thirstforjustice.tripod.com/ybcom612010.html

Note - if attributable to whatever cause(s), placing the mouse over a given link (URL address) and clicking on it does not bring you to the document whose URL address or at least a component whereof would have constituted the destination of a given link , by entering the entire URL address referenced in a given link into the receptacle at the top of this webpage, in place of that presently there, and clicking on the "enter" key, the search engine will deliver you to such link. If such approach fails, the contact information for the webmaster who manages the site in which you are now operating, is included at the bottom of the home page.

“STATE OF ILLINOIS COUNTY OF COOK

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS

COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION

Robert J. More and the ISMA Campaign to Make the World Safe for Innocence Once Again, as Co-Plaintiffs for James Young and/or Mrs. Norma Jean Young - Third Party Plaintiffs

Plaintiff

v. ..... Case No 10 CH 26622

PLEASE SERVE:

Respondents in Discovery

James S. Barrett, Barry Soetoro (aka Barack Obama), Michelle Obama, Rahm Emanuel, David Axelrod, Jeremiah Wright, Richard Daley, Michael Pfleger, Larry Sinclair,

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, IL CHANCERY DIVISION

Robert J. More and the ISMA Campaign to Make the World Safe for Innocence Once Again, as Co-Plaintiffs as Plaintiff for James Young and/or Mrs. Norma Jean Young - Third Party Plaintiffs

v ... Circuit Court Case No. 10 CH 26622

James S. Barrett, Barry Soetoro (aka Barack Obama), Michelle Obama, Rahm Emanuel, David Axelrod, Jeremiah Wright, Richard Daley, Michael Pfleger, Larry Sinclair, Defendants

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, IL CHANCERY DIVISION

Robert J. More and the ISMA Campaign to Make the World Safe for Innocence Once Again, Petitioner v Circuit Court Case No. 10 CH 26622

Petition for Appointment of Special Prosecutor

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, IL CHANCERY DIVISION

Robert J. More and the ISMA Campaign to Make the World Safe for Innocence Once Again, Petitioner v Circuit Court Case No. 10 CH 26622

Petition for Appointment of Justice R. Thomas of the Supreme Court of the State of IL to Adjudicate Any and All Trial Court Proceedings Ever Conducted in Regard to the Matters this Document Concerns.

INITIAL COMPONENT OF 6/1/10 TO BE SUPERCEDED BY 6/2/10 AND PERIODICALLY THEREAFTER AS THE OBLIGATION(S) IMPOSED BY THE MORAL LAW WOULD REQUIRE, COMPLAINT OF 6/1/10 FOR CONDUCTING OF IL SUPREME COURT RULE 224 DISCOVERY, INSTITUTION OF WRONGFUL DEATH SUIT, APPOINTNMENT OF SPECIAL PROSECUTOR TO INVESTIGATE WHATEVER IT MIGHT BE CLAIMED HAS CONSTITUTED THE INVESTIGATION OF THE DEATH OF DONALD YOUNG AND PROSECUTE AS IT MIGHT BE DISCOVERED, IT WOULD BE NECESSARY TO PROSECUTE ANY VIOLATIONS OF ILLINOIS LAW EMANATING THEREFROM AND PETITION TO HAVE IL SUPREME COURT JUSTICE THOMAS ADJUDICATE THE ENTIRETY OF WHATEVER PROCEEDINGS WOULD EVER BE CONDUCTED IN REGARD TO THIS COMPLAINT AT A TRIAL COURT LEVEL IN THE FIRST INSTANCE

Introduction:

An amended version of this document including all of the documents listed in the document list which this complaint accompanies, will be presented to the Presiding Judge of the Chancery Division of the Circuit Court of Cook County, IL on 6/2/10, providence permitting.
1. On December 23, 2007, Donald Young was found dead in a Southside of the City of Chicago Apartment (see D/L of 6/1/10...Doc. # …) with two bullet holes in the back of his head. The Police Department of the City of Chicago classifies his death as a murder which is unsolved. His estate has been and/or is still in the process of being processed through probate.
2. To the extent of Robert J. More’s (“RJM”’s) knowledge, none of the individuals listed in the “Defendants” and/or “Respondents in Discovery” Section(s) of this document, has ever testified under oath regarding whatever information he or she may possess regarding the death of Donald Young (“DY”), even though each of them knew DY personally, and/or possessed an interest in ensuring that what evidence Larry Sinclair has averred under oath existed and/or exists regarding alleged homosexual activity of Barry Soetoro (Doc. # in D/L of 6/1/10.…) would remain forever concealed, suppressed and unexposed.
3. To the date of the last time RJM investigated the matter several months ago, no wrongful death civil lawsuit has ever been filed in regard to the death of DY.
4. Without an identification regarding who killed DY, the identification of the “cause of death“ requirement for the filing and prosecution of a wrongful death lawsuit in IL remains unaccomplishable.
5. RJM has left at least three voice mail messages each at phone numbers RJM procured for James Young and James Barrett and has never received any response from either person.
6. RJM contacted persons in Peoria, IL and the Peoria, IL Police Department in endeavors to contact the mother of DY - Mrs. Loretta Jean Young , without success and transmitted a copy of the letter listed as Doc. # … in the D/L of 6/1/10.… to Mrs. Loretta Jean Young several months ago and has never received a response in regard thereto.
7. Without an identification of the murderer of DY, RJM cannot see how any wrongful death lawsuit can ever be prosecuted.
8. Pursuant to the authority promulgated in among other SCOTUS opinions, that of Logan v Zimmerman Brush Co. (_U.S._) (“damages in a civil suit are property”) the Youngs and possibly Mr. J. Barrett all possess due process and equal protection rights to not be prevented from conducting an investigation into the cause of death of DY in order to ascertain the identities of wrongful death tortfeasors and to ascertain whether the City of Chicago has incurred tort liability in any activity which has hindered and/or prevented such persons from conducting a no counterfeit investigation into the cause of death of DY.
9. Given that the present claimant to the Office of the President of the united States of America cannot possibly be justifiably considered to not be a prime suspect regarding the murder of DY, the inference is certainly not precludable that the Estate of DY beneificiaries are all being intimidated out of the exercise of constitutionally protected rights.
10. It is in instances in which (a) part(y)(ies) to a case would foreseeable be intimidated from the exercise of a constitutionally protected right or otherwise incapable of exercising a right to pursue a civil legal remedy for a given injury unjustifiably caused, that third party standing is one of the remedies, if not the only practical non-vigilante remedy, to be invoked.
11. For all of the reasons enumerated in the accompanying memorandum of law regarding third party standing (Doc. # .., in the D/L of 6/1/10.…) RJM is convinced that no court could justifiably deny RJM the opportunity to intervene in the prosecution of a respondent in discovery/wrongful death claim regarding the matters this complaint concerns (“this complaint”).
12. Since no wrongful death claim can be filed regarding the death of DY, unless and until there is an identification of the cause of the death of DY in order to get all possible tortfeasors included in any such type complaint which might ever be filed and since the City of Chicago Police Dept (“CPD”) and the Office of the Cook County State’s Attorney (“CCSA”) have maintained a monopoly upon the investigation of the evidence of the crime scene relating to the issue of the cause of death of DY, and since the character of the processing of the evidence which ever has been and/or now is, in existence in regard to such crime scene and the issue of who possessed among other necessary elements for the commission of a given crime - the means, opportunity and a motive to eliminate DY, are all entities in issue which this case concerns, the CCSA is an interested party since matters regarding its activity concerning the investigation into the processing of such evidence as is referenced herein are an issue in regard to which criminal charges may have to be instituted and thus, it is necessary pursuant to the provisions of 55 ILCS 5/3-9008 for this Court to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate with or without the assistance of a grand jury and possibly to prosecute any violations of any IL criminal law such as for example, 720 ILCS 5/33-3, which may have been committed regarding the investigation of the causing of the death of DY.
13. The Memorandum Concerning the Appointment of a Special Prosecutor in IL (Doc. # … in the D/L of 6/1/10) explicates the law RJM understands to control the activity of this Court regarding the matters this issue concerns.
14. In Burr v VA (_U.S._) of U.S. V Burr (_U.S._) , Chief of the SCOTUS Justice J. Marshall adjudicated the trial court proceedings conduct in that case due to its importance.
15. In Johnson v Tennessee (or vice versa) (_U.S._) , the SCOTUS conducted the criminal trial.
16. RJM seeks to have Justice R. Thomas of the Supreme Court of the State of IL conduct any and all proceedings ever conducted regarding the matters this complaint concerns in any trial court setting.
17. This demand is no slight to the Hon. Judge D. K. Kinnaird, P. Flynn or any other judge in the Chancery Division of the Circuit Court of Cook County, IL (“CCCC”) .
18. Rather Justice Thomas already, as RJM understands the matter, has his own security guard and it would be far easier to implement ISMA’s Counter-genocide Sentinel” program in its present form (www.thirstforjustice.777host.us) (Sentinel Program), should Justice Thomas express an interest in receiving such type protective services, regarding the adjudication of this complaint than it would be to implement such type program for any other IL Judge.
19. The last thing RJM would be willing to see happen, would be for a judge not lacking the requisite combination of intellectual capacity, adequately adjusted priorities and moral fiber necessary to execute the duties of the office of a trial court judge regarding the adjudication of a given matter according to a minimally acceptable standard of accountability to become a victim of the malice and viciousness of the types of persons listed as Defendants in this case and those who pull their strings in the manner in which Terrence, Yeakey, Brad Duochette, John O’Neill, Pat Tillman, the Members of the Barksdale Nine, etc. etc. etc. due to his or her having adjudicated this complaint without the type of security system which those listed herein lacked at the time each was murdered/assassinated, respectively.
20. RJM does not consent to any incurrent of any fee for endeavoring to file this case, should the 298 petition filed in regard thereto be denied, unless - Dr. Edwin Viera, Dr. Charles Rice and/or Fr. J. Flanagan would inform RJM that in his opinion RJM would be obliged to pay such. Count #1, Wrongful death - Willful and Wanton
21. As a direct and proximate result of someone’s irresponsible and/or intentional use of a firearm, a given human person caused the death of Donald Young, subjecting him or her to liability pursuant to the provisions of 740 ILCS 180/1 et seq.
Wherefore, it is respectfully demanded that judgment be entered against whomever caused the death of DY to fully and fairly compensate the next of kin for their losses which substantially exceed the jurisdictional amount.
Plaintiff demands trial by jury.
I aver to the veracity of any and all factual averments contained herein
Robert J. More
P.O. Box 6926
Chicago, IL 60680
312 545-1890

1. D/L of 6/1/10
2. Complaint of 6/1/2010
3. Il Supreme Court Rule 298 Petition
4. Coroner’s Report of Donald Young Death
5. Affidavit of Larry Sinclair of April 2008
6. Petition to have IL Supreme Court Justice R. Thomas Preside Over Adjudication of The Case This Petition Concerns
7. Initial Component to be Superceded Within …Days Memorandum of Law Regarding Third Party Standing
8. Initial Component to be Superceded Within …Days Memorandum of Law Regarding Appointment of Special Prosecutor in the State of IL
9. Letter to Young’s Mother Safe Harbor Provision Bgollyn 3rd party standing Schiavo, Use complaint in bollyn for appt special prosecutor - file on 6/1/10 - Salutation from Monex