Hello Mr. Hayes,
1. RJM is presently completing a first superseding petition for
indictment and propsed true bill which will be emailed to this email
address and posted online accompanied by the notification of the URL
in re whereto asap.
2. What is the alleged source of law in re which the USDOJ is
preventing me from presenting evidence to the FGJ in Northern IN? (In
the ND of IL it is a March 2007 Court order)
3. More evidence in re the crimes perpetrated in re this matter is now
posted at: "http://ThirstForJustice.net/RJMUNDComm2009disc.pdf".
4.Such evidence demonstrates that RJM's arrest was predicated upon
fabrications and lies in regard to RJM's actual record of activity on
5/17/09, such that a pretext was manufactured to produce the
impression that the SCIP and UND NDSP had complied with the formula
promulgated for arrests in re the 2009 Commencement in effecting the
arrest of RJM on such date.
5. If RJM does not receive a confirmation by 9:30 a.m. on 5/12/14, that criminal charges will
definitely be instituted by 5/15/14, and/or 5/19/14, in regard to the
respective counts included in RJM's proposed true bill most recently
posted online and sent to this office , then
RJM intends to file a federal lawsuit enjoining prevention of access
to the FGJ in NDIN and for other consideration necessary to secure the
legitimate reliance interests at stake in the matters this document
concerns, as inter alia a component part of a "mitigation of damages
project" as RJM is complaining that it is RJM's informed understanding
that the denial of access to the FGJ in NDIN in re these matters
contravenes 18 USC 242 and is also actionable via 28 USC 2201 or whatever is the declaratory judgment statute and via a Bivens action.
6. If it would be possible to get criminal charges instituted in re
the matters this document concerns conditionally solely for the
purpose of preventing the expiration of any and all untolled SOL's,
subject to retraction whereafter (just to get the charges immediately instituted,
RJM conveys this as RJM is as certain as the day is long that there
have been innumerable 18 USC 242 violations and other crimes
perpetrated in re these matters and that no retraction whereof could ever be justified), a confirmation that such institution
would be effected by the dates referenced herein would be sufficient
to render the filing of a legal action next week unnecessary.