavoring to foreclose upon such property on 10/30/13 evidently necessitates RJM's truncating this document here, before he encounters any more interruptions to the prosecution of the agenda of which the completion of such document is a component part which would take him even further off of the time table hd had set for the prosecution of the matters this document concerns than he had been before such interruptions, intending to continue its prosecution upon extricating himself from the pitfall in which he now finds himself postured, in regard to his sleeping and possession maintenance bases.

Judge Manion - SCOTUS

bounties - confiscation and/or destruction of assets/resources

tooley demand from target of government activity and/or prospective intervenor ("TPI"), opportunity for member of policing entity to demonstrate legitimacy of activity conducted by him or her if he or she can effect such objective so that TPI can ascertain whether there would be any legitimate basis upon which he could justify not intervening with potentially permanent disability causing or lethal, force into any given exercise of govt claimed authority

sickness and twistedness "in re "CMA

penitent

DOB-42460

invitations to various officials to "remit" various components of funds received from government sources by any such official(s) to the cause of the unbegrudgeables

libera nos a malo

(Mt. 6:13)

not in hell yet

flush the activity of Lucifer out from any arrangement in which it would evidently have ended up,,,,,,,,,,,

timetable re RJM's adjudications - IL Sup Ct - RJM first mailed documents in October of 2012, irst received document

by:

Crusade Against Immodest Fashions in Dress

No Court whose activity is supposed to be controlled by the authority of this Court in the Governmental System established in the u.s. of A. and the State of IL may sanction RJM for anything in regard to any document(s) ever submitted to this Court in which any Judge would be a respondent wherein.

Obviously the case that it is not considered necessary by... to present to this Court in the case this document concerns - a document free from RJM understands to constitute unjustified presumptions, invalid premises, logical fallacies, liberties in terms of linguistics, semantics and syntax, rules of evidence, constitutional, tort and criminal law recognized as possessing legitimacy in government documents, legal case reporters, text books and treatises available in the CCLL (for whatever such recognition might be worth in any given instance)


John 3:19 or 5;19 lest the evil that they do be exposed, keep the truth suppressed in their wickedness, lord it over them, bind up intolerable burdens and not lift a finger to help them bear them

Emergency/Non-emergency in sense that RJM has no intention of complying with any edicts of any exercise of government authority of any type except in circumstances in which he would be convinced that he would not risk incurring culpability for any sin in complying wherewith, in any given instance.l

fatally defectively dysfunctional Demonically dominated Abomination unto the Lord

cases defended and adjudicated other than by Judge Atkins as if the Sun and rises and sets upon the authority which any given Cook County, IL Judge presumes he can get away with arrogating to himself with impunity, when in fact the sun actually rises and sets upon the interest of what Pope Pius XI referenced as the "Catholic Cause" which is the salvation of souls (preface to the Code of Canon Law of 1917 "The contents of this code must all be interpreted in the reference to the salvation of souls or the purpose of this Code is the salvation of souls

to bring risk of participating in court proceedings back to where it was - target is the France of King St. Louis IX, Daniel-Susanna model,

to the extent RJM understands Lucifer's macro-agenda, his interest in the matters this document concerns ("these matters") and the tactics he has utilized in the past and in capable of using in the future in regard to both such larger agenda and these matters

psychotropic drugging, 2 abuse of direct criminal contempt, 3. resisting arrest statute, 4. audio-video recording, 5. addresses of all govt officials involved - reciprocity, 6. either disarm the CCSD or permit bearing of arms and any and all other weapons constituting the equivalent of weapons any member of an security entity would ever possess (in RDC since there are no criminal ajudications wherein in court and 7. build bullet proof plexiglass screen in courtrooms. 8. establish presumption of freedom from culpability for any instance in which any member(s) of CCSD would encounter any situation in which (s)he would be have been informed that a given order ever issued according to a presumption that he or she would be obliged to comply wherewith in any given instance would lack moral and/or constitutional legitimacy (w/o implying that any unconstitutional order could ever possess moral legitimacy) for refusing to participate in any enforcement whereof, 9. penalty for SCC - issuer of order has to be subject to same penalt(y)(ies) as target of charge

first four - pyschotropic drugging, audio-video record of everything, home addresses of anyone ane everyone involved in any given adjudication, provision for Tooley, declare unconstitutionality of resisting arrest - need to resist arrest or get charged with some violation of some criminal law in order to possess 28 USC 2241 standing as pretrial detainee, disarm deputies or permit bearing of arms in courthouses, build bulletproof fiberglass partition between judges and parties, declaration that In re Oliver is the standard controlling direct (summary criminal contempt) in CC, IL and that any judge who transgresses such standard by using any lower standard will himself be subjected to whatever penalty it would be to which he would subject anyone in using any other standard, issue order declaring


that no one shall be subjected to any detriment for refusing to participate inside any courtroom in CCCC, IL prior to the elimination of the UDC referenced herein, tooley burden upon members of CCSD, in any arrangement in which anyone would be claiming that there would be no legitimacy to any given order, a condition would emanate from any such type development which would result in the establishment of a presumption of freedom from culpability for any offense of insubordination of any member of the CCSD who would in such type circumstances refuse to enforce any given order claiming concerns that no enforcement in re whereto could have been justified in whatever arrangement would have been encountered in any given instance - daniel/susannalkk

add Zeeh jack