Blessed are the [noncounterfeit] peacemakers
[as distinct from the abominable cultivators of false peace] for they shall be
called the children of God (Mt. 5-7)…but the merciful need have no fear of
judgment(Ja 2:13). …but have stored up something against the wrath to come(cf
Rom 2:5, Heb10:30 et al), for it is light-years beyond the human imagination as to just what a “terrible thing it is to fall
into the hands of the living God (Heb.
10:31).”
Pope Felix III: "Not to oppose error, is to
approve it, and not to defend truth is to suppress it, and indeed to neglect to confound evil men when we can
do it, is no less a sin than to encourage them."
Saint
Catherine of Siena : "We've had enough of exhortations to be silent! Cry
out with a hundred tongues. I see that the world is rotten because of silence.
None is so enslaved as he who falsely believes that he is free - von Goethe
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois, Criminal Division
People of State of Illinois
Case # 01118828901
V
Robert More (et al)
Et al – the Noncounterfeit Roman Catholic Church, the principle of The Rule of Law, the DNRCPN, all that is good. noble, decent and true (Phil 4:17), everything not categorically abominable in God’s eyes.
Co-defendants
DEFENDANT (“RJM”)’S VERIFIED MOTION OF 3/14/03 TO RE-PRESENT TO THIS COURT ALL OF THE ISSUES PRESENTED TO IT IN THE MOTION FILED ON 3/4/03 IN THIS CASE, BEGINNING WITH THE MOTION TO DISMISS THE CASE ON THE GROUNDS ENUMERATED IN THE HANDWRITTEN MOTIONS RJM FILED WITH THE CLERK’S OFFICE IN REGARD TO THIS CASE ON 3/7/03 & IF THE CASE IS NOT IMMEDIATELY DISMISSED, TO MOVE THIS COURT TO RESCHEDULE THE FITNESS HEARING THAT HAS BEEN AS OF 3/7/03, SCHEDULED FOR 3/21/03 SINCE RJM HAS BEEN COMMITTED TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE IN AN EAST COAST COURT CASE ON 4/21/03 SINCE BEFORE 3/7/03 AND HAS NOT BEEN ABLE TO RESCHEDULE THAT HEARING IN WHAT WOULD CONSTITUTE THE SIXTH POSTPONEMENT OF THAT HEARING IN THAT CASE
Now comes the plaintiff, RJM, on behalf of the DNRCPN, the Noncounterfeit Catholic Church,
everything that is good, noble, decent and true (Phil 4:17), and for that
matter, since there is not much of anything abiding in that category in Cook
County IL. other than the children under age seven, everything that is not both cold-blooded and venomous, or defined
in the alternative, everyone and everything not as thoroughly corrupted as
Richard Devine and self-exalting State Senator John Cullerton, and on behalf of
all innocent children, both those born
and yet to be born, who cannot possibly deserve to be subject to the type of
abuses that those of us citizens who have not retained baptismal
innocence cannot claim are not Divinely permitted punishments for our sins,
whatever they may be, whether of commission or omission, to move this Court to immediately dismiss
this case on the grounds that the 45 day limit for the fitness hearing expired
on 2/20/03, or on any other of the
several grounds on which the Court would have no authority to refrain from dismissing
it, so long as it was appropriately petitioned to do so, including any of the grounds enumerated in the motions RJM
filed with the Clerk’s Office on 3/7/03, and to assert that the court has lost
jurisdiction over the case except to dismiss it dated retroactively to 2/20/03,
and for every other form of relief enumerated in the title to this motion, most
especially, if the Court will not
dismiss the case immediately, that the fitness hearing be rescheduled for any
day other than 3/21/03, since RJM is already obliged to participate in a hearing
via telephone in a court proceeding in another court on an unrelated
matter on that date, & that the
Court require the Asst. CCSA to produce for RJM the materials which the Court
ordered it to produce to RJM on 1/22/03 which included all of the documents in the possession of the BCX Examiner, not just her report and
illegible notes and in support and explication whereof, RJM avers as follows:
1.
RJM
had to file this three days before the hearing date in order for it to have been timely filed.
2.
RJM
may submit further petitions and
arguments in support of petitions
included in this motion and in support of
petitions to be later submitted, at or before the inception of the
hearing.
3.
RJM
most emphatically objects to BCX reports being completed and issued on grounds
and standards that are not objectively identifiable and thus do not provide
those subject to them and to criminal charges in general, being provided
standards of conduct with which they
can comport themselves and their conduct in order to avoid being subjected to
being declared unfit for trial or for that matter to criminal prosecution in
the first place.
4.
RJM
is also going on record at this juncture as claiming that every issue that RJM
has raised that remains unaddressed is in fact preserved for appeal or that the
Court must articulate a standard according to which RJM must conduct his
activity in order to preserve issues
for appeal in that Post-Richman (cf 270 F. 3d 430), one who endeavors to
raise issues for appeal in a Cook County court cannot claim that doing so might
not foreseeably result in his or her demise. In other words, the case is being
adjudicated under the long shadow of
the death of J. Richman for asking a question on a traffic ticket and
under the long and ever-lengthening shadow of
the displacement of the
principle of the Rule of Law by the
standard of the Reign of Terror (“ROTS”)that is the almost categorically
controlling standard according to which judicial and other governmental
activities are conducted at this juncture in the demise of the Constitutional Republic of the united States of America that is being
displaced and replaced by the Globalist Reign of Terror Police State even as
this motion is composed.
5.
Judge
Reyna confirmed on 3/7/03 that all issues were suchlike preserved.
6.
RJM
was not able to notify the Court on 3/7/03, that he was already committed to
participating in a court proceeding in an East Coast Court on 3/21/03, before
3/7/03, before the Court adjourned. In the Post-Richman Period in Cook County,
truly one evidently takes his life in his hands by opening his mouth in a court
whose existence was originally
established by law, and whose activity is still subsidized by the money
obtained from the labor of private citizens.
7.
At
this juncture, RJM has not succeeded in getting that court date postponed
(it has already been rescheduled six
times or more), and he cannot afford to miss it.
8.
RJM
left a message for Asst. C.C. P.D. Campbell, in which he provided notice that
RJM needs the fitness hearing rescheduled.
9.
There
is no justification for the holding of
a fitness hearing in this case on any grounds as the 45 day period
running from the date, according to the express wording of the applicable statute from which the Court
ordering the BCX received a copy of
the BCX report expired on 2/20/03.
10.
As
developments have transpired, the Asst CCSA, when made aware of this fact, just redefined all of the
terms involved, so that all of a
sudden as if the proceedings were being
conducted in the world of Alice in Wonderland in which “words had no meaning”
(cf ___U.S. ____), or Orwell’s 1984 or Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, or Oz,
the state could continue to cannibalize RJM et al, inspite of the fact that no
one involved had been highly enough committed to continuing to prosecute the
case to even bother to keep track of
the passage of the days
involved, much less to ensure that the hearing was conducted according to the
express wording of the statute.
11.
If there is any activity that is ever conducted
according to an acceptable standard in this attempted lynching, it will be the
first example of such-type activity in
what has been a persecution that can only bring the wrath of God down on the heads of those responsible for it (cf. Mt. 25:31-46,
Heb 10:30-31, et al).
12.
On
3/7/03, facing the prospects of having her report turned inside out
on her.if the doctor who would have to
testify could not keep RJM gagged, [she] took the day off. Instead of just dismissing the case, the Court not
even considering that RJM who has
waited from 9:00 a.m in each appearance until well into the afternoon, had
petitions for relief too numerous to even list here before the Court, attempted
to present several petitions to dismiss
on various grounds and petitions for
other forms of relief, simply rescheduled the hearing for 3/14/03, but
since the P.D. said he could not be present, over RJM’s vigorous objection, the
Court rescheduled the hearing for 3/21/03, all in what RJM claims constitutes
contravention of the statutes on the
fitness hearing and innumerable portions of
Title 18 of the U.S. Code.
13.
Seeing
as how it was so easy for the Court to have kept RJM waiting for the long hours
he was kept in Court on each hearing date and then to just reschedule the
fitness hearing date, RJM surmises that it cannot possibly be any trouble now
for the Court to either just dismiss this case or else to reschedule the
fitness hearing and to require the State to either produce all materials in the
doctor’s possession or else to dismiss the charges.
14.
Surely,
even in this Court System with all its
one-way streets, sacred cows, double standards, unbalanced scales (Prov. 1:3),
strained gnats and swallowed camels
(Mt. 23:24), its treachery and secret
dealmaking, no one could pretend that the denying of RJM’s petition that the hearing be rescheduled could possibly be
justified. On the contrary, the whole matter is nothing other than one of
priorities and there simply would be no
justification for denying RJM’s request for a continuance on the hearing.
15.
Sadly,
it appears that no one other than a tiny thimbleful of persons, such as RJM
remember the painful lessons of
history, one of which is that peasants on so many occasions throughout
history have finally been pushed by evils that came to be insufferable to decide to right themselves by “abolishing
the forms to which they are accustomed” to borrow a most familiar phrase.
16.
RJM
spoke for an estimated one half hour to Asst. CCPD Supervisor E. Ptatek
regarding RJM’s predicament.
17.
As
expected, RJM found in Ptatek a bureaucrat that evidently simply could not care
less what atrocities are perpetrated upon the citizens he is being paid to
protect from the type of cannibalism that has been perpetrated in this tragic
example of all that is worst in the world
at this juncture. As long as he receives his compensation and benefit package,
he will obviously continue to get along and go along in his bureaucratic
proceedings, without a concern in the world as to whether there is even a
penny’s return on the dollar in regard to the compensation he collects,
received by those whose labor subsidizes that package. RJM wasted 30 minutes
speaking to this “Rolph” (ie the despicable capitulator in the Sound of Music
who blew the whistle on the Von Trapp family because he proved himself to be
beyond a shadow of a doubt “one of
them.” Never did Ptatek cite a single authority in support of any
position he asserted.
18.
Ptatek’s
conveyances were all based in his own carnally apprehended self-interest. There
is simply no way with the occupying armies positioned in Cook County
that this guy is ever going to do anything other than what is expedient for
him. He would have fit in without the least friction as a puppet defense
attorney in the charade proceedings Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, et al have conducted over the years
in various forums in various theatres of activity – a casualty of the public-education, group-think control
dominant media, religionless culture, who appears to fit the bill to the T
of the New World Totalitarian Order
bureaucrat. RJM would not expect this
individual to ever complain that “Soylent Green is people.”
19.
RJM
again herein raises the issue of ineffective
assistance of counsel. The P.D.s in this Court do not seem to recognize
that any consideration is due the cannibalized victims of the political corruption in Cook County, or
to the public in exchange for the compensation they receive in their respective
offices. At this Court at least, the funds disbursement paying their salaries
is evidently entirely unjustified. The only benefit of RJM’s conversation with
Mr. Ptatek was to remind RJM of what he must continue to fight with all his
might to keep from becoming – a “Rolph”.
20.
RJM then was left with no choice except to contact Asst. CCSA Callaghan,
who in the past , in her
representations to the Court, has so disingenuously claimed that she does not
listen to the voice mails RJM has left (out of
absolute necessity) which representations of this Despicable Little Dickey Devine Minion who obviously could not
tell right from wrong if her lunch depended upon it, have in each case been replete with gross mischaracterizations
that are not in fact presumptively non-malicious and non-felonious. On the
contrary they have demonstrated how well she fits into Ruthless Richard’s protect
the iniquity workers, and persecute any non-capitulator who refuses to go along
with his “fun” for faggots agenda including
of course the abominable public display
of militant paganisn held each June in
their “parade” .
21.
RJM
petitioned her to move this Court to reschedule the fitness hearing.
22.
RJM
now moves this Court to reschedule the hearing for any date after 3/21/03 and
to require the Asst. CCSA to produce the entirety of the documents the Court
ordered her to produce on 1/20/03 , which included every document the BCX
Examiner has in her possession in regard to this case.
23.
RJM
has no evident choice at this juncture other than to provide notice herein as
he has similarly provided notice before that he recognizes that he simply does not
possess the authority to participate in activities of any sort conducted
according to the ROTS.
24.
If
any more activities are conducted according to this standard (ROTS) in the
adjudication of this case, such
development would elicit the non-discretionary filing of federal felony
complaints (besides the civil complaint already filed) with the U.S. Attorney
and if felonies cannot be appropriately
punished in the forum in which that party conducts his activity, RJM would
follow up with writs of quo warranto and the filing of criminal and civil filings in the world court and in common law courts before grand
juries established to ensure that crimes do not remain unjustifiably unpunished.
These would be in addition to the charges RJM has committed himself to bringing
for past felonies committed in the adjudication of this case).
25.
There
is no quid pro quo proposal contained herein as anyone not categorically
bereft of the capacity to reason logically can easily ascertain. Tragically,
RJM has yet to encounter anyone operating
in any capacity, compensated by the government who has participated
in the proceedings conducted in this
case other than one or maybe two P.D;s who have demonstrated anything remotely
resembling such type capacity.
26.
At
any rate, one of the components of
RJM’s AAPS requires him to provide notice to various parties at various
junctures in proceedings in order to keep parties responsible for the
commission of torts and crimes from at any juncture being able to claim
inculpable ignorance as a defense to a civil or criminal complaint that would
be filed in a given case, that statutes have been trangressed and crimes
committed. This strategy of the
provision of such-type notifications also serves to prevent the commission or
at least completion of crimes and to
facilitate the identification of states
of minds in perpetrators responsible therefore that reveal motivations
consisting of moral malice equivalent
to that present in recidvitism and obduracy in malice, rather than the just the
garden variety malice that is the defining feature of the God-forsaken activity
that is the prevailing standard in Cook County IL – a brutal and terrible
place, a cruel and heartless place, a violent and dangerous place, a place
right out of one of Dante’s circles in
the Inferno, a place in which no
unprotected warm-blooded throat is safe, a place that RJM simply cannot and
will not concede to Lucifer’s categorical control as long as there is breath in
him.
27.
As
RJM possesses a liberty and property right acknowledged by the U.S. Supreme
Court in Logan v Zimmerman (___U.S.____) in the damages available in a civil
suit, all the more so, does he possess such a right in regard to which he can
incur no deprivation without fair notice and a non-counterfeit hearing, to
implement the measures needing to be implemented in a given case to prevent
those responsible for having committed felonies from succeeding in getting away
with committing such with impunity.
28.
On
the contrary, RJM recognizes that he is subject to a duty to implement such
measures as in a given case would need to be implemented to ensure to the
extent RJM can accomplish the
objective that no felonies remain
unpunished according to the ageless axiom: Qui parcit nocentibus, punit
innocentes (He who pardons the guilty, punishes the innocent)
29.
In
the same way that Hitler had his “Night of
the Long Knives” and the ancient pagans in Babylon sacrificed children
to Moloch, and that every depraved group such as Richard Devine and his cronies
and subordinates has, throughout
history, had their ritual sacrifices,
so the prosecutions of innocent
citizens in Cook County such as are perpetrated under color of law
in cases such as the subject one, serve as a sort of a bonding activity in this county that with its
wickedness and depravity, God obviously cannot not hate.
30.
The
competition in regard to the resolution of
this case, is a competition
between the ROLS of Jesus Christ and the ROTS of Lucifer and RJM will fight to
the last breath to assist His Majesty in defeating Lucifer in every way he can.
31.
RJM
realizes that this commitment is inevitably going to bring him into conflict
with many of those who do Lucifer’s
bidding and above all with those who do that bidding and endeavor to keep the
malice contained therein suppressed and concealed, just has it has in the past;
and . RJM has this to say to such parties: RJM will do what he evidently has to
do in a given situation to ensure that to the extent of RJM’s power, that the
ascertainable requirements of God’s moral law are not left un-accomplished, and
he will leave all consequences to God. For the life and the death of the just is in the hands of the Lord.
32.
RJM
possesses several documents that facilitate the identification in a given
scenario in which RJM or someone similarly situated might conduct activity of
what would constitute in a given case, the actual apportionment of a
given form of moral consideration.
33.
Some
of these can be accessed in the website
of the DNRCPN at http://www.geocities.com/thirstforjustice, in various chapters contained therein.
34.
In
other words, in a situation in which competing claims are posited to the same
entity, it is always possible to ascertain to a measure of moral certainty the
appropriate apportionment of the entities in issue.
35.
If any party, under any pretense, at any juncture, unjustifiably interferes with RJM’s endeavors to
accomplish compliance with the requirements of
the moral law, RJM will respond with any and/or all measures at his
disposal in a given scenario, to ensure that nothing in RJM’s conduct can be
construed to constitute an unjustified concession to the advancement of
Lucifer’s Reign of Terror Agenda.
36.
Should
any party participate in any attempt, whether or not such attempt would be
successful or unsuccessful to interfere suchlike as has been described supra,
RJM will consider such interference as being permitted by God and orchestrated
by Lucifer and endeavor to turn any suchlike affair to the evident ultimate
benefit of the Catholic Church.
37.
RJM
also goes on record herein as claiming that any disposition of this case or the
conducting of any proceedings in regard to it, other than its immediate
dismissal on any of the grounds thus far raised by RJM in any document filed
with this Court or on any other ground, would constitute presumptively
malicious and felonious conduct in contravention of 18 U.S.C. Part 1, Chapter 13, Sections 241,
242, 1503, 1621, 1622, 1951, 1961 et seq, and 2381.
38.
RJM
also herein claims that the conducting of
the fitness hearing without the provision to RJM of the documents in the BCX Examiner’s
possession to which reference has been made herein supra, would constitute
separate felonies on all of the bases
enumerated in par. #27 supra.
39.
Truly
the abuses, arrogations, usurpations, trangressions, affronts and crimes
committed against RJM et al, have borne out in the lives of RJM et al, the
truth to which Pope Pius XII in his
Address at Pentecost on 6/6/1941, referred
when he lamented: The inversion of means
and ends, which results in giving the value of ultimate end to what is only a
means for attaining it, or in viewing persons as mere means to that end,
engenders unjust structures which "make Christian conduct in keeping with
the commandments of the divine Law-giver difficult and almost impossible."
40.
RJM herein goes on public record as explaining that it is, in the larger scheme of
things not something other than the case, that who and what it is that RJM is
prosecuting in his defense of this case
is Lucifer and the activity of his Reign of
Terror (cf Ep. 6:12).
41.
On
page 262 of the book The Winning
Side, (St. Brendan’s
Institute, Mishawaka IN, 1999), Dr. Charles Rice, author and professor at the
University of Notre Dame Law School for
over thirty years, avers: “Despite the erosion of constitutional and legal
protections, as described in Parts I and II of this book, no one can
legitimately conclude that the disintegration of the American civil fabric
precipitated by Roe has gone so far that armed rebellion is justified in
whole or in part.”
42.
For
the record, RJM is presenting the developments that have transpired in this
case over the course of its life to Dr.
Rice and to other concerned parties such as for example Justice Edith Jones of
the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals who recently addressed at some length the
problem of the decay of
the American Legal System which has left in place the engines of
oppression and affliction that is [are]
the present non-atypical American Court[s], to be utilized in the
assessment of the conditions that
presently prevail in the court system in
this country.
43.
RJM
does not deny that based upon what he has observed and encountered in the
proceedings of which the whole of this case has consisted, that RJM, as much
as he would like to believe in the claim of
Dr. Rice, to which reference has been made in par. #41 supra, simply
cannot agree with Dr. Rice’s opinion in regard to the present state of the country (the tragedy of the Richman travesty alone seems to
preclusively prevent concurrence with that opinion). Sadly, RJM is afraid that
based upon the entirety of the
competent evidence in regard to which he
is cognizant in regard to the entities in issue in the matters under consideration, that he cannot conclude either that the disintegration to which Dr. Rice
refers began with Roe (rather, RJM is convinced that the whole American
experiment in self-government was doomed to failure from its inception in that
it was never established in an appropriate relationship to the Roman Catholic
religion, and that the influence and activity of the Moneychangers, aka, the Banksters,
ie Rothchild et al, and all
of their fellow members of the Illuminati began to infect and fatally
corrupt it from its infancy) nor
that the type of malice evidently
ubiquitously present in this country in the judicial system and amongst the
members of the lawyer class, amongst
all branches of the government and in
the society at large, in fact justifies the continued abstention from
the means God has provided all able-bodied persons by which to right the wrongs
to which, in a given case they are
subjected, when no remedy is available other than ante-antepenultimate, antepenultimate,
and penultimate, remedies {the ante-antepenultimate remedy
being the confiscation and/or destruction of property under the constraint
of employing a standard of care so restrictive in the endeavors to accomplish
that objective as to ensure that neither any
noncombatant injuries, casualties or deaths would occur thereby, nor that any of the same would even be incurred by
government employees, even those adequately warned in a given case to ensure their
safety and the antepenultimate remedy being the endeavor to accomplish the same
objective according to the less
stringent requirements of the traditional Just War Doctrine including its
requirements of proportionality and
discrimination, and the penultimate remedy being the alternative of the formal
declaring of a domestic insurrection and the correlative engaging in open armed
conflict with anyone who would endeavor to support the preservation of the present intolerably abominable,
havoc-wrecking, social order-destroying, demonically denominated status quo
(similar to the case that was present in the American War of Independence)}. Besides the number of penultimate resolutions enumerated
supra, there is also the ante-ante-ante-penultimate alternative, in which
organizations such as WTP is now engaged, but that is a subject for another
time.
44.
On
the contrary, it is RJM’s present position that the types of abuses to which citizens of what were then
the Thirteen British Colonies of America were subjected to in 1775 were not as
serious as are those to which citizens of
the U.S. are customarily subjected at this period in the history of the country, such as for example, those that
have been perpetrated against RJM et al in the matters constituting this case.
45.
Indeed,
to the extent of RJM’s knowledge, none
of the eleven valid popes that have
served as the Vicar of Christ – the head of the Catholic Church, since the inception of the American War for Independence (which was
not a revolution in the conventional definition of the word, but was
rather a continuation of the development
of the movement for promotion and
establishment in America of the
principle of The Rule of Law, emanating out of among other implementations, that of the establishment of the Magn Charta) has ever condemned that war, neither because of its causes nor the means by which it was fought
& if it is the case that the abuses to which RJM and similarly
situated parties are now subject are more egregious than those to which the
Colonists were subjected in 1775 (cf Richman et al) which left them according
to their collective understanding, which understanding seems to
have been not incompatible with the actual conditions in which they were
then operating in objective reality, without any evident real choice except to
rebel against a despotic civil authority; and given that innumerable
commentators who have opined publicly on the matter have in fact opined that
the conditions for the common citizens in America today are in fact in many
ways substantially worse than were those of
the Colonists, in terms of the
oppressions and violence to which they are subject, then the logical conclusion compelled by the insertion of the facts regarding abuses perpetrated and
correspondingly suffered which RJM has
assessed when inserted into the formula evidently applicable in regard to the
matter of determining the morality
of an armed rebellion, cannot but
evidently compel an inference upon
which, in turn, the only conclusion which could logically abide is that at least two of the five requirements that need be present
for an armed rebellion to be morally justified (Jus Ad Bellum) (without here
getting into the matter of Jus in
Bello) are in fact, present at this time, in this country.
46.
Amongst
the innumerable initiatives in which RJM is involved is one to disarm all law
enforcement personnel who will not at least swear on oath and satisfy other
similar-type requirements to refuse to fire a weapon at and/or to attempt to
harm or kill American citizens and legal or illegal immigrants who are not encountered in the involvement in the commission of a crime
involving physical violence. The implementation of such type measure and
other similar measures would significantly expand the area for negotiations
between individuals who apprehend that they have an interest in the
preservation of the present status quo and those who see that interest as a
menacing threat to everything God does not hate at this juncture in the history
of the country, which includes most
prominently the principle of The
Rule of Law.
47.
RJM
continues to endeavor to eliminate the abominable conditions present in the
legal system in this country, realizing
that so many of his confreres have
already concluded that the matter is beyond the point of no return other than the ante-antepenultimate
and antepenultimate and penultimate
available alternative means of
resolution of the problems of governmental malice, oppression and
criminality. To quote one of the patriot movement’s greatest luminaries in this
regard:
Devvy Kidd
March 9, 2003
Bob Schulz' We the People Foundation is formulating plans for a legal defense fund relating to Americans who are serious about stopping this corrupt government. See:
http://www.givemeliberty.org Anyone who has done any research or followed current events over the past decade, knows without any doubt that the federal and state judiciaries, for the most part, are corrupt beyond anything most people can imagine.
This is an intolerable situation for a free people. Congress has so completely failed to hold any federal judges accountable for the past century, it defies any bounds of decency and borders on the whole bunch as co-conspirators in denying Americans their constitutional(sic)[inalienable] rights.
48.
RJM’s
continued participation in the proceedings constituting this case, given that
he could have simply vanished long ago, bear witness to the measure of RJM’s commitment to continue to attempt to
contribute to the restoration of a now
horrifically diseased system if that objective can possibly be accomplished; or in the case that it
cannot be, to have built up a record of attempts at peaceable resolution
of the problems present that when the
“facts are submitted [in this regard] to a candid world” would necessarily
compel the conclusion that whatever course RJM ultimately would have to take to
accomplish noncounterfeit justice, that the benefit of the doubt as to legitimacy and good faith,
amongst a society awash in deceit and malice, could never be denied RJM and
that no other party ever involved in any affair in which RJM would be involved,
whether as ally or adversary, would ever possess as strong a moral position as would RJM. This is no small claim, but one which RJM
would defend against any challenge.
49.
This
pleading, which also constitutes a subchapter in the chapter in the website
of the DNRCPN, (http://www.geocities.com/thirstforjustice) titled The Attempted
Lynching of …. is herein, except
for the prayer for relief, brought to closure. The sooner the case is likewise
resolved, the less it will end up costing all involved.
Wherefore, RJM on behalf of all those to whom he owes duties of care in regard to the resolution of this criminal charge and duties of care in general, moves this Court to dismiss this charge and to
take notice that all other forms of relief enumerated in the title to this
motion are herein respectfully demanded, most especially that the Court reschedule
any fitness hearing that might ever be conducted in this case to some date
other than 3/21/03, that it take notice that RJM would claim that the
non-provision of such relief would
constitute a felony on the several bases enumerated supra and that it require
the Asst. CCSA to provide RJM the entirety of
the documents it was ordered to produce on 1/22/03 or to dismiss the
case on the basis of the non-production
of such documents if the CCSA will not
comply with the directives of that
order, and that RJM has much much more to enter into the record in regard to
the entities in issue in this case at his juncture and that finally, that if
the case is not dismissed immediately , that RJM is formally demanding that
Richard Devine prosecute this case himself, if he would have the temerity to
claim that a crime had been committed by RJM in regard to the charge filed or
in regard to any other matter other than RJM’s culpable neglect in not
providing a sufficient measure of
opposition in response to the Reign of Terror activity that Lucifer
continues to perpetrate on all those to whom RJM owes duties of care and particularly through the activity
of his devoted servant, Richard Devine.
Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to Section 1-109 of the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure, the undersigned certifies that the statements set forth in this instrument are true and correct, except as to matters therein stated to be on information and belief and as to such matters the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily believes the same to be true.
Ad lucem, per crucem, spe, en defenso de Christianorum per aeternitatem, per praesidio de Coram Immaculatum de Beatae Maria, Mater Dei, Semper Virgenem,
Robert J. More -
Associate Administrative Assistant to the Chief Accountability Monitor pro tem
of the Demonstratively Non-counterfeit
Roman Catholic Protection Network (“DNRCPN”)
www.geocities.com/thirstforjustice
Notice of Motion/Certificate of Service
In the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, Criminal
People of State of Illinois
Case # 01118828901
V
Robert More
On 3/14/03, RJM filed copies of the accompanying DEFENDANT (“RJM”)’S VERIFIED MOTION OF 3/14/03 TO
RE-PRESENT TO THIS COURT ALL OF THE
ISSUES PRESENTED …. At
the Tenth Floor Office of the Criminal
Court’s Filing Office for the Cook County Circuit Court, for the motion to be
heard on 3/19/03 if the Court will not
rule on it instanter on 3/14/03.
______________
Robert More
Innocent defendant
2008 S. Blue Island #39
Chicago, IL, 60608, 3124558385
Certificate of Service
I, Robert More, altogether innocent defendant, certify under penalty of perjury that I did serve via hand delivery, a copy of this notice & of the accompanying motion titled: DEFENDANT (“RJM”)’S VERIFIED MOTION OF 3/14/03 TO RE-PRESENT TO THIS COURT ALL OF THE ISSUES PRESENTED …. at some time prior to 11:00 a.m., upon some Asst CCSA in the Courtroom # 504 at 2650 S. California Ave, Chicago, IL either on 3/14/03 or 3/19/03, depending on when RJM will have gotten to the Court and that this presumably constitutes the accomplishment of compliance with all requirements of the Court, to the extent such have been explained to RJM.
Under penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/1-109 Date_3/14/2003
I certify that the statements set forth herein are
true and corrrect. Robert J. More
Signature/Certification
Clerk of the Circuit court of Cook County, Illinois