In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois, Criminal Division
People of State of Illinois
Case # 01118828901
DEFENDANT (“RJM”)’S MOTION IN WHICH HE PROVIDES NOTICE OF HIS APPEARANCE ON 11/26/02 MADE ON (A) PROPERLY FILED & SERVED MOTION(S) WHICH WERE FILED ON 11/22/02, THAT THE CONJECTURAL PREVENTION OF RJM’S ATTEMPT(S) TO ADDRESS THE COURT ON 11/26/02 &/OR THE NON-ADDRESSING OR INADEQUATE ADDRESSING BY THE COURT OF ISSUES APPROPRIATELY RAISED BY RJM IN THIS (ATTEMPTED) APPEARANCE WOULD ELICIT THE NON-DISCRETIONARY FILING OF A COMPLAINT ON FEDERAL FELONY GROUNDS INCLUDING BUT NOT NECESSARILY LIMITED TO 18USC 241, 1503, 1951, 1961 ET SEQ., 2381, AGAINST ANY & ALL JUDGES, CLERKS, PROSECUTORS &/OR ANY OTHER PARTY THAT WOULD BE IN ANY SUBSTANTIAL MEASURE OR MODE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FELONIES COMMITTED & MOTION FILED INSTANTER TO REQUIRE THE COMPLAINING WITNESS & THE PARTNERS IN HIS LAW FIRM TO PRODUCE TO THE COURT THE DOCUMENTS RJM APPROPRIATELY SUBPEONAED THEM TO PRODUCE IN JUNE OR ULY OF 2001, FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A RULE TO SHOW CAUSE HEARING IN REGARD TO THE NON-PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS PROPERLY SUBPEONAED ON THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT OF NORTHERN IL, FOR A HEARING ON THE ISSUE OF RJM’S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO DEFEND THIS CHARGE ON A CO-COUNSEL BASIS, FOR THE COURT TO TAKE NOTICE OF RJM’S PROPERTY RIGHTS PRESENT IN THE CAUSE OF ACTION NUMBERED 02 C 6736 FILED IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT OF NORTHERN IL., FOR A HEARING ON THE ISSUE OF THE PROVISION BY THE TRIAL COURT FOR CONFIRMATIONS OF FUTILITY THAT WILL BIND ALL TRIBUNALS IN WHICH THESE ISSUES ARE LATER RAISED, FOR THE RECUSAL OF ALL COOK COUNTY JUDGES & THAT THE HEARING ON THIS MOTION BE CONDUCTED BY A DUPAGE COUNTY JUDGE, FOR THE CAPTION TO THE COMPLAINT FILED IN THIS CASE TO BE AMENDED SO AS TO CONTRIBUTE TO THE PREVENTION OF THE CONFERMENT OF THE APPEARANC OF LEGITIMACY ON ACTIVITY THAT IS NOT IN ANY WAY LEGITIMATE & FOR OTHER FORMS OF RELIEF
Now comes the Defendant (“RJM”) to move this Court for all forms of relief enumerated in the title to this motion & in support whereof, RJM avers as follows:
1. Issues will be explained as the need for explanations becomes apparent.
Wherefore, RJM acting as co-counsel &/or through his appointed attorney moves this Court to provide all forms of relief enumerated in the title to this motion, or to provide a confirmation that it would be futile (“COF”) for RJM to continue to seek the forms of relief enumerated herein (itemize specifically which forms or in the case of all forms, that any COF applies to all) the which confirmation will be binding on all tribunals which might at any future juncture consider any issues involved in this criminal prosecution.
Robert J. More