http://thirstforjustice. tripod.com/rcdrchc102212.html, www.thirstforjustice.net (…), Gordon W. Watts.com – click here: Master Document List - (“MDL”) to get to the MDL in which this document is referenced. To access this document via a search engine, enter the characters - aloysiusalphonsusanselm.4 - wherein. Click here to access the home page of the site in which this document is included.

ROMAN CATHOLIC DISPUTE RESOLUTION CHARTS ARE FOUR IN NUMBER AS OF 10/22/12 - CIVIL, CRIMINAL -PETIIONER AS PROSECCUTOR, CRIMINAL -PETITIONER AS DEFENDANT OR CONVICT, & HABEAS CORPUS 28 USC 2241

ROMAN CATHOLIC DISPUTE RESOLUTION CHART – SUPERCEDING VERSION OF 10/22/12 - ROUGH DRAFT UNDER CONSTRUCTION AND SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVISION AND/OR MODIFICATION, BUT CONSTITUTING THE BASIS UNTIL FURTHER SUPERCEDED FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF LEGITIMATE RELIANCE INTERESTS IN ITS PRESENT FORM – REVISED FROM PRECEDING VERSIONS OF SUCH DOCUMENT (NOTE – THE POSITION OF THE ISMA IS THAT IF MARTIAL LAW WERE TO BE IMPOSED AND/OR A FULL SCALE SLAVE-UPRISING/DOMESTIC INSURRECTION COMMENCED, NO OBLIGATION WOULD BIND ANYONE TO PETITION ANY COMMON LAW TRIBUNAL FOR ANY NIHIL OBSTAT(S) UNLESS CIRCUMSTANCES WOULD PERMIT SUCH TYPE PETITIONING IN A GIVEN INSTANCE, AND OTHER DISPENSATIONS MIGHT ALSO BE AVAILABLE IN A GIVEN CASE ACCORDING TO MORALLY LEGITIMATE PRINCIPLES OF EPIKEA). Next scheduled review and possible revision - Easter Sunday - Feast of the Ascension of 2013

• A – ROMAN CATHOLIC NON-DESERTER, NON-DEFRAUDER OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH, CONTRAGENOCIDIST*******

• B- “TOB SHEBBE GOYIM HARIM” ADHERENT &/OR IMPLEMENTER (“TSGHAI”) (APOC. 2:9) CONTROLLED GOVT AGENT AND/OR ANY TSGHAI PREDATORY ADVERSARY WHO WOULD OPPOSE THE ACTIVITY OF A ROMAN CATHOLIC CONDUCTING HIS ACTIVITY IN GOOD FAITH

• Stage 19 Post-Entrance Into Eternity Judgment Of The Soul Of A Given Activity Conductor Who Would Have Been Involved In The Adjudication/Resolution Of A Given Dispute

• Stage 18 Post-Resolution Of A Given Dispute Activity And Developments In The Theatre Of Earthly Existence Which Might Necessitate In A Given Instance The Complete Overhaul Of The Outcome Of A Given Dispute And Re-Adjudication Thereof, So That The Problems That Have Plagued Individuals And The Social Order From The Horrendously Destructive Activity Of The Presently Operative Court Systems In Talmudic Supremacist Movement Controlled America (“TSMCA”) (Apoc. 2:9) Are Not Replicated In Pre-Post TSMCA And/Or Post TSMCA

• Stage17 Review Process of Any Activity Conducted in any Stage 16 Proceeding Not Unworthy of the Appellation "Review"___________________________________________

• Stage 16 Provision for civil adjudication of any claim that any activity conductor prosecuted but not convicted in any Stage #15 proceeding referenced herein ("Stage 15 proceeding") would seek to have adjudicated, or utilization of collateral estoppel defense of any endeavor to procure a civil adjudication of any claim filed by any activity conductor convicted in any Stage 15 proceeding which would have ever been conducted in regard to a given incident/quantum of activity.

• Stage 15a. Worst Case Scenario - Provision of Vigilante Punishment of the Type of the Vindication of Mary Phagan's Honor in 1915 Should a Given Criminal Prosecution be Sabotaged, Against Both the Original Predation Perpetrator ("OPP") and Against Any Sabotuer Enabling a Given OPP to Evade Punishment in Stage 15

• Stage 15 Criminal Prosecution of any Prosecutor, Member of Any Policing Entity and/or Judge who would participate in any trial of a Vigilante/Contra-genocidist for any participation in any vigilante and/or domestic insurrection activity which would demonstrably not have been, in any substantial measure, lacking in legitimacy. (Stages 12-15 are included in regard to a scenario in which there would be some remnant of the present system still in place and operative - other scenarios will be addressed in superseding components of this document.

• Stage 14 Outcomes From One Or More Of The Four Types Of Trials Listed Infra Which Might Result In An Appeal or Series Of Appeals Of Various Type(s)

• Stage 13 Criminal Prosecution Of A Criminal Prosecution Of B Civil Prosecution Civil Prosecution Wrongful Death By TSM Controlled Govt** By Contra-Genocidists Wrongful Death or Personal injury or Personal Injury Of A *** Of B***

• Stage 12 B Captures A A Captures B A – Is Injured Or Killed* B Is Injured Or Killed

• Stage 11 Conflict Involving The Use Of Some Type Of Force (CQC, HHW, Firearms, Projectile Launches, Explosives, Etc) Involving A&B_Due to the Causing of Either Unjustified Interference with Vigilante Endeavor or Some Type of Endeavor to Punish a Legitimate Vigilante Endeavor________________

• Stage 10 Confiscation Or Destruction Of Property Or Combination Thereof Either Via Vigilante Means As A Component Of A Given Vigilante Injustice Rectification Project Or As A Component Of A Domestic Insurrection Waged According To Nothing Less Than At The Very Least The Barest Minimum Of Compliance-Accomplishment Threshold Standards Regarding Vigilantism And/Or Domestic Insurrections/Civil Wars Based Upon The Examples Of Among Other Endeavors Conducted By Catholics Which To The Extent Of The Knowledge Of The Author Of This Chart Have Never Been Declared To Have Been Morally Unacceptable By Either The Magisterium Of The Catholic Church Nor Any Representatives Of The Holy Office Nor Any Canonized Saint (Some Of Which Endeavors Having Been Lauded), Conducting Activity At A Given Juncture In History; Those Of The Procurers of The Magna Charta (Circa 1215 A.D), and of the Declaration Of Arbroath 1320, respectively, of the Gunpowder Plot 1604, Uprising in the French Vendee 1793, Mexican Civil War 1926-29, Spanish Civil War 1936-39, Von Stauffenberg ‘s Endeavor To Eliminate Hitler (1944) {An Analysis of the Endeavors of Those Such as Michael Collins in Ireland (1918-) Who It is RJM’s Understanding Never Sought the Approval of the Catholic Church Regarding Endeavors In Regard to Which RJM Would Understand That Such Approval Ought to Have Been Sought Prior to the Implementation Thereof Would Require Too Much Effort to Assess for References to Such Endeavors to Be Included Herein at This Juncture} And Amongst Those Conducted By Non-Catholics, Those Of The Battle Of Lexington Bridge 1775, John Brown’s Raid Of Harper’s Ferry (1859), The Battle For Athens Tn (1946) Each of Which Constituted a Slavery-abolishing Endeavor, Even if the Intended Objective was not Immediately Accomplished in a Given Example Floating measures to be used at various junctures concurrent with procession through Stage’s #1-9 included herein infra. Submission of evidence of violations of federal criminal laws to Judiciary Committees of U.S. Senate and/or House of Representatives, along with completed proposed congressional subpoenas, pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC 592(g). Presentation of evidence to U.S. Attorney for …(given jurisdiction) pursuant to provisions of 18 USC 3332(a) in order to at least pre-empt claim from any Judiciary Committee member that any remedy alternative to that provided in 28 USC 592(g) would have been left unutilized. Access to a Federal Grand Jury in order to procure a presentment and appointments of special prosecutors (treatments of these issues will be provided in superseding components of this document. Endeavors to present evidence to state grand juries for violations of state criminal codes and/or procure probable cause audience(s) and for appointments of special prosecutors at the county level in regard whereto. The use of such type floating measures certainly would not be required in each and every dispute resolution project in which there would be provision for recourse to contra-predatory vigilante remedies unless prior utilizations of such type measures would have produced results demonstrating that the use of such in a given instance would not be unjustifiably burdensome. Still, endeavors to use such type remedies would have to be repeated periodically, as the contrary approach would not evidently adequately account for the fact that in past history, in various instances, despots have surrendered, the commitment of villains to continue perpetrating predations has been broken, injustices have been eliminated, predators incapacitated, detriment unjustly incurred has been eliminated, just retribution for injuries unjustifiably caused has been administered and righteousness has prevailed - at least temporarily in various times and places.

• Stage 9 ISMA****** Common Law Tribunal or Similar Entity Issues Nihil Obstat (Confirming That “Nothing Stands In The Way” Ie That There Would Be Nothing Such Tribunal Would Have Found To Be Morally Unacceptable In A Proposed Order For The Issuance Of A Given Nihil Obstat Which Would Have Been Submitted Along With A Petition To Such Tribunal For A Given Nihil Obstat Authorizing the Use of Contra-Predatory Vigilante Force to Rectify a Given Injustice***** (Ie That A Given Cause Would Have Been Found To Have Been In No Way Morally Unjustified, And The Petitioner(s) In A Given Case Would Have Committed Himself And/Or Themselves To Restrict Any And/Or All Utilizations/Applications Of Physical Force For The Purposes Of The Rectification Of A Given Injustice, Solely To What Would Constitute In A Given Collection Of Circumstances, The Bare Minimum Quantum Of Force (see: Magna Charta Clause 61) Necessary To Accomplish An Objective In Terms Of The Prevention Of A Given Evil – The Importance Of The Prevention Of Which Would Have Been Found To Have Been Of Such Importance That the Non-prevention of Such Conjectural Evil Would Have Been Found To Have Been a Worse Condition, All Relevant Factors Considered, Than The Foreseeable Evil(s) That Might Or In A Given Case, Most Certainly Would, Result From The Utilization/Application Of Force Necessary To Prevent The Evil Certain Or Likely To Result From Not Resorting To The Use Of Force In A Given Case Under Consideration ***** (Declarations Of Post Facto Non-Presence Of Sinful Culpability For Measures Implemented In Exigent Circumstances For Predation Prevention/Injustice Rectification Without Pre-petition For Nihil Obstat And Other Type Declarations And Writs Are Also Available But Explanations And Forms Therefore are provided Elsewhere)

• Stage 8 Relief Would Have Been Sought From U.S. Supreme Court According To Compliance-Accomplishment Formula For The Petitioning Thereof Described And Delineated In What Are Considered To Constitute The Definitive Treatises Published Upon The Subject Of Petitioning Such Tribunal.****

• Stage 7 Petition Of Some Sort is Filed In Highest Court Of A Given State Which Does Not ______ Grant Relief Upon Petition Therefore To Such Court********______________________________________ (Note – Stage #’s 3,4,5 proceedings may move through the same channel(s) as Stage #2 activity)

• Stage 6 - Appeal Filed In Federal Appellate Court Or In State Appellate Court of Stage #2 Activity

• Stage 5 - Criminal and Civil Charges Instituted Against Anyone who Unjustifiably Interferes with Activity Conducted in Stage #4 Activity Referenced Herein

• Stage 4 – Institution of Criminal Charges Sought and/or Instituted for Any Deprivation of a Constitutionally Protected Right and/or In Regard to the Commission of Any Other Crime Committed in the Adjudication of a Given Dispute

• Stage 3 - Second Case Filed in U.S. District Court Trial Court Or In State Trial Court in Order to Procure Examination of Judge and Adversaries in First Case as It Proceeds so that if such Characters Will Not Agree to the “Contemporaneous Examination Litigation Formula” (For anyone who presumes that “trial court errors can be rectified upon review” if even the most cursory examination of the track records of the IL Appellate Ct. 1rst Dist and/or CCA 7 (that of CCA 7 J. D. Manion excepted) would not be enough to accomplish the disabusement of such notion, insanity or imbecility would have to be presumed).

• Stage 2 - Case Filed In U.S. District Court Trial Court Or In State Trial Court

• Stage 1 - Endeavors Not Involving Any Committee of 300 Controlled De Jure Government Entity Are Undertaken To Rectify A Given Injustice &/or Acceptably Remedy A Given Injury Unjustifiably Caused that Involve Proposals Re. Settlement Etc, (as Distinct from Morally Justified “Occult Compensation”).____________________________________________

• START HERE: Problem – A Malefaction/ Injustice Is Perpetrated Causing An Unjustified Injury To A Given Actor “A” By Any Individual or Collection of Individuals Whose Activity Would Have Left Him, Her or Them Classified As A Type “B” Actor/Individual. (The Issue of Dispute Resolutions Involving Solely Type A’s is Addressed Elsewhere).

• Many of the documents referenced in the footnotes contained herein have not yet, as of 8/24/11, been posted in the website whose URL is included in the ULC of this document. The prior website listed herein, infra, is defunct, and any documents referenced herein can be procured via contacting the "Contact Us" contacts listed in the presently operative website.

• *The Bounty Arrangement for Post-Entrance of “A” Into Eternity Injustice Rectification of Dec. of 2007 is promulgated and described in a separate document posted here: https://thirstforjustice.tripod.com/rclcpeeb.html

• ** The Proposal of Nov. 2007 For The Implementation Of Measures Which Would Make Provision For The Conducting Of A Criminal Trial In A Given TSM Controlled Court Without The Need For Any Subjection Of The Accused In A Given Case To Arrest And/Or Detention… (nor any of the other abusive and worse type predations for which this TSM controlled system has so distinguished itself), so that an acquittal might be procured which would render it unnecessary for a given vigilante protector/rescuer of the rule of law/insurrectionist/antigenocidist/not-altogether reprehensible and un-stalwartlike individual who would have rectified a given injustice via morally legitimate vigilante means and/or participation in an insurrection in a given case to spend his or her post-injustice rectification days in the earthly theatre “on the lam” with the correlative need to restrict his or her conducting of activity to underground agendas, objectives and approaches, is posted here: https://thirstforjustice.tripod.com/rclctwad.html

• ***The Explanation Of Nov. 2007 Regarding The Disparities Between The Measures Of Legal Consideration Available… to those not members of the Predatory Class in ESMCA at this juncture in its continued descent into complete Talmudic barbarity, and what was available to those to whom was accorded the measure of consideration provided by the English Common Law of 1791 is posted here: https://thirstforjustice.tripod.com/cltjrdsj.html

• ****The Notice of Non-legitimacy Non-finality (cf. Matt. 22:22, Acts 5:29, et al) of June 2002, in which is contained notice that _____________ does not accept edicts, orders, judgments and/or mandates that are not demonstrably morally legitimate is posted here: https://thirstforjustice.tripod.com/nnlnfj02.html

• ***** The ISMACLT Rules of Dec. 2007 are posted here: https://thirstforjustice.tripod.com/ismru07.html

• ******The Charter of the Institute of St. Michael the Archangel is posted here: https://thirstforjustice.tripod.com/ismdoc01.html

• *******Nihil obstats are most definitely available for Non-catholic individuals whose record of conduct would demonstrate that any given petitioner therefore could not justifiably be classified as the type of swine to which reference is made in Mt. 7:6, but are not available to individuals who would not have demonstrated at least enough respect for the identifiable “rights of God”, general probity of conduct and rectitude of intention in regard to a given form of relief that would ever be sought, to ensure that no nihil obstat would ever be issued on grounds less legitimate than were those upon which edicts and orders of the Holy Office of the Roman Catholic Church were issued in times past, unless and until a given not non-swine petitioner therefore would have jettisoned priorities, approaches, agendas and/or modus operandis which would indicate that no nihil obstat could be justifiably issued to a given petitioner therefore prior to a given juncture, and remained separated from whatever would have prevented the issuance of the nihil obstat in a given case for a period of time to be designated from the adjudication of a given petition therefore .

• ********Challenges to the Constitutionality as Applied of Nov. 2007 of statutes of limitations and various other deadlines given the unprecedented measure of control which the devil now exerts over the minds and wills of almost everyone involved in the activity of the legal system at this juncture are posted here: https://thirstforjustice.tripod.com/ismdoc01.html

• # Criminal and/or civil proceedings may also be prosecuted against any judge, clerk, security officer, court reporter, attorney or anyone else conducting activity in any office or position who would commit in a given proceeding any unjustified injury-causing duty breach which would proximately cause a miscarriage of justice to result in a given criminal or civil proceeding involving “A” as there is no such thing as absolute immunity of any type in Roman Catholic morality nor is there any provision therein for any type of unconditional and/or unlimited abstention from the use of force against any predator of any sort, in circumstances in which means not involving the use of force would not have accomplished an objective, which at any given juncture, would have to have been accomplished in order for a given individual to ensure that his moral liability in regard to a given matter would not have been left not adequately covered.