documents actually delivered on 12/16/13 to USMS and Office of U.S atty for nd of il- Con of Rec of Serv - 12/11/13ss not 12/16/13

and entry #11 - Time and resources consumed - scratched out

thirstforjustice.tripod.com/grifdlfgj121113ss.html

Document List ("D/L") of 12/11/13ss - FGJ #1

1. D/L of 12/11/13ss - FGJ - griffgjdl121113ss.html X

2. Cover Letter to Grand Jury Foreperson/Demand to USDC ND of IL Chief Judge, Office of U.S. Atty for ND of IL, & USMS - griffgjsublede121113ss.html X

3. Proposed True Bill of Federal Grand Jury Processing Evidence in N.D. of IL on 12/11/13 - grifdlfgjsubprtb121113ss.html X

4....Complaint of 2/14/12 in Case # 11 CH 12339 in Circuit Court of Cook County, IL – grifdlcom2-14-12.html

5. U.S. v Williams, 90-1972 Opinion - grifdlfgjsubuswi6413.html

6. First Superseding Component of 7/8/11 of Notice of 7/7/11 From RJM to USMS re Denial of Access to FGJ - usmsfsgood7-8-11

7. Order of 3/26/07 re Access to FGJ - …/fedgrjurord32607.pdf

8. Invitation to Demonstrate Non-incurrment of Criminal Liability Via Positing of Interference to Presentation of Evidence to a FGJ/Invitation to …Civil Liability Via…. - grifdlfgjsubinv6413.html

9. Proposed Stipulation re Waiver of 5th Amendment Right to not be Criminally Prosecuted for any Alleged and/or Actual Federal Felony Except via Indictment - grifdlfgjsubusps6413.html

10. Confirmation of Reception of Delivery (“ROD”)/ Refusal to Provide Confirmation of ROD/ Service List - grifdlfgjsubcrod121113ss.html X

11. Record of Time and Resources Consumed X

Documents adjacent to which there is an "X" were delivered to the Federal Grand Jury Foreperson and emailed to Asst. U.S. Atty for the NDIL T. Walsh on 12/16/13, b/4 .... and documents adjacent to which there is a "Y" were hand delivered to the Office of the Chief Judge for the USDC for the NDIL, the U.S. Atty for the ND of IL, and the USMS by 12/16/13.

…/griffgjsublede121113ss.html #2

Cover Letter to Grand Jury Foreperson/Demand to USDC ND of IL Chief Judge, U.S. Attorney for ND of IL, & USMS for ND of IL - griffgjsublede121113ss.html

Robert J. More ("RJM")

P.O. Box 6926

Chicago, IL 60680

anselm45@gmail.com, (81211) 688-9880 –lv msg

Federal Grand Jury Foreperson

Federal Grand Jury for the United States District Court, Northern District of IL

13th or 16th or some other Floor

Dirksen Federal Building

219 S. Dearborn St.

Chicago, IL, 60680

Chief Judge of United States District Court for the Northern District of IL (“USDC-NDIL”) Rueben Castillo

Chambers of the Chief Judge of the USDC-NDIL,

Dirksen Federal Building

219 S. Dearborn St.

Chicago, IL, 60680

U.S. Attorney Z. Fardon

Suite 500

219 S. Dearborn St.

Chicago, IL, 60604

United States Marshal Service

Suite 2400

219 S. Dearborn St.

Chicago, IL, 60604

12/16/13 - second letter of 12/11/13

Dear Federal Grand Jury Foreperson (“FGJF”), and Undear Chief Judge of the USDC-NDI, R. Castillo, U.S. Attorney Z. Fardon, (“Chief Judge”) and Whatever Member(s) of the USMS (is) (are) responsible for the maintenance of the arrangement presently prevailing in the geographical area constituting the “Northern District of IL” (“NDIL”) for purpose(s) of the delineation of the jurisdiction of the federal judiciary in regard to such area, in which citizens are prevented via the notification from the USMS of intent of the USMS to endeavor to effect arrest in regard to any initiative(s) undertaken to present evidence of alleged and/or actual violations of provisions of the United States Code in which is contained provision for criminal prosecution and punishment by any activity conductor not listed by role and/or title in the Order issued by the Chief Judge referencing the entirety of types of activity conductors permitted to access the FGJ in the NDIL, which is dated March 26, 2007 (“Order of 3/26/07 re Access to FGJ”), and Asst. U.S. Attorney Thomas Walsh,

The documents adjacent to which there is an "X" listed in the "Document List of 12/11/13ss" which accompanies this document were delivered to the Federal Grand Jury Foreperson for the Federal Grand Jury Conducting Activity in Chicago, IL, (FGJFP") on 12/16/13 to the extent RJM was permitted to effect such delivery (which has meant leaving them at the front security desk), along with a cover letter and confirmation of reception of document, with copies of such documents having been delivered to the Office of the Chief Judge of the USDC for the NDIL (either in paper and/or via email), the Office of the U.S. Attorney for the ND of IL (via email to Asst. U.S. Atty T. Walsh accompanied by a demand to transmit it to some appropriate destination), and the USMS stationed in the Dirksen Federal Bldg (via email to available email address), in Chicago, IL, to the extent RJM would have been capable of effecting such deliveries and would not have encountered obstacles preventing the effecting of such, which emails would have been transmitted by 12/12/13, if no obstacles would have been encountered to such delivery, or as soon whereafter as such delivery could have been executed.

FTR, the documents RJM delivered on 12/11/13 to the Office of the U.S. Atty for the ND of IL and delivered to the Office of the U.S.M.S. for the Federal Grand Jury for the ND of IL were never delivered to the Chief Judge for the ND of IL.

The purpose of the delivery whereof was to get criminal charges instituted in regard to the activity referenced in the file "grifcomp21412" (posted at: "thirstforjustice.tripod.com/grifcomp21412.html") which is also included in the CD which accompanies documents which RJM has mailed to, and/or endeavored to deliver to, the FGJ, in the past.

As there is a statute of limitation ("SOL"), if not tolled, set to expire upon the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the u.s. of A. violating, criminal prosecution in regard to the unconstitutional and criminal siezure of Robert J. More ("RJM") perpetrated by Cook County Sheriff's Department Sergeants Jennifer Griffith, Gerald Quimque and Gail Bergfalk on 6/13/08, at midnight on 12/17/13 in regard to all of the counts enumerated in the "Proposed True Bill" ("PTB") which this document accompanies, RJM found it necessary to transmit this document to the FGJFP today, in order that either indictments against those listed in the caption of the "proposed true bill" ("PTB") which accompanies this document can be instituted against such individuals by 12/17/13 or that in a scenario in which such measure would not have been implemented by such date, so that such can be issued after such date, or that, at least a claim to resort to the use of (a) contra-predatory vigilante remed(y)(ies) for the purpose of adequately vindicating and protecting the interests which are supposed to be vindicated and protected via the criminal prosecution, conviction and punishment of Federal crimes committed in the u.s. of A. (but which cannot be so vindicated and protected given the patently criminal and tortious control of the FGJ at this juncture in history by the Executive and Judicial Branches of the Federal Government and in a larger context via the control of all of the branches of such government by the Rothschild's et al Empire - constructed out of the defraudment of hundreds of trillions of dollars extracted and extorted from the fruits of the labor of the world's "goyim" ), can be adequately effected entirely independently of any Committee of 300 owned, influenced and operated government entity.

At this juncture, time constraints being what they are, RJM proposes that the addressees of this document simply read paragraphs numbered 18-53, 152-160 of the complaint and Counts #4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 in the document file included in the CD referenced herein titled "grifcomp21412" whose URL is also included herein, discuss such matters along with the rest of the FGJ members presently serving on the FGJ conducting evidence assessments and issuing true bills in Chicago, IL, and sign a copy of the true bill included herein infra or some such similar type document by the end of the day on 12/17/13, and execute whatever other affirmative acts would have to be executed by such time in order to get criminal charges for violations of 18 USC 242 instituted by the end of the day of 12/17/13 against the (individuals) (crime perpetrators) whose activity this document concerns. There is no need for any investigation of anything in regard to the matter of the institution of the indictment sought herein. The trial court judge, as reprehensible and criminal as activity conducted by him in regard to the matters this document concerns, indisputably was, explained in directing a verdict of acquittal of RJM on 12/17/08 that the two lying CCSD representatives - Sgt. J. Griffith and Deputy D. Dattulo "were thoroughly impeached. The report completed by Sgt. Griffith on 12/8/08 in regard to the arrest of the Defendant (Robert J. More), asserted that the Defendant (RJM) said he would leave 'if he was going to be arrested'". Verdict is directed against the State and the Defendant is free to leave." What RJM had actually conveyed to the CCSD criminals whom he encountered in Room 2408 of the RDC on 6/8/08 was somewhat more sophisticated than what Griffith claimed RJM had conveyed in the report referenced herein, but even in the truncated form in which Griffith had conveyed what she claimed RJM had asserted to her prior to her effecting the false arrest of RJM on 6/8/08 which this document concerns ("these matters"), RJM's notification of the CCSD of his understanding of the legal and moral character of the developments transpiring on 6/8/08 which ultimately resulted in the false arrest and Fourth Amendment violating seizure of that date, completely exonerated RJM from any criminal activity in regard to these matters.

The documents of which this document constitutes a component part have been delivered in a historical and jurisprudential context delineated as follows:

Global Macro Arrangement - The Apostolic See of the only Divinely Established and hence invincible, institution ever in existence and which could ever be in existence, namely the Roman Catholic Church having been Abducted by the Rothshild Empire in 1958, What is now the former u.s. of A. has been subsumed into what is now the Rothschilds' and Affiliate's Flagship Slave Colony on the Global NWO Plantation, with only the Non-prostitute Sheriff's and various other government officials in various offices (Sheriff's et al) still unwilling to participate in the consumation of the NWO Extermination of the Goyim unsuitable, attributable to any of a number of disqualifiers (unwillingness to participate in the defraudment of legitimate reliance interests (the members of this group constituting by far the biggest problem for the Genodicists, as the comparative rectitude of its members enables a participation in joint cooperative ventures requiring sacrifice and long-sufferingness and transparency which leaves in place a group capacity to wage a successful -defined as prevailing militarily via means restricted solely to morally permissible ones - insurrection and then adquately govern and manage what would emanate wherefrom for the true common good, which the morally bankrupt cannot effect), lack of productive capacity, unwillingness to be subjugated, unwillingness to relinquish private property, etc.) for NWO "Citizenship"and the completion of the enslavement of those willing to accept enslavement themselves and to participate in the enslavement and extermination of others in positions in the slavemaster class of such order, and the rest of the FEMA Red and Blue List Population left standing along with the Sheriff's et al between such Slavekeepers and the Consumation of their centuries old agenda of complete global domination, there is a structural defect present in the institutions of the former u.s. of A. which has been so conspicuously present in almost all of the matters in which RJM has ever been involved in the Dirksen Federal Building in Chicago, IL.

Situation Specific macro arrangement and problem - common illegitimate interests of USDOJ - controlled by the Usurper B. Soetoro Claimant to the Office of the POTUS, given that Soetoro's claim to avoid criminal punishment and resource relinquishment has been and remains vulnerable (if Barry was as thoroughly insulated from receiving the just recompense this side of eternity for the crimes and predations in which he has been a principal as the Slavekeepers have obviously lead him to believe that they can keep him, how can the fact that there are even FEMA Red and Blue Listers still alive be explained?) to the consequences of a non-counterfiet criminal prosecution of the members of the Chicago Police Dept and Office of Cook County, IL, State's Attorney ("CCSA") responsible for the non-investigation and prosecution of the Bland, Young and Spencer murders for defrauding the public of legitimate investigations and prosecutions of them and the capacity of the CCSA to continue to leave both such non-investigations and such murders, themselves, uninvestigated and unprosecuted, and with that of the CCS (Cook County, IL, Sheriff) - T. Dart, alleged former roomate of Soetoro when he was an IL State Senator who so obsequiously withdrew from the race for the Mayor of Chicago, IL, after getting the signatures necessary to get into that race in late 2010, when it became obvious that it was apprehended by the powers that control this Country, and world, that it was in their interest(s) to have Rahm Emanuel, with his ensconcedness in the most highly sophisticated intimidation, terror and assassination network the world has ever known - the Rothschild Terror Network - installed in that office - which installation would of course, just "coincidentally" leave RE in a position to use that office to better insure the keeping of such murders "swept under the rug" than if someone not possessing as strong an interest in the maintenance of such arrangement nor the means to eliminate anyone causing problems in such regard without the risk of backfire, as effectively as could RE, would have secured such office. Maybe it was just a coincidence, but the nominal and usurper claimant to the Office of the U.S. Attorney General was in Chicago a few weeks ago to attend the installation of the present nominal and usurper claimant to the Office of the U.S. Attorney for the ND of IL (Soetoro not satisfying the "natural born citizen" requirements for the ascension to and holding of the Office of the POTUS, none of his appointments possess any legitimacy). If he attends all such installations, it is a wonder how he can participate in as much government crime and violence as he has been accused of committing thus far in his "psuedo-tenure". In other words there is a serious problem of "slavemaster class member symbiosis" which both resulted in the violence and criminality referenced herein and plagues the theatre in which the consequences of such violence and criminality are supposed to be adequately punished, but in regard to which what ordinarily and customarily occurs when those considered to be slaves (the "goyim") demand that the government entit(y)(ies) (such as the USDOJ entities in Chicago, IL and the USDC for the ND of IL, not to mention the hell-full of horrors that the CCA 7, Judge D. Manion, at least to a considerable extent, whether or not wholely, excepted, constitutes), subsidized by the fruits of their (our) legitimate labors provide the consideration (it is) (they are) supposed to be in existence to provide, is that such government entit(ies) facilitate(s) the exculpation from subjection to just "use of existing nominal government systems" recompense of the original predation perpetrators and in so many cases, proceed even more egregiously, to effect(s) retaliation against the victim(s) of any given original government crime in order to break the commitment of the contra-genocide component of the population ("everything warmblooded") (to the Talmudics what would unaffectionately constituted the "uppity goyim") to eliminate the criminal syndicates in place throughout governmental systems at all levels at this juncture and to ensure the leaving in place of disincentives to bearing-of-the-burden to govern the government activity for the purpose of deterring other unjustifiably injured individuals from contesting goverment criminality and violence.

Specific Sub-macro arrangement - At all times involving the period in which the activty referenced herein was conducted there was an incentive for all of those named in this document as crime perpetrators and correlatively, individuals whom society needs to have adequately punished - the names of which are included in the caption of the proposed true bill in which this conveyance has been included, to contribute to the insulation of themselves and the others involved wherein from criminal and civil liability, as 1.) many of such officials may or in some cases, most definitely do, possess incriminating evidence of criminal and tortious activity conducted by (any) of the others referenced wherein, 2.) all such persons were conducting activity in an arrangement in which it would be foreseeable that each could cover for the unjust activity of any and all of the others ever conducted under the authority of a given office in which any given official would ever be conducting activity in the future - to the short-term evident (as apprehended by the jaundiced eyes of those who cannot recognize even their own true bodily preservation interests as distinct from what Lucifer succeeds in tempting them to believe constitutes such) economic, political and social benefit of such officials and those who possess the "leverage" to manipulate exercises of government authority to - on the other end of the balance, or in this case gross imbalance- the entirely unjustified detriment of the entirety of the members of the population - which members are of course entitled in all instances to the accommodation of their legitimate reliance interests in any and all exercises of government authority ("the honest services of a government office" - 18 USC 1346), and at all such times, Judge Donnelly, Atty Albukerk and the Members of the Office of the CCSA were subject to the additional incentive to Keep the Charge(s) Instituted against RJM, instituted, in Order to Keep the Market Value of the Law Licence in Chicago, IL higher by an apportioned measure than it would have been Had Such Charge Not Been Kept in Operation

Minimal Postulation of Controlling Law In Regard to counts included in the "Proposed Indictment of 12/11/13 which accompanied this document - 1. the maintenance of a criminal prosecution predicated upon an arrest made w/o probable cause in a situation in which the entirety of the basis for the criminal prosecution was contained in the arrest which would have fructified into the unconstitutional criminal prosecution constitutes a violation of 18 USC 242. Peirson v Ray. (_U.S._) The Pierson Court - 'the arrest was, in fact, [without probable cause, and] unconstitutional."Id. at 386 U. S. 557, 2. denial of due process of law in the priorities and method(s) according to which of any adjudication would ever (be) (have been) conducted - "persons can be deprived of due process of law via activity of a state court" - Fayerweather v ritch (_U.S._), "the right to DPOL is a right guaranteed by the Const. and laws of the u.s. of A," Fayerweather v Ritch, 3. The non-execution of acts the execution of which would be obligatory upon equals and/or superiors in any government office, in any given instance in order to prevent the deprivation of and/or to extricate an innocent individual from continued deprivations of, rights guaranteed by the Constitution and laws of the u.s. of A. is explicitly promulgated in 42 USC 1986. Contrary to the usurpous and defrauding of legitimate reliance interests position of various representatives of the USDOJ, prosecutions for violations of 18 USC 242 cannot legitimately be limited to situations in which injuries requiring hospitalization are incurred from police misconduct (though RJM's being injected with psychotropic drugs in regard to matters already presented to those to whom this document has been presented was a most egregious example of exactly the types of brutality and permanent unjustified injury-causing activity that even dishonest DOJ representatives have conceded constitute the basis for 242 prosecutions). Judge Lanier was prosecuted according to such statute Lanier v U.S. (_U.S._) and in Dennis v Sparks (_U.S._) the SCOTUS conceded that a judge can most definitely be prosecuted for crimes perpetrated via the exercise of his or her adjudicative authority. 4. The existence of a tort corresponding to a successful retaliatory inducement to prosecute as being violative of a constitutionally protected right to not be subjected to any type of malicious prosecution has been recognized by the SCOTUS in the case of Hartman v. Moore, 547 U.S. 250 (2006). As the identification by the SCOTUS of constitutionally protected rights actionable in tort provides anyone susceptible to liability in tort for the violation whereof adequate notice whereof for the purpose of the identification of such liability for constitution - violating activity, so too, does such necessarily provide such identification for the incurrment of criminal liaibility in re whereto, for there could obviously be no rational basis upon which it might ever be claimed that the definition of such type "constitutionally protected" right could be applicable in a civil theatre but not in a criminal one, which would explain why RJM has yet to come across any example of the SCOTUS endeavoring to restrict any such type definition to the civil theatre. The prima donnas in the Office of the U.S. Attorney for the ND of IL are all "presumed to know the law" and that would necessarily have to include the concept of "substantive due process" actionable via 18 USC 242 as actionable via 42 USC 1983 as violative of the guarantee of the protection of substantive due process aspect of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the u.s. of A. applicable to state actors and those acting via the authority of any political subdivision of any given state. The legal propositions contained herein supra have all been "well established" or more accurately "adequately established" in that such propositions have been postulated in the jurisprudence of the SCOTUS and thus satisfy the Parrat v Taylor (_U.S._) , Harlow v Fitzgerald (_U.S._) threshold for delineation of the scope of (a) constitutionally protected right(s) sufficient to provide notice to those subject to liability of various types for the deprivation whereof in any given instance of the scope whereof and since the civil corrollary of 18 USC 242 is 42 USC 1983, it is obvious that the identification of the scope of a constitutional deprivation in the civil sphere cannot possibly be incompatible with the scope whereof in the criminal sphere.

If the issuance of an information before the end of the day on 12/17/13 in lieu of an indictment in regard to the matters this document concerns would be sufficient to secure any SOL issue not already adequately covered and secured in regard to these matters, then RJM herein demands on behalf of everything warmblooded, that such type entity be so instituted or issued before 12/18/13.

Robert J. More

…/grifdlfgjsubprtb121113ss.html #3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V.

Circuit Court of Cook County, IL ("CCCC") Judge Thomas More Donnelly, Cook County State's Attorney Anita Alvarez, Asst. Supervisor CCSA Charis Valiente, Cook County Sheriff ("CCS") Thomas Dart, Asst. CCSA N. Uche, Asst. CCSA B. Franco, CCS Dept. ("CCSD")Chief Nolan, CCSD Sgt J. Griffith CCSD dattulo or Danattulo or Danatulo, CCSD Sgt G. Bergfalk, CCSD Sgt G. Quimque, Attorney Nick Albukerk, & CCSD Chief of Legal Department P. Kramer - conditional upon contents of Whatever response to "Invitation to Demonstrate the Non-incurrment of Criminal Liability" Issued to Him Might Be Provided by Him

Indictment:

INDICTMENT

THE GRAND JURY CHARGES:

INTRODUCTION

The individuals listed by name herein supra have been found to have violated the provisions of 18 USC 242 according to the evidence presented to the Federal Grand Jury in the “…Complaint of 2/14/12….” which accompanies this indictment, Donnelly for refusing to permit Robert J. More ("RJM") to defend himself, and to address any of the several motions which RJM filed and/or endeavored to file in Circuit Court of Cook Cty, IL Case # 08 MC 123941901, Cook County State's Attorney Anita Alvarez, Asst. Supervisor CCSA Charis Valiente, Asst. CCSA N. Uche, and Asst. CCSA B. Franco, for continuing to maintain a criminal prosecution emanating entirely from an arrest which violated the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the u.s. of A.'s prohibition on illegal seizures, and Cook County Sheriff ("CCS") Thomas Dart, CCS Dept. ("CCSD")Chief Nolan, CCSD Sgt J. Griffith CCSD Sgt G. Bergfalk, CCSD Sgt G. Quimque, & CCSD Chief of Legal Department P. Kramer for both "successful retaliatory inducement to prosecute", Hartman v. Moore, 547 U.S. 250 (2006) culpably leaving the acts each, respectively, was obliged to execute in order to terminate the Fourth Amendment Violation this document concerns, as postulated in 42 USC 1986, which would leave investigation into the matter of whether 18 USC 241 was not violated in regard to the matters this document concerns of high importance, CCSD Sgt J. Griffith and CCSD Deputy D. Dattulo for misrepresenting the activity of RJM on 6/13/08 in such a way that had such testimony not been adequately impeached, might have resulted in an entirely unjustified conviction of RJM, notwithstanding his innocence of any criminal activity in regard to any matter this document concerns, and Atty N. Albukerk for refusing to present RJM's motions, the presentation of which could have rendered a trial in the matters this document concerns entirely unnecessary, but which presentation might have resulted in structural modifications which would reduce his longer term earning capacity by making it more difficult than it was in 2008 for government criminals to perpetrate pretextual criminal prosecutions against innocent persons.

Parenthetically and contextually, RJM herein postulates as follows: given that evidence in re which the indictment sought in the documents included in the document collection of which this document constitutes a component part can so readily be inserted into the form of the "proposed true bill" ("PTB") transmitted w/n the past month by RJM to all of those to whom this document has been transmitted in regard to the innumerable violations of 18 USC 242 perpetrated in regard to the factual predicates included in the Complaint presently pending in CCCC, IL Case # 11 CH 12339 (which complaint is also accessible at: "thirstforjustice.tripod.com/grifcomp21412.html") , which emanated from the patently unconstitutional, criminal and tortious prosecution and adjudication of Case # # 08 MC 123941901 in the CCCC, IL (which so far from being anomalous, was one of five pretextual prosecutions to which RJM has been subjected by the Office of the CCSA over the past 15 years), and that the prospects of anyone in the DOJ (aka the Department of "Just Us")in its various subcomponent criminal enterprises and/or the Chief Judge of the ND of IL even refraining from working to keep any indictment from being instituted in regard to the matters this document concerns ("these matters"), much less adequately bearing the burden of any given office to ensure the institution of such, are so small that RJM did not see how it was justified at this juncture to put all such evidence into a PTB. Beyond that RJM can be summonsed to testify and/or to produce documents (which can also be procured from the Clerk of Court for the CCCC, IL, independently of RJM) and upon the reception of a request that RJM put such factual predicates into a PTB format, RJM would immediately execute the acts needing to be executed to get such task completed as soon as it could be completed. Therefore, RJM cannot see how any positing of any excuse for any non-institution of criminal charges in regard to these matters predicated upon any claim that there was not enough time to get criminal charges instituted in regard to this matter between now and 12/17/13 not accompanied by an explanation identifying the entirety of the priorities according to which the activity conducted in the Office of the U.S. Atty for the ND of IL, the Chief Judge for the USDC for the ND of IL, the FBI Chicago, IL Division, and the Federal Grand Jury presently instituted in Chicago, IL (in such period) (in the entirety of the period of time in which RJM has been endeavoring to get criminal convictions for government perpetrated crimes and/or of crimes perpetrated by those presuming that they can perpetrate crimes on individuals conducting activity in the type of posture in which RJM has been conducting activity in such period with impunity), could possibly possess any legitimacy at all and not itself be subject to criminal prosecution on any number of bases. Any grand jury member(s) afraid of retaliation in response to the adequate discharge of the duties of the office of a grand jury member w/o the permitting of any attempts at intimidation and/or even worse forms of violence from any given government criminal(s) for the purpose of effecting the intimidation of any member(s) whereof out of the adequate bearing of the constitutional and moral burden which grand jury members are obliged to bear, can contact RJM via use of any of the contact information included anywhere in this document and/or contact the CSPOA for sanctuary if such would be sought. The favorable destinies of billions are indisputably depending upon either the adequate bearing of the burdens of the offices of grand jury and for that matter, petit, jury members, or a complete mutiny and overthrow of, and destruction of, the Talmudic-barbaric Enslavement and Extermination Apparatus presently in place in this world, which the Rothschild's and their fellow slitters of goy throats indisputably continue to run. RJM would posit no objection to the deletion of any of the contents of this document provided (an) indictment(s) would ultimately be issued in regard to the matters it concerns, so no claim of "disqualifying surplussage" nor any other suchlike justification for any non-institution of criminal charges will be accepted as possessing any legitimacy. Anyone interested in RJM's evidence regarding the context and conditions in which this document was composed can see the "Cover Letter of 12/11/13" which accompanies this document and is posted in the URL listed herein supra.

Subject to supersession to keep bases for pretextual criminal prosecution and/or any other type of government violence which might ever be perpetrated against the author whereof limited to bases other than any regarding the composition and delivery of this document.

At all times material to the Indictment:

1. Each of the Defendants referenced in the caption of this document was employed by either the State of IL, an entity conducting activity as a component of a political subdivision of the State of IL, such as the Cook County, IL Sheriff's Dept, or Office of the Public Defender and/or as a private contractor, contracted to provide consideration to any of the above, such as the Isaac Rey Center, referenced herein.

2. At such juncture,

a.) Thomas More Donnelly was conducting activity ("WCA") as a Judge of the Circuit Court of Cook County, IL.

b.) Anita Alvarez WCA as the Cook County, IL State's Attorney ("CCSA")

c.) Thomas Dart WCA as the Cook County Sheriff ("CCS")

d.) Asst. Supervisor CCSA Charis Valiente,

e.) Asst. CCSA N. Uche, Asst.

f.) CCSA B. Franco,

- were all conducting activity as Asst. State's Attorneys in Cook County, IL,

g.) CCS Dept. ("CCSD")Chief Nolan,

h.) CCSD Sgt J. Griffith,

i.) CCSD Dattulo or Danattulo or Danatulo,

j.) CCSD Sgt G. Bergfalk,

k.) CCSD Sgt G. Quimque,

l.) , & CCSD Chief of Legal Department P. Kramer

m.) CCSD Sgt Kush

n.) CCSD Deputy Wilson

- were all conducting activity as reprsentatives of the Cook County, IL Sheriff's Dept

0.) Attorney Nick Albukerk was conducting activity as a licensed attorney in the State of IL

- all within the scope and meaning of 18 USC 241 and 242.

2. The State of IL is a state government entity, and the County of Cook County, IL is a political subdivision of the State of IL within the scope and meaning of 18 USC 242 and 241.

3. Excerpts from Complaint presently pending in Circuit Court of Cook County, IL ("CCCC") Case # 11 CH 12339 ("Complaint") are incorporated herein as factual predicates and/or distinctive counts for the purpose of the effecting of the issuance of (an) indictment(s) and/or information(s) before the end of the day on 12/17/13, n regard to the matters this document concerns.

Note #1: The entirey of the Complaint presently pending in the CCCC has been provided upon the CD submitted along with this document on 12/16/13 to the FGJ so that the context of what transpired in regard to the matters concerned as referenced herein can be ascertained to the extent RJM had to chronicle such matters in order to survive any legitimate motion to dismiss which might ever (have been) (be) filed in regard whereto without RJM's having been provided opportunity to depose any of the constitutionally protected right violators whose activity has been chronicled herein prior to any of them seeing the entirety of the evidence which RJM possesses regarding activity both tortious and criminal conducted by (any of) them. Only those components of such complaint which RJM has understood that it has been indispensably necessary to include in this document in order to get criminal process of some type issued in regard to the various violations of 18 USC 242 and possibly 241 which this document concerns prior to the expiration of any statute of limitations, which absent the tolling whereof would be set to expire on 12/17/13 in regard to some such activity and in regard to 11/26/13 and 12/17/13 , respectively, in regard to other components of activity referenced herein have been included herein.

Note #2. RJM is in the process of completing documents to be submitted to the Judiciary Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives in regard to the response issued by the U.S. Attorney for the ND of IL on 12/4/13 in regard to documents submitted to him by RJM in November of 2013 regarding matters directly related to the matters this document concerns, in that it is RJM's informed understanding that the processing of the documents submitted by RJM to such office also constituted violations of among other provisions of the Federal Criminal Laws presently operative in the u.s. of A. those of 18 USC 242 and possibly 241, 18 USC 1346 and the aiding and abetting statute, as inter alia, no demonstration of the compatibility of the issuance of such response with instances in which 18 USC 242 charges have been instituted was even attempted and RJM is concerned to not incur culpability for the sin(s) evidently perpetrated in what RJM understands to constitute the legitimate reliance interest defrauding processing of such documents.

Note #3. RJM is in the process of completing documents to be submitted to all of those to whom this document will have been submitted regarding the activity conducted in the post-trial adjudication of the CCDC and in regard to the adjudication of 11 CH 12339 in the CCCC which it is RJM's informed understanding also constituted violations of among other provisions of the Federal Criminal Laws presently operative in the u.s. of A. those of 18 USC 1346, 18 USC 242 and possibly 241, but as no SOL in such regard is presently set to expire, if not tolled, such documents will not be completed at this juncture, as RJM is subject to innumerable other legal and other burdens at this juncture in his earthly theatre tour of duty which evidently necessitate his attending whereto in order to prevent the incurrment of various types of detriment.

Note #4. It is RJM's informed understanding that all that is needed in order to get criminal process issued in regard to the matters this document concerns is the presentation of evidence in regard to the specific violations of Federal Criminal Laws ("FCL") that would cause men of ordinary prudence to conclude that a crime had been committed" (citation to authority yet to be added) in regard to the evidence included in any submission for the issuance of criminal process in the form of an indictment and/or information, and RJM is entirely convinced that the evidence included herein easily traverses that threshold (ie. "probable cause") and could explain the basis for such conviction if any demand and/or proposal would be made upon RJM to provide any such type explanation and/or provide documentation in support of any such type explanation.

Note #5. The inclusion in a given legal document of material that could ever legitimately be claimed to constitute "surplussage" can never legitimately constitute a basis for the disregard of any material ever contained in any given document which would not ever be legitimately considered to constitute such, and thus the inclusion of any conclusions, legal conclusions, opinions, adjectival phrases and/or rhetorical devices not indispensably necessary in a given instance to effect a given legitimate end can never legtimately be utilized to disregard any and all legally competent and admissible evidence in the form of averments and/or otherwise, which would ever be utilized in order to effect any legitimate end.

Note #6. RJM herein informs those to whom this document has been addressed ("addressees") that RJM remains available to testify in regard to any and all of the matters referenced in this document and that he is proceeding as expeditiously as he can continue to proceed in regard to the matter of providing the transcripts of the CCDC to each and all of such addressees as soon as such objective can be accomplished.

Note #7. It is RJM's informed understanding that no material included herein in italics need be considered in order to get (an) indictment(s) and/or information(s) issued before any untolled statute of limitations ("SOL") this document concerns would expire, if untolled, in regard to the matters referenced herein, and the issue of the tolling and/or estopping of any such applicable SOL will be addressed in future submissions made relating to the matters referenced herein.

Note #8. It is RJM's informed understanding in regard to the SOL issue referenced herein supra that it is actually the case that any and all SOLs have all necessarily been and remain, tolled, attributable to the criminal arrangement in place in the USDOJ in the period of 6/13/08 to 12/17/13 in which the independence of the Federal Grand Jury has been replaced with a homage grand jury which is no grand jury at all, both in Chicago, IL and throughout the nation, and the condition of the Office of the U.S. Atty for the ND of IL, which is itself a criminal enterprise whose activity so far from protecting and accomodating the legitimate reliance interests of all effected whereby, functions to accomodate the Jn. 8:44 Agenda of the Rothshchilds and their inferiors in the Talmudic-barbaric Enslavement and Extermination Apparatus which took hold of the now former u.s. of A. at the very latest by 12/23/1913 and has incrementally proceeded to strangle the non-counterfeit version of the rule of law, reducing the former u.s. of A. to the ruins in which it is presently found to have been reduced, such that any SOL which would have been set to expire upon the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the u.s. of A. violating, criminal prosecution in regard to the unconstitutional and criminal siezure of Robert J. More ("RJM") perpetrated by Cook County Sheriff's Department Sergeants Jennifer Griffith, Gerald Quimque and Gail Bergfalk on 6/13/08, at midnight on 12/17/13, were the checks and balances installed into the Constitution of the u.s. of A. actually operative in such period, has necessarily been tolled, but RJM adds that such reality could not possibly constitute any justification for the non-institution of indictments on or before 12/17/13 in regard to the matters this document concerns.

Note #9. The form in which this document has been presented has been produced off of a template derived in regard to the issuance of a "True Bill" in Case # 07-872 in the USDC for the District of New Mexico in all respects which RJM understood it was necessary to ensure the accomplishment of procedural compliance in re whereto, in regard to which RJM has been capable of accomplishing such compliance.

Note # 10. All factual averments included herein #'ed "18-151" have been so included under penalty of perjury pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC 1746 - Robert J. More, 12/11/13

<<<<<<RJM's burden - Qui nocentibus parcit , innocentibus punit

IV. Barest minimum of factual predicates necessary to sustain claims concerned until all Defendants answer complaint:

18. On 6/13/08 ("RJM mistakenly pled the date of "6/12/09" in Case # 09 CH 18934[)], Robert J. More proceeded to Courtroom 2408 of the R. Daley Center in regard to Case # 08CH 9978 (More v Obama for Senate Campaign, et al), as RJM had filed a motion to be addressed on such date at 9:45 a.m. in such case.

19. RJM proceeded to go to Courtroom 2601 on another matter at 10:00 a.m.

20. RJM returned to Courtroom 2408 ("2408") shortly thereafter.

21. At about 10:45 a.m 2408 Case Management Coordinator, Barbara _________ ("CMCB") informed RJM that case # 08 CH 9978 had been dismissed and that an order declaring such had been placed in the "orders bin" outside of 2408, a copy of which RJM confirmed that he had received by that time.

22. RJM then informed CMCB that RJM would compose and submit a motion to have the case recalled on 6/13/08, which would include petitions for other relief as well, within minutes of that time.

23. The great majority of the details regarding what transpired next need not be detailed herein on this occasion, according to RJM's understanding of the compliance-accomplishment threshold according to which RJM must plead the causes of action herein pled in order to get this case to the discovery stage of the litigation process.

24. Based upon the plethora of lies CCSD Sgt Griffith and Deputy Dattulo told on the witness stand on 12/17/08, under penalty of perjury, in the criminal case adjudicated regarding the matters this complaint concerns, RJM would not see how RJM could possibly justify pleading this case more thoroughly than it is herein being pled, prior to RJM's being permitted to depose everyone who was in 2408 at the time of the arrest perpetrated on 6/13/08 in this case, and everyone who conducted activity in regard to such matter prior to 12/17/08 and indeed prior to the date upon which RJM would conduct such depositions, as there is every reason to believe that the problem of the tailoring of witness testimony to the contents of a complaint in order to evade liability will be a serious one in the adjudication of this case ("testilying" as the phenomena is labeled).

25. RJM would have filed this case in the local federal court, except that there are two filing restrictions still - entirely unjustifiably imposed - in place upon RJM in such court which would prevent the filing of anything RJM would endeavor to file therein. RJM has never discontinued his endeavors to get such restrictions removed, but as of 4/9/12, RJM has not succeeded in accomplishing the removal thereof. The fact that the USDC for NDI and CCA 7 judicial junkyards (acknowledging that just as there are sometimes invaluable items in junkyards, so too there are some individuals conducting activity in those Courts whose salutary contributions to the protection and restoration of the rule of law cannot remain unacknowledged in any legitimate assessment of the condition of such Courts) are still operative is itself a standing rebuke to RJM and a cause for great concern regarding RJM's prospects for avoiding ending up in hell.

26. As of the date of the filing of this complaint, the research RJM has conducted in regard to the issue of whether a state court would possess authority to adjudicate (a) tort claim(s) ever posited against a federal judge has provided no conclusive answer.

27. RJM herein simply explains that a number of individuals in 2408 advised RJM to proceed to room 802 and file a motion there.

28. RJM explained that he was filing a "Motion to Recall the Case on 6/12/08, Instanter" (or 6/13/08) in 2408 on 6/12/08 (or 6/13/08), as RJM possessed a constitutionally protected right to do so.

29. At this time CCSD Deputies Dattulo and Koppe were in 2408.

30. Deputy Koppe ("DK") clasped RJM's right arm and proceeded to endeavor to pull RJM away from the bench.

31. RJM demanded that DK release RJM's arm.

32. DK released RJM's arm.

33. RJM proposed that some supervisor other than Sgts. Quimque or Bergfalk be summonsed to 2408, and proposed that it be Sgt Garrett or Boyd who would be so summonsed.

34. Deputy Dattulo or Koppe, at RJM's insistence, summonsed a supervisor.

35. Minutes later, CCSD Sgts. Griffith, Bergfalk and Quimque entered 2408.

36. RJM explained what had occurred, as did Dattulo and Koppe.

37. Griffith informed RJM that RJM had to leave the courtroom.

38. In a voice of conversational tone, speaking with his head in the direction of Griffith, with no background noise then presently rendering communication difficult, RJM informed all concerned that RJM would leave the 2408 as soon as RJM received a confirmation that either the Court had ordered RJM to leave, that the courtroom was closed for the morning or that RJM would be arrested if RJM refused to leave without either of the types of confirmations referenced herein supra.

39. No such type confirmation was provided.

40. Bergfalk and Griffith both addressed RJM.

41. RJM again explained that all RJM understood that RJM needed to procure in order to possess the authority to leave 2408 at what was then very shortly after 11:00 a.m. was the type of confirmation described herein supra, emphasizing that RJM would leave without delay if the consequences of RJM's not leaving would be that RJM would be arrested for not leaving immediately.

42. The purpose of RJM's engaging in the colloquy described herein supra, is the principle volenti non fit injuria ("he who consents has no injury"), as an individual who would find him or her self in the position in which RJM found himself as described herein supra, cannot voluntarily accede to the mandate contained in an unjust order from a member of a policing entity ("MPE") without risking jeopardizing any claim to relief which might be due him or her in a given situation upon the shoals of a claim from a given (collection of ) MPE('s) that the addressee of a given illegitimate order would have voluntarily acceded thereto or that according to some other argument, no act constituting any utilization of any coercive aspect of an exercise of government authority would have ever been executed as a proximate cause of any injury alleged to ever have been unjustifiably inflicted.

43. RJM then opined that he was calling "the Office of Legal Counsel"

44. As RJM dialed 603-3396, Griffith moved into RJM's person space (the area within RJM's reach in an arrangement in which such positioning would not be unavoidable and would not be due to RJM's having provided at least tacit approval of such positioning).

45. As RJM heard Mr. M. Burke answer the phone, Griffith grabbed RJM's hand causing RJM to drop the phone onto the ground and informed RJM that RJM was under arrest.

46. RJM rose from the pew in which RJM had been seated and was escorted by Griffith et al out of 2408.

47. RJM inquired as to the basis for the arrest and Griffith stated: "Criminal Trespass to State Supported Land." ("CTSSL")

50. RJM was escorted to the lock-up in the basement of the R. Daley Center.

51. Descriptions of activity conducted by and encountered by RJM in regard to the matters this case concerns between 6/13/08 and 12/17/08 which in regard to such activity encountered, RJM understands to have been tortious[,] is included herein infra somewhat further in this series of factual averments.

52. It is RJM's understanding that the pretrial endeavors RJM utilized in order to implode the prosecution of Case #08 MC 123741901 would have imploded it in an adequately aligned and accountable system, but that the system operative in IL at that time was plagued by what Solzenhytsen referenced as a "tilt towards evil".

53. On 12/17/08, Judge T. M. Donnelly granted a directed verdict for the Defendant Robert J. More and against the State of IL, in Criminal Case # 08 MC 123741901, which was the case in which a conviction was sought for the CTSSL Griffith alleged RJM perpetrated, explaining that the trial testimony of both Griffith and Dattulo had been thoroughly impeached by the Defense and that the contents of a statement of Griffith which the State produced at trial - a copy of a report Griffith submitted to her supervisors on 6/13/08, that stated that "More said he would leave if he would be arrested", exonerated Defendant Robert J. More of any criminal culpability in regard to the charge concerned.

54. Notwithstanding that Asst. CCSA's Franco and Uche transmitted to RJM's counsel on the scheduled day of trial a copy of such statement, Franco and Uche still proceeded to endeavor to procure a conviction of RJM regarding the activity which the Court ultimately decided was completely protected via RJM's notification of his intent to depart from courtroom 2408, were he to be subject to arrest for refusing to depart such room at the time immediately before RJM was in fact arrested in regard to the matters this complaint concerns ("these matters").

(Paragraphs # 67 - 89 not needed. Paragraphs #'ed 90 - 151 and the counts from CCCC, IL Civil Case # 11 CH 12339, hereinafter kept in this document which have been included herein infra have been kept herein to the exclusion of all paragraphs in such component not included wherein attributable to the importance whereof in the various instances in which such paragraphs have been kept herein so the fact that the numbering of such entries as have been included herein infra leaves gaps could in no way constitute any legitimate type of basis for any non-processing of this document.)

90. A Mr. N. Albuquerque ("NA") ended up as RJM's counsel due to RJM's mother being induced through Dr. Shelton's counsel to pay him $1200.00 to replace JS.

91. The activity of JTMD, NA and the prosecutors from the Office of the CCSA resulted in RJM's not getting any of the pretrial or trial issues which RJM endeavored to raise, addressed, which prevented the dismissal of the case on a pretrial basis and also denied the public the evidence of the priorities according to which 01 M123741901 was instigated, prosecuted, defended and adjudicated, as can be ascertained from the contents of the motions RJM filed in such case on: 8/13/08, 8/15/08, 9/12/08, 9/15/08, 9/23/08, and 12/08/08.

92. On 12/17/08, RJM was again, without any justification, held in contempt of court, and Sgt Kush and CCSD Deputy Wilson battered RJM via an unconsented physical contact in taking RJM to the lock-up.

93. JTMD prevented RJM from finishing his presentation to such actors regarding RJM's claims as to their liability in enforcing the contempt order issued, before RJM was escorted out of the courtroom.

94. There was no response to any of the subpoenas RJM issued on various Cook County officials.

95. There is no record in regard to which RJM is cognizant that any Cook County Official who could have brought the ever lifted so much as a finger to prevent or remedy any of the injuries RJM has incurred as described herein, but RJM is concerned to salute and express.

96. On 12/17/08, the prosecutor - B. Franco ("PBF") made an opening statement in RJM's criminal case trial during which RJM endeavored to make the sign of the cross for each sin against the Eighth Commandment which it was RJM's understanding had been committed by him wherein and RJM ended up continuously making such sacramental sign as the statement was simply a series of fabrications, an enumeration of which will be provided once RJM can get the transcripts created from the conducting of such proceedings scanned into a form which will enable RJM to paste such into an editable document.

97. The Court directed a verdict against the prosecution based upon the contents of a memo written by Sgt Griffith to her supervisors on 6/13/08 which was entirely incompatible with the testimony Griffith and Dattulo provided under oath, which certainly permits the inference that such 131. RJM herein complains that he was subject to inventory searches on five separate occasions, [between 12/8/08 and 12/17/08 inclusive]all of which constitute separate torts as violations of the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the u.S. of A.

132. RJM also complains that both Matthew Burke and Peter Kramer, licensed attorneys in the CCSD Office of Legal Affairs, expressed surprise on 12/10/09 and 11/23/09, respectively, that RJM had ever been criminally prosecuted in the matters this complaint concerns, indicating a total lack of control over the CCSD by Thomas Dart - if the members of the Office of Legal Counsel did not even ever receive notice that a criminal prosecution of the type herein described was being conducted, especially since investigations and monitoring of RJM had been conducted by various representatives of the CCSD, over the several years prior to and during the criminal prosecution in regard to which RJM herein complains.

146. RJM's Mother paid 1200.00 for an attorney to defend RJM against the UCC this complain concerns which was a totally preventable expenditure.

150. The letter from U.S. Attorney' s Office of July of 2008 regarding the unconstitutional and unacceptable conditions of the Cook County Jail evidently did not result in enough improvements for RJM et al to have been spared the grief and harm described herein.

151. RJM respectfully proposes that this Hon. Court consider eventually either providing her signature on a copy of the Proposed Dec…RJM (*HYPERLINK "../www.thirstforjustice.777host.us"**www.thirstforjustice.777host.us*) (Declaration Unconstitionality...RJM) in regard to this or some similar case which RJM will almost invariably have to file in the future, or providing such on an amicus curiae to a higher court in such regard and seeks feedback for what type record of conduct RJM would have to demonstrate in order to procure such at some future juncture.

Count #22 - Denial of Due Process of Law in Violation of the 5th Amendment to the Constitution of the u.s. of A. as Applied to the Activity of State Actors and/or Actors Representing Political Subdivisions of States, via the Incorporation Provisions of the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Const. - CCSD Supervisors for refusing to provide RJM the means to get a federal habeas corpus petition filed on 12/17/08 pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC 2241

Count #23 - Denial of Due Process of Law in Violation of the 5th Amendment to the Constitution of the u.s. of A. as Applied to the Activity of State Actors and/or Actors Representing Political Subdivisions of States, via the Incorporation Provisions of the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Const. - CHS Supervisors and clerks of unknown name for refusing to provide RJM the means to get a federal habeas corpus petition filed on 11/26/08 pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC 2241

Count #24 - Denial of Due Process of Law in Violation of the 5th Amendment to the Constitution of the u.s. of A. as Applied to the Activity of State Actors and/or Actors Representing Political Subdivisions of States, via the Incorporation Provisions of the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Const. - CCSD Supervisors for refusing to provide RJM the means to get a federal habeas corpus petition filed on 12/17/08 pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC 2241

Count #25 - Denial of Due Process of Law in Violation of the 5th Amendment to the Constitution of the u.s. of A. as Applied to the Activity of State Actors and/or Actors Representing Political Subdivisions of States, via the Incorporation Provisions of the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Const. - CCSD Supervisors for refusing to provide RJM any medical examination before his being transferred out of Inmate Intake at the Cook County, IL Jail

Count #26 - Denial of Due Process of Law in Violation of the 5th Amendment to the Constitution of the u.s. of A. as Applied to the Activity of State Actors and/or Actors Representing Political Subdivisions of States, via the Incorporation Provisions of the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Const. - Cook County, IL ("CCJ") Jail Supervisors for refusing to provide RJM adequate nutrition and hydration while in the involuntary custody of the CCJ from 12/17-12/17 of 2008

Count #27 - Denial of Due Process of Law in Violation of the 5th Amendment to the Constitution of the u.s. of A. as Applied to the Activity of State Actors and/or Actors Representing Political Subdivisions of States, via the Incorporation Provisions of the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment f the U.S. Const. - Cook County, IL ("CCJ") Jail Supervisors for refusing to provide RJM adequate provision for exercise and to participate in the ordinary activities of life from 12/17-12/17 of 2008

Count #33 - Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Violation of the 6th Amendment to the Constitution of the u.s. of A. as Applied to the Activity of State Actors and/or Actors Representing Political Subdivisions of States, via the Incorporation Provisions of the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Const Including Officers of the Court -Nick Albukerk - in not renewing the demands make in the innumerable pre-trial motions RJM filed in 08 MC 123941901.

Count #38 - Malicious Prosecution - Non-performance of Adequate Investigation - CCSA Valiente, Uche, Franco

Count #39 - Malicious Prosecution - Griffith, Bergfalk, Quimque, Dattulo, Devine, Alvarez, Valiente, Uche, Franco

Count #40 - Denial of Due Process of Law in Violation of the 5th Amendment to the Constitution of the u.s. of A. as Applied to the Activity of State Actors and/or Actors Representing Political Subdivisions of States, via the Incorporation Provisions of the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment f the U.S. Const - Official Court Reporters - deprived RJM of transcripts regarding proceedings conducted in 08 MC 123941901 on 12/2/08

Count #41 - Monell Claim for Maintaining Conditions, Policies and Practices Resulting in Deprivations of Rights Guaranteed by the Constitution and Laws of the u.s. of A. - Cook County, Il Judges Evans and Wright

Count #1 of Indictment - Maintenance of Criminal Proceeding in which Defendant is prevented from representing himself, in Spite of His Having Posited Objections to Presence of Licensed Attorney in Defense of Case and Demands for Self-representation and Absence of Any Evidence of Non-presence of Informed Consent to the Selection of Such Alternative - Donnelly - resulting in both entirely unjustified trial and unjustified expenditure of $1200.00 in Attorney Fee

1. The contents of paragraphs numbered 18 to 151, extracted from 11 CH 12339 in the numbering system used in the Complaint filed on or about 2/14/12 in such case other than those included in italics wherein are incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth herein.

2. On or about 12/17/08 in Cook County, IL in the State of IL, within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Northern District of IL ("USDCNDI"), the defendant Thomas More Donnelly, then a CCCC Judge while acting under the color of the laws of the State of IL did In violation of 18 U.S.C. 242 - orchestrate the criminal perpetration referenced in the title to this Count, under color of law

In violation of 18 U.S.C. para 242.

Count #2 of Indictment - Refusal to Rule on any of the Motions Defendant had filed since institution of charges, preventing both Presentation of Non-presence of Probable Cause that Any Crime had been Committed in Regard to the Matters the Charge Instituted Concerned and pretrial dismissal and adjudication of innumerable issues - Donnelly - Donnelly resulting in both entirely unjustified trial and unjustified expenditure of $1200.00 in Attorney Fee

2. On or about 12/17/08 in Cook County, IL in the State of IL, within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Northern District of IL ("USDCNDI"), the defendant Thomas More Donnelly, then a CCCC Judge while acting under the color of the laws of the State of IL did In violation of 18 U.S.C. 242 perpetrate the offense described in the title to this count, under color of law

In violation of 18 U.S.C. 242.

Count #3 of Indictment - Non-execution of Sua Sponte Dismissal Resulting in Entirely Unjustified Trial and unjustified expenditure of $1200.00 in Attorney Fee

2. On or about 11/26/08 in Cook County, IL in the State of IL, within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Northern District of IL ("USDCNDI"), the defendant Judge Thomas M. Donnelly then a CCCC Judge while acting under the color of the laws of the State of IL did In violation of 18 U.S.C. 242 perpetrate the offense described in the title to this count, under color of law

In violation of 18 U.S.C. 242 and 2.

Count #4 - Institution and Maintenance of Criminal Charge in Situation in Which Probable Cause that a Crime Had Been Committed was Not Present - Cook County State's Attorney Anita Alvarez, Asst. Supervisor CCSA Charis Valiente, Cook County Sheriff ("CCS") Thomas Dart, Asst. CCSA N. Uche, Asst. CCSA B. Franco, CCS Dept. ("CCSD")Chief Nolan, CCSD Sgt J. Griffith CCSD dattulo, CCSD Sgt G. Bergfalk, CCSD Sgt G. Quimque, & CCSD Chief of Legal Department P. Kramer - conditional upon contents of lkresponse to Invitation to Demonstrate the Non-incurrment of Criminal Liability

2. On or about 11/26/08 in Cook County, IL in the State of IL, within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Northern District of IL ("USDCNDI"), the defendants Cook County State's Attorney Anita Alvarez, Asst. Supervisor CCSA Charis Valiente, Asst. CCSA N. Uche, and Asst. CCSA B. Franco, while acting under the color of the laws of the State of IL did In violation of 18 U.S.C. 242 perpetrate the offense described in the title to this count

In violation of 18 U.S.C. para 242 and 2.

Count #5 - Disregard of Defendant's Due Process Rights to Get Issues the Adjudication of which Could Have Both Resulted in Dismissal of a Charge and the Identification of Malicious Intent in a Prosecution Adjudicated Such that Priorities According to which Activity was Conducted in Institution and Maintenance of Charges Could be Adequately Exposed and that Such Exposure Could Save Everyone Cost of a Trial, Which is Exactly What RJM Understands Necessarily Would have Happened had RJM's Various Motions been Granted - Albukerk

In violation of 18 U.S.C. para 242 and 2.

Count #6 - Induction of Criminal Prosecution/successful retaliatory inducement to prosecute -Cook County Sheriff ("CCS") Thomas Dart, , CCS Dept. ("CCSD")Chief Nolan, CCSD Sgt J. Griffith, CCSD Sgt G. Bergfalk, CCSD Sgt G. Quimque,

2. On or about 12/17/08 in Cook County, IL in the State of IL, within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Northern District of IL ("USDCNDI"), the defendants, Cook County Sheriff ("CCS") Thomas Dart, , CCS Dept. ("CCSD")Chief Nolan, CCSD Sgt J. Griffith, CCSD Sgt G. Bergfalk, CCSD Sgt G. Quimque, and CCSD Legal Chief P. Kramer (Kramer - conditionally upon character of his response to invitation to demonstrate justification for activity conducted and left unconducted by him in regard to matters this document concerns, did perpetrate the offense described in the title to this count

In violation of 18 U.S.C. para 242

Count #7 - Griffith and Dattulo, Danattulo, Danatulo - Perjury/Conveyance of false Testimony

In violation of 18 U.S.C. para 242 and 2.

Count #8 Denial of Means to File a Federal Habeas Corpus Petition Pursuant to the Provisions of 28 USC 2241

2. On or about 12/17 of 2008 in Cook County, IL in the State of IL, within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Northern District of IL ("USDCNDI"), the defendants,, CCSD Sgt Kush and Deputy Wilson did perpetrate the offense described in the title to this count under the color of law.

In violation of 18 U.S.C. para 242 and 2.

A TRUE BILL

_____________________________-

Foreperson of the Grand Jury

I, the undersigned complainant pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC 1746, state that the contents of the “…Complaint of 2/14/12….”, which accompanies this document are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Robert J. More

P.O. Box 6926

Chicago, IL, 60680

HYPERLINK "mailto:anselm45@gmail.com" anselm45@gmail.com , 81211 688-9880 (lv msg)

In violation of 18 U.S.C. para 242 and 2.

A TRUE BILL

_____________________________-

Foreperson of the Grand Jury

Confirmation of Reception of Delivery (“ROD”)/ Refusal to Provide Confirmation of ROD/ Service List - grifdlfgjsubcrod6413.html

Confirmation of reception of the document this confirmation accompanies:

I have received a copy of each of the documents listed in the “Document List of 12/16/13 – FGJ” which his document accompanies, adjacent to which there is an "X" or "Y" (Name)________________, (Title) ____________________, (Address)________________ , (Date) ________________refused to sign______________________

Certificate of Service

Under penalties of perjury pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC 1746, and 735 ILCS 5/1-109, I (Robert J. More), ________________________, herein aver that I did leave a copy of the documents this certificate accompanies, which are referenced herein supra, with ____________________________, at the _______________________________________and did access the

______________________________ and speak with ______________________ on ____________, who refused to provide any signature confirming the reception whereof.

Robert J. More, P.O. Box 6926, Chicago, IL 60680, anselm45@gmail.com, (81211) 688-9880 –lv msg

__________________, _______________________, _________________, ______________

Service List:

Federal Grand Jury Foreperson

Federal Grand Jury for the United States District Court, Northern District of IL

13th or 16th or some other Floor

Dirksen Federal Building

219 S. Dearborn St.

Chicago, IL, 60680 –

Chief Judge of United States District Court for the Northern District of IL (“USDC-NDIL”), R. Castillo

Chambers of the Chief Judge of the USDC-NDIL,

Dirksen Federal Building

219 S. Dearborn St.

Chicago, IL, 60680 – delivered by hand on 12/11/13

United States Marshal Service

Suite 2400

219 S. Dearborn St.

Chicago, IL, 60604 – delivered by hand on 12/11/13

U.S. Attorney for ND of IL

Posted to URL listed herein supra by 12/31/13

Doc. # 11 in D/L of 12/11/13ss - GFGJ.

Time and Expense Record in Regard to Composition 12/9/13, 10:00 - 23:00, 12/10/13 - 10:40 - 21:00, 12/11/13 - 10:30 - 12:15 p.m. plus Printing, Mailing and/or Delivery of this Document and/or any Documents Listed in the List in Which this Entry is an Entry