such as those RJM understands are present in these matters, to bear
open and public witness to the TRUTH – in this case the application of
the requirements of  such moral law to the circumstances RJM is
presently encountering in regard to  these matters.
58. RJM cannot see how it could possibly justifiably be claimed that a
vote for Sotomayor to enable her to join the SCOTUS is not a VOTE FOR
THE GENOCIDE OF 92% OF THE WORLD’S PEOPLE.
59. RJM is not willing to spend eternity lamenting not having screamed
bloody murder when the articulation of  such averments as would have
to be articulated in order to stop a genocide would be mandated, nor
not having participated in the use of  whatever measure of force would
have to be used to stop the genocide obviously in progress.
60. If the articulation of such concerns causes RJM’s  name to end up
on some new list of those to be first eliminated, so be it.
61.  To any others on such type list, RJM can only herein provide an
expression of the deepest appreciation for whatever it is that such
persons have contributed to  the prevention  of  the genocide
referenced herein supra from being consummated that would cause the
names of  such persons to end up on such type lists, and offer
whatever assistance RJM might ever be capable of providing in the
continued campaign to prevent such genocide from ever being
consummated and to make the world safe for innocence once again.
62. RJM finds that  he has to truncate this document here at this
point  in order to  transmit  it  to some Court or post it online
prior to the conducting of any hearing on the TRO which RJM has
sought, and RJM herein provides notice that  the contents of what will
constitute the “Second  Superceding Component of  8/6/09… “ is
presently being composed and that such document will be provided or
otherwise made available,  to, this Court on 8/7/09 via one means or
another.
63. Arguments demonstrating that these matters are not
non-justiciable, that RJM does not lack standing  too seek the relief
sought herein in that it cannot possibly be justifiably claimed  that
he would not be irreparably injured by the denial of  the petition for
the TRO included alongherewith and/or the denial of  the relief sought
generally in this complaint and/or that his injury from the conditions
in regard to which RJM complains is not a legally cognizable injury in
regard to which the a judicial determination of  these matters would
provide an adequate remedy, and that none of  the conditions which
would have to be present for the granting of a TRO at this time in
regard to these mattes are not present in such matters are contained
in the “Initial Abbreviated, Memorandum of  8/6/09 of  Points and
Authorities in Support of  the Granting of the TRO…” which accompanies
this document as Document # _____ in the D/L of  8/6/09.
64. RJM seeks an oral telephonic hearing  on such TRO petition prior
to 14:00 EST so that  RJM can enumerate the reasons which RJM
understands compel this Court to grant the TRO and transmit it to the
USS prior to any vote being conducted on the Sotomayor nomination –
which is scheduled to occur at 15:00 EST on 8/6/09.]

2. RJM herein incorporates  the entirety of   the “Initial Abbreviated
Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of  Petition of  8/4
and/or 8/6/09 for the Issuance of a Temporary Restraining Order in the
Matter of  More v Gainer, Erickson, Reid Et al”
www.thirstforjustice.777host.us (Soto…TRO…) into this document, by
reference,  as if fully set forth herein and if the Court cannot find
this document, it can call RJM and RJM will email a copy to this Court
and/or find it for the Court at the URL listed herein supra.

Prayer for Relief
RJM herein seeks to have the vote of  the USS on the Sotomayor
nomination recalled and to enjoin any subsequent vote on the
nomination unless and until the actual true record of  Sotomayor’s
judicial activity over the  course of her judicial career and the
claims which Dr. R. Cordero has been making regarding the financial
condition of  Judge  Sotomayor would have been entered into the Senate
Public Hearings Record so that any members of the USS who would vote
for her confirmation based upon such actual true record would not
succeed in evading whatever consequences might justly result from the
casting of  a vote as a Senator of  the u.S. of A.,  to confirm
Sotomayor on her true and actual judicial record, or to have this
Court sign a copy of  the “Motion and Proposed Order…
Unconstitutionality…RJM…”  which accompanied filings already submitted
in regard to the case this complaint concerns, and subsequent to the
procurement of  such relief, to procure a declaratory judgment,
declaring the following:

Declaratory Judgment Regarding Confirmation Proceedings in the United
States Senate of Judicial Nominees No  Senate vote on a confirmation
of any nominee for any federal judgeship shall ever be conducted in
the case of  any confirmation proceedings ever conducted in regard to
the nomination of a given nominee, unless and until individuals and/or
parties whose cases a given nominee would have adjudicated  in any
judicial theatre established pursuant to any law(s)  of  the united
States of  America or any political subdivision thereof which
adjudication(s) would  not have been listed as answers to the
questions included in any questionnaire which  a given nominee would
have received from, completed and submitted to -  as a requirement for
consideration of  a given judicial nominee’s qualifications for a
given judicial office for which he or she would have been nominated -
the members of  the Judiciary Committee  of  the Senate of  the united
States of America  (“SJC”) in a given instance, would have been
provided an opportunity to (present to the Senate  of  the United
States of America in such a )  – the entity responsible to ensure that
the authority and power of  the appointment of  federal judges would
not be vested solely in the Executive Branch of  the government
pursuant to the Appointments Clause of  the Constitution of the u.S.
of A. – evidence of  her conduct in cases which  would  not have been
included in the list of all cases in regard to  the adjudication of
which she  would have participated according to such a formula that no
evidence presented thereto would not end up in a public record of any
proceedings conducted in any confirmation of  a given nominee,  the
consideration of which by any given citizen who  could justifiably be
classified as  a “member” of  what  would constitute  at any given
juncture in human history, that component of  the population of  the
united States of  America to which reference could justifiably be made
as  the “public at large” and that component of  the world’s people
who would constitute the “mankind” for whose opinion the Author of the
Declaration of  Independence and its Signatories  manifested a
conspicuous concern to demonstrate a “decent respect” in refusing to
severe the bonds which had bound them to the English people without
providing an enumeration of  the causes which they asserted compelled
the separation(“citizen”) that no member of  the USS could justifiably
and legitimately claim that he or she would have been invincibly
(inculpably)  ignorant of  the evidence which would  have been
presented in a the proceedings conducted in a given nominee’s
confirmation hearing process of the judicial activity of a given
nominee by any and all citizens who would possess evidence of such
judicial activity in  regard to the adjudication of any case which
would not have been listed as a case in the adjudication of  which a
given nominee would have participated in any answers submitted to any
questionnaire the completion and submission of  which would have
constituted  a requirement for the procurement of a Senate vote on a
given nominee’s confirmation to a given federal judgeship and/or any
other relief which would eliminate the injury RJM will have incurred
if Sotomayor is confirmed without the evidence which RJM and Richard
Cordero possess of  her misrepresentations to the SJC and the activity
conducted by her in regard to the cases which were not included in the
list of cases in the adjudication of which she has participated as a
federal judge, and that no activity of  this Court in the adjudication
of  this case could ever be used to preclude, prevent and/or prohibit
RJM from filing any other legal proceeding in regard to the dispute
Appeal #08-1263 CCA 2 concerns, since RJM will not have been provided
a full and fair opportunity to resolve the issues such dispute
concerns in any proceeding conducted in the matters this complaint
concerns, tangential to such concerns as this complaint no doubt is.
(Note: order to procure a TRO enjoining any vote on the Sotomayor
nomination on 8/6/09, RJM will under protest consent to have the word
“united” capitalized in any TRO and/or declaratory judgment any court
would issue in regard to the matters this complaint concerns, subject
to permitting RJM to explain the reasons that RJM would insist that
such term be used only in lower case in any final formulation of  any
declaratory judgment which would be issued in regard to the matters
this document concerns)

Under penalty of perjury pursuant to the provisions of  28 USC 1946, I
aver to the veracity of all factual averments in regard to which I
possess percipient knowledge contained herein and as to any averments
made upon information and believe, that I verily believe such
averments to be true.
Robert J. More

Robert J. More
P.O. Box 6926
Chicago, IL 60680
312 545-1890
anselm45@gmail.com


Sotodcmtr-www.thirstforjustice.777host.us(sotodcmtr)
1/15/10, b.32, c.,  m.   n.   p.1

Document List of  1/15/10 (D/L 1/15/10)
1. D/L 1/15/10 Code (1/15/10/09, b.32, c.,  m.   n.   p.1)
2. MTR of  1/15/10 Code (1/15/10/09, b.32, c.,  m.   n.   p.2)
3. Notice of …Code  # (“C#”) 1/15/10/09, b.32, c.,  m.   n.   p.3
4. Proposed Amended Comp of 1/15/10 b. 32 c. m. n, p. 4

Sotodcmtr-www.thirstforjustice.777host.us(sotodcmtr)
1/15/10/09, b.32, c.,  m.   n.   p.2
United States District Court
            for  the
    District of  Columbia
Robert J. More
Petitioner/Plaintiff
V        Case #  09-1487
Sergeant at Arms of  the United States Senate, Secretary of  the
United States Senate, Majority Leader of  the United States Senate,
Mr. Harry Reid,
Respondents/Defendants

INITIAL SUPERABBREVIATED, NOT YET PROOFREAD, COMPONENT OF 1/15/10 OF
MOTION TO RECONSIDER OF  1/6/10, TO BE SUPERCEDED, PROVIDENCE
PERMITTING, BY 1/29/10, IN WHICH RJM MOVES THIS COURT TO GRANT LEAVE
FOR THE FILING OF  THE SECOND SUPERCEDING COMPONENT OF  1/15/10, OF
THE COMPLAINT OF  8/4/09, A COPY OF  WHICH  HAS BEEN POSTED AT THE URL
LISTED IN THE UPPER LEFT HAND CORNER OF  THIS DOCUMENT AT WHICH THIS
COURT CAN ACCESS IT UNTIL RJM WOULD BE GRANTED LEAVE TO EFILE ALL
DOCUMENTS IN THE CASE THS MOTION CONCERNS (“THIS CASE”)



Now comes the Plaintiff, Robert J. More, to file the “Second
Superceding…Complaint…” , a copy of  which accompanies this motion and
in explanation and support whereof, RJM avers and explains as follows:
RJM incorporates by reference the entirety of  the contents of  the
motion Titled “…Motion to Reconsider of 1/6/10….” as if fully set
forth herein.
For now RJM awaits the ruling of  this Court on the document mailed to
it on 1/6/10, so that RJM would not consume unregainable time and
resources in regard to the rectification of  the injustice this case
concerns unless the consumption thereof would be unpreventable.
Wherefore, RJM herein seeks the relief described in the title and/or
in the opening paragraph of this motion
Indignantly -  unless the Court was justified in issuing the order it
issued on 8/6/09, submitted,
Robert J. More – Jn. 21:15, MC Clause 61, Papal Christmas Message of
1956, Rom 12:21 – Suspect Stumblebum,  Heartless Coward, Or Both,
Until The Atrocities Of  The Edomites Will Have Been Adequately
Avenged

Sotodcmtr-www.thirstforjustice.777host.us(sotodcmtr)
1/15/10/09, b.32, c.,  m.   n.   p.2

United States District Court
      for  the
District of  Columbia
Robert J. More
Petitioner/Plaintiff
V        Case # 09-1487
Sergeant at Arms of  the United States Senate, Secretary of  the
United States Senate, Majority Leader of  the United States Senate,
Mr. Harry Reid,
Respondents/Defendants


NOTICE IS HEREIN PROVIDED that a copy of the accompanying:
INITIAL SUPERABBREVIATED, NOT YET PROOFREAD, COMPONENT OF 1/15/10 OF
MOTION TO RECONSIDER…..and a copy of  this notice,    has been filed
with the Court via  the mailing thereto  to the United States District
Court   for the District of  Columbia,  at: 333 Constitution Ave.,
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20001 on or before  1/17/10,   and set for
telephonic hearing on 1/29/10 – 14 days after the 10 day window on
Rule 59(e) motions filed based upon orders issued on  12/31/09 would
be due , in the Courtroom of  Judge R. Walton ,   a true and correct
copy of which is herewith served upon you.
_____________
Robert J. More
P.O. Box 6926
Chicago, IL 60680, 312 545-1890
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
N/A – as no Defendants have yet been served except in regard to the
TRO sought on 8/5/09 and/or 8/6//09