(ROMAN
CATHOLIC) (ANTI-PREDATION – FOR THOSE WHO FOR WHATEVER REASON ARE OUTSIDE THE
RC CHURCH BUT ARE OPPOSED TO PREDATIONS OF WHATEVER SORT) LITIGATION CHART –
SECOND ROUGH DRAFT UNDER CONSTRUCTION AND SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVISION AND/OR
MODIFICATION AS OF 12/13/07 –REVISED
FROM ORIGINAL VERSION OF SUCH DOCUMENT (NOTE – THE POSITION OF THE ISMAF IS
THAT IF MARTIAL LAW WERE TO BE IMPOSED AND/OR A FULL SCALE
SLAVE-UPRISING/DOMESTIC INSURRECTION COMMENCED, NO ONE WOULD BE BOUND TO
PETITION A COMMON LAW TRIBUNAL FOR ANY NIHIL OBSTATS UNLESS CIRCUMSTANCE WOULD
PERMIT SUCH AND OTHER DISPENSATIONS MIGHT ALSO BE AVAILABLE IN A GIVEN CASE
ACCORDING TO MORALLY LEGITIMATE PRINCIPLES OF EPIKEA).
A
– ROMAN CATHOLIC NON-DESERTER, NON-DEFRAUDER OF
B-
JEWISH SUPREMACIST MOVEMENT CONTROLLED GOVT AGENT AND/OR ANY TALMUDIZED
ADVERSARY WHO WOULD OPPOSE THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CONDUCTING HIS ACTIVITY IN GOOD
FAITH
Stage 13 Post-Entrance Into Eternity
Judgment Of The Soul Of A Given Actor/Individual
Who Would Have Been Involved In The Adjudication/Resolution Of A Given
Dispute
Stage 12
Post-Resolution Of A Given Dispute Activity And Developments In
The Theatre Of Earthly Existence Which Might Necessitate In A Given Instance The Complete Overhaul Of
The Outcome Of A Given Dispute And Re-Adjudication Thereof, So That The
Problems That Have Plagued Individuals And The Social Order From The
Horrendously Destructive Activity Of The
Presently Operative Court Systems In Jewish Supremacist Movement Controlled
America (“JSMCA”) Are Not Replicated In Pre-Post JSMCA And/Or Post JSMCA
Stage
11 Outcomes
From One Or More Of The Four Types Of Trials Listed Infra
Which
Might Result In An Appeal or Series Of
Appeals Of Various Type(s)
Stage
10 Criminal Trial Of A Criminal
Trial Of B Civil Trial Civil Trial #
By JSM Controlled Govt** By Anti-Genocidists Wrongful Death “Wrongful Death”@
or Personal Injury Of A *** or Personal Injury Of B***
Stage
9
B Captures A A Captures B A – Is Injured Or Killed* B Is Injured Or
Killed
Stage
8
Conflict Involving The Use Of
Some Type Of Force (CQC, HHW,
Firearms, Projectile Launches, Explosives, Etc) Involving A&B
Stage
7 Confiscation Or
Destruction Of Property Or Combination
Thereof Either Via Vigilante Means As A
Component Of A Given Vigilante
Injustice Rectification Project Or As A Component Of A Domestic Insurrection Waged According To
Nothing Less Than At The Very Least The Barest Minimum Of Compliance-Accomplishment Threshold Standards
Regarding Vigilantism And/Or Domestic
Insurrections/Civil Wars Based Upon The Examples Of Among Other Endeavors Conducted By Catholics Which To The Extent Of The Knowledge Of The
Author Of This Chart Have Never Been
Declared To Have Been Morally
Unacceptable By Either The Magisterium Of
The Catholic Church Nor Any
Representatives Of The Holy
Office Nor Any Canonized Saint (Some Of Which Having Been Lauded), Conducting
Activity At A Given Juncture In History; Those Of The
Procurers of The Magna Charta (Circa
1215 A.D), and of the Declaration Of Arbroath
1320, respectively, of the Gunpowder Plot 1604, Uprising in the French Vendee
1793, Mexican Civil War 1926-29, Spanish Civil War 1936-39, Von Stauffenberg ‘s
Endeavor To Eliminate Hitler (1944) {An
Analysis of the Endeavors of Those Such as Michael Collins in Ireland
(1918-) Who It is RJM’s Understanding
Never Sought the Approval of the Catholic Church Regarding Endeavors In Regard to Which RJM Would Understand That Such Approval Ought
to Have Been Sought Prior to the Implementation Thereof Would Require Too Much Effort to Assess for
References to Such Endeavors to Be Included Herein at This Juncture} And
Amongst Those Conducted By Non-Catholics, Those Of The Battle Of Lexington Bridge (1775), John Brown’s Raid Of Harper’s Ferry (1859),
The Battle For Athens Tn (1946) Each of Which Constituted a Slavery-abolishing Endeavor, Even if the Intended Effect was not Immediately
Accomplished in a Given Example.
Stage
6 ISMA****** Common Law Tribunal of
Similar Entity Issues Nihil Obstat (Confirming That “Nothing Stands In The
Way” Ie That There Would Be Nothing Such Tribunal Would Have Found To Be
Morally Unacceptable In A Proposed Order For The Issuance Of A Given Nihil Obstat Which Would Have Been
Submitted Along With A Petition To Such Tribunal For A Given Nihil Obstat Authorizing the Use of Force to Rectify a Given Injustice***** (Ie
That A Given Cause Would Have Been Found To Have Been In No Way Morally
Unjustified, And The Petitioner(S) In A Given Case Would Have Committed Himself
And/Or Themselves To Restrict Any And/Or All Utilizations/Applications Of
Physical Force For The Purposes Of The
Rectification Of A Given Injustice, Solely To What Would Constitute In A Given
Collection Of Circumstances, The Bare Minimum Quantum Of Force Necessary To Accomplish An Objective In
Terms Of The Prevention Of A Given Evil
– The Importance Of The Prevention
Of Which Would Have Been Found To Have
Been Of Such Importance That Such Conjectural Evil Prevented Would Have Been
Found To Have Been Worse, All Relevant Factors Considered, Than The Foreseeable
Evil(S) That Might Or In A Given Case, Most Certainly Would, Result From The
Utilization/Application Of Force Necessary To Prevent The Evil Certain Or Likely To Result From Not Resorting To The Use Of Force In A
Given Case Under Consideration*****
(Declarations Of Post Facto Non-Presence Of Sinful
Culpability For Measures Implemented In Exigent Circumstances For Predation
Prevention/Injustice Rectification Without Pre-petition For Nihil Obstat And Other Type Declarations And Writs Are
Also Available But Explanations And
Forms Therefore are provided Elsewhere)
Stage
5 Relief Would Have Been Sought From
U.S. Supreme Court According To Compliance-Accomplishment Formula For The
Petitioning Thereof Described And Delineated In What Are Considered To
Constitute The Definitive Treatises Published Upon The Subject Of Petitioning
Such Tribunal.****
Stage
4 Petition Of Some Sort
is Filed In Highest Court Of A Given State Which Does Not ______ Grant Relief
Upon Petition Therefore To Such Court********
Stage
3 Appeal Filed In Federal Appellate Court Or In State Appellate
Court
Stage
2 Case Filed In
Stage
1 Endeavors Not Involving Any
Government Entity Are Undertaken To
Rectify A Given Injustice, Remedy A
Given Injury
Unjustifiably
Caused that Involve Proposals Re. Settlement Etc, (as Distinct from Morally
Justified “Occult Compensation”).
Problem
– A Malefaction/ Injustice Is Perpetrated Causing An Unjustified Injury To A Given Actor “A” By Any Individual or
Collection of Individuals Whose Activity Would Have Left Him, Her
or Them Classified As A Type “B”
Actor/Individual. (It Would Be Hoped
That No Type A Would Ever Have To Sue Any Other Type A).
http://www.geocities.com/thirstforjustice/rclc1214.html
Footnotes:
*The
Bounty Arrangement for Post-Entrance of
“A” Into Eternity Injustice Rectification of Dec. of 2007 is promulgated and described in a separate document
posted here: http://www.geocities.com/thirstforjustice/rclcpeeb.html
**
The Proposal of Nov. 2007 For The Implementation Of Measures
Which Would Make Provision For The Conducting Of A Criminal Trial In A Given JSM Controlled
Court Without The Need For Any Subjection Of
The Accused In A Given Case To
Arrest And/Or Detention… (nor any of
the other abusive and worse type
predations for which this JSM controlled system has so distinguished itself),
so that an acquittal might be procured which would render it unnecessary for a
given vigilante protector/rescuer of the rule of
law/insurrectionist/antigenocidist/not-altogether reprehensible and
un-stalwartlike individual who would have rectified a given injustice via morally legitimate
vigilante means and/or participation in an insurrection in a given case to
spend his or her post-injustice rectification days in the earthly theatre “on
the lam” with the correlative need to
restrict his or her conducting of
activity to underground agendas,
objectives and approaches is posted
here: http://www.geocities.com/thirstforjustice/rclctwad.html
***The Explanation
Of Nov. 2007 Regarding The Disparities
Between The Measures Of Legal
Consideration Available… to those not members of the Predatory Class in JSMCA at this juncture in its continued
descent into complete barbarity, and
what was available to those to whom was accorded the measure of consideration provided by the English Common
Law of 1791 is posted here:
http://www.geocities.com/thirstforjustice/cltjrdsj.html
****The
Notice of
Non-legitimacy Non-finality (cf. Matt. 22:22, Acts 5:29, et al) of
June 2002, in which is contained
notice that _____________ does not accept edicts, orders, judgments
and/or mandates that are not demonstrably morally legitimate is posted here:
http://www.geocities.com/thirstforjustice/nnlnfj02.html
*****
The ISMACLT Rules of Dec. 2007 are posted here: http://www.geocities.com/thirstforjustice/ismru07.html
******The
Charter of the
*******Nihil
obstats are most definitely available for Non-catholic individuals whose record
of conduct would demonstrate that any given petitioner
therefore could not justifiably be classified as the type of swine to which reference is made in Mt. 7:6, but are not available
to individuals who would not have demonstrated at least enough respect for the identifiable “rights
of God”,
general probity of conduct and rectitude of intention in regard to a given form of relief
that would ever be sought, to ensure that no nihil obstat would ever be issued on grounds less legitimate than
were those upon which edicts and orders of
the Holy Office of the Roman
Catholic Church were issued in times past, unless and until a given not
non-swine petitioner therefore would have jettisoned priorities, approaches,
agendas and/or modus operandis which
would indicate that no nihil obstat
could be justifiably issued to a given petitioner therefore and remained
separated from whatever would have prevented the issuance of the nihil
obstat in a given case for a period of time to be designated from the
adjudication of a given petition
therefore .
********Challenges
to the Constitutionality as Applied
of Nov. 2007 of statutes of limitations
and various other deadlines given the unprecedented measure of control which
the devil now exerts over the minds and wills of almost everyone involved in the activity
of the legal system at this time are posted here: http://www.geocities.com/thirstforjustice/ismdoc01.html
#
Criminal and/or civil proceedings may also be prosecuted against any judge,
clerk, security officer, court reporter, attorney or anyone else conducting
activity in any office or position who
would commit in a given proceeding an unjustified injury causing duty breach
which would proximately cause a miscarriage of justice to result in a given
criminal or civil proceeding involving “A” as there is no such thing as
absolute immunity of any type in Roman Catholic morality nor is there any
provision therein for any type of
unconditional and/or unlimited abstention from the use of force against any predator of any
sort, in circumstances in which means not involving the use of force would not
have accomplished an objective, which at any given juncture, would have to
have been accomplished in order for a given individual to ensure that his moral
liability in regard to a given matter would not have been left not adequately covered.
@”Wrongful
death” in the category of an “A” implementing measures which would have
resulted in the death of a “B” is an
oxymoron, unless a given “A” would disregard the express contents of a given nihil obstat, as none would ever have
been issued except for legitimate purposes in order to eliminate a given
injustice ever prevailing and no recipient thereof would ever have received such an entity
except upon an adequate examination of a
given recipient thereof’s record of having demonstrated both an adequate
understanding of what would constitute a
measure of force which would be morally
permissible in a given case and an adequate commitment to keep any and
all utilizations of force within limits
that would render a given use of force not morally unacceptable in a given case.
Anyone
who would dare to read into this document anything which is not present –
namely a conveyance not constitutionally protected under Brandenburg v
Ohio (_U.S._) and various other
promulgations defining the scope of
various constitutional protections ought be prepared to reap whatever
fruit might be borne why whatever he or she would sow in this regard. The
author of this document is a servant
of His Majesty, Christus Regnat, not a
prostitute in the House of Rothshild and/or any subordinate entity in the
Jewish Supremacist Movement’s Reign of Terror and his battle cry is not the “Tob Shebbe Goyim Harim” which of course, is now the de facto motto of the U S.A. but rather Christus Vincit, Christus Regnat, Christus Imperat et en saecula
saeculorum, AMEN.