thirstforjustice.tripod.com/akailapmotdl31612.html, www.thirstforjustice.net, gordonwwatts.com,

The d/f for this document is: aloysiusalphonsus.2

time spent: 3/16/12 - 21:45

delivery of TCR –

composition time:printing, mailing – costs $1.25

APPEAL TO THE ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT, FIRST DISTRICT, FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY

Robert More (“RJM”), et al

Plaintiff/Appellant

Circuit Court Case No. 11 M1 - 011143 Judge L. Dunford

Akal Security, Inc. et al

Defendant/Appellee

INITIAL COMPONENT OF 3/16/12 OF VERIFIED MOTION OF 3/16/12 FOR VARIOUS MEASURES OF CONSIDERATION, FILED AS DEFECTIVE AS RJM CANNOT AFFORD TO EITHER PRINT OR MAIL MORE THAN ONE COPY WHEREOF, YET TO BE PROOFREAD, POSSIBLY TO BE SUPERSEDED OR RETRACTED IN WHICH RJM MOVES COURT TO PROVIDE WHATEVER TYPE OF CONSIDERATION RJM WOULD NEED TO PROCURE IN ORDER TO RETAIN THE MORALLY LEGITIMATE CLAIM WHICH RJM UNDERSTANDS THAT HE HAS RETAINED SINCE 8/23 OR 25 OF 2005 TO RECTIFY THE INJUSTICE(S) THIS DOCUMENT CONCERNS VIA THE PARTCIPATION IN THE USE OF CONTRA-PREDATORY VIGILANTE REMED(Y)(IES) WHICH MAY INCLUDE DECLARING THE CRIMINAL CODE PRESENTLY OPERATIVE IN IL TO KEEP THE SLAVES ENSLAVED UNCONSTITUTIONAL ....RJM, SUMMARILY VACATING THE ORDER OF 2/27/12 DENYING THE MOTION FILED ON 2/18/12, AND VACATING THE MANDATE ENTERED ON 2/29/12 IN REGARD TO THE APPEAL THIS DOCUMENT CONCERNS

NOW COMES Appellant, Robert J. More (“RJM”) to move this court to grant the consideration referenced in the “Proposed Order of 2/18/12”, which accompanies this motion and in support whereof, RJM asserts the following facts:

· RJM incorporates by reference herein the entirety of the contents of RJM’s “…Motion of 1/10/12….” as if fully set forth herein.

· The appeal this motion concerns (“this appeal”) ended up getting DWP’ed for no apparently justifiable reason and RJM understands that in order to ultimately participate in the use of a contra-predatory vigilante remedy in order to remedy the unjustifiably caused injury which this appeal concerns that RJM now had to file this motion.

· The duty of this Court to conduct its activity within the limits of the protections of the Constitutions of the u.s. of A. and the State of IL and beyond that of the moral law may remain unfulfilled in regard to its adjudication of this appeal, but RJM has no intention of permitting his own moral liability to remain uncovered in such regard.

· It is RJM’s understanding that this Court is so accustomed to trampling over the top of the Oath its members have taken, of disregarding the requirements of God’s moral law, of depriving litigants and their affiliates of the consideration due them from any given adjudication and from defrauding posterity of the consideration due it in a given instance, that RJM is obliged to prosecute this appeal off of the anchor of the “Escort to Civil Litigation” document which RJM is in the process of completing, as otherwise RJM cannot see how anything postulated to this Court will ever even be considered, if indeed anything presented whereto would even be understood.

· RJM is now, barring the encountering of some unexpected adversity, within weeks of getting his “Escort” magnum opus posted in the website referenced in the ULC of this document.

· The time it would take to continue addressing this Court in this motion is keeping RJM from completing that project, the completion of which is a necessary component of everything else in which RJM is involved.

· To be continued as the circumstances of Providence would permit.

Wherefore, RJM herein moves this Court to grant one of the forms of relief contained in the proposed order which accompanies this motion.

Pursuant to the provisions of 735 ILCS 5/1-109, I aver to the veracity of all factual averments contained herein.

Robert J. More

D.#2

APPEAL TO THE ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT, FIRST DISTRICT, FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY

Robert More (“RJM”), et al

Plaintiff/Appellant

Circuit Court Case No. 11 M1 - 011143 Judge L. Dunford

Akal Security, Inc. et al

Defendant/Appellee

NOTICE OF FILING

To: Jody W. Moran

Jackson Lewis Law Firm for Akal Security, Passias et al

You are hereby notified that on 2/18/12, I filed the following documents with the Clerk of the Appellate Court via the mailing whereto: Initial Component of 2/18/12 of Motion to Vacate the DWP of 2/18/12, copies of which accompany this notice.

_____________________________

Robert J. More

Plaintiff-Appellant

Robert J. More

P.O. Box 6926

Chicago, IL 60680

(863) 688-9880 (lv msg)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Under penalty of perjury pursuant to the provisions of 735 ILCS 5/1-109, I aver that on or before 2/21/12, I served a copy of this notice and all documents enumerated in the document list included herein, upon the

Attorney, J.W. Moran of Jackson Lewis Law Firm for Appellees Akal Security and Passias, via email according to operative stipulations

Robert J. More

Document List of 2/18/12 D.#1

· D/L 2/18/12

· Notice of Filing of 2/18/12

· Initial…Verified Motion of 2/18/12 for Various Measures of Consideration

· Proposed Order of 2/18/12

D.#3

thirstforjustice.tripod.com/akailapmotdl21812.html, www.thirstforjustice.net, gordonwwatts.com, click here to access docket in which this document is an entry. The d/f for this document is: aloysiusalphonsusanselm.38

D.#5

APPEAL TO THE ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT, FIRST DISTRICT, FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY

Robert More (“RJM”), et al

Plaintiff/Appellant

Circuit Court Case No. 11 M1 - 011143 Judge L. Dunford

Akal Security, Inc. et al

Defendant/Appellee

Appellant’s (“RJM”) Proposed Order of 2/18/12

· Relief sought is granted/denied.

· The dismissal for want of prosecution (“DWP”) issued in regard to the appeal this order concerns (“this appeal”) is herein vacated.

· The case this appeal concerns is summarily returned to the trial court and placed into the position in which it abided on 3/31/11, as the law cannot compel the impossible, and RJM is granted leave to audio record any and all proceedings conducted wherein ___________________, or, the criminal codes of the States of NM and IL are declared to be unconstitutional as applied to any activity conducted by RJM for the purpose of remedying the injuries this appeal concerns once the IL and New Mexico, Attorney Generals would provide this Court a confirmation that each, respectively, has been provided notice of the contents of this order _____________________, or this appeal is stayed for 365 days in order for the dust to clear in regard to the matters addressed in the motion this order accompanies and/or any superseding component whereof which RJM would file in this Court within the next 60 -90 days, and to ascertain whether any appeal in re the matters it concerns would be necessary at all, given that RJM has informed this Court that on 11/21/11, the trial court vacated a DWP in the predecessor case to this case and set a discovery closure date in such case of 2/17/12, or this Court has provided the following means via which RJM can file the trial court record (“TCR”) in this appeal _____________, or RJM is dispensed from filing the TCR in re this appeal _________________.

· All matters this appeal concerns are herein stayed for 365 days until 1/12/13, so as to, inter alia, prevent any expenditure of resources which might not be justified because not necessary.

· This Court has been informed that barring some unexpected adversity, if some provision is not made for RJM to get documents and records to the Clerk of this Court that RJM will file a petition to the IL Supreme Court to rectify the unjust arrangement presently prevailing in such regard within 90-120 days.

· No claim to any type of consideration has been relinquished attributable to RJM’s not having raised any given matter or not having more clearly explained any matter raised than whatever clarity in such regard has been provided, in the motion, which this order accompanies.

· Whatever order was issued barring RJM from accessing the 160 N. LaSalle St. Bldg is herein vacated as having constituted a deprivation of a constitutionally protected right.

· This Court confirms that it has been apprised that if relief relieving RJM from the burdens imposed upon him from the access barring order would not be granted, RJM would seek findings of fact and conclusions of law in regard to any order not granting such and to examine this Court under penalty of perjury with a camcorder in regard to this issue.

Robert J. More _______________

P.O. Box 6926 _______________

Chicago, IL, 60680, 863 688-9880 _______________